In a message dated 1/12/2005 4:56:56 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jt: JOHN a dead baby is not my problem. I have a Heavenly Father whose nature and character is love and so I
leave all those kinds of problems with Him cause I don't have to know everything. However, what a
In a message dated 1/12/2005 4:56:53 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Even though we do not all affirm your view concerning a lack of a fallen nature, there are at least a couple of us who will affirm the absence of a concept of "spiritual death" in the biblical narrative.
No
In a message dated 1/12/2005 4:56:53 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
O poor poor John,
yes, that's me. :-)
From: Bill Taylor
Allow me to give you a
resent example of one of your smears. Depending how you do with it,
I may go further:
"BTW
you are included in the triad along with Lance, and
Jonathan."
Can you say to me
with a clear conscience and your hand on the Bible
Bill Taylor wrote:
> The hermeneutical criteria that I am questioning
> is the criteria of interpretation that you use against
> others but are unwilling to apply to yourself.
> ... you sent a series of posts stating that no where
> in Scripture are the words "eternal Son" used. You
> therefore use
Bill Taylor wrote:
Now let me give you and example of
your caricatures from a recent post? However,
this is subject to change if anyone can show me in the scriptures that
I am in error and so far none of the "eternal son" people have done so.
While I
admit that on this occasio
I hear you Izzy - seems like I can also recall going
through this procedure before and I've not been around
TT as long as you ...
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:12:15 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Jt, also I have
learned that when a certain mormon fellow (to remain unna
jt: I don't "fake" stuff Kay, what am I supposed to be
getting that I don't get? All anyone can have is an
opinion about this question - unless you have some
hidden insight and if you do then please share.. judyt
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:13:55 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wri
] Whose Names are
Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:02:00 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Kay...in this shade: Judy
in this shade
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005
08:31:07 -0500 "Slade Hens
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:02:00 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Kay...in this shade: Judy
in this shade
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005
08:31:07 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
A dead baby may not be your problem, Judy, but it's many peo
e you feel better?
Bill
I sure hope not because a
false peace is much worse than no peace. judyt
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tues
hTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are
Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
God bless you, Kay. You are so right on with this
one.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Slade
Henson
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 12,
In a message dated 1/11/2005 11:52:02 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have no idea what you are talking about Bill. First you might define what you mean by "hermeneutical criteria"
and then tell me how I hold your feet to the fire and excuse myself, because to me this is not
Kay...in this shade:
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy
TaylorSent: Wednesday, 12 January, 2005 10.13To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are
Written in
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:31:07 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
A
dead baby may not be your problem, Judy, but it's many people's rather
traumatic problem. People wonder where their family members GO...especially
their children when they die. Death is a very re
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Judy Taylor
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005
2:06 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose
Names are Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:48:12 -0700 "Bill T
grievous error, the overall consequences too major to imagine.
Corrections below:
Bill
Original Message -
From: Bill Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 7:43
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are
Written in the Lambs Book of Life
God bless you, Kay. You are so right on with this
one.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Slade
Henson
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 6:31
AM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are
Written in the Lambs Book of Life
is one.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 6:00
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are
Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
Now Bill, let
God who is love?
Kay
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Judy
TaylorSent: Tuesday, 11 January, 2005 23.46To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are
Written in the La
Now Bill, let's not rush to judgment here. You
have me convicted and sentenced while the jury is still out.
Are you certain that what I describe below is not you?
Can you prove that you don't believe these things and have never promoted them on this list? Let's take
care of these questions
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 1:06
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are
Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:48:12 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
To the contrary, Judy, I have no problem
believin
essage -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 12:49
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are
Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
I have no idea what you are talking about Bill.
First
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:48:12 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
To the contrary, Judy, I have no problem
believing that the names of those who do not reject the Christ will remain
unblotted from the Lambs Book of Life. How about if you let me and the triad
articulate
t because a false
peace is much worse than no peace. judyt
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005
6:48 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose
Names are Wri
don't.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 11:39
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are
Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
On Tue, 1
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 6:48
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names
are Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
In a message dated 1/10/2005 11:55:01 AM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
jt: Unscriptural John. How did he get born saved
since
jt: JOHN a dead baby is not
my problem. I have a Heavenly Father whose nature and character is love and so
I
leave all those kinds of problems with Him cause
I don't have to know everything. However, what about the babies of the
Amorites and these other nations God was so disgusted
with? I
affirm the absence of a concept of "spiritual death" in the biblical
narrative.
Now, does that make you feel better?
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 6:48
PM
Subject: Re
The soul that sinneth, it shall die -- is
not a true statement for those who are in Christ.
JD, then
by your theology there will be very few in hell, and most everyone in heaven—correct?
Izzy
In a message dated 1/10/2005 11:42:20 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I thinkcorrect me if I'm wrong, John
that John is saying that a child is "saved" when he is born. A newborn is not cast into hell because he wasn't "born again". A child who dies goes to heaven...unt
In a message dated 1/10/2005 11:55:01 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jt: Unscriptural John. How did he get born saved since everyone is born into a "fallen creation" (sin) in the first Adam. The scriptures teach that God saw us in Christ before the foundation of the world (
In a message dated 1/11/2005 4:55:22 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please yourself John.
Excuse me ?? !! I am afraid to ask what this means... but I feel another grin comin on !!
JD
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 5:12
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Whose Names are
Written in the Lambs Book of Life?
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:49:40 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:So, the really important
thing is not t
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:49:40 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:So, the really important thing is not
the book of life but the Divine Eraser.
Interesting teaching.
jt: Not my "teaching"
John it is in the Book and the really important thing should be what God says
even if it does conflict
In a message dated 1/10/2005 8:39:20 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jt: Unscriptural John. How did he get born saved since everyone is born into a "fallen creation" (sin) in the first Adam. The scriptures teach that God saw us in Christ before the foundation of the world (Ep
jt: From what I can understand John is saying
that children are not born into the first Adam or in a lost condition
which is opposite to the teaching of scripture
which tells us that this is so and this is the reason why everyone must be
"born again" into the 2nd Adam if they are to inhe
I
thinkcorrect me if I'm wrong, John
that
John is saying that a child is "saved" when he is born. A newborn is not cast
into hell because he wasn't "born again". A child who dies goes to
heaven...until he is of the age of accountability and makes his
decision...either for God and "h
101 - 138 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
