Ok, I've started to use 0.90 for the name for now. Can easily change it if
something better comes up.
...ant
On 5/3/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for 0.90
- Venkat
On 5/2/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It would be good to choose a name soon so we can star
+1 for 0.90
- Venkat
On 5/2/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be good to choose a name soon so we can start completing all the
readme's and release notes etc, there doesn't seem much consensus on beta1
so how about 0.90? That sounds closer to 1.0 than M3 or alpha and still
give
On 5/2/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I thought Ant's suggestion was just 0.90 and not beta anything. I can
live with this. I don't think we are ready yet to call it beta 1.0
or beta1 1.0.
Simon
haleh mahbod wrote:
> why does it matter if we call it beta1 or beta .90? It is a
I thought Ant's suggestion was just 0.90 and not beta anything. I can
live with this. I don't think we are ready yet to call it beta 1.0
or beta1 1.0.
Simon
haleh mahbod wrote:
why does it matter if we call it beta1 or beta .90? It is a variation of
what we call beta. The fact that there i
why does it matter if we call it beta1 or beta .90? It is a variation of
what we call beta. The fact that there is a number after Beta is an
indication that there might be revisions of Beta anyway before 1.0 release
is reached.
On 5/2/07, Ignacio Silva-Lepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 on 0.9
+1 on 0.90
On 5/2/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be good to choose a name soon so we can start completing all the
readme's and release notes etc, there doesn't seem much consensus on beta1
so how about 0.90? That sounds closer to 1.0 than M3 or alpha and still
gives space for
It would be good to choose a name soon so we can start completing all the
readme's and release notes etc, there doesn't seem much consensus on beta1
so how about 0.90? That sounds closer to 1.0 than M3 or alpha and still
gives space for more releases before the final 1.0.
...ant
On 5/1/07, Ber
I realize I'm a bit late to this conversation, I'm just now getting
mostly unpacked from a move to Somerville, MA. I agree with Simon in
that we should be careful what we call "beta". I know that we all
would like to get to beta quality code and features as soon as we can,
but I don't think we a
On 4/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
> On 4/24/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> So I think it comes down to whether it is more important to put
>> something out by JavaOne (in which case I'd be hesitant to call it
>> "beta") or whether
Both of these seem like useful suggestions. There's a scheduled IRC next
Monday so lets discuss the release contents at that, in the meantime people
could add their names to wiki items [1] for things that they want to get
into the next release.
...ant
[1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/dis
A working release that is closer to 1.0 spec version sooner would be better
than having more content and a later release. M2 is old now and has
issues.
Should IRC be used for a discussion on release or maybe we should update
the Wiki page with (IN/Out) comment to help you? If an item has both
On 4/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
> On 4/24/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> So I think it comes down to whether it is more important to put
>> something out by JavaOne (in which case I'd be hesitant to call it
>> "beta") or whether
ant elder wrote:
On 4/24/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I think it comes down to whether it is more important to put
something out by JavaOne (in which case I'd be hesitant to call it
"beta") or whether it is more important to attain a true "beta" level
of quality even if that t
Ant,
thanks for the pointers here. I am persisting with this, but I thought
I'd just post an update as this doesn't seem to be working as it should. I
have two main problems, one is when attempting to deploy the SDO tools jar
by command -- see [1], the maven command removes the pom i'm trying
On 4/25/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've got to the point where I have packaged up a new beta1 SDO java
release
candidate in the style if the last one [1], but that's only part of the
process now that I have to set up a remote maven repository as a staging
post for the deploye
I've got to the point where I have packaged up a new beta1 SDO java release
candidate in the style if the last one [1], but that's only part of the
process now that I have to set up a remote maven repository as a staging
post for the deployed release candidate artifacts (as per the recent
discuss
On 4/24/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I think it comes down to whether it is more important to put
something out by JavaOne (in which case I'd be hesitant to call it
"beta") or whether it is more important to attain a true "beta" level
of quality even if that takes a little bit
4, 2007 4:32 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it
> How about Ant as release manager for this release? He has been very
> diligent in reviewing previous Tuscany releases with many helpful
> comments. He has a good understanding of the Apache requirements
> and proces
o attain a true "beta" level
of quality even if that takes a little bit longer.
Simon
Raymond Feng wrote:
+1.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: Next release
+1.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: Next release name? (was: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What
should be in it)
+1
As for DAS, as it has dependencies on SDO
4, 2007 4:32 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it
> How about Ant as release manager for this release? He has been very
> diligent in reviewing previous Tuscany releases with many helpful
> comments. He has a good understanding of the Apache requirements
> an
+1
As for DAS, as it has dependencies on SDO, I'd propose to follow the same
name convention as SDO, and use beta1 as well.
On 4/24/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
> What are we going to be calling this next SCA release?
>
> We've had M1 and M2 releases,
ant elder wrote:
What are we going to be calling this next SCA release?
We've had M1 and M2 releases, some alpha kernel releases, DAS are talking
about an M3 release and SDO is doing an M3 release although there was
some
discussion about renaming that to beta1. I think milestone and alpha
rele
gt; ----- Original Message ----- From: "Luciano Resende"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To:
>> Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 10:25 AM
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it
>>
>>
>>> +1 on focusing on the stability an
+1. I would like to nominate Ant too.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 4:32 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it
How about Ant as release manager for this relea
On 4/24/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ant,
your note is well timed as I've had a couple of off-line chats with
people
in the last week about release naming, particularly with regard to the
effect that a milestone or alpha name can have on uptake of a release. In
the IRC chat o
to be the release manager. This
way, I can learn more and get ready for the next time.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message - From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in i
Ant,
your note is well timed as I've had a couple of off-line chats with people
in the last week about release naming, particularly with regard to the
effect that a milestone or alpha name can have on uptake of a release. In
the IRC chat of 16th April [1] we reached a conclusion that given the f
What are we going to be calling this next SCA release?
We've had M1 and M2 releases, some alpha kernel releases, DAS are talking
about an M3 release and SDO is doing an M3 release although there was some
discussion about renaming that to beta1. I think milestone and alpha release
names may discou
I think the M2 arrangement for the construction of the WAR file
was quite complex and hard to reproduce by non-maven users who
didn't have the special plugin. I wrote some documentation for
the web site in case anyone wanted to do this with M2 and it wasn't
very easy, especially the Jave-serializ
On 4/21/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Luciano Resende wrote:
> +1 on focusing on the stability and consumability for the core
functions,
> other then helping on simplifying the runtime further and work on a
> Domain
> concept, I also want to contribute around havin
The problem I have been working on is TUSCANY-1218. See the problem
desription and the comments on my attached patch for more details of
the problem and how my patch resolves it.
I'm aware of the ModuleActivator.stop() method and I am using it in
my patch for TUSCANY-1218. However, this isn't s
[snip]
Luciano Resende wrote:
+1 on focusing on the stability and consumability for the core functions,
other then helping on simplifying the runtime further and work on a
Domain
concept, I also want to contribute around having a better integration
with
App Servers, basically start by bringing
Simon Laws wrote:
On 4/19/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/19/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Let's keep the ball rolling...Can someone please come up with a
master
> > list of "extensions, bindings, services, sa
. This way, I can learn
more and get ready for the next time.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it
+1 on foc
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 6:07 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it
>
>
> > Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >> Folks,
>
07 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> Let's keep the ball rolling...Can someone please come up with a master
>> list of "extensions, bindings, services, samples" which can then help
>
to be the release manager? If not, I can
give a try.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it
Davanum Sriniv
On 4/19/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not against adding new features for the release b.t.w
Good point, me either. I hope my previous post didn't sound like I was
against adding new features, all I was saying was that I think those other
things are important to do and they're
[snip]
Simon Nash wrote:
I agree with the comments from Ant and Simon on focusing on stability
and consumability at the moment rather than adding a large amount of
new function.
I've been working on a complex bug fix recently (watch this space
for a JIRA and patch) and I noticed that we lost som
I agree with the comments from Ant and Simon on focusing on stability
and consumability at the moment rather than adding a large amount of
new function.
I've been working on a complex bug fix recently (watch this space
for a JIRA and patch) and I noticed that we lost some previously
working suppo
On 4/19/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/19/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Let's keep the ball rolling...Can someone please come up with a master
> > list of "extensions, bindings, services, samples" which can the
On 4/19/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Let's keep the ball rolling...Can someone please come up with a master
> list of "extensions, bindings, services, samples" which can then help
> decide what's going to get into the next release. Pl
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Folks,
Let's keep the ball rolling...Can someone please come up with a master
list of "extensions, bindings, services, samples" which can then help
decide what's going to get into the next release. Please start a wiki
page to document the master list. Once we are done doc
ebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>> ant elder wrote:
>>> On 3/30/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>&
extensibility story for implementation/binding extensions
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Next version - What should be in it
Jean-Sebastien Del
[snip]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
ant elder wrote:
I guess everything in contrib is not going to be in the next release
unless
something changes. How about also moving bpel, celtix and servicemix to
contrib?
Makes sense to me. I've not seen any activity in these modules
recently, and the
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 3/30/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,
Let's keep the ball rolling...Can someone please come up with a master
list of "extensions, bindings, services, samples" which can then help
decide what's going to get into the next r
ant elder wrote:
On 3/30/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,
Let's keep the ball rolling...Can someone please come up with a master
list of "extensions, bindings, services, samples" which can then help
decide what's going to get into the next release. Please start a wiki
pag
On 3/30/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,
Let's keep the ball rolling...Can someone please come up with a master
list of "extensions, bindings, services, samples" which can then help
decide what's going to get into the next release. Please start a wiki
page to document the
Folks,
Let's keep the ball rolling...Can someone please come up with a master
list of "extensions, bindings, services, samples" which can then help
decide what's going to get into the next release. Please start a wiki
page to document the master list. Once we are done documenting the
list. We can
51 matches
Mail list logo
