Bill Taylor. Thanks for this, Bill.
Lance
David, please:
What sort of 'creationist' are you?
Did you write complete submit a Ph.D. thesis? What was the title? What
were the chapter headings? Would it be possible to read it?
Please explain 'worst answer on the entire exam'.
Lance
- Original Message -
From: David Miller
- Original Message -
From: Victor Shepherd To: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 20, 2006 07:31
Subject: RE: hi Lance, it's Domenic. We met last week.
Lance,
while nothing creaturely is the measure of God's holiness, by revelation
we
are drawn into fellowship with God
Please explain yourself on this? Isn't this
backwards? (i.e. Should the latter be wrong, even very wrong, then, might the
former be informed by an incorrect understanding of the 'gospel'. (i.e. again,
contract over covenant, fear based preaching etc.)
If, when speaking of Jesus, I thoroughly
misrepresent and offer up a charicature of Jesus, does this matter? IMO, WHO
JESUS IS, is so central to 'our gospel' that removing HIM from the center in our
thinking/preaching is to offer up a gospel that is other than 'Christ centered'.
IMO, this
Worth a look for some.
One would assume, Dean, that herein lies something
of your own understanding on the matter at hand. Why not draw that 'something'
from the Darby quote, put it in your own words then, await a reply?
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
-
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/21/2006 6:19:43 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Homosexuality over
orthodox christology?
Please explain yourself on this? Isn't this
backwards? (i.e. Should the latter be wrong, even very wrong
Man
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/21/2006 6:41:17 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Jesus ,
neither God nor Man
If, when speaking of Jesus, I thoroughly
misrepresent and offer up
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: January 21, 2006 08:32
Subject: funeral
In about 15 minutes I am going to Toronto to the funeral
ofFrau Bertsch, an old family friend who I think was in her 90s. She was
oneof my mother'snight school ESL students
: [TruthTalk] Homosexuality
over orthodox christology?
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/21/2006 7:21:41 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Homosexuality
over orthodox christology?
Sorry
Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/21/2006 8:26:24 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance,
Bill, John, David?
Ah! This then would put JND in the position
of denying that which Bill Taylor is affirming. Allow me
?
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/21/2006 8:56:00 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Homosexuality
over orthodox christology?
I'm with ya on the 'wicked thingy'. Now, if SPS
could just do a 180
Judy exemplifies non-inflammatory language: 'Give
me a break' 'He's got his sperm and flesh spread all over the Arab nations
for goodness sake' 'adult people who are (hopefully) in their right mind'
'He was not a raving schizophrenic'
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
Jt pronouncements free of editorial component: 'how crazy does it sound..'
'Jesus..with a nature that follow Satan..' (just a couple I missed last time
'round)
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
One person (unnamed female) is employing too much
invective in her posts. Ease up a little and utilize substantive argumentation
to make your points.
You're beginning to sound just a bit too much like
Lance. He thinks you wouldn't appreciate the
comparison.
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: January 19, 2006 23:48
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Something to think about
"I did not make it; no, it is making me; it is the very
truth of God, not the invention of any man." --Rich Mullins, in the song
Cre
Do you now or, have you recently, TAUGHT THIS IN
ANY CHURCH?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 20, 2006 04:13
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Uncleanness come
via the woman
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:39:56
to keep things a bit more
pure?
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 05:51:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Do you now or, have you recently, TAUGHT THIS
IN ANY CHURCH?
On
Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:39:56 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Either faith in Christ is faith in God or, it is
idolatry.
: [TruthTalk] Uncleanness come
via the woman
So???
Most would not allow Jesus himself into their
churches to teach even as early as the
2nd Century he was outside knocking on the
door.
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:18:40 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
FWIW
You critiqued the course outline by Victor Shepherd
as to its inordinant 'theological' focus. Are you aware that the majority of
practicing scientists who are themselves Christians hold to some form of
evolution.? Do you?
: January 20, 2006 06:39
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Uncleanness come
via the woman
So Lance where do you get your anointing as
"chief appraiser?" It's one that is not listed in all the
NT
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:35:24 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
: [TruthTalk] Thought
Now where didthat profound thought came
from?
What about faith in God by way of the Church
Fathers? What is that?
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 06:31:36 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Either faith in Christ is faith in God or, it
is idolatry.
IFO and, I may be the last holdout as to Judy's
self-awareness, believe Judy to be quite unaware of what she's doing. Have you
ever heard Gracie Allen? FWIW, I believe this equally of David
Miller.
- Original Message -
From:
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
) is
really an attack against us. I wonder if she notices that my arguments have
come from Scripture. Is she unaware of that too? I don't think
so.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Friday, January
CALLING DAVID MILLER: ARISE THOU THAT SLEEPEST!
You've not had a more important discussion (potentially) on TT, David. Why are
you in semi-hybernation? You posted as temp mod a week or so ago on the most
petty of matters yet, you fail to come forward, comprehensively, on such as
this! WHY?
Well said, David.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 20, 2006 12:19
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, David?
Judy wrote:
I am amazed that anyone reading Church history
would want to hold the early
Yikes.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 20, 2006 12:23
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] CALLING DAVID MILLER! You SAID that God had shown
you good things about Bill Taylor did you not?
Lance wrote:
CALLING DAVID
Yikes again.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 20, 2006 12:40
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Uncleanness come via the woman
Lance wrote:
FWIW Judy, I'm confident that DM, BT, JD
and G would never allow you, given your
Well said again, David.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 20, 2006 16:09
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Judy, Lance, Bill, John, David?
Hi Judy. Calvin is generally NOT considered a church father. I think
over
'I read this to be saying'!! May we put that other
matter to bed once and for all, DM/JT?
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 19, 2006 08:42
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Jesus , neither
God nor Man
'Once you've thrown away language you've thrown
away a world.'
Jesus is neither unambiguously human with our
humanity nor unambiguously God with God's divinity. This would make Jesus some
'third thing'. (Arianism)
Sometimes you will hear people say 'Jesus is human
all right but, he's more than human. That which is more than human isn't human.
That
09:24
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Something to
think about
Then he's a Mormon Jesus ... who has a problem with
that??
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:19:52 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jesus is neither unambiguously human with our
humanity nor unambig
eir creeds the professing Church (or
embryonic rcc) was already off into darkness.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:44:27 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Help me out Judy. Are you meaning to say that
if Jesus is wholly human and wholly divine simultaneously then,
is earthly
ministry he claimed to
have come from "heaven" which is hardly "wholly human" and earthly or of the earth.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:15:07 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
NO!
From: Judy Taylor
Isn't this a form
to
think about
Being wholly human and god ATST is a Mormon
construct.
Whereas it would be against the God of the Bible's
ways to be "fallen" and wholly God ATST
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:43:13 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I assure you (pe
.. who has a problem
with that??
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:19:52 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jesus is neither unambiguously human with
our humanity nor unambiguously God with God's divinity. This would make
Jesus some 'thi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then he's a Mormon Jesus ... who has a
problem with that??
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:19:52 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jesus is neither unambiguously human
with our humanity no
of Balaam which is in effect that ppl will make it with or without
sin.
There is no overcoming involved because of the
"incarnation" - at least this is what I have been hearing from
you.
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:46:52 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Bill revised his comments, Judy.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 17, 2006 15:24
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Jesus , neither
God nor Man
Thank you Dean,
It is really
So then, Judy, should Jesus' human nature actually
have been other than your 'reading' of Scripture?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 17, 2006 16:06
Subject: Re:
The doctrine of Christ's personal preexistence as
the second person of the Trinity is taken for granted by most orthodox
Christians and has been since New Testament times. The effect of its denial is a
god who differers radically from the Biblical God.
"The way the pre-existence of Christ
It may be 'that no (wo)man is an island' yet, does
every 'island' produce its own theologian. The DM's (2) need be remindeded that
the Scriptures in the hands of some can be dangerous.
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
the first Adam".
Think about it - SERIOUSLY
.
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 05:28:25 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
So then, Judy, should Jesus' human nature
actually have been other than your 'reading' of
Scripture?
- Orig
ges"
when it was chained to the pulpit because of fear. Have faith
in God.
From: Lance Muir
It may be 'that no (wo)man is an island' yet,
does every 'island' produce its own theologian. The DM's (2) need be
remindeded that the Scriptures in t
cern to DM and if he were not so grounded
in his faith the attitudes of you and JD toward him personally would
top the list
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:36:27 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE SCRIPTURES, JUDY!! This
ought to be a matter of
are hearing from God when
you can accept all of God's Word as is without having to
explain any of it away or cut any of it
out. Now this is PEACE.
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:34:53 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
LOGICALLY, Judy, (ala David Miller) IT IS QUITE
DM knows that BT does, in reality, almost never
fail to grasp your meaning when you post, Judy. Sadly, you often believe him to
have 'missed it'. On the matter of 'who is Jesus' some would find you to have
gone further afield than the Mormons. DM, it only sometimes appears, knows the
y what God has shown youand ppl either
accept it or they reject it ... the outcome is not up to
us.
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:58:32 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
DM is, IMO, intentionally elusive. At times he
appears almost duplicitous, sayin
address. Shame
on you Lance - you really should learn to
employ 2 Cor 10:5 and read your Bible more and other
men's theology less...
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:53:49 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Your doctrines, Judy, along with some of DM's
ARE the
and BT grasp my meaning Lance then why can't either of you
respond using plain speech rather
than some man's "orthodox" theological maze? Why not just stick with
the Words of Truth and the faith
ONCE given to the saints?
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:14:45 -0500 "Lance Muir&qu
IMPORTANT*
Here's another fine mess you gotten me into,
Ollie
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 16, 2006 18:27
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
See Irenaeus Athanasius 'The unassumed is
unhealed' If (wo)men are to be fully saved, Christwould have to be FULLY
HUMAN.
IMO, if He were not fully human then we are yet in
our sins. This is who Jesus is.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Dean, IMO, intends this more favorably than I
would. There is a 'cat and mouse' style noticeable within SOME of David's posts.
Even in this most central of discussions on WHO JESUS IS, he comments then
withdraws. When asked point blank to offer a few paragraphs outlining his
position, with
Asked and answered on numerous occasions, Judy. You
already know that.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 17, 2006 07:32
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Jesus , neither
God nor
Let's see if DM is as cavalier as you are on this
matter, Judy. The cost to him in mocking 'orthodoxy' would be much greater than
to you. Hels doing his own 'perichoretic dance' you might say. In his case he's
'dancing', as you like to put it, with himself. He won't commit. At least one
Don't hold your breath. I'm also checking for the
Bat signal should WW be unavailable.
.
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 9:47 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Fw:
FYI re:Who is Victor?
- Original Message -
From: Victor Shepherd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lance Muir [EMAIL
to exhort and to convince the gainsayers.
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 1:05 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done working for now
Going to the Bible will NOT bring the issue to resolution, Dean. Judy
it }:(
Oh well, that's not going to stop me from agreeing with it :)
Well said, Debbie.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 12:20 PM
Subject: Fw: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?
- Original Message -
From
Amen!
- Original Message -
From:
David Miller
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 15, 2006 23:07
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Differences
I know that you say that you do not believe that one must be right to be
saved, but you do not realize that I
authority to read trinity as someone has
to read godhead or divine nature.
jd
-- Original message --
From: Lance Muir
On employing 'non-biblical' terminology when speaking of WHO Jesus is:
Insofar as the language one chooses accurately reflects the subject under
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: January 15, 2006 13:42
Subject: RE: Fw: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?
For cd: I understand
baptism INTO CHRIST as identification with Christ, acknowledging participation
in his faith/covenant-keeping for us
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: January 15, 2006 20:32
Subject: glory
Hey, Lance! I am
finallyreadingthe last chapter of the Gunton book Jonathan lent me,
having set it aside for a bit, and have just come to something that speaks very
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: January 15, 2006 21:04
Subject: leading into all truth
And here is something else interesting, about the Spirit leading into all
truth. You may recall from the second lecture/chapter his explaining that the
Spirit
Does anyone have any recommendations as to material
which addresses the technological shift of recent
years?
DM:
I should be pleased to put you in touch with Dr.
Shepherd. He's open to substantive input as the course will not be taught until
September, 2007. Please remind me of your scientific credentials so that I might
commend you to him.
Just a thought re: your query: As the cosmos is the
Those who deny Christ's eternal pre-existence have
some difficulty in holding, consistently and coherently, to His Deity (diety for
those who prefer it)
trinity " in the place of
"Godhead." Our translations are copies of the original
tex t (as best as we can reconstruct that text) . The Latin
Vulgate has the same place in biblical history in terms of type
and quality as does the more literal of the English
translatio
THE CALL? From unbelief to belief? From immorality to morality (already
addressed). From morality? The latter is certainly no 'straw man'. It may be
that some on TT need to be called from this. I sometimes see DM with one
foot in this camp.
- Original Message -
From: Dean Moore
IFF you are incorrect on this matter then, 'all
truth' does NOT include this rather central and rather important matter
concerning 'who Jesus is'.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent:
0:00 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Please check your sources on this, Judy. I
believe he claimed to be speaking under 'inspiration'.
From: Judy Taylor
Benny Hinn was quoting another source and from
what I understand he
repent
udy you wrote "NO Dean" I believe you meant to
say"No Lance" as you are replying to his statement and not
mine.
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 07:30:00 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 14, 2006 17:42
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] love and
trinity THE HUMANITY OF CHRIST IS NOT DIVINE
- Original Message
-
From: Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/14/2006 10
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: January 14, 2006 17:02
Subject: OK, done working for now
paragraph inthis
lecture of Victor's:
I've often said, too, that the
hardest part of any service of worship for the minister is the children's story
in this
passage?
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/14/2006 10:17:23 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Differences
Never fear Dean, it's based on a faulty reading
of key texts so nobody's
It fascinates me that both yourself and DM believe
that readers/participants on TT do not 'know' you. You both have no hesitation
to say that you 'know' us. Why is that, Judy (DM)?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc:
s lived theirs !! jd
On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 06:56:35 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I'm with Bill on this one. God
is with Bill on this one, IMO, of course.
(Judy)
This is a rather broad question, Lance. I'm not sure where to
begin. It sounds like you want me to write a book for you. Can you
narrow your question a little?
David Miller
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
he appears to be a thorn in your side.
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:53:46 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
It fascinates me that both yourself and DM
believe that readers/participants on TT do not 'know' you. You both have no
hesitation to say that you 'kno
n the holy and the profane.
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:58:51 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Judy:THAT IS YOUR PROBLEM, JT, YOU DO BELIEVE
THE BIBLE!! DM ALSO BELIEVES THE BIBLE! Wherein there lies coincidence
between that which God Himself says and, tha
less dangerous than John claiming an
ontological infallibility for himself. Why do you give him a pass on
that,
but wrangle over every jot and tittle of what I write?
David Miller
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 6
in our words just as the scholars and Pharisees did to
Jesus. On the other hand, the feedback you give us from how we represent
you tells us that we are reading and understanding you just fine.
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday
DM: You have an impressive mind which is reflected
in your ability to write and, to evaluate the writing of others. Good for you,
DM. NOW, as to that short message, pulling together the disparate
understandings, on Who Jesus Is...
Please,
Lance
-
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/15/2006 6:46:56 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Differences
Any errors in the passage, Dean? No, I know of
none. Any errors in the interpretation, Dean? YES!
Dean:IMO, JT DM occupy a position
, but I think Bill and I believe in the same
Jesus. I'm not sure what to talk about. What's the point? Write a
thesis
about Jesus? That's a book, man. Where would I find the time to do that?
David Miller
- Original Message -
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent
Muir himself
would deign to write the following
about another person ..
"Should you wish to continue to pontificate from on
high then, we shall not hear matters of substance. We shall only hear you
judge us. (something you seem to do regularly)"
From: "Lan
Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/15/2006 6:49:49 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] love and
trinity THE HUMANITY OF CHRIST IS NOT DIVINE
Dean:I'd ask of you what I asked of DM, namely,
outline your own position regarding
Why didn't God send Himas
an antidote to "unbelief" only if this is the main problem??
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 06:50:35 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lanc
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/15/2006 8:40:26 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Differences
Let's break the response down into two parts,
Dean. Part #1:Are you aware that the majority of believing Bible scholars
- Original Message -
From: Debbie Sawczak
To: 'Lance Muir'
Sent: January 15, 2006 09:23
Subject: RE: Fw: [TruthTalk] What is the gospel?
Lance, I think David may be right about regularly posting
to TT the remarks I make to you about forwarded messages that I find
interesting
FYI re:Who is Victor?
- Original Message -
From: Victor Shepherd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: January 07, 2006 20:35
Lance,
Here's the latest.
Victor
Theology and Science.doc
Description: MS-Word document
as you seem to suppose. If one is to evaluate
the speaker then one must also consider the speakers past statements to
determine theavailability of truth offer by the speaker.Which statement
do you want me to support?
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
AMEN Dean!!
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 15, 2006 12:38
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Differences
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk
-
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 15, 2006 12:57
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: OK, done
working for now
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/15/2006 12
Judy, rightly IMO, has oft spoken of the disconnect
that may take place between theologizing and godliness. Conversely, as
illustrated in this post by Bill, a more thoroughgoing teaching, along with the
apprehension, of the Trinitarian Nature of God ought to issue in that which Jt
speaks
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 07:39:32 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Judy, rightly IMO, has oft spoken of the
disconnect that may take place between theologizing and godliness.
Conversely, as illustrated in this post by Bill, a more thoroughgoing
Divine = God
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 14, 2006 09:59
Subject: RE: Fw: [TruthTalk] love and
trinity THE HUMANITY OF CHRIST IS NOT DIVINE
Well, yes and no, DH. I am included in that circle
801 - 900 of 4850 matches
Mail list logo
