This guy wants low cost equipment. If they have been running on a 486
box up until now, speed is certainly not an issue. I'd suggest
browsing ebay for a 1-2 year old dual core server or workstation.
You'd be surprised at how cheap they are once they come off lease.
I do this myself every couple
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony
Youngman
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2007 6:29 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: Re:[U2] New UV system
Your memory is faulty :-( though I would advise people to do what you
suggest.
We've had serial
day, June 14, 2007 12:34 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: Re: [U2] New UV system -- AMD Opteron v. Xeon? PC architecture
> experts?
>
> Considering all the discussion here, I'd like to ask a question and make a
> statement for those a little more familiar with server archite
16G is supported on x64 (and I suppose Itanium) versions only. 32-bit
versions are limited to 4G.
On 6/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I have a year old Sun Fire x4200 server, two Dual Core Opteron 275s,
> which
> >performed much better with UV and in general than my bran
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 June 2007 03:01
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: Re:[U2] New UV system
The other 'fun' you'll have is if they have serial printers. If memory
serves, you'd have to convert the
>I have a year old Sun Fire x4200 server, two Dual Core Opteron 275s,
which
>performed much better with UV and in general than my brand spankin' new
Dell
>PowerEdge 1950, with two Xeon Woodcrests (Core 2 Duo-based). Each
machine
>has 16G RAM and similar hard drive configurations. Both run Wind
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 June 2007 18:45
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] New UV system
Wol,
One reason for using uvbackup is that the index file path names within
UV
are hard coded and I have had interesting issues when not using uvbackup
to
move work directory/accounts around be
I also have a Dell Xeon server at home, and it was horribly noisy until I
switched off the default ultra-fast disk option (it made no noticeable
difference to performance). That dropped the noise level by about 60-70%.
Their case design has a fan in the front of the drive bay that rattles like
Considering all the discussion here, I'd like to ask a question and make a
statement for those a little more familiar with server architecture
I have a year old Sun Fire x4200 server, two Dual Core Opteron 275s, which
performed much better with UV and in general than my brand spankin' new Dell
Pow
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MAJ Programming
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 7:05 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: Re:[U2] New UV system
Thanks for all who responded. I have to see how much gets printed versus
gets downloaded (accuterm) and printed from the d
Thanks for all who responded. I have to see how much gets printed versus
gets downloaded (accuterm) and printed from the desktop.
Thanks
Mark Johnson
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 6:44 PM
Subject: Re:[U
Dave Taylor did a wonderful job explaining the difference in porting
UV from NIX to NT and many of the things that should influence the
choice of base platforms.
As someone who is porting from UV from AIX to Linux, I will add even
NIX to different NIX has its challenges in the area of printing
uthorized IBM Business Partner
- Original Message -
From: "MAJ Programming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 5:17 AM
Subject: [U2] New UV system
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
.
Cheers,
David Murray
.learn and do
.excel and share
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Youngman
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 12:05 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] New UV system
Why do you need uvbackup?
I&#
> Seems to me a move to Linux would be better since they are probably more
> familiar with a nix system. The spoolers are completely different.
I agree with what Jerry said. In addition to his points, consider that
changing the operating system means that you have to worry about any
applicat
) 763-5664
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
www.allspec.com
---
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Haskett
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 12:17 PM
> To: u2-users@lis
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen Batchelor
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 11:56 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: RE: [U2] New UV system
>
> Cost-wise, consider a dual-core AMD X2
lways
something, isn't it? :-)
Bill
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glen Batchelor
>Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 8:56 AM
>To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
>Subject: RE: [U2] New UV system
>
> Cost-wise, cons
46
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] New UV system
Hi,
You can run a 5 users of uv on a lite box (I do it on a notebook)
Use W2003 server (W2003 is more demanding in ressource like UV, it can
run
on XP too ).
To switch from sco to windows, you must use *uvbackup* tool into sco to
prepare a
www.allspec.com
---
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-u2-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MAJ Programming
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9:17 AM
> To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
> Subject: [U2] New UV system
>
> All:
>
Mark,
I'm moving a client to a new server right now. The specs we are
using are Dual Core Xeon 5140, 4 GB memory, with Windows 2003. It sounds
like you could get away with a much smaller system. I shy away from
using desktops as servers, so I'd recommend you go with a rack-mountable
if yo
files.
- Original Message -
From: "MAJ Programming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 8:17 AM
Subject: [U2] New UV system
All:
I have a client running UV on SCO on a 486/Pentium-1 looking box. They
would
like to move everything to a contemporary box.
Message -
From: "MAJ Programming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 3:17 PM
Subject: [U2] New UV system
All:
I have a client running UV on SCO on a 486/Pentium-1 looking box. They
would
like to move everything to a contemporary box.
While I don
Mark,
We just went through a conversion from a UV box and can help you if you
haven't already been overwhelmed by responses.
Contact me at 919 567-0042 or at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Will
American Computer Technics, Inc.
MAJ Programming wrote:
All:
I have a client running UV on SCO on a 486/Pen
All:
I have a client running UV on SCO on a 486/Pentium-1 looking box. They would
like to move everything to a contemporary box.
While I don't create systems, I would like some suggestions on which kind of
W2000-class server to hold a 5 user version of UV. I don't want to switch
databases to UD o
25 matches
Mail list logo
