Marshall Schor wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
On 5/13/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Before:
---
MyAnnotation x = new MyAnnotation(someView_1);
aView_1.addFsToIndexes(x);
aView_2.addFsToIndexes(x);
// remove
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Eddie Epstein wrote:
On 5/14/07, Adam Lally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I prefer that we deprecate addToIndexes() and removeFromIndexes() but
take reasonable steps to make the methods behave is closely to the
current behavior as possible. If Marshall is willing to imp
Current design has 1 instance of FsClassRegistry per Cas per View.
With the redesign going on for JCas we no longer need one per View.
We don't even need one per Cas. CASes in a pool, sharing the same type
system, can share generators.
Anyone object if I change the impl to move the FSClassRe
When Cas Views are made, another instance of CASImpl type is created,
and a great many of its fields are copied from the
base view.
How about an alternate design, which moves all of the fields being
copied into a new object that is shared by all CASImpls belonging to one
view? This would "doc
Eddie Epstein wrote:
On 5/15/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When Cas Views are made, another instance of CASImpl type is created,
and a great many of its fields are copied from the
base view.
How about an alternate design, which moves all of the fields being
copied into
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Current design has 1 instance of FsClassRegistry per Cas per View.
With the redesign going on for JCas we no longer need one per View.
We don't even need one per Cas. CASes in a pool, sharing the same
type system, can share generators.
A
initCASIndexes in CASImpl starts off with:
public void initCASIndexes() throws CASException {
if (null == this.ts.getType(CAS.TYPE_NAME_SOFA)) {
throw new CASException(CASException.MUST_COMMIT_TYPE_SYSTEM,
null);
}
... more
The MUST_COMMIT_TYPE_SYSTEM message
CASImpl has a method initCASIndexes.
This method is called by lots of test cases, and by the main routine of
doCreateCAS - it is supposed to set up the "built-in" indexes for the CAS.
It sets up 2 of these:
1) the "AnnotationIndex"
2) the "SofaIndex": an index over SofaFSs.
It seems to me
The class FSInfo in uimaj-core: org.apache.uima.cas.impl.FSInfo appears
to be completely unused, there
are no references to it that I can find.
Ok to remove it?
-Marshall
I'm just fininshing up a re-org of the CASImpl - the tests now all run,
but I'm doing some final checking before checking things back in...
If possible, please wait until I'm done before proceeding.
I've also gone thru and changed the "protected" methods to
package-private in CASImpl - they we
The resetNoQuestions iterates over all the views, calling resetView:
/*
* iterated reset - once per view of a CAS except for the base CAS
*/
private void resetView() {
this.indexRepository.flush();
if (this.mySofaRef > 0 && this.getSofa().getSofaRef() == 1) {
// i
t; in the uimaj directory - it fails
validation, with no error message (it says "unknown error").
Will look at this more...
-Marshall
Marshall Schor (JIRA) wrote:
Reorganization of TypeSystemImpl, CASImpl, FSClassRegistry, addi
Just received this:
Original Message
Subject:Your ApacheCon US 2007 session proposal(s)
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 11:27:57 -0700
From: Ken Coar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMA
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Hi all,
how are we doing for our next release? I have a couple of minor
things I want to
commit, but nothing major. I'd like to propose the following schedule:
6/1: feature freeze, start testing, make sure documentation is up to date
6/8: if no major bugs found, build rel
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Hi all,
how are we doing for our next release?
It would be good if someone went through Jira and categorized the open
issues. A quick look shows 88 unresolved issues. I know we don't have
to do all of these for 2.2, but let's consider which one(s) to do. The
ones causi
In putting in the hooks for changing the class path when calling user
code, for the Flow object methods like "next", I need to have the
framework access the CAS that the flow object is associated with.
The Flow object implementations (there are 2 impl bases - one for cas
and one for jcas) have
The interface FlowController has an abstract subclass:
FlowController_ImplBase, which has 2 other abstract subclasses: a Cas
and a JCas impl base. But it also ahas a non-abstract subclass
"FlowControllerImpl" which seems unreferenced by the rest of the code.
Can this class be deleted?
-Mar
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Everybody,
I'm in the process of updating the CVD docs, and struggling with
the images again. Since I've found no way to make things work for
both pdf and html, I've decided to go with html. I'm leaving the
images unscaled, which looks good in the browser. In pdf, they
co
al |contentwidth| attribute
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Everybody,
I'm in the process of updating the CVD docs, and struggling with the
images again. Since I've found no way to make things work for
both pdf and html, I've decided to go wit
Adam Lally wrote:
On 6/1/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The interface FlowController has an abstract subclass:
FlowController_ImplBase, which has 2 other abstract subclasses: a Cas
and a JCas impl base. But it also ahas a non-abstract subclass
"FlowControllerImpl&q
A-351:
-
Assignee: Marshall Schor (was: Michael Baessler)
Hi Marshall,
I have created an additional testcase for the PEAR runtime and unfortunately it fails...
For me it seems that there is something wrong with the type system.
Caused by: org.apache.uima.cas.CASRuntimeException:
The
ttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Baessler reassigned UIMA-351:
-----
Assignee: Marshall Schor (was: Michael Baessler)
Hi Marshall,
I have created an additional testcase for the PEAR runtime and unf
+1 to dropping Eclipse 3.0 support, based on time, and the fact that
it's quite easy to upgrade to new versions of Eclipse. I hope I'm not
wrong... but the users will speak I guess.
-Marshall
Adam Lally (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-400?page=com.atlassian.jir
://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Baessler reassigned UIMA-351:
-
Assignee: Marshall Schor (was: Michael Baessler)
Hi Marshall,
I have created an additional testcase for the PEAR
: UIMA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Core Java Framework
Reporter: Adam Lally
Assignee: Marshall Schor
Fix For: 2.2
Annotators are prohibited from calling CAS.reset() but not CAS.release().
Since release() in turn calls reset(), previously
Reminder - please update the main documentation (perhaps in the tutorial
book) to make users aware of this capability, if not already done.
-Marshall
Adam Lally (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpane
Michael Baessler (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-357?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501483 ]
Michael Baessler commented on UIMA-357:
---
Marshall,
can we easily setup a docbook b
this link:
http://www-304.ibm.com/jct09002c/university/scholars/ur/awards/eclipse/uima_awards.html
-Marshall Schor
Adam Lally (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12501723 ]
Adam Lally commented on UIMA-402:
-
Marshall wrote (on uima-dev):
Basic thought: if the use
Adam Lally (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally reassigned UIMA-402:
---
Assignee: Marshall Schor (was: Adam Lally)
Marshall, I added the uima-core
ok. -Marshall
Adam Lally wrote:
On 6/14/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adam Lally (JIRA) wrote:
> [
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-402?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
>
> Adam Lally reas
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall,
thanks for setting this up. Would you mind if we turn
this into a general sandbox documentation project? Now
that you have done the initial work of creating a docbook
build, we might want to add documentation about other
sandbox projects, not just the CAS Editor.
The test plan says these doc updates are done. What was updated? I
took a look and didn't find it - but maybe I missed it...
-Marshall
e/UIMA-459
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Documentation
Affects Versions: 2.2
Reporter: Thilo Goetz
Assignee: Marshall Schor
Fix For: 2.2
When built separately, the references html file is generated correctly.
+1
Backwards compatibility is something we take seriously, and when a
change is needed,
we should provide transition time for our existing users.
Results specifications seem to be good concept - and this approach
gives us time to thoughtfully evolve it.
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
As email
Thanks. Found 2 instances of this wrong usage, and fixed them. -Marshall
Benjamin Sznajder wrote:
Hi
In section 3.6.5.1 you write and picking "UIMA Start Vinci Service", I
suppose, it must be "UIMA Start VNS"
benjamin
Thanks. Fixed. -Marshall
Benjamin Sznajder wrote:
Hi
When we stop the VNS, we get
[6/24/07 1:13 PM | main] Exitting.
...
Cheers!
Benjamin
I suggest::
258 - remove "fixed in 2.2"; wait until someone feels this is
important enough
328 - remove "fixed in 2.2"; wait until someone feels this is
important enough
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Hi all,
according to our test plan (http://cwiki.apache.org/UIMA/testplan22.html),
we hav
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Has any progress been made on UIMA-464 (a classcast exeption using an
FSIterator returned by the AnnotationIndex.subiterator(AnnotationFS)?
If this is a bug, I'd like to see it fixed for 2.2...
-Marshall
Hi Jörn - thanks for this.
Is the a UIMA version, an Eclipse version, or a Maven version
number?
What does the .ignore mean?
Can you post a link to something that describes how you figured out what
to put here?
Thanks again!
-Marshall (trying to keep learning new things)
Jörn Kottmann (JIRA)
While working on the fix for this, I ran across another possible
incomplete impl of arrays, in the functions that
check for "arrays". Many of these test if the type is one of the
built-in array types. The rangeTypeName for arrays of specific objects
is created as the specific object followed b
uimaj-tools has in src/main/resources in
org/apache/uima/tools/util/gui/ a file "about.txt, with the content:
Apache UIMA (Unstructured Information Management Architecture) SDK
Version ${version}-incubating
http://incubator.apache.org/uima
Copyright 2006, 2007 The Apache Software Foundation
D etc.) in org.apache.uima.tools.util.gui.AboutDialog. Please do not
remove ;-)
--Thilo
Marshall Schor wrote:
uimaj-tools has in src/main/resources in
org/apache/uima/tools/util/gui/ a file "about.txt, with the content:
Apache UIMA (Unstructured Information Management Architecture) SDK
Version ${version}-
Please review and fix / augment as needed :-) Wiki is:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/July2007
-Marshall
I poked around in the code for TypeSystemImpl a bit and concluded:
1) Re: The Array of arbitrary FSs mechanism, which is implemented to
allow adding additional arrays of specific FS types after the type
system has been committed. The call which actually adds a type is
ts.getArrayType(componen
There was a (in)famous incident where the implementation for rerunning
the Semantic Index Builder did the same thing - it (formerly) erased all
the files in the target directory.
What happened was a senior level manager (Dave Ferrucci) was just trying
out this code, he was busy and didn't read
ceIt.get());
currentLen = 0;
for (tokenIt.moveToFirst(); tokenIt.isValid(); tokenIt.moveToNext()) {
++currentLen;
}
maxLen = ((maxLen < currentLen) ? currentLen : maxLen);
}
System.out.println("Longest sentence contains " + maxLen + " tokens.
tty sure I've documented this before. I don't know
where that text went. Maybe I dreamed it.
--Thilo
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo - is this "fixable" - so it just works as users expect?
-Marshall
Original Message
Subject: Re: Iterators: problem
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Is it just me, or is the following from section 1.1 of the Tutorial and Guide
out of context:
Note
In Eclipse 3.1, if you highlight a UIMA class or method defined in the UIMA SDK
JavaDocs, you can
conveniently have Eclipse open the corresponding JavaDoc for that class or
m
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
On 7/12/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's unclear about this method?
You can get a Type object that represents a typed-array, but there is
no way to create an instance of such an array. What good is it then
to get the Type o
I'm going to try and make a test case to see if I can duplicate Greg's
slowdowns. If anyone has beaten me to it, please let me know right away ;-)
-Marshall
add to
the vm args something like -Xmx384m)). If it works for you, please see
if you can isolate what's different in your failing case verses this
artificial test.
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
I'm going to try and make a test case to see if I can duplicate Greg's
slowdowns.
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Hello,
is it possible to use LGPL icons in the Cas Editor ?
I don't think so. This is because downloaders of things from Apache
expect to be free of "obligations" when they
do things with what they downloaded.
See http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html. This lists
Those arguments sound convincing to me. I guess I would only prefer the
docs were less mysterious,
and in addition to saying "not to mix the two styles", they would
state the reasons, as you have here :-)
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
It seems to m
Michael Baessler wrote:
As far as I know is System.nanoTime() a Java 5 feature and is not
available in Java 1.4.
So do we still want to be Java 1.4 compatible?
I think we want the framework to be 1.4 compatible. It's probably less
a requirement for the
test cases :-), but I take your point -
In addition to http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-500 which
reduces lock contention,
there are some other changes needed.
TypeSystemImpl is not thread safe, but is used by many threads.
Because it has the property that it is "updated" by one thread, and then
is read-only by all threads,
Michael Baessler wrote:
What do you mean by
"we can add a remoteAE if and only if, the AE is already deployed
on the remote machine"
do you use the ComponentDescriptorEditor (CDE) plugin to do that?
In this case, the CDE has to retrieve the meta data of the deployed AE
to get for example
+1 I don't know of any use of the 2nd way, but I may be just
un-informed ;-) Lev Kozakov may know something about this.
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
When looking at the InstallationController code I see some old method,
where I think they are never used.
The InstallationController
Good points - I'll keep both versions from now on. I was trying to
clean up Jira
a bit to see if we had any remaining issues that needed attention in
this release.
There are some which I didn't know anything about - so I left as affects
2.1 (only).
These are mostly things Thilo and Adam migh
Good point. I'm choosing to deferring this until after 2.2 is out to
avoid having to retest...
-Marshall
Adam Lally (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12513246 ]
Adam Lally commented
been fixed :-)
please update Jira.
Then, take a look at the test plan and see if you think we're ready to
vote
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Good points - I'll keep both versions from now on. I was trying to
clean up Jira
a bit to see if we had any remaining issues that need
ill help the eclipse platform to enforce that the plugin is is
run as we tested it.
Jörn
On Jul 17, 2007, at 7:47 PM, Marshall Schor (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-498?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marshall Sc
last post was not clear: I spoke about the Eclipse Plugin
specifically.
Benjamin
Marshall Schor
<[EMAIL P
ion? Something where
we can check what level of Eclipse the user has and issue an error if it's
too low? I think we've discussed this before, we could check for EMF at the
same time. That would be very helpful, both to us and our users.
--Thilo
Marshall Schor (JIRA) wrote:
[
I think these TODOs came over from the original Velocity project.
+1 to delete. These are not TODOs for our use, I think.
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Do we need this file? Some TODOs seem out of date,
for the others we could maybe open Jira issues?
--Thilo
Thilo Goetz wrote:
As you may have noticed, I tagged a first release candidate
earlier today. Subsequently, RAT found a number of issue.
These are the remaining ones. As soon as these are resolved,
I'll build another release candidate.
--Thilo
Thilo Goetz wrote:
RAT complains about these:
Oops -
They're already *not* in SVN.
So they shouldn't be in our source distribution. If they are, we can
fix the assembly build step.
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
[...]
These files all are "genera
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
[...]
These files all are "generated" by Docbook, so can't have a license.
!?
uimaj-2.2.0-incubating/uima-docbooks/src/styles/titlepage/titlepage-html.xsl
!?
uimaj-2.2.0-incubating/ui
Schor wrote:
Oops -
They're already *not* in SVN.
So they shouldn't be in our source distribution. If they are, we can
fix the assembly build step.
-Marshall
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
[...]
These files all are
Michael Baessler wrote:
Hi,
I see Marshall has fixed the RAT issues reported by Thilo and the JIRA
bug tracking system says that we have no open issues to fix for uimaj
2.2.
So it seems that we are ready to build the hopefully latest release
candidate level.
+1
But what do we do with all
I'm no expert - but in the code fragment below - it looks like for
windows, the browser launcher is not a browser, but
rather just one of the command shell windows?
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
Hi,
when testing the annotation viewer some misconfiguration came up.
The annotation viewer
Some history: Debian (a Linux distributor) has a legal issue with
Mozilla (and Firefox), around
trademarks; google this or see http://lwn.net/Articles/118268/
The issues appear to involve firefox as well. Debian's browser is named
Iceweasel.
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
Hi,
when tes
Some useful leads:
http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2006/101106-portland-project.html describes
xdg-utils, and says Fedora, OpenSUSE, and Debian have already committed
to installing the utilities.
One utility enables visiting a Web page in the user's chosen browser.
On Debian, this capability is
Michael Baessler wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
When checking through the Resolved issues assigned to me I noticed
that one of them was the addition of jars containing our source code,
as part of our binary release. I must have missed that when it went
in.
The current uimaj-2.2.0-03 does not contain
] PEAR API
does not delete the PEAR ID subdirectory before the new content is
installed - ASF JIRA
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-307 : [#UIMA-307] Fix CVD
screenshots - ASF JIRA
-- Michael
Marshall Schor wrote:
Michael Baessler wrote:
Hi,
I see Marshall has fixed the RAT issues
Thanks, Michael; nice job :-)
I'm going to update the documentation to describe in the same sections
(where you
took out info about how to attach the source) similar
sections on how to attach the javadocs which are included in the binary
distribution.
-Marshall
Michael Baessler wrote:
Mich
Adam Lally wrote:
On 7/26/07, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So should be add the source jars to the source release?
I don't think that is the normal Apache thing to do. On
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html it defines
source release as "a simple export fr
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
I played around with the CasEditor and tried to add a cas processor,
but unfortunately without success. I was able to add the cas
processor (annotator) to my project and I found the place in the
context menu to run it, but I ever get ClassNotFound exceptions...
what is t
In our release notes, the last section is cut/pasted from the release
note generation done by Jira. We could replace that with a
link to the Jira system to (re)generate on demand the release notes.
The link would be, for instance for 2.2:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?ver
Except for needing to rerun the release note generation, I'm +1 ! for
doing the 2.2 release.
Thilo - if you agree, can you call for an official vote?
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
-1 to this change. What exactly is the concern here?
My main concern is what I originally said: "Don't some companies have
issues with their people downloading source code?"
Does that concern a large corporation that some of us work
for, or
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Eddie Epstein wrote:
On 7/30/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eddie Epstein wrote:
How hard is it to create the source jars from the UIMA source distribution?
Not hard *if* you have our build env. set up (i.e., maven etc).
I'm sort
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
On 7/30/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
-1 to this change. What exactly is the concern here?
My main concern is what I originally said: "Don't some companies have
issues with their people downloading
Running org.apache.uima.cas.test.AnnotationTreeTest
testTree(org.apache.uima.cas.test.AnnotationTreeTest) Time elapsed:
0.16 sec <<< FAILURE!
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
at
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError.(AssertionFailedError.java:11)
at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.
Adam Lally wrote:
Actually I was thinking of something perhaps even easier for the user.
What I meant was that the script would automatically add the source
files directly into the jar files in the UIMA binary distribution. So
no action would be necessary at all in Eclipse.
(To locate the bina
Adam Lally wrote:
On 7/31/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also - the resources need to be included in the jars (they have the
message bundles, etc.).
The resource are already in the jars, so we don't need to add them in
this step. Just the source files need
to jdk.
-Marshall
--Thilo
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
Running org.apache.uima.cas.test.AnnotationTreeTest
testTree(org.apache.uima.cas.test.AnnotationTreeTest) Time elapsed:
0.16 sec <<< FAILURE!
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
at
junit.f
Adam Lally wrote:
On 8/1/07, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see that issue 499 is still in reopen state. I checked in my changes
using this issue. So I think we can close them or is there anything else
we need to do?
OK with me to close it.
We should update the docume
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Michael Baessler wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
We should update the documentation (3 places?) which describes how to
attach javadocs, to now also mention
running those scripts to attach the source.
Do you know where exactly the places are that we need to
Adam Lally wrote:
On 8/3/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we're finally ready ;-) I cut RC3 this morning,
found a minor issue with RAT and did RC4. Next time I'll
run RAT before tagging the release...
The release artifacts are available on people.a.o at
/home/twgoetz/uima
Adam Lally wrote:
On 8/6/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
I built a new release candidate with Adam's and Marshall's fixes
in. It's available as usual at on people.a.o at
/home/twgoetz/uima-distributions/2.2/RC5. Let's try a new vote
later today or tomorro
Marshall Schor wrote:
Adam Lally wrote:
On 8/6/07, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
I built a new release candidate with Adam's and Marshall's fixes
in. It's available as usual at on people.a.o at
/home/twgoetz/uima-distributions/2.2/RC5.
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
I built a new release candidate with Adam's and Marshall's fixes
in. It's available as usual at on people.a.o at
/home/twgoetz/uima-distributions/2.2/RC5. Let's try a new vote
later today or tomorrow.
+1 to doing a new vote :-) -Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Ok, here we go. This build passes our regression test
suite, as well as Adam's test scripts. Michael and I
also ran some manual sanity checks. RAT report looks
good, too.
The release artifacts are available on people.a.o at
/home/twgoetz/uima-distributions/2.2/RC5
So pleas
Adam Lally wrote:
As I recall we had a couple of user requests for us to publish our
jars as Maven artifacts in the Apache incubator repository. And I
think I got our Maven metadata into shape during the 2.1.0 release
process after some comments from Dan Kulp on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
So s
Thilo Goetz wrote:
Hi all,
I'm wondering if it's time to move to Java 1.5 after this
release. While there are still people out there who use
Java 1.4, their numbers are shrinking rapidly. I'm guessing
that by the time we do our next release, the need for
Java 1.4 compatibility will have gone.
Adam Lally wrote:
On 8/7/07, Adam Lally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maven automatically generates "sources" jar files (check your local
Maven repository). Unfortunately these don't have the DISCLAIMER,
LICENSE, NOTICES. I will see if I can figure out how to get those to
be added.
I'v
In the uimaj project's pom, the element points to itself. Why
is this done, and
where is the documentation in Maven which describes what this means?
Also, there are two elements defining the javadoc plugin - is this
intentional, or should/can
these be merged?
If we are heading toward puttin
Adam Lally wrote:
On 8/8/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the uimaj project's pom, the element points to itself.
I don't see any element in the uimaj project's pom.
right - my oops - I was looking at the uimaj-distr pom, not the uimaj pom.
Thilo Goetz wrote:
For uimaj-2.2.0 I created a directory, and collected all the
various release candidate tags under it. For 2.1.0, we
didn't do that, and it's a bit disorganized. Anybody mind
if I retroactively create a uimaj-2.1.0 dir and move all
2.1 tags under it? It's not going to affect
401 - 500 of 1794 matches
Mail list logo
