Check your JIRA issue - Jacopo has answered and this is not how official Apache
releases are done. You will need to change your documentation - at least until
the project distributes a different type of zip for this release than the
official Apache release.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Jun 25, 2010,
They might, but I would start working towards upgrading to the new release
candidate sometime soon.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On May 14, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Patrick wrote:
WIll tomahawk work with ofbiz 9.04 (i
Feel free to leave Ruth's references in the book sections and not on every
email where someone's asking a question. Ruth, you already have your URL in
your signature - I think what might drive people to your site is to help them
instead of just taking them off of the mailing list to go check
It's not - we just have to get the information out and make it a priority. I
suspect that anyone using this stuff in production is having the same problem.
IMO, what we need to have happen is for the ASF to give more of us access so
that we can get more of the information out there to more
I like the idea of having a place for people to be able to download third party
software like many other projects have - but I'm still not sure how it would
work here. People have always been worried about compatibility between the
components and making it more difficult for people to actually
The compatibility is much less of a concern between the providers add-on and
the project - the problem will come early and often between two components -
that was what I was alluding to.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Apr 2, 2010, at 4:22 PM, ScottA wrote:
Tim,
I would think that it would have to
Thanks Len.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 31, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Len Shein wrote:
Purity products - www.purityProducts.com
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ruppert [mailto:tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:23 PM
To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Calling
://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/archive/snapshots/
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
Thanks Steve!
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 30, 2010, at 4:29 PM, Steve wrote:
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Tim Ruppert
tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.comwrote:
All, as we're doing changes to the home page of OFBiz, I'd like to solicit
people to provide links to:
1. Websites you've created
, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Is there really no one else out there who's using OFBiz and would like to
help push this section of the site forward? Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 19, 2010, at 9:40 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Tim:
Please add to your list:
OFBiz Learning Resource Center: myOFBiz.com http
much!
Ruth
Tim Ruppert wrote:
All, as we're doing changes to the home page of OFBiz, I'd like to solicit
people to provide links to:
1. Websites you've created that are running on Apache OFBiz
2. Products you've built that are based on Apache OFBiz
3. Other Media that are talking about
with or
how I should classify the JIRA. I took a quick look and I can't find any
examples of how to do this. Could you point me in the right direction?
TIA
Ruth
Tim Ruppert wrote:
I do think this is news Ruth. Please make a JIRA issue with a patch and
I'll submit it. Please don't use the main
://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/OFBiz+Source+Repository+and+Access
I think it would be good if we put this section below OFBiz Website
Repository and Access (for committers) heading.
--
Ashish
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Tim Ruppert
tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
Here's one
Seems interesting Hans - wished it had been in OFBiz, but much like the
OpenTaps stuff that is not licensed under apache and none of us can technically
work on - please have your discussions off list about your new components that
you are building outside of OFBiz.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 22,
, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Seems interesting Hans - wished it had been in OFBiz, but much like the
OpenTaps stuff that is not licensed under apache and none of us can
technically work on - please have your discussions off list about your new
components that you are building outside of OFBiz
I think that would be the case BJ - but keep doing it!
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 22, 2010, at 10:29 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
I really would like to contribute to ofbiz.
my problem over the years has been the trunk moves to fast to do valid
testing. by that I mean that once code is touched it must
I think those are reasonable numbers - but I might up the memory on the trunk
server to a full gig whenever you get a chance.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 21, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Ashish,
The same than before the move. We have 2560MB for both instances. I only
changed
,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Mar 21, 2010, at 7:47 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Anil:
Don't know about Mike's blog.
I didn't post it. It is not my blog. Puneesh Lamba approached me to do this.
It is his site and his blog
,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
In commit r924312, we have followed David's precedent and removed all HotWax
Media links on the home page of OFBiz - mean to help ensure that the project is
focused on the community and not the providers. Here is a link to a new JIRA
task that I am looking to commit along these lines - later
+1 - another thing to add to this list would be the ability to roll back an
upgrade or data load so that if issues are found that we can get back, in the
system, directly to where we started. Normally we do this with a staging
upgrade first and a db backup second, but having something like
to make this happen - and it will only get there if
all of the corporate entities out there begin to or continue to support the
community by donating a ton of time into documentation, mailing list responses,
enhanced applications. Thanks again Nick - this is great stuff.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim
I'll post this to the OFBiz website straight away.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Mar 1, 2010, at 12:51 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
http://today.java.net/pub/a/today/2004/06/01/ofbiz.html
Maybe bring it into wicki and update
Then I'll stop from posting it up there :) - thanks David - read thru it, but
didn't look at the date ...
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Mar 1, 2010, at 1:05 PM, David E Jones wrote:
I agree it's a great article and a nice bit of history, but it is over 5
years old.
-David
On Mar 1, 2010, at
. But if
I
could not find the information and videos I couldn't do it. Boring holidays
;-)
Cheers,
Michael
Tim Ruppert tim.ruppert at hotwaxmedia.com writes:
There is no reason to start hosting files outside of the ASF infra - that's
why we made the move right? If
someone will get
this weekend though... Also BJ made a proposition (not the
svn one I mean)...
Jacques
From: Tim Ruppert tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com
I won't contribute to going back to what we were providing and was asked
to move onto ASF infra. I'm happy to post them up to the ASF server
somewhere
I'm posting the PDFs now. When there's a place to move all of the bigfiles
things - I will be happy to post those as well.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 24, 2010, at 3:56 PM, goranjan wrote:
BJ,
I think Tim is asking for the actual files (PDFs and videos) to be put on
the infrastructure.
Btw, just to chime in - it's a helluva lot easier to train someone to follow
best practices and write higher quality code in mini lang than it is to do the
same in Java. I'm a Java programmer first and foremost, but I love the fact
that OFBiz provides minilang as an option - it increases
Thanks BJ - having the real information is always helpful
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 23, 2010, at 2:47 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
If one follows the dev and commits, you will see that patches that fixed
bugs in trunk were, when plausible, back ported to 9.04
Also bugs fixes were put in 9.04 all you
I was asking for was
a clear and unambiguous statement from the project concerning what is meant
by stable release so that non-committers can choose for themselves which
release and/or trunk version they wish to get started with.
Regards,
Ruth
Tim Ruppert wrote:
Many, many committers
There is no reason to start hosting files outside of the ASF infra - that's why
we made the move right? If someone will get me a list of files they want
posted somewhere, I'm sure we can make it happen
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 20, 2010, at 12:02 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
David:
are you
, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Tim,
Yes indeed, that sounds like the most reasonnable thing to do. If in the
same time we could redirect https://demo.ofbiz.org to back end it would be
great, both to trunk I guess (for the moment it's not an option anyway)
Thanks
Jacques
From: Tim Ruppert
Where should the redirect go for http://demo.ofbiz.org? The redirect that's in
place does demo.ofbiz.org/* - ofbiz-vm.apache.org/$1 - but that obviously
means that it would simply go to ofbiz-vm.apache.org - which has no app. What
would likely be the best thing to do would be to change
I think we can simply go back to the same reasons that the files aren't
perfectly provided by the ASF yet ... there were problems in the migration of
services that have not been rectified yet. It was certainly there just fine on
the old server just fine.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 8, 2010, at
or if this was a one time glitch? That was my motivation for
asking the question.
Not trying to point fingers. Honest.
Regards,
Ruth
Tim Ruppert wrote:
I think we can simply go back to the same reasons that the files aren't
perfectly provided by the ASF yet ... there were problems
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Feb 7, 2010, at 2:31 PM, David E Jones wrote:
If people are interested in making diagrams there is some stuff build into
OFBiz to export eomodeld files. That particular file format can be imported
by a few
with that (in the
ofbiz/site directory would probably be best).
-David
On Feb 8, 2010, at 11:03 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
HotWax would love to donate these and the time that went into them from
David Jones, John Maw and Laurian Escalanti. It's a great set of
information for people
as of this AM. Are those coming over too?
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:03 -0700, Tim Ruppert wrote:
HotWax would love to donate these and the time that went into them from
David Jones, John Maw and Laurian Escalanti. It's a great set of
information for people learning or using OFBiz - for those
Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Feb 8, 2010, at 5:16 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Cool, sounds great.
-David
On Feb 8, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Yeah - I think putting them into SVN would be best - I'll do that later
today
Anytime my friend - anytime.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Feb 8, 2010, at 7:12 PM, David E Jones wrote:
I just checked it out, and it looks good.
Thanks again Tim.
-David
On Feb 8, 2010, at 6:50 PM, Tim
Ruth, I'm sure there's some good that could come out of your message - so
against my general nature of responding to this type of attitude, I'm going to
try and help you phrase this in a way that will help us help infra to try to
meet what you're looking for. Here's what I see when I go to the
at this point is, no one is minding the store. I just don't get
it: You guys spend hours agonizing over how and where to put spaces in Java
files, yet you can't see the most obvious flaws in how OFBiz does business.
Oh well...
Regards,
Ruth
Tim Ruppert wrote:
Ruth, I'm sure there's
to making software successful than anything clever foxes will
ever have time to consider.
Actually, I take that back. If I'm part of the committer's group, I won't be
able to whine and troll from the comfort of my desktop anymore.
Regards,
Ruth
Tim Ruppert wrote:
Thanks - again
Yes they do ... :)
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Feb 5, 2010, at 5:18 PM, David E Jones wrote:
Plenty of PMC members, committers, and contributors still manage to do just
that...
-David
On Feb 5, 2010, at 1:31 PM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
You're definitely right about that :)
Cheers,
Ruppert
at project
committers. I left that discussion with the impression that was the last
word. Are you saying that you might be open to discussing this again?
Regards,
Ruth
Tim Ruppert wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. I'm going to think on it this weekend and will try
and come up with some ideas
Please let me know what you would like me to do here?
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Jan 31, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
But knowing hat the apache environment isn't ready yet?
On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 15:47 -0800, Tim Ruppert wrote:
I'll be happy to get these redirects in place this evening
helping to
make this stuff happen.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Jan 31, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi BJ,
As Tim explained Contegix will not support us anymore. Please use the
ofbiz-vm.apache.org
This will be fixed sometime tonite - please take a look here to get what you're
looking for:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Feb 1, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Craig Gilbert wrote
in place for a bit - but kong term this will go away since it's
not official.
If my understanding is incorrect on any of these points let me know.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Jan 31, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Hans Bakker
No - but there has been discussion around ServiceMix and ActiveMQ in the past
(and maybe others).
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Jan 30, 2010, at 12:04 PM, natxo cabre wrote:
Hi,
First of all, I am a complete newbie
Wink's a really nice program - good to see it put to such good use.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Jan 26, 2010, at 6:20 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Hans,
Thanks. I'll contact Anders directly.
Regards,
Ruth
Hans
I'm sure we could extract some numbers out of Apache to find out some
information about it - but since this is moving to an ASF server, the right
thing would be for us to be talking about how we'd achieve this going forward
if it's a requirement. There are tons of spikes - but since this is
infrastruct...@apache.org - one of the many other tools at our disposal -
especially for these types of things.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Jan 18, 2010, at 7:46 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Tim:
Who would I send
If it's not desirable to have it there, maybe a permalink icon where you could
get it would be acceptable?
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Jan 8, 2010, at 4:30 AM, Christopher Snow wrote:
It would be useful
Heidi, just make sure that you do indeed send your patch in if you've found an
error and fixed one - otherwise, you'll get to answer the more painful question
the hard way of whether upgrading OFBiz is in your future :) (just so it's
clear - if you wanted to update OFBiz, but your fix didn't
on the itself!
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 22, 2009, at 8:51 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:
We have now committed an updated ofbiz website which runs under the
ofbiz system
This website can be normally updated using our own ofbiz
There is also a Crowd integration which does more than just authentication that
you could check out as well.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 17, 2009, at 8:53 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence
option would be to move the olddocs to ASF infra as well - if
anyone wants to make that happen I can get an export ready. I've sent a
request to priv...@ofbiz.apache.org, but have not heard back - I'll ping again.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o
Yes - for sure - we run well over 10 simultaneously. You just need to update
your configuration files to be specific about ports and domain names and you
should be good to go.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 11, 2009
I'm guessing three instances - and in response - ours are all completely
separate - mostly for staging and testing - although we have shared servers at
Contegix that run many on the same server in production as well.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o
Looks like it's right here - it's in a personal space and those were not
migrated:
http://olddocs.ofbiz.org/pages/viewpageattachments.action?pageId=5969
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 11, 2009, at 3:18 PM, Stephen
Yeah - we just maintain separate patches / patch directories for any mods that
we have specific for a particular server and it works out just the same.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 11, 2009, at 3:35 PM, Christopher
Thanks for all of your help Sam - much appreciated.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 2, 2009, at 2:56 AM, Sam Hamilton wrote:
Hi Jacques
I was helping Tim out getting the wiki redirect sorted with Contegix
- I just
I will yet another redirect that will go from http://docs.ofbiz.org to http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence
- but that should be it. The redirect in question below works
perfectly.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 2
This is complete.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 2, 2009, at 9:27 AM, BJ Freeman wrote:
yup, thanks.
appreciate you effort
:D
Tim Ruppert sent the following on 12/2/2009 8:23 AM:
I will yet another redirect
Someone needs to figure out what happened to that page - it should've
mapped perfectly with the new redirect.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Dec 1, 2009, at 3:00 PM, BJ Freeman wrote:
here is one of my pages from
mappings
already - please just let me know and I'll get them up there ASAP.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 29, 2009, at 11:16 PM, Sam Hamilton wrote:
Hey Guys - just wondering if you guys had thought about 301
to prototype the integration and
to give OFBiz another feature that I'm sure many people are looking for.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 27, 2009, at 5:08 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
Hi Richard,
Thanks for getting
be used so that that decision can be made.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 25, 2009, at 12:38 PM, David E Jones wrote:
On Nov 25, 2009, at 6:18 AM, Abdullah Shaikh wrote:
I think Tim is right in saying it should
Seems like an interesting feature to add to the system for sure -
probably another special purpose app, eh?
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 24, 2009, at 11:01 AM, Carsten Schinzer wrote:
All,
Funny that you ask
This seems like a great improvement Erwan - is this something that
will be making it's way into OFBiz proper or something you guys are
working on just in the derivative? No stress, just wondering as it
seems like it has great potential.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http
Ask them to up it on the server - we've got more memory room I
believe
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 22, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Could it be a lack of space? (we run in only 256MB...)
http
The downtime will actually begin tonite and over the weekend as we do
stepped upgrades. Thanks for your patience
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 17, 2009, at 10:34 AM, Tim Ruppert wrote:
Just wanted to let everyone
Yeah Sam, we've got an in-depth amazon integration we've been working
on with another client for a while now. Amazon is definitely a beast,
so we'll get with you and let you know what pieces will match your
requirements and we can go from there.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
Ok - I'll start the process now and will let you know when its good to
go. I think we should upgrade our JIRA first - then move it to Apache.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 16, 2009, at 11:39 PM, David E Jones
Just wanted to let everyone know that you may experience some downtime
or issues as we're going thru this - please bear with us.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Anytime gents - anytime.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 17, 2009, at 10:49 AM, David E Jones wrote:
Yes, thanks for your work on that Tim... both now and previously.
-David
On Nov 17, 2009, at 10:47 AM, Jacques
Use the tinyURLs then - they never change. Also, as I've been asking
forever - shall we upgrade Confluence to prepare for the move to Apache?
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Nov 15, 2009, at 3:08 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
- Original Message - From: Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
inline
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Nov 15, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
From: Tim Ruppert tim.rupp...@hotwaxmedia.com
Use the tinyURLs then - they never change.
tinyURLs in Jira ? How to ?
tinyURLs in Confluence - that's what was being said was moved ...
Also, as I've been asking
there and sorry that I missed most of you -
looking forward to the next one.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 5, 2009, at 1:54 PM, Brett Palmer wrote:
David, sorry to hear that you're not coming. I arrived yesterday
If there's anyone here in Oakland for ApacheCon US 2009, please stop
by the HotWax Media booth. Last year was so swamped OFBiz people - it
was a bit of a bummer not to see all of those familiar faces at the
committers get together last night.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
I had a Bruno Souza sighting today - looking forward to seeing more of
you here when you arrive. Ruth, David, I'm sure you are coming since
you're speaking - when will you arrive?
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 4
I might miss you, but please come by when you get here.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 4, 2009, at 4:24 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hello Tim:
I arrive tomorrow (Thursday) late afternoon.
Look forward to meeting you
Looking forward to seeing the new integrations!
Cheers,
Ruppert
f:801.649.6595
On Nov 3, 2009, at 11:03 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
OK, it was not clear to me, thanks
If it's done the same way other gateways are implement I can't see
any issue using httpcomponents-client-4.0, and yes it
was testing this in Firefox and Safari on a MAC and am pleased with
the rendering as long as you're viewing it with a viewport of over
about 1190 (basically any 13 Macbook).
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 31, 2009, at 11
all learn to use it and fix it up.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 31, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hi Tim,
Sorry to says that it's not the case with my 1680x1050 on Windows XP
with any browser for
https
right inline stylind and tables don't break) that I can't even
put it to words. We'll keep fixing the issues as they come up and
will take this project to the next level.
Cheers,
Ruppert
On Oct 31, 2009, at 1:56 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hello Tim:
Please see my comments inline:
Tim Ruppert
I think it's Is Immediately Fulfilled
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 25, 2009, at 6:38 AM, Hemanth Kumar Kanamarlapudi wrote:
Hi BJ and Tim,
Thanks for your information on order processing.
If I want to charge
It's a setting on the product store - but remember, in many cases it's
not legal to take the money until you are actually shipping / packing
the product - so the auto capture is often something businesses decide
not to do.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http
the top of my head - but I know that it was
around June of this year.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 22, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Scott. wrote:
Hello all,
We are very close to finalizing our method of credit card
I hope this thread helps Scott.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
Begin forwarded message:
From: Scott Gray scott.g...@hotwaxmedia.com
Date: June 5, 2009 5:12:47 AM MDT
To: d...@ofbiz.apache.org
Subject: Re: Clearing credit
Ok - great - thanks Scott - I'm sure the other Scott will thank you.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 22, 2009, at 1:19 PM, Scott Gray wrote:
It actually never made it back into the trunk, the differences
between
I get a different error - cmsSite: 404 Not Found. Please file an
issue in JIRA.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 19, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Chris Snow wrote:
Is this a bug? Shall I raise a JIRA issue?
Christopher Snow
=VARCHAR(40) java-
type=String/field-type-def
That works like a charm if you choose to go this route.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 16, 2009, at 2:40 PM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi James:
I don't think the product id field
Please note that what Ruth and BJ are mentioning here James is likely
the preferred way to do this. The Good Identifiers is the way I'd
push the client nowadays, but they do like this info in their IDs, so
no need to push.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http
Thanks Scott - that is what we are seeing as well. And for everyone
else - we will be making some mods to the BizznessTime theme that will
address the issues that have been reported.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
for convincing people to use OFBiz. I'd leave this in
place and change it to the ugly, ugly in your own installations before
I wanted to go back to Flay Grey as a sales tool
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 13, 2009
it sit stagnant.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 13, 2009, at 7:10 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hello Tim:
If this a tool for convincing people to use OFBiz, then IMO, we are
way off the mark. The backend applications
: http://www.myofbiz.com
Tim Ruppert wrote:
We are all working within the constraints of _not_ redesigning the
entire set of backend applications - which is really what needs to
be done. The old theme sucks visually - has no spice, doesn't fit
today's look and feel guidelines AT ALL, looks
in OFBiz - as evidenced by the amazing amount of investment in time
and money that's been made by our company.
Cheers,
Ruppert
--
Tim Ruppert
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
o:801.649.6594
f:801.649.6595
On Oct 13, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Ruth Hoffman wrote:
Hi Tim:
This will probably
1 - 100 of 259 matches
Mail list logo
