On 3/7/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/02/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/22/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/21/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. The apache mailing list seems sensitive to attachments. The
Jira is the
On 07/03/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/7/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/02/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/22/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/21/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. The apache
+1
On 04/03/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote to approve the release of the sca-api's for r1.0 of the
specification. This is the API code that we recently reviewed but
please vote again to confirm the release.
[tag]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1155:
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
setting patch available flag
Java SDO static code
Hi All,
Title: There are no tests in the current suite that exercise relationships
formed by compound keys.
We need to add this for completeness
Ref: IN RDB DAS User Guide - WorkingWithCompoundKeys section - It is
explicitly stated that JIRA-841 is for
demonstrating relationship with compound
n
Mario,
thanks for that. It's really great to see what people are doing with
Tuscany. Are you still looking for answers to the questions you posed at
the end of the document. I'm not in a position to answer them, but it
might be worth pulling them out into a post on this list.
Regards,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson reopened TUSCANY-1065:
-
Reopening to reintroduce the amended test case provided by Fuhwei.
Coexistence problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1065:
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Coexistence problem between EMF and Tuscany SDO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1156:
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
CodeGen generates lowercase feature name when the schema
On 3/7/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/03/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/7/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/02/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/22/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/21/07, Pete
Hi Amita,
the scheme is just a prefixing device defined by the SDO spec that allows
implementations to provide for alternative path syntaxes. It's just
academic at the moment, since we use the default scheme and don't have any
alternatives. So it permits things like
+1
- Venkat
On 3/4/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote to approve the release of the sca-api's for r1.0 of the
specification. This is the API code that we recently reviewed but
please vote again to confirm the release.
[tag]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12478753
]
shaobin commented on TUSCANY-441:
-
I guess using commons-logging and log4j might be a good idea.
Remove DAS use
Hi Dan, I've just spent a couple of days stepping through the SCA code and
trying various tests to build up my knowledge a little. I note the
databinding tests are being updated and you are asking for some help (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1149). I just updated from SVN
(for
On 07/03/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/7/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/03/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/7/07, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 22/02/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/22/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL
On 3/7/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
n
Mario,
thanks for that. It's really great to see what people are doing with
Tuscany. Are you still looking for answers to the questions you posed at
the end of the document. I'm not in a position to answer them, but it
might be worth
If you try with the very latest SVN code both the JAXB and SDO WS tests
should work now as Raymond made so fixes over night (works for me now).
I don't think the tests using the default binding will work right now as
there's no default binding implemented yet.
...ant
On 3/7/07, Simon Laws
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-708?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12478762
]
Fuhwei Lwo commented on TUSCANY-708:
That's a good point. I think the problem we have now is the inconsistency
On 3/7/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you try with the very latest SVN code both the JAXB and SDO WS tests
should work now as Raymond made so fixes over night (works for me now).
I don't think the tests using the default binding will work right now as
there's no default binding
Hi,
Recently, I've been getting the following error when running mvn on the
sdo project. Does anybody have an idea what the problem might be?
Thanks,
Frank
[INFO] Building Tuscany SDO Implementation
[INFO]task-segment: [install]
[INFO]
Hi, Frank.
I'm seeing the same problem and did some investigation. It seems to be a bug
in the latest maven surefire plugin 2.3.1 SNAPSHOT. You can try to
explicitly set the version to 2.3 in the pom.xml like the following:
plugin
+1
Thanks
On 3/5/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have posted release candidates of the 2.0-alpha kernel release on
my home directory at people.apache.org and uploaded the artifacts to
the maven repo for:
SCA Parent POM 1.0-incubating
SCA Composite Plugin 1.0-incubating
SCA
Thanks Raymond! That fixed it.
Frank.
Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/07/2007 11:12:02 AM:
Hi, Frank.
I'm seeing the same problem and did some investigation. It seems to be a
bug
in the latest maven surefire plugin 2.3.1 SNAPSHOT. You can try to
explicitly set the version to
Seems like Raymond generates the SDO representation of the wsdl as well as
the data in the the XSDs. This seems to be due to the use of wrapped style
of ws binding (or is it always necessary ?). Interesting thought that this
is required, personally I'd not have guessed it would be needed as I'd
Thanks for your comments, we have resolved this issue and we are now using
log4j as DAS log strategy. More info on DAS logging strategy can be found
here :
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava/DAS_Java_Overview/Improved_logging
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
I have a couple of questions about the http.jetty service.
First, I am assuming that this service is intended to be kept around and
not deprecated, but let me know if this is not the case.
If that is the case, then I wonder what the intended usage pattern is
supposed to be. I do see a
The test class org.apache.tuscany.das.rdb.test.CompoundKeyTests does
contain some initial tests that demonstrate and verify the use of
compound keys. Examples from here could be added to the User's Guide.
It would be best if all current Relationship tests were duplicated using
compound keys.
Thanks Jeremy, + 1
On 3/7/07, Ignacio Silva-Lepe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Thanks
On 3/5/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have posted release candidates of the 2.0-alpha kernel release on
my home directory at people.apache.org and uploaded the artifacts to
the maven repo
On Mar 7, 2007, at 9:04 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
I have a couple of questions about the http.jetty service.
First, I am assuming that this service is intended to be kept
around and
not deprecated, but let me know if this is not the case.
If that is the case, then I wonder what the
Hi,
I am trying to run a spring application under tomcat 5.5.17 but I am getting
UnRecognizedElement exception. I am using tuscany-incubating-M2. can somebody
tell me how I can install spring extension?
thanks,
Muhammad
-
Luciano,
Removing a page is dreadfully simple - be cautious about its use. Go
into Edit mode on the page you want to delete. On the top right of the
editing pane, you will find a trash can icon with a link labelled
Remove Page. Click on either the trash can or the text and that will
Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
I have a couple of questions about the http.jetty service.
First, I am assuming that this service is intended to be kept around and
not deprecated, but let me know if this is not the case.
If that is the case, then I wonder what the intended usage pattern is
supposed
WSDL has schemas and portTypes.
WSDL2Java uses SDO CodeGen to compute classes names for schemas and
generates classes for portTypes.
SDO code seem not actually generated.
Is that desired?
If not, I can look into how to fix.
If yes, are users supposed to use SDO CodeGen themselves?
If so, what
Hmm, yes, I suppose I spoke too soon. I should have looked more
closely at the fact that @Service(ServletHost) is indeed exposed.
Thanks Jim and Sebastien
On 3/7/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
I have a couple of questions about the http.jetty
If that helps, I have been able to use the Jetty service in the
integration branch as a ServletHost to expose Web Services with the
Axis2 binding. To see this working you can take a look at the sca/
extensions/axis2/samples/helloworld-ws sample.
--
Jean-Sebastien
Cool, do you want to
Thanks Mike, I was having authorization problems trying to remove pages, but
repareting worked fine and should allow me to proceed for now.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 3/7/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano,
Removing a page is dreadfully simple -
I've been working on getting the Physical marshalling and build
infrastructure integrated with the connector. In order to do this, I
changed the way types are being tracked on
PhysicalOperationDefinition. Instead of directly referencing the
type's class, I changed it to track the fully
Type below...
On Mar 7, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Jim Marino wrote:
I've been working on getting the Physical marshalling and build
infrastructure integrated with the connector. In order to do this,
I changed the way types are being tracked on
PhysicalOperationDefinition. Instead of directly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Frank Budinsky resolved TUSCANY-1098.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in revision 515733. See new test case,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Frank Budinsky resolved TUSCANY-1155.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 515783.
Java SDO static code generation tool
Jim,
Is the MPL available in the registry. Or is it going to be the app CL looked
up from the registry and the MPCL created from the looked up app CL and the
system CL?
Ta
Meeraj
From: Jim Marino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject:
Hi,
With the release of maven-surefire-plugin 2.3, we can now run JUnit 4.x test
cases under maven. I plan to update pom.xml(s) in the sca-java-integration
branch to take advantage of this capability. I have run the full top-down build
and everything looks good.
Please let me know if you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Frank Budinsky resolved TUSCANY-1065.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed Fuhwei's http fix in revision 515841.
Coexistence
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12479182
]
Yang ZHONG commented on TUSCANY-1064:
-
I'm prototyping.
WSDL2Java tool doesn't have an option to generate
On Mar 7, 2007, at 9:59 AM, Mike Edwards wrote:
Folks,
With my spec hat on - the NAMES of the specs ain't going to change.
However, some of the FILES belonging to the spec are VERY likely to
change before publication. I know FOR SURE that sca-core.xsd is
going to change from the
I'd add that the API jar here does *not* contain the schemas.
We don't have approval yet for the 3rd party license covering the
ones on the OSOA site and to my knowledge do not yet have versions
available under the Apache License.
--
Jeremy
On Mar 7, 2007, at 9:59 AM, Mike Edwards wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yang ZHONG updated TUSCANY-1064:
Attachment: 1064.patch
The attached patch has passed all extensions/axis2/tools build tests.
On Mar 7, 2007, at 1:50 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Jim,
Is the MPL available in the registry. Or is it going to be the app
CL looked up from the registry and the MPCL created from the looked
up app CL and the system CL?
Ta
Meeraj
It should be the Multiparent CL from the
When we convert over to the federated marhsallers, I think we can get
rid of AtomicComponent and just have Component. To do this, we would
need to move some of the lifecycle getters such as conversational
lifetime, etc. to Component. The other change we would need to do is
have
On Mar 7, 2007, at 9:47 AM, Waseem, Muhammad ((CA - Toronto)) wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to run a spring application under tomcat 5.5.17 but I
am getting UnRecognizedElement exception. I am using tuscany-
incubating-M2. can somebody tell me how I can install spring
extension?
thanks,
Luciano Resende wrote:
+1, Thanks for volunteering !
On 3/7/07, Raymond Feng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
With the release of maven-surefire-plugin 2.3, we can now run JUnit
4.xtest cases under maven. I plan to update
pom.xml(s) in the sca-java-integration branch to take advantage of this
On Mar 7, 2007, at 6:42 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
When we convert over to the federated marhsallers, I think we can
get rid of AtomicComponent and just have Component. To do this, we
would need to move some of the lifecycle getters such as
conversational lifetime, etc. to Component. The other
On Mar 7, 2007, at 6:24 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
It should be the Multiparent CL from the ClassLoaderRegistry. It
looks like Jeremy got the multi-parent loading merged with the
composite classloader in r515464. This classloader will load the
impl class and we can use those to in turn load the
We had +1's from jmarino, meerajk, isilval, jboynes, lresende,
kelvingoodson, and svkrish
+0.9 from rfeng
and no -1's
There was concern from jsdelfino, lresende and rfeng about the
possibility of spec changes during final publication and jboynes
described how the version number
Hi Jim,
My scdl file contain.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!--
Author: Muhammad Waseem
Description: Account Service SCA Spring Composite Application
Date Last Modifed: March 02, 2007
Status: Prototype
--
!--
Composite Service:
CheckingAccountService
Services:
CheckingAccountService
Hi,
I was trying to build a project that uses sdo c++, but it fails cause it`s
not finding the time.h file. Where do I find this header?
Adriano Crestani
A related question I had was, wouldn't most of the logic in
JavaComponent etc for handling properties, introspection etc go into the
generated instance factory bytecode?
Meeraj
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 March 2007 04:08
To:
Hi,
I have checked in the changes.
To Sebastien's questions:
1) Yes, we can start to take advantage of @BeforeClass, @AfterClass
annotations. But don't forget to fix the memory leaks :-).
2) When I try to port the SCATestCaseRunner to support JUnit 4.x
annotations, I found it fairly
+1 from me.
A side comment, this will give us the ability to init a single
runtime instance in a method annotated with a Junit @BeforeClass
annotation and reuse it across multiple test methods. I think it
will be interesting for integration tests in particular.
Raymond, are you going to
On Mar 7, 2007, at 9:57 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
A related question I had was, wouldn't most of the logic in
JavaComponent etc for handling properties, introspection etc go
into the
generated instance factory bytecode?
I believe so. I just stubbed out the methods from
On 3/7/07, Dan Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems like Raymond generates the SDO representation of the wsdl as well as
the data in the the XSDs. This seems to be due to the use of wrapped style
of ws binding (or is it always necessary ?). Interesting thought that this
is required, personally
61 matches
Mail list logo
