Triode,
I'll give this a go in QEMU A.S.A.P as I don't have any ARM based
devices. However, I'm not sure what the current Arch arm systemd
version is, and the last time a tried to build an emulation using the
ARCH rfs and load/update additional ARCH packages in dynamic QEMU it
ground to a halt
Just curious - why Arch? Is there something that makes it preferable to
other distros for this use case?
Mark Miksis's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=529
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevice
Over the last couple of days I've been working a port of
squeezelite/jivelite and a web control application to install on arch
linux. This is intended to allow relatively easy installation of the
application software on top of a the arch linux distribution which is
well supported across multiple
castalla wrote:
> You need to go to one of those 6:00 AM Morning Glory Raves which are all
> the thing for the workers in the City. That'll gee you up for the
> interview!
I could tell a couple of stories relating to all night raves when I used
to work in the city. I'll skip past the stuff that
JJZolx wrote:
> See how fast they escort you from the building when you begin referring
> to yourself in the third person. "Clive's wife wants him home by 5:30."
> :eek:
Yep, that's just another example. I do that all the time.
--
See how fast they escort you from the building when you begin referring
to yourself in the third person. "Clive's wife wants him home by 5:30."
:eek:
JJZolx's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10
View
JackOfAll wrote:
> LOL. I dont think I'll need to attend an interview to realise that'll be
> way too "corporate" an environment for me.
>
> I'll be getting the scowling looks after referring to a member of the
> opposite sex as "love" first hour. By hour two, I'll be expedited into
> the poli
bakker_be wrote:
> Good for you! I think you should definitely go to the interview!
LOL. I dont think I'll need to attend an interview to realise that'll be
way too "corporate" for me.
I'll be getting the scowling looks after referring to a member of the
opposite sex as "love" in after the fir
Good for you! I think you should definitely go to the interview!
Main System: Touch; Marantz SR-5004; TMA Premium 905; TMA Premium 901;
BK Monolith+ FF; HDI Dune Smart D1; Pioneer PDP-LX5090H
iPad 32GB Wifi + Squeezepad (local playback activated)
Acer Iconia Tab A700 + Squeezeplayer
Wandboard D
JackOfAll wrote:
> Ta, very much! It seems that presiding over a train crash, is just the
> trigger to get you head-hunted by Google. LOL. It's a funny old world!
>
> Where would you place Google on a list of "despicable capitalists"?
> Shall I go to the interview?
If you can't beat 'em ..
soundcheck wrote:
> Any news ? Progress? Would love to get an image for testing!?!?
Not currently available. Trying to get the image released via a third
party. Will let you know if/when that happens.
JackOfAll's Profile:
castalla wrote:
> All I can say is 'good luck'.
Ta, very much! It seems that presiding over a train crash, is just the
trigger to get you head-hunted by Google. LOL. It's a funny old world!
Where would you place Google on a list of "despicable capitalists"?
Shall I go to the interview?
-
Castalla,
Perhaps Clive is too polite to say it, but it's time to shut up. And for
the record, I don't think capitalism is despicable. That was an overly
emotional response to the project's problems.
Krisbee's Profile: htt
JackOfAll wrote:
> Forgiving? What's that got to do with the price of bread?
>
> Maybe I'm in the middle of a discussion with a commercial company about
> doing something which I think will help me and a community project in
> the short term, and whatever thoughts I have towards commercial
> ope
castalla wrote:
> I'm evidently not as forgiving of commercial operators in the modern
> world as you are!
Forgiving? What's that got to do with the price of bread?
Maybe I'm in the middle of a discussion with a commercial company about
doing something which I think will help me and a community
JackOfAll wrote:
> Brian,
>
> This is going to sound like me having a pop at you again. But I'm
> not.
>
> There is no need to name and shame, someone who hasn't done anything
> wrong. I'm not going to name anyone "so they can be avoided like the
> plague". You want to avoid someone like t
JackOfAll wrote:
> We don't need to be bad mouthing people who have not done anything
> wrong, and especially commercial entities that can afford lawyers. I
> don't know whether you guys realise this, but I am in a hole. I was in a
> hole, and it has been dug deeper with the unplugging of the rep
JackOfAll wrote:
> And *you* are entitled to see it any way *you* want to. That is *your*
> right!
>
> My opinion, if anyone needs to be complaining about anyone else
> profiting out of *my* work, I think that is *my* right. And while I
> might be complaining about many other things, including
Krisbee wrote:
> All very true, but if someone made a request for all the GPL code they
> were using, how would they respond? And if you had been alerted to this
> perhaps you could have moved to protect the project image in some way.
> Obviously they wouldn't want you to do that. So they take y
castalla wrote:
> I for one would like some hint who these operators are, so I can avoid
> them like the plague! I know you are unlikely to name them, but
> something like Klongin Player Inc. instead of Klingon Player Inc. would
> suffice.
Brian,
This is going to sound like me having a pop at
Krisbee wrote:
> I deal with questions from my wife about her latop on a daily basis ...
> I can't finnsh that sentence without risking death if she ever read it.
> :p
Got a wife like that too, and she has an iPhone and an iPad as well
:rolleyes: On top of that she has to make her own pictures
bakker_be wrote:
> I deal with end-users on a daily basis in my IT Support job. You'd be
> amazed how little is feasible in that regard :p
I deal with questions from my wife about her latop on a daily basis ...
I can't finnsh that sentence without risking death if she ever read it.
:p
---
JackOfAll wrote:
> I think by the time of the F21 release it will be possible. Right now,
> there are a whole heap of issues, and while most can be dealt with
>
> I'm playing devils advocate Stock F20 ARM image... To do anything
> useful with that, even get past the initial setup screen
Krisbee wrote:
> All very true, but if someone made a request for all the GPL code they
> were using, how would they respond? And if you had been alerted to this
> perhaps you could have moved to protect the project image in some way.
> Obviously they wouldn't want you to do that. So they take y
JackOfAll wrote:
> *Not dispicable, no, not at all!* As far as code is concerned, anyone
> releasing anything under a typical "free" or GPL license knows at the
> point they are doing it, that it is possible and entirely reasonable for
> commercial entities to profit from their work. Everything I
Krisbee wrote:
>
> This is exaclty the concept I thought might be feasible - for geek or
> non-geek alike. Surely people could follow instructions? As it is,
> anyone looking for an alternative for their shiny
> newCubietruck/Wandboard now will have to get to grips with some
> technical stuff.
JackOfAll wrote:
> I don't know whether others will see this as good news, or bad.
>
To me personally, this is very good news !!
Looking forward... :-)
'M-DAC' (http://www.audiolab.co.uk/M-DAC%20Series.aspx?lang=En) ->
'Cambridge Audio Azur 840E'
(http://www.cambridgeaudio.com/products/a
Krisbee wrote:
> Believe me, was trying to read between the lines of your previous posts
> and much of what you just said was in my mind. You mentioned before that
> one, or more, "commercial entities" had freely borrowed your work -
> which is pretty despicable. What a mess!
*Not dispicable, no
Krisbee wrote:
> This is exaclty the concept I thought might be feasible - for geek or
> non-geek alike. Surely people could follow instructions? As it is,
> anyone looking for an alternative for their shiny
> newCubietruck/Wandboard now will have to get to grips with some
> technical stuff.
I d
JackOfAll wrote:
> There are reasons why upstreams like Fedora and Ubuntu place as much
> stock in trademark as license protection. If you change one line of
> code, you cannot call it Fedora, that is protected by trademark, it is a
> respin, remix or some such, and "unofficial", so downstreams w
Krisbee wrote:
>
> This is perfeclty understandable, but without full knowledge my
> suggestion might seem naive. Would it not have been possible to create
> and distribute a Fedora based image with the patched kernel and root
> file system, but devoid of the jivelite/squeezelite/webUI/LMS cont
Krisbee wrote:
> I was hoping Clive would have time to answer my question, #2492 appears
> to offer a possible immunity blueprint for any future efforts, but
> leaves things unanswered. Perhaps it's not posslbe to illucidate
> further in plublic.
The problem is that legal responsibility doesn't
mherger wrote:
> > Now what's next: what can I do to figure out what is causing jpeg
> files
> to fail in Raspbian?
JiveLite on Raspbian is failing to resize the artwork. If I disable the
upscaling in SlimServer.lua -> _loadArtworkImage(), then I do get the
image, though only small if the full
Pepe,
If you're thinking of taking the debian route, the Robert Nelson
netinstall might be of interest:
https://github.com/RobertCNelson/netinstall, but it's a technical
install.
In any case "squeezelite" does exist as a package in debian armhf
testing and unstable repos, but it's not built with
Thank you Chris, very kind of you.
Best
Pepe
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
snoozer's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=39230
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=
I see Debian Wheezy is available for the Wandboard. I have used this for
the Beaglebone Black and simply installed Squeezelite for use as a
player. May not be optimised for the purpose and just a player but it
certainly works.
-
Krisbee wrote:
>
>
> So Pepe, it's extremely sad, and your timing is unfortunate, but like
> other folk in your position, you will need to get to grips with some
> Linux in order to make use of your Wandboard as an audio player. You'll
> need to think about what alternatives distros are out
It took less than a second to receive the picture of 55731 bytes size.
Yet it wasn't shown. What debug option would I need to get more
information where it might fail?
Ok, this probably isn't a jivelite issue after all: it's failing on jpeg
files and on my Pi only. PNG are shown ok on the Pi as
JackOfAll wrote:
> Pepe,
>
> I'm not being rude. I know what you need. And I'm trying to encourage
> someone else to get you what you need, and cover their backside at the
> same time.
> Have a little patience, please. (And really, I'm sorry if you think I'm
> being rude. I'm really not!)
Than
JackOfAll wrote:
>
>
> > Krisbee wrote:
> > But I have a direct question. The -*the protection of a limited
> > liability company*- was mentioned. Would the creation of such an entity
> > have avoided legal problems? Would you then have been able to create &
> > distribute images for various A
Any news ? Progress? Would love to get an image for testing!?!?
Cheers
::: ' Touch Toolbox and more' (http://soundcheck-audio.blogspot.com) :::
by soundcheck
soundcheck's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?
Triode wrote:
> There's a 70 second timeout (grep for SOCKET_BODY_TIMEOUT) on http
> connections - I hope you are not seeing this?
That's not the problem. Here's the log output from a picture which did
not show:
Code:
20140528 08:34:3
This is what I get from "tail -f /var/log/squeezeboxserver/server.log"
2014-05-28 00:50:24 squeezeboxserver_safe started.
[14-05-28 00:50:26.8837] main::init (368) Starting Logitech Media Server
(v7.8.1, 1401187905, Wed May 28 03:03:01 UTC 2014) perl 5.014002
[14-05-28 00:50:27.1599] Slim::Utils:
43 matches
Mail list logo
