the city of Jerusalem? I await your
answer. jd -- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] What was it for you the N or the O?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, Kev -- did you somehow miss the part in the discourse below that presents the author's desire, hope
up his bed Jesus makes the issue a matter of the will of the man! Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Taken to its ABSURD "logical" conclusion then this must be a example of a PORNO "babe" in Christ. We have a EPIDEMIC of HEARERS and a FAMINE of DOers in the Land! They
al message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Notice JD the scripture does not say some as in only those that do not grow it clearly say EVERY is cast into the fire.The scripture also tells me clearly I can CONFIDENTLY KNOW (sorry Lance) which ones are which BY THEIR FRUITS!It says nothing
air, Kevin, we are told not to keep company with Christians who are fornicators. We cannot keep Christian standards for unbelievers. What do you think? izFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 10:31 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.in
cators. We cannot keep Christian standards for unbelievers. What do you think? izFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Deegan Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 10:31 AM To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Joanna Williams - friend of some 10 ye
exactly . just send them directlyto the trash heap somewhere outside the city of Jerusalem? I await your answer.jd-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] What was it for
Is such a Believer pleasing to God?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, Kevin, for the sake of our discussion, the whole world does revolve around the single Corinthian passage. I assume you believe it to be the inspired word of God as well as any other passage of scripture. I do. So, plug it into your
You seem more interested in the philosophy of just what is and what is not a christian. Is the dictionary definition correct or not. What is much more important is the fact that DH is headed for eternal torment. Man overboard! Do you want to discuss wether we throw the blue/white life preserver
the least of them to the greatest of them .. I will forgive them and remember their sins no more." Jere 31:33 -- Original message ------ From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] You mean God might really be able and that without you or me?
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New P
Just to keep on the up N up I never advocated censoring DH. So why would you mention such in a response to me? This really surprises me.Well you are welcome to DO as you see fit. I do not feel called to UNDERSTAND thru discussionthe lost. This is just your own personal Humanistic
ectly to the trash heap somewhere outside the city of Jerusalem? I await your answer. jd ------ Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] What was it for you the N or the O?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, Kev -- did you somehow
Are you Amil?David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kevin, please read Hebrews 8. This day spoken of in Jer. 31:33 has come already, so how can you say, "That WILL be the day" (emphasis mine)?David Miller.- Original Message - From: Kevin DeeganTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Monday,
the words "for breakfast - in a whim" sound hauntingly familiar? I'm loving this
thread !!!jd-- Original message ------ From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Is such a Believer pleasing to God?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, Kevin, for the sake of our discuss
as Iscariots? I don't think so. David Miller- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 3:14 PM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Is a Mormon a Christian?Do you see Jesus Paul using your Dictionary definition of Chri
on. jd-- Original message --
From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] You seem more interested in the philosophy of just what is and what is not a christian.Is the dictionary definition correct or not.What is much more important is the fact that DH is headed for eternal t
ver? As for Anti-Christs being Christian, well, of course that will be the case. Judas Iscariot was a Nazarene and look how he turned out. Should we expect Christianity to be pure and void of any Judas Iscariots? I don't think so. David Miller ----- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To:
T
. Judas Iscariot was a Nazarene and look how he turned out. Should we expect Christianity to be pure and void of any Judas Iscariots? I don't think so. g t;David Miller
- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 3:
les and then pretend to pass moral judgment on others ??!! And who is stirring the pot? The one who points to the rule or the one who wilfully violates the rule? But we are just arguing , now. Each of us have made our points. Let's go to the next unanswered question, shall we? jd
From: Kevin Dee
would have no problem with that. jd-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why don't you restate my theology JD Then we can go from there.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Undersanding that such language allows for the believer to be alive in Christ
Is there subterfuge going on behind the scenes? Maybe JD has been working for the Job all along.Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DavidM couldn't possibly be THAT busyOn Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:37:46 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Vote for JDDean Moore [EMAIL
Sorry I just meant it is God's point from His word!Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:cd: O.K. Bro- Since you are not going to voluntary to give your point- What is you point! :-) - Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: 3/13/2006
With what about FOUR posts on the issue JD did see the evil intentions of all you posters that don't check first.Remember KIDDIES, my granny says, always check the subj line before you hit send.Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:cd: No need to apologize to me Judy- but I do
John? I knew he wasrunning for MODERATerr!Thats OK DeanI thought it was way overboard GT' statement about my Mother! Nothing should surprise with this crowd.Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:cd; They have been in contact with Miller- Blain, DH ,John, Gary- and
?? If not what are you saying? I think we should go to that Mormon site you told me about?Take Judy and izzy with us- invite Perry-and have a blast?:-) What say ye? - Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: 3/13/2006 8:37:27 AM Subject: RE
Why do you lie?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:To those that find problems with the spelling-thank you- because if that is the only problem you can find to criticize then I am doing well-and am well aware that my Master was criticized before me and He is greater then I-there are also some people that
om evil"You JD are guilty of promoting a false assurance and a false security which will not
stand in the day of the Lord... I wonder how many there will be saying "Bishop Smithson told me I had plenty of time to decide"-- Original message ------
know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God.Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: Debbie Sawczak To: 'Lance Muir' Sent: March 11, 2006 22:35 Subject: Dylan
t they used the term gods as in plural. Since Mormons worship the only true God, they would view themselves not as pagan at all. However, could that not lead one to ponder whether those who worship a trinitarian God might be considered Pagan? Kevin Deegan wrote: Due to your suggestion on Christian
the only true God, they would view themselves not as pagan at all. However, could that not lead one to ponder whether those who worship a trinitarian God might be considered Pagan? Kevin Deegan wrote: Due to your suggestion on Christian in the dictionary, I now have a problem because to rem
themselves not as pagan at all. However, could that not lead one to ponder whether those who worship a trinitarian God might be considered Pagan? Kevin Deegan wrote: Due to your suggestion on Christian in the dictionary, I now have a problem because to remain consistent I check the definition of Pagan
Pastor Smithson Bishop of Love and Understanding Minister of Patient Grace Overseer of the Gospel of Victory in Christ Joint Heir in Christ A son of God -- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Believers in bondage to sin Married Bac
So why don't you guys start your own Community of "faith" on the net?Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Judy: Bill's 'concept of humanity' is biblical. IFF it in any way concurs with someone else's biblical understanding than their biblical conclusions are similar/identical. Bill has never
Hi IZ I will answer this soon. I was out of town preaching.Unless I provide a full answer I am afraid some will mischaracterize what I am talking about. Setting up their straw man attack on "works salvation". Which is irrelevant sinceI teach no such thing, and no such thing EXISTS. Men are
Well It would appear that the fellow referenced in 1 JN is a modern day "Christian"-Liar! Unfortunately Rev 20 says ALL liars will have their part in the Lake of FireDean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Original Message] From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
Your MOTHER wears Combat boots[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: myth (Legalism your fathercourts Dualism your motherSpawns)On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 05:33:52 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Choose one Intellect or Heart..ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Like A W Pink who went way out there?"Mr. Pink used to be a contributor to our magazine. His articles on GLEANINGS IN GENESIS are good, and we printed them in book form. But when he began to teach his frightful doctrines which make the God of love a monster we broke fellowship with him. The
Illustration of those who have to remove portions of sentences to twist misquote Now have to remove letters! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:interesting On Sat, 11 Mar 2006 06:19:50 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Just what is a
nuance..?||
Yahoo! Mail
1 Co 5:9 I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicatorsWhich part is hard to understand the N the O or the T ?"As we sipped on coffee"if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with
to in Mt 7:21-23.Kevin Deegan wrote: Due to your suggestion on Christian in the dictionary,
I now have a problem because to remain consistent I check the definition of Pagan. Since a Pagan can not be a Christian then one can not logically be a member of both groups. This poses a problem
That is Mormon Logic for ya Something can be both A and NON A at the same time.James 3 Doth a fountain send forth at the same place sweet [water] and bitter? Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DAVEH: Nothing impossible or even difficult about that, Kevin. Ever hear of a boxing/wrestling ring? A
inction in your eyes, Kevin?Kevin Deegan wrote: Maybe
that is why we are not to go to the World for answers. The dictionary is not the discerner of who/what is a Christian. The World has no answers. All the soothsayers at Jackson Square were made an open show open shame for all to see. T
I did not change definitions as you accuse. Things are not what they SEEM I simply gave you actual dictionary readings, what the dictionary said about PAGANS. If the shoe fits...Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you see Jesus Paul using your Dictionary definition of Christian?DAVEH: Some
Praise The Lord!No I am not leaving.Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Man this is where the rubber meets the roadDAVEH: Does that mean you are leaving TT, Kevin???PTLDAVEH: Please define. (I did not find it in the INNGLORY list of acronyms.)Kevin Deegan wrote: I am sure this is gonna help me
e, Lord. jd ------ Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] You DaveH are a Pagan.DAVEH: ; I respectfully disagree, Judge
Dean. To me, your above comment is a blatant ad-homWhy is attacking your genuinely held beliefs an attack on your person? Seriously; can
is what, exactly . just send them directly to the trash heap somewhere outside the city of Jerusalem? jd-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1 Co 5:9 I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with
fornicators
Are you running for MODERATerr?Vote for JD![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Why is Linda's compliment to Dean posted under the "Moderators Comment +++" heading not once, but twice? Have the rules changed on this. I know the owner of the List, David Miller (Beverly Hills , Florida) complained
So you are running for MODERATerr![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Perhaps you need to clarify with DavidM He seemed to be somewhat critical in a recent exchange with you. If I were moderator, Dean, I beleive it would be apparent that the list still belonged to David. I am not so sure that is the case
Nice pics similar to the 77 edition of the Book of Mormon had all this PAGANstuff pictured in it. It all was removed in later editions after it was pointed out it was Anachronistic.Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:cd: Good reading-Only Half a page. Rev.2:26 And he that overcometh,
LOL Have you considered going on tour?ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Jd, the obvious truth is that the Lord allows for BABIES in Christ to have a season of growing up. You are far beyond that point, and look quite ridiculous in diapers. izFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Romans 8:6 For to be carnally minded [is] death[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:There is no time limit in the scriptures, is there. Further, Paul certainly thought that the carnal babe in Christ - a significant portion of the Corinthian congregation, by the way - had been around long enough to have
Have you ever wondered that from the start that this was planned Are you going Calvinist? ; ) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:cd: The you need to set limits on the authority you give to others-see below- I am only doing the job you asked me to do David. The site is growing again-membership is
1 Co 3:17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroyShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:The implication is that they should be turned over to satan for the destruction of their flesh if they dont repent of their sin. (ICor 5:5) iz
From: [EMAIL
At the current situation on TT one will lose their closeness with GodWhat then would you do in a REAL CRISIS? Jer 12If thou hast run with the footmen, and they have wearied thee, then how canst thou contend with horses? and [if] in the land of peace, [wherein] thou trustedst, [they wearied
the city of Jerusalem? I await your answer. jd -- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] What was it for you the N or the O?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey, Kev -- did you somehow miss the part in the discourse below that presents the author's desire
gets to violate this rule
while the other does not. Only a curiosity on my part. jd -- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you running for MODERATerr?Vote for JD![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Why is Linda's compliment to Dean posted
reconcile the two passages, Kevin. Its easy to quote scripture. jd-- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Romans 8:6 For to be carnally minded [is] death[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:There is no time limit in the scriptures, is there. Further, Paul
suspect I was not the only one with this "knowing." Not passing judgment in this post -- just making my observation clear. Traps keep that in mind until after Dean and I have our debate. Should be interesting. jd
-- Original message ------ From:
uction occurs -- God patiently works with those who are in need of Him. So it is that the "babe" in Christ is carnal still and , yet, alive in Christ. All the twisting in the world cannot escape this conclusion. jd-- Original message ------ From: Kevin Deegan [EMA
members, please do so.David Miller Just curious why one side of the aisle gets to violate this rule while the other does not. Only a curiosity on my part. jd -- Original message -- From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Are you running for MODERATerr
yet, alive in Christ. All the twisting in the world cannot
escape this conclusion. jd-- Original message ------ From: Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1 Co 3:17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroyShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTEC
PROPHETS, I agree it is a serious matter.Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: 3/10/2006 7:33:15 AM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Kinder Gentler God would not call names - pagan ?Blaine has
@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 11, 2006 06:35 Subject: [TruthTalk] Astrology-Miller- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: 3/10/2006 7:33:15 AM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Kinder Gentler God would not call names - pagan ?Blaine has
WHO SAID ANYTHING ABOUT MILITARISTIC?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: *myth* (both the Military its imagery are 'carnal', therefore, unlike the you,the bible is anti-militaristic)On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 18:42:23 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: *The Bible uses Military imagery
. Not even was a specific action mentioned. Yet it appeared as though you identified with something underlying. Makes me wonder what makes you tick, Kevin....Do you really think my speculative comment constitutes an ad-hom? If sospecifically to whom is the ad-hom against?Kevin Deegan wrote:
ttack on your person? Seriously; can you expound? KD DHcanmakethe point but let me chime in here, as well. "You .. are a pagan" is not the same as "Your beliefs are pagan" Those who haveeyes, let them see, Lord. jd -- Original message -- Fr
TT. I do not recall you making any such comments though.You are always looking for "common ground" I think I can agree with the following:DAVEH: I find that interesting. I did not think you would see it quite the same way as OP stated it. Hm.I learn something every day!Kevin De
. It is an inaccurate judgment, and as it was presented it represents a
false accusation..does it not meet the definition of the ad-hom rule of TT?Kevin Deegan wrote: OOPS! just noticed the SUBJECT so I reposted changedKevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You DaveH are a Pagan.DAVEH: I respectfully
d
with egalitarian exchage of ideas with worldviews that are in error.. Christianity is not a hugfest The Bible uses Military imagery, when talking of the "good Fight of faith"! -- Kevin Deegan __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
ge of ideas with worldviews that are in error.. Christianity is not a hugfest The Bible uses Military imagery, when talking of the "good Fight of
faith"! -- Kevin Deegan
Yahoo! Mail
Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.
NICE ILLUSTRATION of whatan ADHOM is Lance NICE GOING!Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not David Miller but am operating under the assumption that a public post is open to a public response.Barry Goldwater lost an election due to the perception that he'd have HIS 'finger on
And as established in God's LAW One can not initiate a witness wether true of false and then refuse to answer questions pertaining to such witness. This is condemed in God's wordand is SIN.In American jurisprudence this is established as the right to face ones accuser. Lance likes to make
Sorry Lance No "FUNDIES" behind that doorSome say there are FUNDIES hiding behind EVERY DOOR - LOLLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Door #1 please Bob!- Original Message - From: Judy Taylor To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
? In what way did I sin in the situation? Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:And as established in God's LAW One can not initiate a witness wether true of false and then refuse to answer questions
pertaining to such witness. This is condemed in God's wordand is SIN.In American jurisprudence
Watch out with Whoopdeedo's and being southern and all, could get you 30 lashes As to (ILO) Just more Psycho Assertionism! What confidence can we have in the statements of one who preaches that you can not have confidence in anyones statements?Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure this is gonna help me be a better christian TODAY! Man this is where the rubber meets the road. PTL!Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FYI: Izzy, Judy, Kevin Dean. THANKS TO THE BISHOP FOR THIS FINE WORK!- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Lance Muir
Do you see Jesus Paul using your Dictionary definition of Christian? Under this definition then, a decieved one who follows ANTI Christ is truly a Christian! 1) He truly Believes he is worshipping Jesus Christ 2) He truly believes the one he is following was sent by God 3) He follows his
Due to your suggestion on Christian in the dictionary, I now have a problem because to remain consistent I check the definition of Pagan. Since a Pagan can not be a Christian then one can not logically be a member of both groups. This poses a problem of inconsistency, can you rectify this
Believers in bondage to sin Married Bachelors Square circlesLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've a friend who runs a group home. He works the streets in the toughest area of one of Canada's largest cities. He is presently heading up a small group of believers, newer and older,
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:45:07 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: sting ||"keep your filthy..Theology away from me."--Kevin, Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:02:36 -0800 (PST) ||Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Whether[any of us]is a true believer is known only to God. All
Is it the two sentences from me or the Five BIBLE verses that you consider a RANT?Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DAVEH: I can understand you saying that about Lance, Kevin.but, why did you include Judge Dean in that rant?Kevin Deegan wrote: You Lance can attack all you want. God
I do not want you gone Dave. Please don't misrepresent me I have never said or implied such I am not a pope protestant or potentate! Banishment and worse is a Popish - Protestant distinctive! This is in their belief system I have told you before I am not of the RC nor their offspring the
Now that was funnyDave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DAVEH: Is that a Mormon girl trying to give you a karate chop, Dean?!?!?! ;-) ** -- ~~~Dave Hansen[EMAIL
READ THE POST Do I think those who dont arent saved? No. Any other question? IzPerhaps IZ believes being IN Christ, IN the Spirit Baptized INTO is the act of being a Christian as the Bible states. All others that are WITHOUT or out side of that transaction of God's grace are NOT Christian.
Wed, 8 Mar 2006 06:33:12 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There is a rather large distinction between agreeing with you Kevin, and being teachable. From: Kevin Deegan
Your not teachableLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you send your kids to SS?
of Jesus Christ is a deeper conformation of that
point.Get over it the truth is not an Ad. Homein attack- or state a petition to impeach me.I am not Judge Dean -by your standards isn't that Ad. Homein attacking-better stop or I will have to go to the Moderator.Hey -Judge Moore Moderate this!Kev
It is in a book Not THE BOOKJudy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A couple of questionsLance; 1. Is John Wilson preterist like you and is "preterism" his gospel? 2. What is "personhood" and where would one get the idea that Jesus had come to redeem it?John wrote: She said she
Well as far as Theology it is pretty funny Actually it is hilariousLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. I've no idea as we've never discussed it over the years we've come to know one another. 2. 'Personhood' Judy, has been discussed at great length. As I recall, you found the
Personhood? The theolgy is hilarious, that some to this view is nothing but SAD!Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm! Are you sure your recall does not concern someone else Lance? I don't remember commenting on this and I certainly do not find it humorous. Jesus did not come to put
'.- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 09, 2006 07:18 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The 'spirit' of truthtalk? Is it the two sentences from me or the Five BIBLE verses that you consider a RANT?Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DAVEH: I
the wrong site you need personality talk You can then discuss persons to your hearts content. Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm glad we amuse one another. I find you and Dean embarrassingly funny!- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org S
than that which you exhibit on TT. Otherwise. - Original Message - From: Kevin
Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 09, 2006 08:19 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] ***Respose - ModeratorcommentADHOM*IMO?Your opinion is your opinion
There you go refering us to your "bibLe" againWhy would I not find such import displayed in the HOLY BIBLE? Why do I need to go to those that ( IYO ) may or may not have REAL TRUTH Your philosophy is SELF-REFUTINGLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is apparent to all that I'm no
. Boy, are you out of touch! Bet it makes you feel smart though. Why not use it with the Pagans? Just make sure that you don't choose a Pagan with an education.- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 09, 2006 08:33 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk
No it is the ACT Things such as Love are the evidence/emblemCan one see your baptism into the death of Christ? That is a spiritual act performed by God One can however see the EVIDENCE of your Love. ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:It is one evidence. Not the only
SO Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ThePentecostal pastors/seminary teachers I speak with differ over this. - Original Message - From: ShieldsFamily To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 09, 2006 08:43 Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Addendum to 'snakes
PT 101Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: YOU still AMUSE ME so, I'll hang around if only for laughs.- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 09, 2006 08:38 Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Fw: Open door on the journeyDo you belong
whoever Lance is listening to because he badmouthed GWB the entire time in a loud voice.From: Kevin Deegan SP's are really Secret Agents for GWB! LOLAre you a conspiracy theorist?Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: DH:TT has a NEW POPE! You're just going to have
uir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I should have know better than to suggest thinking. Shame on me! Do you enjoy saying nothing about something?- Original Message - From: Kevin Deegan To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: March 09, 2006 08:42 Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] PersonThere you g
Coming from a Master Cryptologist I thought you really enjoyed the cryptic messages passed from within the deep dark caverns of the "community of real crypto believers" Incidently, is Gary the high priest and pinnacle of community communication?Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO WE REALLY WANT TO GO THERE ONtoLOGICALy? Ontorelation aspects of personhood and the chemical attachments? My holistic rememberance of the "discussions" brings back bad memories!Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's called the archives.- Original Message -From:
301 - 400 of 4803 matches
Mail list logo
