Congratulations for the achievement that demonstrates the great work
being done!
Mario
Rats... unfortunately I'm in Sri Lanka so I can't make the Dolphin :(
Paul
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Mike Edwards
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>>
>> This is great news!
>>
>> Congratulations and thank you to our mentors and the incubator folks for
>> helping c
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
This is great news!
Congratulations and thank you to our mentors and the incubator folks for
helping create the Tuscany community!
When is the graduation party?
We're having one in "The Dolphin" in Hursley tomorrow...
...you're welcome to join us ;-)
We ne
Matthieu Riou wrote:
"Special order 7B, Establish the Apache Tuscany Project, was approved by
Unanimous Vote of the directors present."
Congratulations guys!
Matthieu
This is great news!
Congratulations and thank you to our mentors and the incubator folks for
helping create the Tuscany com
Matthieu Riou wrote:
Congratulations guys!
Congratulations to all. Many put in an extreme amount of hard work, and
I think it shows favorably in the project. Enjoy the recognition.
--
Thanks, Dan Becker
Happy to hear the great news! Congratulations to everyone.
Ignacio
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> "Special order 7B, Establish the Apache Tuscany Project, was approved by
> Unanimous Vote of the directors present."
>
> Congratulations guys!
>
> Matthie
Matthieu Riou wrote:
"Special order 7B, Establish the Apache Tuscany Project, was approved by
Unanimous Vote of the directors present."
Congratulations guys!
Matthieu
Great news everyone!!
Thanks to everyone for a lot of hard work and dedication.
I think that the next year will be the year
Matthieu Riou wrote:
"Special order 7B, Establish the Apache Tuscany Project, was approved by
Unanimous Vote of the directors present."
Congratulations guys!
Matthieu
Thanks for this excellent news. It has been great to be part of
the Tuscany community in our journey towards full Apache-hood
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:57 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/22/08, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Congratulations everyone!
>
> +1
> Robert
>
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> T
On 5/22/08, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Congratulations everyone!
+1
Robert
>
> Paul
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That's great news.
>>
>> ++Vamsi
>>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:44 AM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Congratulations everyone!
Paul
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's great news.
>
> ++Vamsi
>
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:44 AM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> "Special order 7B, Establish the Apache Tuscany Project, was approve
That's great news.
++Vamsi
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:44 AM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> "Special order 7B, Establish the Apache Tuscany Project, was approved by
> Unanimous Vote of the directors present."
>
> Congratulations guys!
>
> Matthieu
>
This is an exciting news.
Congratulations.
Thanks,
Feng Wang
On 2008-05-22 05:15:30,Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Special order 7B, Establish the Apache Tuscany Project, was approved by
>Unanimous Vote of the directors present."
>
>Congratulations guys!
>
>Matthieu
>
Congratulations !
2008/5/22, Haleh Mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Congratulations to all.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 2:19 PM
> To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Graduati
I'm excited to hear the great news. We finally graduate in the graduation
season after a long journey!
Cheers, Tuscany is now a TLP!
Thanks,
Raymond
--
From: "Matthieu Riou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 2:14 PM
To: "tuscany-de
Congratulations to all.
-Original Message-
From: Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 2:19 PM
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Graduation
Hey, thanks for the good news.
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Hey, thanks for the good news.
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Special order 7B, Establish the Apache Tuscany Project, was approved by
> Unanimous Vote of the directors present."
>
> Congratulations guys!
>
> Matthieu
>
--
Luciano Resende
Apache Tus
If someone is a very active contributor, he/she is most likely watching the
commit list as well as the dev list. If someone is just subscribed to the
dev list to watch the key discussions and occasionally gets involved, he/she
would not want to see all the JIRA updates. This assumes that new
disc
ant elder wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 5:28 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One other consideration - sometimes it's appropriate to reply to a
JIRA rather than updating the issue: if there are two lists, on has to
decide - should the replies go to both or just dev?
In such a case I thin
ant elder wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 5:28 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
One other consideration - sometimes it's appropriate to reply to a
JIRA rather than updating the issue: if there are two lists, on has to
decide - should the replies go to both or just dev?
In such a case I thin
sebb wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Or can we configure JIRA to only send a message when a comment is added
to an issue?
Surely one needs all the JIRA changes?
You're right, I was initially thinking that we could cut on the number
of useless JIRA notifications, but after reviewing a
On Feb 6, 2008 5:28 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One other consideration - sometimes it's appropriate to reply to a
> > JIRA rather than updating the issue: if there are two lists, on has to
> > decide - should the replies go to both or just dev?
> >
> In such a case I think the r
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 8:00 AM
Subject: Re: Graduation next steps
If we are going to remove JIRAs from dev list, my personal preference
would be to have a notification list and have JIRA, Build
notifications, etc sent to this list. But I'm still not convinced that
sebb wrote:
On 05/02/2008, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
- route the JIRA traffic out of the dev list as suggested by Matthieu
I understand that this traffic can get a bit overwhelming at times, but
I'd like to make
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Typically these discussions have multiple aspects to it and we end up
bringing perspectives to each aspect. If there is such a topic then I'd
think the WIKI is a good place. There could be one description of the
problem and comments by the community at various points. S
My top 3 in
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Graduation+Next+Stepsare
11,12,13,19,22,32/33,38 and 18 but modified to have a policy of being
vocal early when no-one has the bandwidth to address an incoming JIRA. I
know that's not 3, but hey!
I can't see on the wiki page the
I like to be able to look at a JIRA and readily find the discussion relating
to it, so I find having technical discussion as a series of comments in the
JIRA helpful. In this pattern it makes sense to copy JIRA comments to the
dev list, as it forms the substance of our technical communication. I k
If we are going to remove JIRAs from dev list, my personal preference
would be to have a notification list and have JIRA, Build
notifications, etc sent to this list. But I'm still not convinced that
moving JIRA out of the dev mailing list is the best solution here.
On Feb 6, 2008 5:26 AM, ant elde
On Feb 4, 2008 8:06 PM, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - route the JIRA traffic out of the dev list as suggested by Matthieu
> >
> I understand that this traffic can get a bit overwhelming at times, but
> I'd like to make the case that it does have value for new developers
> (though not
On Feb 6, 2008 10:27 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 6, 2008 10:23 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Jan 31, 2008 1:41 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'd like to get some discussion going on what we want to do for
> > > graduating t
On Feb 6, 2008 10:23 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 31, 2008 1:41 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to get some discussion going on what we want to do for
> > graduating to an Apache TLP.
> >
> > The attempt back in November raised issues about diversit
On Jan 31, 2008 1:41 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to get some discussion going on what we want to do for graduating
> to an Apache TLP.
>
> The attempt back in November raised issues about diversity and since then
> it feels like we've just been waiting around hoping diversi
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Typically these discussions have multiple aspects to it and we end up
bringing perspectives to each aspect. If there is such a topic then I'd
think the WIKI is a good place. There could be one description of the
problem and comments by the community at various points. S
Typically these discussions have multiple aspects to it and we end up
bringing perspectives to each aspect. If there is such a topic then I'd
think the WIKI is a good place. There could be one description of the
problem and comments by the community at various points. So at any time one
knows wh
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Simon Nash wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
- route the JIRA traffic out of the dev list as suggested by Matthieu
I understand that this traffic can get a bit overwhelming at times, but
I'd like to make the case that it does have value for new develop
On Feb 5, 2008 10:09 AM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However few (if any) mail archives seem to offer such facilies and so
> can be difficult to read if there are lots of JIRA messages mixed in
> with the rest.
>
Thats a good point. Up till now I've thought its better to have the JIRA
email
On 05/02/2008, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Nash wrote:
> > Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> [snip]
> >> - route the JIRA traffic out of the dev list as suggested by Matthieu
> >>
> > I understand that this traffic can get a bit overwhelming at times, but
> > I'd like to
Simon Nash wrote:
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
- route the JIRA traffic out of the dev list as suggested by Matthieu
I understand that this traffic can get a bit overwhelming at times, but
I'd like to make the case that it does have value for new developers
(though not for users). On
My +1 as well to all the points that have been brought out. I am certainly
for picking out a couple rightaway and starting with some baby steps.
I think we must have an IRC session soon to review our JIRAs.
Thanks
- Venkat
The e-mail is getting long :-). I just want to add my +1 to these great
ideas. I definitely willing to help in various areas.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Nash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: Gradu
Simon Laws wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 1:41 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to get some discussion going on what we want to do for graduating
to an Apache TLP.
The attempt back in November raised issues about diversity and since then
it
feels like we've just been waiting around ho
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
Matthieu Riou wrote:
>
>(cut)
What you've said sounds good, here's a few more suggestions.
JIRAs, patches and features:
- cleanup and organize JIRAs to help people find where to contribute
+1
- apply patches from contributors more quickly
+1
- have a roa
> > what about using Docbook for documenting things?
>
> I can't comment on that as I don't know docbook. Any thoughts from others?
I was thinking about a developer manual:
* your general structure, the invocation infrastructure, the fact
that components
are active objects...and so on.
>
> > Anot
Giorgio Zoppi wrote:
2008/2/3, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
There's a lot i think the project could do to encourage others to
participate, here's a few things I can think of -
We have a lot of downloads and real users, we need to try to get more of
these people engaged and contri
2008/2/3, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >>> There's a lot i think the project could do to encourage others to
> >>> participate, here's a few things I can think of -
> >>>
> >>> We have a lot of downloads and real users, we need to try to get more of
> >>> these people engaged and c
Matthieu Riou wrote:
I'm happy to see this discussion going and I think most of the points listed
make a lot of sense.
A small detail to add to the list that I think could have some importance:
your -dev list is flooded by Jira issues. Newcomers interested in Tuscany's
development are very likel
I'm happy to see this discussion going and I think most of the points listed
make a lot of sense.
A small detail to add to the list that I think could have some importance:
your -dev list is flooded by Jira issues. Newcomers interested in Tuscany's
development are very likely to get overwhelmed by
On Jan 31, 2008 1:41 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to get some discussion going on what we want to do for graduating
> to an Apache TLP.
>
> The attempt back in November raised issues about diversity and since then
> it
> feels like we've just been waiting around hoping diver
Subject: Re: Graduation: Spec Openness
Mike Edwards wrote:
> Folks,
>
> I'd like to offer a different perspective
>
> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>>>
>>> That all sounds good to me (assuming that means no work in Tuscany
>>> on OSOA things th
This is a good description of what Tuscany does in addition to the spec
implementation. Is everyone OK with adding this text or a simpler version of
it to the overview page?
Tuscany is an implementation nursery for new areas of work that are not
being worked in in places like OSOA and OASIS. Exam
Mike Edwards wrote:
Folks,
I'd like to offer a different perspective
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
That all sounds good to me (assuming that means no work in Tuscany
on OSOA
things that are not public, which is what you mean right?)
...ant
That's what I mean.
I believe that
On 10/2/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > How about we put a check list up on the wiki so
> > we all get a view of what's going on and what needs to be done by when.
> I've
> > started one here by copying the checklist from the graduation guide
The current make up of the PPMC is partly historical and in its current
state isn't an accurate reflection of the diversity of the active commiters,
we are actively fixing this as one of the TODO items before we graduate.
...ant
On 10/3/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> One issu
One issue I see is diversity. The proposed PMC seems very dominated
by a single vendor as, if I understand the affiliations correctly, we
have:
Andrew Borley (IBM)
Andy Grove (RogueWave)
ant elder (IBM)
Ignacio Silva-Lepe (IBM)
Jean-Sebastien Delfino (IBM)
kelvin goodson (IBM)
Luciano Resende
Folks,
I'd like to offer a different perspective
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
That all sounds good to me (assuming that means no work in Tuscany on
OSOA
things that are not public, which is what you mean right?)
...ant
That's what I mean.
I believe that in addition to imple
On 10/2/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > How about we put a check list up on the wiki so
> > we all get a view of what's going on and what needs to be done by when. I've
> > started one here by copying the checklist from the graduation guide (
>
Folks,
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
[snip]
kelvin goodson wrote:
Do people want to say something about things we're doing that are not
covered by OpenCSA, the data access service work, the data binding work,
and the SCA implementation and binding extensions that are not covered
by OpenCSA? A
Luciano Resende wrote:
I think the SDO group is just a little behind in the process, there
was an e-mail to OASIS Members on 09/25/2007 with the subject
"[members] Proposed Charter for OASIS Service Data Objects (SDO)
Technical Committee".
But others more involved with SDO can give more details.
I think the SDO group is just a little behind in the process, there
was an e-mail to OASIS Members on 09/25/2007 with the subject
"[members] Proposed Charter for OASIS Service Data Objects (SDO)
Technical Committee".
But others more involved with SDO can give more details.
On 10/2/07, Jean-Sebast
[snip]
kelvin goodson wrote:
Do people want to say something about things we're doing that are not
covered by OpenCSA, the data access service work, the data binding work,
and the SCA implementation and binding extensions that are not covered
by OpenCSA? Are they all covered by the "based on th
ant elder wrote:
On 10/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
On 9/27/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
5 - On ongoing OSOA work. Assuming that there is ongoing work and that
the
mode of operation is unchanged, maybe we wait unt
On 10/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ant elder wrote:
> > On 9/27/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > 5 - On ongoing OSOA work. Assuming that there is ongoing work and that
> the
> >
> >> mode of operation is unchanged, maybe we wait until it reac
On 27/09/2007, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Nash wrote:
> >
> > Paul Fremantle wrote:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >> On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Folks,
> >>>
> >>> My pennyworth:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> a Project Management Committee c
On 27/09/2007, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> My pennyworth:
>
>
> a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
> maintenance of open-source software supporting a range of technologies
> that simplifies the development of service oriented applications and
> pro
On 10/1/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 This sounds reasonable, and open.
>
> On 10/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ant elder wrote:
> > > On 9/27/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 5 - On ongoing OSOA work. Assuming
+1 This sounds reasonable, and open.
On 10/1/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
> > On 9/27/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > 5 - On ongoing OSOA work. Assuming that there is ongoing work and that the
> >
> >> mode of operation is unch
ant elder wrote:
On 9/27/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
5 - On ongoing OSOA work. Assuming that there is ongoing work and that the
mode of operation is unchanged, maybe we wait until it reaches OASIS.
Thats the one i was mainly thinking about.
"wait until it reaches OAS
ant elder wrote:
On 9/27/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about the following reordering:
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
maintenance of open-source software that simplifies the development of
service oriented applications and pro
Folks,
In response to this query:
Matthieu Riou wrote:
2 - Do the IPR terms chosen by the SCA TCs in OASIS make upcoming OSASIS
specifications suitable for implementation by Tuscany when they appear? I
guess we need to get the view from legal@ on this.
Are these public yet?
OASIS IPR te
On 9/27/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about the following reordering:
> >
> > a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
> > maintenance of open-source software that simplifies the development of
> > service oriented applications and provides a man
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/28/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As Venkat said, we have been consistent making releases. We should be
able to mark this done.
I counted:
SCA-Java 5 releases
SCA+SDO-Native 3 releases on Linux, Windows, 1 on MacOS
SDO-Java 4 releases
DAS-Java 3
On 9/28/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As Venkat said, we have been consistent making releases. We should be
> able to mark this done.
>
> On 9/27/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, I'd think so and this is not with just the 1.0 release but with the
> > fac
As Venkat said, we have been consistent making releases. We should be
able to mark this done.
On 9/27/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I'd think so and this is not with just the 1.0 release but with the
> fact that we have been consistent with releases for sometime now - rele
Yes, I'd think so and this is not with just the 1.0 release but with the
fact that we have been consistent with releases for sometime now - releases
of SCA, SDO and DAS.
- Venkat
On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> This is down as one of the checklist items for Tusc
Simon Nash wrote:
Paul Fremantle wrote:
+1
Paul
On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,
My pennyworth:
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
maintenance of open-source software supporting a range of technologies
that simplifies the development o
On 9/27/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How about the following reordering:
>
> a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
> maintenance of open-source software that simplifies the development of
> service oriented applications and provides a managed service-oriented
ant elder wrote:
On 9/27/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
5 - On ongoing OSOA work. Assuming that there is ongoing work and that the
mode of operation is unchanged, maybe we wait until it reaches OASIS.
Thats the one i was mainly thinking about.
"wait until it reaches OASIS" i
On 9/27/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/27/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Folks,
> > > >
> > > > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > > > On 9
Mike Edwards wrote:
Folks,
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/27/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So you have 4 more days after Sunday :) But there's no reason to rush
out,
I'm just clarifying the timeline, you'll be ready when you'll
Paul Fremantle wrote:
+1
Paul
On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,
My pennyworth:
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
maintenance of open-source software supporting a range of technologies
that simplifies the development of service oriented
On 9/27/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
5 - On ongoing OSOA work. Assuming that there is ongoing work and that the
> mode of operation is unchanged, maybe we wait until it reaches OASIS.
Thats the one i was mainly thinking about.
"wait until it reaches OASIS" is one option but it do
On 9/27/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > > On 9/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >> On 9/27/07, Matthieu
ant elder wrote:
On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Folks,
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/27/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So you have 4 more days after Sunday :) But there's no reason to rush
out,
I'm just cl
On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Starting another thread based on Ant's comment:
>
> - the openness of the specs and our interaction with OSOA has been
> brought up before by the Incubator. Most things have now moved to OASIS
> and that should resolve those issues
On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I've split this off as its a specific action item for Graduation.
>
> Based on Ant's comment:
>
> - the PPMC doesn't yet reflect the diversity of the committers. We've
> all been a bit busy with 1.0 etc and there's a few people now
On 9/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Folks,
> >
> > Simon Laws wrote:
> > > On 9/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> On 9/27/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> So you ha
+1
Paul
On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> My pennyworth:
>
>
> a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
> maintenance of open-source software supporting a range of technologies
> that simplifies the development of service oriented applications an
Folks,
My pennyworth:
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
maintenance of open-source software supporting a range of technologies
that simplifies the development of service oriented applications and
provides a managed service-oriented runtime, based on the standards
d
On 9/27/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> Simon Laws wrote:
> > On 9/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On 9/27/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> So you have 4 more days after Sunday :) But there's no reason to rush
> out,
> >>>
Folks,
Simon Laws wrote:
On 9/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/27/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So you have 4 more days after Sunday :) But there's no reason to rush out,
I'm just clarifying the timeline, you'll be ready when you'll be ready
and
you can also
> > Yep, with the "provides a managed service-oriented runtime" bit moved
> forward that scans better.
>
> To me "based on the standards" doesn't imply "limited to the standards".
> Works for me. Everyone happy from a scope point of view?
Yes I deliberately avoided limiting this to the standards.
On 9/27/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How about this?
>
> a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
> maintenance of open-source software that simplifies the development of
> service oriented applications and provides a managed service-oriented
> runtime, base
How about this?
a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and
maintenance of open-source software that simplifies the development of
service oriented applications and provides a managed service-oriented
runtime, based on the standards defined by the OASIS OpenCSA group,
for distribu
On 9/27/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/27/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > How about
> >
> > charged with the creation and maintenance of open source software that:
> > * simplifies the development of service oriented applications,
> > * implements the SCA s
On 9/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 9/27/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> So you have 4 more days after Sunday :) But there's no reason to rush out,
> > I'm just clarifying the timeline, you'll be ready when you'll be ready
> and
> > you can also target Nov.
On 9/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This first part seems like a big improvement to me:
>
> "open-source software that simplifies development and management of
> applications using service oriented approach."
>
> I've updated the text on the wiki to say that, I'm not so sure about
On 9/27/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How about
>
> charged with the creation and maintenance of open source software that:
> * simplifies the development of service oriented applications,
> * implements the SCA standards as defined by the OpenCSA group at OASIS,
> and
> * provi
How about
charged with the creation and maintenance of open source software that:
* simplifies the development of service oriented applications,
* implements the SCA standards as defined by the OpenCSA group at OASIS, and
* provides a managed service-oriented runtime for services and applications.
I know you're good at words so how about help come up with a good
description for the TLP proposal of what Tuscany is about?
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Draft+TLP+Resolution
Which currently just says "open-source software that simplifies development
and management of a
Guys
Sorry to be so quiet on this thread! How can I help?
Paul
On 9/27/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems ok to me.. .may be we could say 'embedded in app servers like Tomcat
> and Geronimo' (just to bring in the connecting that we are doing with other
> Apache projects. Y
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
