Thanks Allie. I think I'm getting there. I made a classic mistake and didn't set it
to manual. Then refiltered my Inbox. NoteTab started going wild!
Doug
--
Doug's Archaeology Site http://www.ramtops.demon.co.uk
Current version is 1.61 |
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 11:49:22 -0400
James Senick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Jan,
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 11:19:22 [GMT -0400] (which was 11:19:22
AM in NY, USA) Jan Rifkinson wrote:
[SNIP]
In addition, I think there are other
programs, Mailbag Assistant or Zoot for
Hi Doug.
At 5:48 AM on Monday, September 30, 2002 you
[DW] wrote the following about 'Email
Archiving, was: Editing incoming mail (was:
Wish list item)':
DW Has anyone tried Forkeeps?
Too expensive for me.
--
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB! V1.61/W2K_SP3
ICQ 41116329
Hello Doug,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, at 10:48:28 [GMT +0100] (which was 5:48:28
AM in NY, USA) Doug Weller wrote:
What don't you like about Mailbag Assistant?
Has anyone tried Forkeeps?
Reply to this message has been sent directly to you and to TBOT
as well as this thread has been declared
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:18:49 -0500
Allie C Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:.
Here's the filter:
BeginFilter
Name: Export for editing
Active: 1
Source: \\alliem\Inbox
Target: \\alliem\Inbox
CopyFolder: none
[SNIP]
Sorry, I'm lost.
What do I do with this? Where do I put it?
I'm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, September 30, 2002, Doug Weller wrote...
Here's the filter:
BeginFilter
Name: Export for editing
Active: 1
Source: \\alliem\Inbox
Target: \\alliem\Inbox
CopyFolder: none
[SNIP]
Sorry, I'm lost.
What do I do with this?
Hello Jonathan,
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, at 14:03:20 [GMT -0500] (which was 3:03:20
PM in NY, USA) Jonathan Angliss wrote:
On Monday, September 30, 2002, Doug Weller wrote...
Here's the filter:
BeginFilter
Name: Export for editing
Active: 1
Source: \\alliem\Inbox
Target: \\alliem\Inbox
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 19:18:49 -0500
Allie C Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
[SNIP]
Here's the filter:
BeginFilter
Name: Export for editing
[SNIP]
AM You then go back to TB! and hit the shortcut to import the message,
AM mark it as read and delete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Doug Weller [DW] wrote:'
DW I'm lost again, sorry. What do I put for 'lists'
Put the name of the target account you wish to import the mail to.
DW and what is backup-cmds\edit.txt?
The name of and
Hello Jonathan,
Monday, September 30, 2002, 3:03:20 PM, you wrote:
JA -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
JA Hash: SHA1
JA On Monday, September 30, 2002, Doug Weller wrote...
snip
JA Highlight from where it says BeginFilter to EndFilter (inclusive),
Hi Peter!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, September 30, 2002, 4:56:57 PM, you wrote:
JA Highlight from where it says BeginFilter to EndFilter (inclusive),
JA copy (CTRL C), then go to your filters dialog box, and press CTRL V.
PK
Hello Dwight!
On Saturday, September 28, 2002 at 7:05:33 AM you wrote:
there are lots of work arounds. some are better than others. but the
bottom line is that once the mail has been received, it belongs to the
recipient, not the sender
As I wrote in another message that is plainly wrong.
Hello James!
On Saturday, September 28, 2002 at 1:13:27 AM you wrote:
It amazes me why many don't understand the need for it. If I
had to guess, I'd have to say that many who don't see the need
to edit the subject lines either don't carry on discussions or
they simply do not use email for
Hello Dwight
Thank you for your email dated Saturday, September 28, 2002, 6:05:33 AM, in which you
wrote:
DAC but the bottom line is that once the mail has been received, it belongs to the
DAC recipient, not the sender
I'm being pedantic here but in English law a letter becomes the property
Hello Allie,
IOW's, we have to meet the software half-way. I'm quite happy with
the solution I've just mustered up. I've since created a common
folder to which the imported message is saved. I then drag the
altered message back to its original source folder. Of course this
setup is for
Hello Dierk,
Saturday, September 28, 2002, 8:35:40 AM, you wrote:
DH Wrong. I do change occasionally the subject line *in conversation*.
DH That is, I assign a meaningful/changed subject line to a reply. I am
DH very particular when it comes to vital communication and *don't want
DH anybody
Hello Jim!
On Saturday, September 28, 2002 at 11:57:03 AM you wrote:
Sorry, I completely disagree with you on this.
No, you don't.
This being the case,I do not see any problem in annotating the text or subject
line of an E-mail. Because some people may be lazy or careless in their
ON Friday, September 27, 2002, 11:40:11 PM, you wrote:
DAC Your amazement is no reason to deprive those who would use it, the
DAC ability to do it. If there was any reason which would make me consider
DAC going back to Eudora, it would be the ability to make notes in
DAC messages when I want
ON Saturday, September 28, 2002, 1:13:27 AM, you wrote:
JS It amazes me why many don't understand the need for it. If I
JS had to guess, I'd have to say that many who don't see the need
JS to edit the subject lines either don't carry on discussions or
JS they simply do not use email for
Hello Dierk,
Saturday, September 28, 2002, 11:21:50 AM, you wrote:
DH What I cannot do is take your comments, adjust them as I like (even
DH for private use!) and then either say it is mine or it is yours. What
DH I can do, is write something that is clearly identified as a comment
DH unto it
Hi Dierk.
At 6:21 AM on Saturday, September 28, 2002
you [DH] wrote the following about 'Editing
incoming mail (was: Wish list item)':
DH This is nothing else than what I wrote:
DH Annotating being the operative word
DH here. It is something completely
DH different from Changing or Altering
Hello Dierk,
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 09:35:40 [GMT +0200] (which was 3:35:40
AM in NY, USA) Dierk Haasis wrote:
Wrong. I do change occasionally the subject line *in conversation*.
That is, I assign a meaningful/changed subject line to a reply. I am
very particular when it comes to vital
Hello Dierk,
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 12:21:50 [GMT +0200] (which was 6:21:50
AM in NY, USA) Dierk Haasis wrote:
What I cannot do is take your comments, adjust them as I like (even
for private use!) and then either say it is mine or it is yours. What
I can do, is write something that is
Hi James.
At 9:50 AM on Saturday, September 28, 2002
you [JS] wrote the following about 'Editing
incoming mail (was: Wish list item)':
JS [...] There's simply no reason not to
JS have this feature available. [/...]
Sure there is.
This is a different program the
feature[s] you
Hello Jan,
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 09:46:13 [GMT -0400] (which was 9:46:13
AM in NY, USA) Jan Rifkinson wrote:
Without commenting on the merits of your
position one way or the other, it strikes
me that you may be coming to this question
from a very different POV that some of the
Hello Jan,
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 10:15:54 [GMT -0400] (which was 10:15:54
AM in NY, USA) Jan Rifkinson wrote:
JS [...] There's simply no reason not to
JS have this feature available. [/...]
Sure there is.
This is a different program the
feature[s] you are talking about can be
Hi James.
At 10:45 AM on Saturday, September 28, 2002
you [JS] wrote the following about 'Editing
incoming mail (was: Wish list item)':
JS [...] There's simply no reason not to
JS have this feature available. [/...]
Sure there is.
This is a different program the
feature[s] you
Hi Jim!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Saturday, September 28, 2002, 4:57:03 AM, you wrote:
JL Saturday, September 28, 2002, 8:35:40 AM, you wrote:
DH Wrong. I do change occasionally the subject line *in conversation*.
DH That is, I assign a meaningful/changed
Hello Jan,
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 11:19:22 [GMT -0400] (which was 11:19:22
AM in NY, USA) Jan Rifkinson wrote:
A valid point but I think lobbying for
something that already exists in a
different form sort of belongs in the dept.
of redundancy dept.
Redundancy? Redundancy? I'm
On Saturday, September 28, 2002, 10:19:22 AM, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
A valid point but I think lobbying for something that already
exists in a different form sort of belongs in the dept. of
redundancy dept.
It doesn't exist. I cannot put the cursor on a message, type in a
note, move the
On Saturday, September 28, 2002, 2:30:06 AM, Dierk Haasis wrote:
As I wrote in another message that is plainly wrong.
No, you are mixing content and the object.
Any written text belongs to its originator regardless of where the
physical evidence is stored.
are you claiming you can come to
Hello Batters,
How many Emails does one receive where the subject line content is:
1. Less than clear
2. Does not fully relate to the message content
3. Is the 3rd or 4th reiteration of replies
There was a facility in Outlook 2000 where the subject line could be amended.
This was a useful,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jim Lanyon [JL] wrote:'
JL Worthy of consideration for inclusion in the nexr release?
I currently adjust message subjects by dragging the message to one
of my Outboxes, opening the message there,
Hello Jim,
I added this to the list several months ago with the added wish
that threads also be configurable i.e. dragging a message from
one thread to another and having it inherit it's new thread's
subject. I don't think anyone understood what I was talking
about.
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, at
Hi James,
bye... mark.
+- time/date: 19:06:32/27.09.2002
| web: www.shakwave.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| funny private forum @ forum.shakwave.de
++
2600 Windows XP 1.61
- Original message was / included -
Your address: James Senick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello shakwave,
Friday, September 27, 2002, 10:06:34 AM, you wrote:
s Hi James,
s bye... mark.
You can simply drag the Email into the outbox folder-Then double
click on it and it will open to allow you to EDIT any portion of the
message_ Subject line and or Body. Close and then drag
Hello brunson,
Friday, September 27, 2002, 6:18:27 PM, you wrote:
s bye... mark.
b You can simply drag the Email into the outbox folder-Then double
b click on it and it will open to allow you to EDIT any portion of the
b message_ Subject line and or Body. Close and then drag back into
Hello brunson,
Yes, that's a nifty workaround but certainly not a
solution...and Allie already suggested this. Nevertheless, you
forgot to mention that during this process, you have to save the
edited message which, unfortunately, adjusts the date.
But hey, I could just adjust my clock settings
Another workaround is to build a forwarding template that includes the
header information that you need/want and forward the message back to
yourself with a new subject.
I'm too lazy to do all that dragging editting. And with a mail
server running on your system, the forwarding wouldn't even
ON Friday, September 27, 2002, 7:48:58 PM, you wrote:
JS Hello brunson,
JS Yes, that's a nifty workaround but certainly not a
JS solution...and Allie already suggested this. Nevertheless, you
JS forgot to mention that during this process, you have to save the
JS edited message which,
Hello Gerard,
Friday, September 27, 2002, 2:24:03 PM, you wrote:
G ON Friday, September 27, 2002, 7:48:58 PM, you wrote:
JS Hello brunson,
G It amazes me that someone who wants to edit an received
email is G worried about the time and date.
G As a last resort you could try
On Friday, September 27, 2002, 4:24:03 PM, Gerard wrote:
It amazes me that someone who wants to edit an received email is
worried about the time and date.
Your amazement is no reason to deprive those who would use it, the
ability to do it. If there was any reason which would make me consider
Hello Dwight,
On 27 Sep 2002 16:40:11 (my local time 14:40:11), Dwight A Corrin
wrote
(in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
If there was any reason which would make me consider going back to
Eudora, it would be the ability to make notes in messages when I
want to. (And keep as
Hello Gerard,
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, at 23:24:03 [GMT +0200] (which was 5:24:03
PM in NY, USA) Gerard wrote:
Hi James,
It amazes me that someone who wants to edit an received email is
worried about the time and date.
It amazes me why many don't understand the need for it. If I
had to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
James Senick [JS] wrote:'
JS Yes, that's a nifty workaround but certainly not a
JS solution...and Allie already suggested this. Nevertheless, you
JS forgot to mention that during this process, you have to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Allie Martin [AM] wrote:'
AM You hit the shortcut to run the filter to export the message.
AM You open the file on your desktop using the shortcut to it. Edit the
AM subject as needed.
I've encapsulated
, the whole
thread will be entitled Editable Subject instead of Wish List
Item.
Sure would be nice to just type over the subject though :)
--
Best regards,
James
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.stamp-co.com
The Bat! v.1.62/Beta1
Windows XP build 2600
AMD Athlon 1Ghz 1.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
James Senick [JS] wrote:'
JS Sure would be nice to just type over the subject though :)
'It sure would be nice ..' never ends. :)
It would sure be nice to change the subject of an entire thread,
W I'm too lazy to do all that dragging editting. And with a mail
W server running on your system, the forwarding wouldn't even touch the
W net.
and with local delivery enabled, you don't even need the local mail
server
--
Ricardo M. Reyes | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| (Mar del Plata
On Friday, September 27, 2002, 5:44:31 PM, Anthony Xin Chen wrote:
Bat! allows you to make notes in the form of memo.
there are lots of work arounds. some are better than others. but the
bottom line is that once the mail has been received, it belongs to the
recipient, not the sender, and if
Hi John,
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 02:36:34 +GMT (14/01/2000, 10:36 +0800GMT),
John Sullivan wrote:
JS The "above stipulations" were purely an example. In fact the message I
JS was sat in front of at the time was in my Read Messages folder, and I
JS knew it was in response to a message in my Sent
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 19:33:41 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 14, 2000, 6:33:41 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Thomas Hi John,
Thomas On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 02:36:34 +GMT (14/01/2000, 10:36 +0800GMT),
Thomas John Sullivan wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On 14 January 2000 at 19:33:41 GMT +0800 (which was 11:33 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
JS The "above stipulations" were purely an example. In fact the
JS message I was sat in front of at the time was in my Read Messages
JS folder, and I knew
Hello Marck D. Pearlstone,
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 14:08:34 + GMT your local time,
which was Friday, January 14, 2000, 9:08:34 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
Marck Absolutely. With 48000 messages in my base I have to organize tightly.
Marck Project/person/list specific
Hi tracer,
On 14 January 2000 at 23:26:57 GMT +0700 (which was 16:26 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
Marck Absolutely. With 48000 messages in my base I have to organize
Marck tightly.
t Marck, do you have all those messages in the Bat in their active
t folders
Hi John,
On 14 January 2000 at 01:21:34 GMT + (which was 01:21 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points:
JS What I'd *really* like to be able to do, is from a message I have
JS in some folder somewhere (which does have valid In-Reply-To: and
JS References:
On Friday 14 January 2000 Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
... the quickest way of finding such a message given the above
stipulations about "In-Reply-To" etc. (provided that it resides in the
same folder) is to press Alt-1 - thread by reference. Of course, if
it's in another folder,
57 matches
Mail list logo
