Thanks. You illustrate my central point. This is
why I continue to say that your intent is not as perceived by some. I DO BELIEVE
IT IS NOT YOUR INTENT TO HURT OR WOUND. BTW, I also believe that you do not
write to accrue to yourself allies. However, you have them in Kevin, Terry,
David,
He (TS) was the last of a dying breed,
Dave.
- Original Message -
From:
Dave
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: November 26, 2005 00:19
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Charles Perry
Lock says 'A totally arrogant and insensitive reply, IMO' of Dave Hansen
DAVEH:
It reveals more of the one(s) who feign offence
than the purported offender.An acquaintance of mine asked the other day about
the distinction between fundamentalists and evangelicals. Part of what I had to
say in response was that 'fundamentalism' is to be found in every faith and
Im just feeling badly because I
asked DaveH a personal question to see how far mormon adherence to the
rules actually goes (and from which I expected a Yes, No, or MYOB!), and
have apparently inadvertently opened the gates of Hell. The acrid fumes
of sulphur are really smelling up the
Jude, youve once again hit the nail
on the head. Good job. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005
12:37 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Calvin's
'Off-line' amen!
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: November 26, 2005 06:18
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] On taking
offence where none is given
Im just feeling
badly because I asked DaveH a personal question to
Here we go again - with you illustrating my point made
below as well. All five of this mornings linesconsistare solely
of
your diagnosis and personal
opinion about persons who are members of this list.
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 05:48:41 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks. You
Read and noted, thanks,
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 9:24
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 'Calvin's
beliefs are of Satan-He was an evil man'
Should there be any intrinsic value in this
activity whatsoever Judy, it'd be this: Those who respond to you, ITO, 'in
kind', IMO, are mistaken. I am, believe it or not, speaking on YOUR behalf.
(Yes, I do understand that you are not in need of me doing so). Most all
successful
Okay, time for a new subject. You are assigned an angel
whose mission is to answer one, and only one, question that you would like to
ask God. What is your question? iz
Lance's question:Shall there be, ultimately,
universal reconciliation? (Even the humanly constructed Geneva convention
decries the torture of acknowledged enemies)
Wow! If this doesn't draw attention then, nothing
will.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To:
Linda:Please accept the following as a serious
question: Are these (issues/personalities -the persons expressing the issues)
separable?
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: November 26, 2005 07:08
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk]
I would say Yes, of course. Truth stands
independent of those seeking and/or discussing it, does it not? iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005
6:19 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re:
Do you mean reconciliation between every
person on the earth, Lance? IMO, there will never be universal
reconciliation, as there will be eternal separation between the forces of light
and darkness. What do you think? What does everyone else think? iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What do I (Lance) think? I'm a 'wanna be
universalist'. How's that for a conversation starter/ender?
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: November 26, 2005 08:01
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] One
Question
Do you mean
Not my spelling just my typing skills my 2 typing fingers trip over one another especially when I hit speeds of upwards of 10 words per minute! It is a good thing I do not get paid for my typing skills at work.(hit the key to the left of d)sepends one of the most difficult to type words
What difference does it make why the LDS folks in SLC are offended by the likes of you waving their underwear around like fools. The point is that you are offending them (not me) by doing such. As Perry suggesteddon't you think you owe them an apology? May I quote you? DAVEH: ??? Huh? Just
JD wrote:
... I would venture the guess that not a single
translator, if asked to give an opinion on what
Bill has written (in plain English, by the way,
Terry) would dispute his commentary. Where
in the world do you think Bill T came up with
such ideas? You think he just made them up
You are kidding, of course !! rol !! -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:08:00 -0600Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Re:Judy on ...wellJudy
I think what Judy would like is to have us discuss issues, not
While you are busy defending yourself , did you get my point? -Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 05:28:14 -0800 (PST)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 'Calvin's beliefs are of Satan-He was an evil man' says Dean Moore
Not
askDavidMs
(brainwashed?) wife about this subject, Bro--she knows the drill, all about the
absurdity of life minus human experience--tell her how beautifullyher
childrenentered the world exclusively by the Word of God minus human
experience--and now DavidM denies this is hishuman
As Bible Believers, we take the Bible as without error. The Bible commands us to preach to every man. It also calls us to Reprove Rebuke (2 Timothy 4:2). 2 Tim 3:16 "All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
What is your point? You are INTREATING me? Your point is you have no hope of dealing with the issues and haveRUN out of caricatures and false accusations so you must get the focus on other things.You have not answered my questions either. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:While you are busy
There are a couple of things that could be said about "descriptive duratives" in view of the literal translation of "being sanctified"and all -- I say all -- that Bill had to say on the subject.but first things first -- I couldn't find your reference in Robertson'sGreek grammar.Perhaps a page
cd:My advice is for Izzy to show this to here husband-and let him resolve
this matter. Then the snake in the grass will learn respect for a decent
women and not to try and speak to her as one would a whore. He is not sorry
for anything-as he has no morality.Don't even know right from wrong and
The Temple garments are ALL about MODESTYLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It reveals more of the one(s) who feign offence than the purported offender.An acquaintance of mine asked the other day about the distinction between fundamentalists and evangelicals. Part of what I had to say in
- Original Message -
From: Lise Struthers
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: November 26, 2005 08:46
Subject: McClooneyism
Being the movie buff
you are I thought you might like this. Lise
McClooneyism
National Post, November
25, 2005
Peter
Foster
The movie Good Night,
and Good Luck is
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 11/25/2005 10:50:48 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Izzy's Sexual Experiences-Charles?
Hey tough guy, it was Linda Shieldswho open the door to this thread -- not DH.
cd: Hey lost man, it was Dave who took it into
[Original Message]
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 11/25/2005 7:32:45 PM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] DaveH's Reply to the Controversy
A totally arrogant and insensitive reply, in my opinion.
cd: The local people in the Blue Ridge Mountains
..isn't
temptation a human experience? explain it otherwise,
bro
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:50:29 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
askDavidMs
(brainwashed?) wife about this subject, Bro--she knows the drill, all about
the absurdity of life minus human experience--tell her how
Linda: Would you be so kind as to e-mail Dean personally?
However you choose to handle this, may we ask for it (the non-issue, IMO) to
disappear from TT as a public discussion?
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: November
You can't finda greek grammar that will disagree with what hehas said. DM shoots down your false accusations and now it is YOU THAT CAN NOT FIND!"Apparently you have not consulted too many grammars." OUCH!JD why not stop the foolishness and start having a real conversation?[EMAIL
You should never has ceased being the moderator of
TT 'G'!!
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: November 26, 2005 08:50
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
corrector/revisor
askDavidMs
(brainwashed?) wife about this
You know, I was going to take time to answer two of your longer posts. I saved them for that purpose. But, as it turns out, I realized yesterday that I am talking to a person who defends the Received Text (that would be a greek thingy) while, at the same time, having no regard whatsoever for
..how is one
tempted exclusively by the Word of God?
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 07:14:43 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..isn't temptation a human experience?
explain it otherwise, bro
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:50:29 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
askDavidMs (brainwashed?) wife
what's her husband gonna
do, file a(nother) law suit?is therean end to legal actions he'd be
taking to protect his reputationfrom his wife's?
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 09:17:25 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Judy, instead of comparing your writings with those of Lance and John, ask
yourself whether or not there might not be more room for graciousness in writing
things like, "God has spoken" or "amazing how the devil jumps in and shuts it
down." It may be that your comments are warranted, but
First , your last sentence sounds like any number of people I know. Secondly - I am a husband who would defend his wife even to the point of violence. I missed the part where DH spoke to Linda as if she were a whore. Where was that statement? And why are you taking offense at something for which
and grammar
itself--does it not facilitate the expressiveness of both God and man? let's see
you right wing wackos,w/o absurditity, remove the human experience from
the grammar of the NT
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:25:59 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
||
-Original
Am I talking to a Christian or a tough guy? One is the new man and the other, the old man. Which is it Deano. Again, and I fully believe this to be the case, you are using this circumstance to sound tough and threatening. This is about nothing else just macho deano. So get back on
Translation I was gonna but I am NOT able. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:You know, I was going to take time to answer two of your longer posts. I saved them for that purpose. But, as it turns out, I realized yesterday that I am talking to a person who defends the Received Text (that would be a
[Original Message]
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 11/26/2005 1:27:30 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Lance Mur says: I have a sense of DaveH that he
ain't got it in
Yet more arrogant drivel.
cd: I say we kick his arrogant butt off this
for what purpose,
to impress the Word of God with yourdisdain for human
experience?
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 09:33:23 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
be.. a little more subtle and you will come across as being more
intellectually urbane. :-)
:-)
[Original Message]
From: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 11/25/2005 8:49:58 PM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Lance Mur says: I have a sense of DaveH that he
ain't got it in 'em
Lance, the principle I was taught is that when you offend someone you
Have a good laugh on you - But actually she is right
on!!
Because in all of this judging after the flesh you are
blindly doing exactly what you decry in Romans 14
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 08:47:00 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are kidding, of course !! rol !! From: ShieldsFamily
WARNING for BIBLE CORRECTORS Words are important even the "S" at the end of a word (Remember EVERY JOT TITTLE not even one "IOTA" will be lost!) is important some have erred by not paying attention to the letter "S"! LetterS, Jots Tittles even IOTA's are IMPORTANT! HOW THEY MISSED ONE
Just to clarify. My Robertson's has a listing of scriptures discussed. Heb 10:10 and 10:14 are not on that list. I am thinking they are a part of a secondary discussion in the book and that is why they are not on the list. I don"t know that but I am giving David the benefit of the doubt. I just
[Original Message]
From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 11/25/2005 9:55:38 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Lance Mur says: I have a sense of DaveH that he
ain'tgot it in 'em
I would like to apologize to everyone for not being offended. I feel so
Why not allow DavidM's wife to speak for herself?
You have introduced gossip and heresy here.
Were you invited to bepresent for the birth of their children?
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:50:29 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
askDavidMs
(brainwashed?) wife about this subject, Bro--she
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 11/26/2005 9:35:52 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Dave's Disrespect.
First , your last sentence sounds like any number of people I know. Secondly - I am a husband who would defend his wife even to the point of
Today, I came across a quote that I would like to bring up for discussion:
People
can be saved in varying degrees of theological error. There are
regenerated people who do not understand predestination, don't accept
election, don't understand federal headship, are clueless about
imputation,
You got it !! -Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:45:36 -0800 (PST)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 'Calvin's beliefs are of Satan-He was an evil man' says Dean Moore
Translation I was gonna but I am NOT able.
[EMAIL
You practice this David and it does not appear to help
you with Lance, John, or Gary, but thanks for the suggestion.
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 09:33:23 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy, instead of comparing your writings with those of Lance and John,
ask yourself whether
ask her (and her husband
if he's interested)if they were humanor exclusively of the Word of
God(?)
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:08:49 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 11/26/2005 9:43:02 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Dave's Disrespect
Am I talking to a Christian or a tough guy? Well that where you are wrong-we are not talking.One is the new man and the other, the old man. Which
interesting
idea--she can tell us in her own wordshow childbirth goes without human
experience
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:05:21 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not allow DavidM's wife to speak for
herself?
Judy's answer is - In the light of God's Word ...
No there will never be "universal reconciliation" ... ever
The Geneva convention decries a lot of things but has
no power to stop them iethe rapes in Uganda
Sin is and will be a problemso long as men love
darkness more than light - they judge
Dean,
As *moderator* I do not think banning Dave at this time is called for.
Perry
From: Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Lance Mur says: I have a sense of DaveH that he
ain't got it in Date: Sat,
hopelessness; it
arises from zero and falseEschatological perspective
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:27:17 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy's answer is - In the light of God's Word ...
No there will never be "universal reconciliation" ... ever
||
Judy's question:
Why do some ppl find it so hard to accept what they can
not change? God's Word has been settled in heaven
It is what it is. He does not change and neither
does His Word. Yet so many appear to believe they could do it
better leaving themselves open to massive
deception.
Yes ... Hopelessness in the false premise
Rejoicing in the real
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 08:39:04 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hopelessness; it
arises from zero and falseEschatological
perspective
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:27:17 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Like I said -- and it is becoming even more obvious: this is not about anything but Dean making it clear that he is the toughest guy on the block. You want to come out here? We can go to the North Gym and roll around on the mat for awhile. I could use a good work out partner. As far as making
JD why do you so consistently keep stirring the pot
even after an issue has been resolved?
Izzy dealt with the issue long ago
Dean put forth his suggestion
The Moderator has spoken
It is now a non-issue, finito - finished -
resolved
You are wasting mental energy
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:49:55
You think Dean's "suggestions" indicate finality? I don't. But -- is there anything else to be accomplished ? For me, not after my invite memo to Dean and his wife. I find it interesting that your post was not forthcoming with Dean's "make me" post. but enough said is something I agree with.
some day the lamb
will be friends with the lion: universal reconciliation eschatologically, its a
promiseof God's
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:46:53 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes ... Hopelessness
||
You are carrying my comment into absurdity. What I said was written
in the same vein as "we walk by faith not by sight." I'm not denying my
engagement with the human experience. I'm talking about where my heart and
confidence is. I can either choose to walk by the Word of God or by my
FTR, my husband chose not to be
offended. He has experienced much greater offense than such tasteless
banter in the real life violation of his first marriage. Perhaps that
puts other things in perspective. I would hope so, as Ive
experienced it, too. There truly is a great big difference
I dont pay to see movie stars who
are venomous, liberal, anti-American, Bush-bashers. Sorry Lance. Iz (Oh, nonow
we have to put up with more Dylanisms from Gary. Brace yourself!)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, November
SHALL WE ALL MOVE ON AT THIS POINT? Thanks
Iz!
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: November 26, 2005 11:22
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Dave's
Disrespect
FTR, my husband chose
not to be offended. He has experienced
wanna describe your
engagement?
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 11:19:44 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not denying my engagement with the human
experience.
You are probably looking at the wrong index. Also, 1934 is the
copyright date, not the edition. We have been over this edition stuff
before in regards to Thayer. I hope we don't havea repeat
here. The publisher is what is important when you get down to page
numbers. My copy is from Broadman
Actually, Caroline would probably give God glory in how the Word of God has
worked in our child birth experiences. She seemed to have avoided the
curse of pain in childbirth, and our children entered the world in a truly
beautiful manner. Nevertheless, I think Gary's point is that I am a
LOL! You makea good point, Judy.
Peace be with you.David Miller.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 10:13
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:Judy on
Gary you are not that
masterful, even, at twisting the words and meanings of others. David
Miller never said we should not have human experiences. He said we should
not judge Gods Word according to such. Of course you would miss
that point. izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
True, but only after the bad guys and sin
are locked up in hell. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005
10:04 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One
Question
some day
I can certainly agree with you this far,
Andrew. izzy
Today, I
came across a quote that I would like to bring up for discussion:
People
can be saved in varying degrees of theological error.
Thats why you are incapable of a
simple Yes or No. You recognize no boundaries between Truth and the folks
seeking it. Truth is not what we collectively decide it to be. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, November 26,
You ARE a universalist, Lance. So wish
for something else. There will never be Peace on Earth until the
Accuser locked away along with sin and death. Iz
Think Whirled Peas
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, November 26,
FWIW Debbie, who read this exchange, believed that
Gary intentionally misrepresented you. I, on the other hand, do
not.
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: November 26, 2005 11:37
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Oh the wisdom of the womeniz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2005
11:08 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
corrector/revisor
FWIW Debbie, who read this exchange, believed that
Perhaps it is difficult sometimes to
believe that God would settle things so seemingly unfairly. Perhaps that
is because we are only experiencing our current pain, and not yet able to focus
upon and trust in His future, higher, more important, invisible plans. I
think He understands that
My 1934 editionis from Broadman Press as well. The page number was suffienct information, David. Thank you.
jd-Original Message-From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 11:30:37 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor
You are
In the New Jerusalem with those who make the final cut
which is after death and hades
have been cast into the lake of fire. The promise
you are hanging to is one of your own making.
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 09:04:09 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
some day the lamb
will be friends with the
I would like to apologize to everyone for not being offended. I feel so
guilty.
Terry
cd: Little wonder as it was not you wife who was asked these questions-What
if someone did-How then would you feel then-Also the sinful undertones of
such a question angers the Holy
i'm not
misrepresentingthis statement either; DavidM ain't seen JC nor the Father,
and, even if he has, he's no better than Moses who's no better than Paul neither
of whose ministriesisqualified bysubjective,
dualisticabsurdity--whatever we've seen of God is visable to anyone else
who's
Of course you are ... and what's more he is better than
Moses. Jesus said John the Baptist (not Moses) was the greatest under the
Old Covenant and the leastin the Kingdom are greater than he which would
include DavidM's wife Caroline. I don't
understand your continual tanget about dualism
absurdly subjective
as usual--Moses, who like JtB,actually sawJC, is
(also)'humble'--check it out, he was unusually humble; by contrast, DavidM
ain't even seenJC and is absurdly arrogant; JtB, by the way, was
'great/est' because he terminated the the reign of the Mosaic law (as Moses
So, Terry, if I understand you correctly, your sense of humor is such that
it is titillated by someone asking Izzy about her sexual experiences, and
suggesting that I know something about them, even humorously, especially
before your Christian peers? Hmmm.
From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL
ftr,
thiswould betrue--as someone suggested, let her speak for
herself
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:22:33 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the leastin the Kingdom..would include DavidM's
wife Caroline
Translation:I still don't get it![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:You got it !! -Original Message-From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 06:45:36 -0800 (PST)Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] 'Calvin's beliefs are of Satan-He was an evil man' says
Knowing Dean personally, he is not one to feign anything. He is deeply concerned with holiness and I believe I can testify that he lives it too. I would not assume anything as far as the mat either.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Like I said -- and it is becoming even more obvious: this is not
DAVEH: I'd like to thank you and the other TTers who may be doing
just that, Izzy. I've had the distinct impression that some TTers do
pray for me.and, I'm sure I need it. Thanx again.
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Id rather
use my
breath to pray for DaveH than to curse him. izzy
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy
TaylorSent: Saturday, November 26, 2005 5:00 PMTo:
truthtalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: [TruthTalk] 63% of church going
teens believe it is possible to climb up some other way
A Strange Faith -- Are
Church-Going Kids
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 18:00:24 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A Strange Faith -- Are Church-Going
Kids Christian?||
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:22:33 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..he is better than
Moses.
they ain't too
impressed withyour prophet?
what's
whatever we've seen of God is visable to anyone else who's looking, even one's lowly wife
this , I believe , is an extremely important statement. I couldn't agree more. "Enlightenment" when used to imply knowledge that is not available to anyone who cares to look is nothing less than mythology
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 19:20:17 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
whatever we've
seen of God is [visible] to anyone else who's looking, even one's
lowly wife
this , I believe , is an
extremely important statement..
||
You misunderstood, my friend. My sense of humor was not tittilated. I
did not even find it funny. I simply recognized that it was offered as
humor with no intention of denigrating Izzy or you. Like I told CD,
some people have their button pushed more easily than others. You see a
reason
DAVEH: I hope you don't mind me intruding on your discussion with
John, Dean. Since you are referring to me and since the subject line
is obviously meant to highlight what I may or may not have said, I feel
it is within my right to respond to your accusations.
DUH-Tell us of your sexual
insightful T--the
'if' is for wisdom's sake
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 18:48:16 -0600 Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:[If] You see a reason to see Dave as someone with
a filthy mind. I do not.
Then the snake in the grass will learn respect for a decent
women and not to try and speak to her as one would a whore.
DAVEH: FTR.Let nobody misunderstand me on this. I highly
respect Izzy, and in no way consider her to be a whore.
If you want to think of me as a snake in the
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
