Re[3]: The Bat! v. 3.0 PATHETIC

2004-09-07 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Miles, Thursday, September 2, 2004, 9:06:29 PM, you wrote: MJ> One very small example which I saw months and months ago and couldn't MJ> believe is still right smack in the middle of their home page. They claim MJ> their software is going to "extend our lives"... Can you prove it won't?

Re[2]: The Bat! v. 3.0 PATHETIC

2004-09-07 Thread Miles Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JH> you know I really pity the programmers, because I think they're doing a JH> great job, and they get kicked in their butts just as much as us users. Jurgen I would agree IF this were the case, like it is for most of the dozens of software programs I've owned. HOWEVER,

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-03 Thread Martin Websteron TBUDL
Hello Michael, On 03 September 2004, 09:22 -0700 (03/09/200417:22 local time) Michael L. Wilson [MLW] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: MB>> Yes, but only from a marketing point of view. RITLabs seems to have MB>> embarked on a new marketing push, to get TB! more widely known. MLW> I have no pro

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Michael! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 11:22 AM, you wrote: MB>> ... RITLabs seems to have embarked on a new marketing push, to MB>> get TB! more widely known. MLW> I have no problem with true, honest marketing. I wish RitLabs MLW> would try that. ... I think a lot of advice has been sen

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-03 Thread Michael L. Wilson
Hello Mary, On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Mary mused about "The Bat! v. 3.0" (at least in part): MB> Yes, but only from a marketing point of view. RITLabs seems to have MB> embarked on a new marketing push, to get TB! more widely known. I have no problem with true, honest marketing.

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Allen! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 8:50 AM, you wrote: MB>> I read every message listing, as to sender, subject, and size, MB>> and do my own Selective Download, even when there are 700 mails MB>> to look at. AD> You -really- ought to look into the new filter system. Might be AD> good f

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-03 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Alexander! On Friday, September 03, 2004, 7:02 AM, you wrote: MB>> Everything went with great ease. My filters are working MB>> perfectly. My big screen likes the icons. I am still smitten MB>> with, and no doubt permanently in love with, The Bat! < ... > ASK> Do you feel, now that you ha

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-03 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Mary Bull, 02-Sep-2004 18:32, you wrote: > Everything went with great ease. My filters are working perfectly. My > big screen likes the icons. I am still smitten with, and no doubt > permanently in love with, The Bat! May I x you a question... (not wanting to flame against Rit, just out of

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-03 Thread Ludovic LE MOAL
Hi, On Friday, September 3, 2004 at 11:40:21 AM, Roelof Otten wrote: >>> Filtering on filename LLM>> Does it mean that we can delete a .pif file for instance ? > I haven't tried it yet, but that's what I expect. Ok. One good point for the new V3 (now, just have to find money...). -- Ludovic LE

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-03 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Ludovic, On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:29:52 +0200GMT (3-9-2004, 10:29 +0200, where I live), you wrote: >> Filtering on filename LLM> Does it mean that we can delete a .pif file for instance ? I haven't tried it yet, but that's what I expect. -- Groetjes, Roelof The Bat! 3.0 Windows XP 5.1 Buil

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-03 Thread Ludovic LE MOAL
Hi, On Thursday, September 2, 2004 at 10:54:59 PM, Roelof Otten wrote: > Filtering on filename Does it mean that we can delete a .pif file for instance ? -- Ludovic LE MOAL (Quimper - France) http://www.lemoal.org/> ICQ# 92250692 Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows 98 4.10

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello A.Translator! On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 2:19 PM, you wrote: MB>> I've been using v. 3.0 for almost 3 hours now, and so far, I'm MB>> extremely pleased. AT> Could you tell me why? I am not trying to be ironic, just would AT> like to know why I should upgrade. Sorry to be late answer

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-02 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo A.Translator, On Thu, 2 Sep 2004 21:19:24 +0200GMT (2-9-2004, 21:19 +0200, where I live), you wrote: >> I've been using v. 3.0 for almost 3 hours now, and so far, I'm >> extremely pleased. AT> Could you tell me why? AT> I am not trying to be ironic, just would like to know why I should upg

Re[2]: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-02 Thread Lynn
Thursday, September 2, 2004, 11:01:58 AM, you wrote: JH> you know I really pity the programmers, JH> because I think they're doing a great job, and JH> they get kicked in their butts just as much as JH> us users. Yes, the programmers don't make policy :-( I consulted my geeky son-in-law, who sh

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-02 Thread A.Translator
Op Thu, 2 Sep 2004 13:17:20 -0500 schreef Mary Bull: > I've been using v. 3.0 for almost 3 hours now, and so far, I'm > extremely pleased. Could you tell me why? I am not trying to be ironic, just would like to know why I should upgrade. -- [using The Bat! 2.12.00 on Win XP Pro] __

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-02 Thread MAU
Hello Jurgen, > you know I really pity the programmers, because I think they're doing a > great job, and they get kicked in their butts just as much as us users. Fully agree. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.12.00

Re[2]: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-02 Thread Neal Laugman
Hi Jürgen, JH> you know I really pity the programmers, because I think JH> they're doing a great job, and they get kicked in their butts just JH> as much as us users. Isn't that the truth! And IT people in larger organizations, too...the computer guy (person;) is /always/ in trouble. Expectations

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Jurgen! On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 1:01 PM, you wrote: MB>> I do hope that in the future those making the decisions will find ways MB>> to keep the beta-testers (to whom I myself am forever grateful) better MB>> informed and happier. JH> you know I really pity the programmers, becaus

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Neal! On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 12:27 PM, you wrote: NL> There was a suggestion made by Cory: NL> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NL> that may be worth considering for RitLabs. This is the arrangement I NL> have with Sparx http://www.sparxsystems.com.au/ for there excellent NL> Enterprise Archi

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-02 Thread Thomas Martin
Hello Mary, on Thursday, 2. September 2004, at 11:52:07 [GMT -0500] you wrote regarding "The Bat! v. 3.0": > Thanks for your nice reply. Could you explain what "eToken" is? Should > I disable it? If so, how? eToken or Aladin is a hardware solution for encrypting in t

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-02 Thread Neal Laugman
Hi Mary and tbudl, MB> I have just now bought, downloaded, and installed The Bat! v. 3.0. MB> Among the first 20 messages that I received with it, I found my MB> RITLabs "thank-you" letter, with the registration key. I received my registration in about 20 minutes. MB> Ever

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Thomas! On Thursday, September 02, 2004, 11:48 AM, you wrote: TM> This version will be in the future the former SecureBat!! Version. You TM> are using eToken. Thanks for your nice reply. Could you explain what "eToken" is? Should I disable it? If so, how? -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! 3

Re: The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-02 Thread Thomas Martin
Hello Mary, on Thursday, 2. September 2004, at 11:32:41 [GMT -0500] you wrote regarding "The Bat! v. 3.0": > I have just now bought, downloaded, and installed The Bat! v. 3.0. > Among the first 20 messages that I received with it, I found my > RITLabs "thank-you"

The Bat! v. 3.0

2004-09-02 Thread Mary Bull
Hello fellow tbudl subscribers! I have just now bought, downloaded, and installed The Bat! v. 3.0. Among the first 20 messages that I received with it, I found my RITLabs "thank-you" letter, with the registration key. Everything went with great ease. My filters are working perfect