proposal

Hello, What should be a very nice feature in Ofbiz which doesn't exist at the moment, is the following: It should be nice if you could insert all the data for a certain new product in different days. Let's say day one, you do the product properties, day two you continue with the content part, day

Re: proposal

The solution would be to not add the product to the VIEW_ALLOW category until you are done setting it up. Thanks& Regards Atul Vani Enterprise Software Developer HotWax Media Pvt. Ltd. http://www.hotwaxmedia.com/ We are the Global Leaders in Apache OFBiz, Google 'ofbiz' and see for yourself.

Re: proposal

Hi, Why don't you use the start date/end date on the product to control visibility in the catalog? --Venkat On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Info Olagos wrote: > Hello, > > What should be a very nice feature in Ofbiz which doesn't exist at the > moment, is the following: > > It should be nice

Re: proposal

Hi Heidi: IMHO, these responses are missing the point and show a total lack of understanding surrounding the many and varied business rules behind publishing a product catalog. I think this is a really cool idea and would certainly set OFBiz apart from any competition. Best Regards, Ruth Ho

Re: proposal

Hi Ruth, Yes, i think it is smoother to push one button, than to have to think to set every date available in the catalog manager on the right date and change it afterwards. But i think in that case database model should change a little bit. Regards, Eric & Heidi 2012/5/21 Ruth Hoffman > Hi He

Re: proposal

Hi Heidi: I started working on something like this a long time ago but got distracted with other projects. I was using the workflow part of the data model to managing the process of creating and publishing a product. My solution was a new "Product Management" application. It didn't require dat

Re: proposal

There is also something similar in our BigFish implementation. Checkout resources at http://bigfish.salmonllc.com -- in particular the Admin Module for one of the demo instances at https://bigfish.salmonllc.com:8442/osafe-admin/control/main. The Catalog/Product area allows entry of a new produc

Re: proposal

Hi Nick: I agree with you 100%. IMHO it is noteworthy that BigFish does implement an entirely new UI to expose these functions. In my ideal world, I would add to BigFish and build a new application. This application would, under certain circumstances (these are the business rules that I menti

Re: proposal

Ruth, Yep, all possibilities. As always the simple original request that was posted "so we need a PUBLISH button" now morphs into something that gets considerably more complex! You mentioned pricing, inventory, image available and approvals (all good considerations). I would add to this the

Re: proposal

at the first level you can create a "working Catalog" that is not online. then you can use the copy function to the "live catalog" when ready. so the only thing necessary is a to from list that a import routing can read and do the copies in mass. Info Olagos sent the following on 5/20/2012 11:3

Re: proposal

Ruth, Nick, It might be a possible scenario that someone wants to display the newly setup products in the catalog at any particular date-time, may be at the beginning of a new season or some kinda festival. He would rather process the product data for them in advance, test it and have some tr

Re: proposal

Hi Atul: IMO you miss the point. The point is not that these features do or do not exist. We all agree that you can accomplish this task in several different ways using the OOTB Catalog Manager and Content Manager applications. The point IS that the end-user requirement(s) as stated by Heidi

Re: proposal

Agreed. Agreed that there is a huge list of things that can be made easier in OFBiz for the end user. But I disagree that the one mentioned is one among them, or is a top ranking at least. My point is that, if I am not missing something, you're considering a very small subset of the requirement

Re: proposal

I have to agree with Ruth on this. System developers tend to forget whom they are building solutions and enhancements for, or have a different view on problems endusers perceive. What is easy for one can be a cumbersome task for another. Having easy workflows in place helps adoption. Regards, Pi

discussion: document proposal.

-- The proposal is to move the documents from docs.ofbiz.org to the ofbiz content manager. --- What are the advantages? 1. No external system required for documentation 2. The content of the internal

glossary enrichment proposal

Hi , We use many technical terms throughout the pages and articles but the interpretation of the term may be open or approximate to various stakeholders due to lack of common definitions and glossary. We already have a glossary page https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBENDUSER/Glossar

Alternativ products on proposal

Hi, I want to reduce the number of proposals, that I have to create, by specifying alternative products for an item. So I can tell the customer, what options he can choose from. Would be nice, if only the price difference to the normal item is displayed and the proposal sum is not affected by

Re: discussion: document proposal.

ments/ApacheOfbiz.xml > in html format. > > The pdf format does not yet work...(Anybody can help: see comment in > svn) > > --- > The propo

Re: discussion: document proposal.

lp: see comment in svn) --- The proposal is to move the documents from docs.ofbiz.org to the ofbiz content manager. --- What are the advantages? 1. No external system requ

Re: discussion: document proposal.

monext/documents/ApacheOfbiz.xml in html format. The pdf format does not yet work...(Anybody can help: see comment in svn) --- The proposal is to move the documents from docs.ofbiz.

Re: discussion: document proposal.

gt; Then you will see the xml document in file: >>> /applications/commonext/documents/ApacheOfbiz.xml >>> in html format. >>> >>> The pdf format does not yet work...(Anybody can help: see comment in >>> svn) >>> >>> --

Re: discussion: document proposal.

ontent -> navigate -> documents -> 'apache ofbiz in html format' Then you will see the xml document in file: /applications/commonext/documents/ApacheOfbiz.xml in html format. The pdf format does not yet work...(Anybody can help: see comment in svn) ----

Re: discussion: document proposal.

lications/commonext/documents/ApacheOfbiz.xml in html format. The pdf format does not yet work...(Anybody can help: see comment in svn) --- The proposal is to move the documents from docs.ofbiz.org to the ofbiz content manager. ---

Re: discussion: document proposal.

> documents -> 'apache ofbiz in html >>>> format' >>>> >>>> Then you will see the xml document in file: >>>> /applications/commonext/documents/ApacheOfbiz.xml >>>> in html format. >>>> >>>> The pdf format does

Proposal on French translations

Hi all, some of the uilabels which are referring to the Ids are labelled, for example for partyId "Réf. de l'acteur". I think this notation is a bit long, and it would be a good idea to reduce the label only to "Acteur". Lots of users know that "Acteur" near a textbox or on a column header mea

Re: discussion: document proposal.

ly where I am talking about, upgrade your local >>>> version, reload your seed data (or run ant-install) and go to: >>>> content -> content -> navigate -> documents -> 'apache ofbiz in html >>>> format' >>>> >>>> Then

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

+1 Jacques Le 29/08/2017 à 12:07, Rajesh Mallah a écrit : Hi , We use many technical terms throughout the pages and articles but the interpretation of the term may be open or approximate to various stakeholders due to lack of common definitions and glossary. We already have a glossary page

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

I like the idea, +1. Thanks & Regards, Devanshu Vyas. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Rajesh Mallah wrote: > Hi , > > We use many technical terms throughout the pages and articles but > the interpretation of the term may be open or approximate to various > stakeholders due to lack of common d

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

Nice idea, thanks Rajesh! Regards, Sonal Patwari Enterprise Software Engineer HotWax Systems On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Devanshu Vyas wrote: > I like the idea, +1. > > Thanks & Regards, > Devanshu Vyas. > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 3:37 PM, Rajesh Mallah

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

+1 for the idea. Few More Suggestions: 1) Glossary of terms can also be bifurcated based on business processes or OFBiz components. For Example, inventory can have business terms like ATP, QOH, Back Order etc. 2) We can also incorporate business terminologies used in real world. So, people can re

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

Nice idea Rajesh, Shivangi. +1 Best Regards, *Sanjay Yadav * Manager, Enterprise Quality Assurance www.hotwaxsystems.com www.hotwax.co On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Shivangi Tanwar < shivangi.tan...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > +1 for the idea. > > Few More Suggestions: > > 1) Glossary of te

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

Thanks for the kind words everyone. I already created a scratchpad https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=73635445 it is my first page and i feel it got created in a wrong place. :D request senior members to kindly relocate to a more suitable place. regds mallah.

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

Hi Shivangi , pls find replies inline. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Shivangi Tanwar < shivangi.tan...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > +1 for the idea. > > Few More Suggestions: > > 1) Glossary of terms can also be bifurcated based on business processes or > OFBiz components. For Example, invento

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

+1 for the Idea. Thanks & Regards, Ankit Joshi On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Rajesh Mallah wrote: > Hi Shivangi , > > pls find replies inline. > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Shivangi Tanwar < > shivangi.tan...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > +1 for the idea. > > > > Few More Suggestio

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

can someone conversant with confluence/wiki point me to list of *all* pages created under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Business+Process+Reference+Book else i have to create the list in the hard way (manually). regds mallah. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Ankit Joshi wro

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

+1 for the idea Rajesh. To answer your question, did you notice the child pages in the bottom? Here is quick reference; Page: Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Page: E-commerce

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

Rajesh, Something you want to avoid in Confluence titles are special characters. Confluence does not handle them well and so create URLs for the page like yours below. I replaced & by and and the page is now at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/ScratchPad+for+collecting+Terms+

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

Thanks Jacques , noted regds mallah. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:33 PM, Jacques Le Roux < jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > Rajesh, > > Something you want to avoid in Confluence titles are special characters. > > Confluence does not handle them well and so create URLs for the page like >

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

Thanks Rishi , I was actually looking for a total node list . no probs shall create one and your info shall quicken the traversal. regds mallah. On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Rishi Solanki wrote: > +1 for the idea Rajesh. > > To answer your question, did you notice the child pages in the

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

I've moved the page under "Documentation" where it belongs. Please do not put pages, temporary or not, in the root of our wiki. We are working on a user friendly structure and if new pages are simply put in root, they soon clutter the look of the sidebar. Thanks, Michael Am 29.08.17 um 15:0

Re: glossary enrichment proposal

+1 Great initiative, thank you, Rajesh! Regards, Michael Am 29.08.17 um 12:07 schrieb Rajesh Mallah: Hi , We use many technical terms throughout the pages and articles but the interpretation of the term may be open or approximate to various stakeholders due to lack of common definitions an

Re: Alternativ products on proposal

ying alternative products for an item. So I can tell the customer, what options he can choose from. Would be nice, if only the price difference to the normal item is displayed and the proposal sum is not affected by the alternatives. Thanks and best regards Sebastian -- View this message i

Re: Alternativ products on proposal

> what options he can choose from. Would be nice, if only the price >> difference >> to the normal item is displayed and the proposal sum is not affected >> by the >> alternatives. >> >> Thanks and best regards >> Sebastian >> -- >> View this mes

Re: Alternativ products on proposal

So I can tell the customer, what options he can choose from. Would be nice, if only the price difference to the normal item is displayed and the proposal sum is not affected by the alternatives. Thanks and best regards Sebastian -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Alternativ-products

document proposal with big diff!

I have here a diff file of 17Mb (uncompressed) which I, because of its size did not yet commit. Let me know if somebody has objections. What does it do? This diff will add the ability to OFBiz to process docbook (www.docbook.org) documents and be able to show these documents from a single xml sou

[Fwd: Submit your proposal now]

O'Reilly Open Source Convention (OSCON) July 21-25, 2008 Oregon Convention Center Portland, OR conferences.oreilly.com/oscon Share What You Know at OSCON 2008, Coming July 21-25 Submit Your Proposal for Participation Now The 10th Annual O'Reilly Open Source Convention will be held

Re: document proposal with big diff!

I see there is even a plugin for confluence to export documents in the docbook format. On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 16:33 +0700, Hans Bakker wrote: > I have here a diff file of 17Mb (uncompressed) which I, because of its > size did not yet commit. Let me know if somebody has objections. > > What does i

Re: document proposal with big diff!

Hi Hans: For what it is worth, my opinion: This would be fantastic! DocBook is the way to go. Thanks Ruth Hans Bakker wrote: I have here a diff file of 17Mb (uncompressed) which I, because of its size did not yet commit. Let me know if somebody has objections. What does it do? This diff will

Re: document proposal with big diff!

ould improve the documentation for ofbiz >> substantially. >> >> Regards, >> Hans >> > -- > Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/document-proposal-with-big-diff%21-tp25113093p25122464.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: document proposal with big diff!

does http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/dbcpyright.html allow it to be included in apache Hans Bakker sent the following on 8/24/2009 2:33 AM: > I have here a diff file of 17Mb (uncompressed) which I, because of its > size did not yet commit. Let me know if somebody has objections. > > What does

Re: document proposal with big diff!

Hi BJ, i too had some concerns so i wrote to Norman Walsh the original designer and major player his reply on my question if we can include the schemas and stylesheets in OFBiz: > None at all. Share and enjoy! so in the next few days you can expect the big commit.. Regards, Hans On M

Re: document proposal with big diff!

LOL guess apache severs will get a kick back from my mail server. my server limits the size of emails. Hans Bakker sent the following on 8/25/2009 5:57 AM: > Hi BJ, > > i too had some concerns so i wrote to Norman Walsh the original designer > and major player > his reply on my question if we

Compoinent locatinos was Contributor branch Proposal,

wiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Contributors+Branch+proposal David E Jones sent the following on 7/15/2010 9:03 AM: Hans, How would you create such a branch, or what would that look like? Who would be able to commit to it? -David On Jul 15, 2010, at 2:59 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: Shou

Rolling release and LTS , a proposal

: http://www.zdnet.com/ubuntu-linux-developer-squabbles-go-public-712295 The Mark Shuttleworth (CEO Canonical, owner of Ubuntu) proposal http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1246 regards, Hans

Re: [PROPOSAL]Request to enhance entity:SystemProperty.

Anybody have a comment on this? -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-Request-to-enhance-entity-SystemProperty-tp4709232p4709390.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [PROPOSAL]Request to enhance entity:SystemProperty.

; Regards --- Arun Patidar Manager, Enterprise Software Development HotWax Systems Pvt Ltd.www.hotwaxsystems.com On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Wai wrote: > Anybody have a comment on this? > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble. >

Re: [PROPOSAL]Request to enhance entity:SystemProperty.

Thanks Arun, Please Wai, check also on dev ML where I copied your email (the discussion should be rather there), Nicolas asked you a question. Thanks Jacques Le 10/08/2017 à 06:54, Arun Patidar a écrit : Hello Wai, We can use permission checks on screen and service level instead of adding

Re: [PROPOSAL]Request to enhance entity:SystemProperty.

Thanks for the reply. I shall take a look. http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Re-Request-for-enhance-entity-SystemProperty-tp4709235p4709446.html -- View this message in context: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/PROPOSAL-Request-to-enhance-entity-SystemProperty-tp4709232p4709447.html Sent from

Proposal to add company related legal numbers

Hello All, Proposal to add company related legal numbers. When setting up an internal organization/company, the company requires few legal numbers. For example, for an Indian company, the following are required. 1. PAN number 2. Sales Tax Registration number 3. ROC - Registrar of companies

Re: Compoinent locatinos was Contributor branch Proposal,

does not stop any current developer from learning and offering these. -David On Jul 15, 2010, at 10:11 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Contributors+Branch+proposal David E Jones sent the following on 7/15/2010 9:03 AM: Hans, How would you cr

Re: Compoinent locatinos was Contributor branch Proposal,

Le 20/07/2010 22:29, Jacques Le Roux a écrit : Sounds logical, but I guess history will not permit us to do that, or as you said with a rather big effort! couldn't the sourceforge project be reused as a contributor branch ? Maybe this would help OFBiz to regain popularity on it. Or the creation

Re: Compoinent locatinos was Contributor branch Proposal,

nce the manufacturing, travel and Eccommerce would be defined as >>>>>> addon, Just as the finacial Services, telecommunication, Proffiessional >>>>>> services, Insurance and HealthCare are in the vol II of data model book. >>>>>> so why limit i

Re: Compoinent locatinos was Contributor branch Proposal,

offering these. -David On Jul 15, 2010, at 10:11 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Contributors+Branch+proposal David E Jones sent the following on 7/15/2010 9:03 AM: Hans, How would you create such a branch, or what would that look like? Who would

Re: Compoinent locatinos was Contributor branch Proposal,

d back to the trunk? >>>>>>>> or are they now Forks? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> What you're describing isn't even a fork as it doesn't sound like it &g

Re: Compoinent locatinos was Contributor branch Proposal,

do so, from the community spirit perspective... all the better! it also gives ofbiz a greater appeal to the users that may use ofbiz in a vertical market. and it does not stop any current developer from learning and offering these. -David On Jul 15, 2010, at 10:11 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: htt

Re: Component locations (was: Contributor branch Proposal)

On 7/20/2010 2:10 PM, David E Jones wrote: Unfortunately many committers don't feel it is so important which is why we have hundreds of ridiculous dependencies from the framework to the base apps, from the base apps the special purpose apps, and from one special purpose app to another, and NON

Re: Compoinent locatinos was Contributor branch Proposal,

d separately > >>>>>>>> that was the intention. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> and is meant to eventually be merged back into the trunk. > >>>>>>>>

Re: Compoinent locatinos was Contributor branch Proposal,

, at 10:11 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Contributors+Branch+proposal David E Jones sent the following on 7/15/2010 9:03 AM: Hans, How would you create such a branch, or what would that look like? Who would be able to commit to it? -David On Jul 15

Re: Compoinent locatinos was Contributor branch Proposal,

Matt: from a users perspective it would not be any different. However from a developers perspective, if the manufacturing is of no use, like in a retail outlet, then it should be able to be deactivated with no ill effect to the base applications. Matt Warnock sent the following on 7/20/2010

Re: Compoinent locatinos was Contributor branch Proposal,

That is an interesting argument, but complicated to solve. You should be able to disable the manufacturing manager app without affecting other apps. You should even be able to get rid of the services, if no other component is calling them (I don't know about that). Getting rid of the data model

Re: Compoinent locatinos was Contributor branch Proposal,

I understand that. But Dave's point (if I understood his post correctly) was that the separation into modules was in fact made at the application level, not the database level. All the entities, their storage mechanisms, and data translation code for those, are defined in the base. Keeping the d

Re: Component locations (was: Contributor branch Proposal)

On Jul 20, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Adrian Crum wrote: > On 7/20/2010 2:10 PM, David E Jones wrote: >> Unfortunately many committers don't feel it is so important which is why we >> have hundreds of ridiculous dependencies from the framework to the base >> apps, from the base apps the special purpose

Re: Compoinent locatinos was Contributor branch Proposal,

my orginal statement that got this part of the thread going was >ofbiz, now has three basic layers, as I see it. > > first is the framework, which should stand alone from the other layers. > > Next is your basic Business layer needed for all businesses, to manage relationships, cash flow, product

Re: Compoinent locatinos was Contributor branch Proposal,

From: "David E Jones" That is an interesting argument, but complicated to solve. You should be able to disable the manufacturing manager app without affecting other apps. You should even be able to get rid of the services, if no other component is calling them (I don't know about that). Not

ShipmentReceipt potential bugs and potential enhancements proposal

When a ShipmentReceipt is created, an AcctgTrans is also created with the shipmentId field set but not the receiptId. Should the AcctgTrans.receiptId also be set since it exists? Also, when a ShipmentReceipt is cancelled, no AcctgTrans and corresponding debit/credit AcctgTransEntry records ar

[MARKETING] Progress Update on Updating Website Proposal

-Updating-Website-Proposal-tp4671825.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Proposal to add company related legal numbers

ty def and demo data especially, as well as the Tax Authority docs on docs.ofbiz.org). -David On Jun 10, 2009, at 2:02 AM, aswath narayana wrote: Hello All, Proposal to add company related legal numbers. When setting up an internal organization/company, the company requires few legal nu

Re: ShipmentReceipt potential bugs and potential enhancements proposal

HI Christian, What is the situation here? Jacques Le 24/08/2014 02:17, Christian Carlow a écrit : When a ShipmentReceipt is created, an AcctgTrans is also created with the shipmentId field set but not the receiptId. Should the AcctgTrans.receiptId also be set since it exists? Also, when a S

Re: ShipmentReceipt potential bugs and potential enhancements proposal

Hey Jacques, Sorry, missed this back in January. No progress has been made on these issues but I do need the ShipmentReceipt to ReturnItem association immediately. I'll create a JIRA for further discussion. The first part still seems relevant as well. AcctgTrans are created when ShipmentReceip

Proposal: sending the specialpurpose/oagis component to Attic

Hi all, my proposal is to remove the "oagis" specialpurpose component from the trunk and record the event in our Attic page [*]. If we will do this, the consequence will be that the component will no more be available in future releases: if you are using it, or plan to use it, sp

Proposal: Use of single label for input fields

Hello, In OFBiz, some of the forms have a common group label that binds a certain set of input elements together under a group, like, *Shipping Address* - Address 1 - Address 2 - City - State This is okay when we have multiple input fields in a group. But, in case of independent fi

Re: Contributor branch Proposal, was: Contributor branches https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Contributors+Branch+proposal was: Attaching files to a product

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Contributors+Branch+proposal David E Jones sent the following on 7/15/2010 9:03 AM: Hans, How would you create such a branch, or what would that look like? Who would be able to commit to it? -David On Jul 15, 2010, at 2:59 AM, Hans

Re: Contributor branch Proposal, was: Contributor branches https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Contributors+Branch+proposal was: Attaching files to a product

ttps://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Contributors+Branch+proposal > > > David E Jones sent the following on 7/15/2010 9:03 AM: >> >> Hans, >> >> How would you create such a branch, or what would that look like? Who would >> be able to commit to it? >

Re: Contributor branch Proposal, was: Contributor branches https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Contributors+Branch+proposal was: Attaching files to a product

it perspective... all the better! it also gives ofbiz a greater appeal to the users that may use ofbiz in a vertical market. and it does not stop any current developer from learning and offering these. -David On Jul 15, 2010, at 10:11 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: https://cwiki.apache.org/conflue

Re: Contributor branch Proposal, was: Contributor branches https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Contributors+Branch+proposal was: Attaching files to a product

t; perspective... all the better! >> > it also gives ofbiz a greater appeal to the users that may use ofbiz in a > vertical market. > and it does not stop any current developer from learning and offering > these. > > >> -David >> >> >> On Jul 15, 2010, at 1

Re: Contributor branch Proposal, was: Contributor branches https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Contributors+Branch+proposal was: Attaching files to a product

these. -David On Jul 15, 2010, at 10:11 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Contributors+Branch+proposal David E Jones sent the following on 7/15/2010 9:03 AM: Hans, How would you create such a branch, or what would that look like? Who would be able

Re: Contributor branch Proposal, was: Contributor branches https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBIZ/Contributors+Branch+proposal was: Attaching files to a product

was meant to communicate the popular vote is meant as an >>> indicatore, but the PMC would be the deciding vote. >>> >>> >>>> For those interested, why not just create a sourceforge or google code >>>> project and share commit access with others who are in

Proposal: All Contributors to have a signed Apache ICLA

z.135035.n4.nabble.com/Proposal-All-Contributors-to-have-a-signed-Apache-ICLA-tp4658761.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Proposal: sending the specialpurpose/oagis component to Attic

+1 Jacques Le 23/09/2016 à 10:44, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : Hi all, my proposal is to remove the "oagis" specialpurpose component from the trunk and record the event in our Attic page [*]. If we will do this, the consequence will be that the component will no more be available

Re: Proposal: sending the specialpurpose/oagis component to Attic

+1 Kind Regards Ashish Vijaywargiya HotWax Systems - est. 1997 On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > my proposal is to remove the "oagis" specialpurpose component from the > trunk and record

Re: Proposal: sending the specialpurpose/oagis component to Attic

twaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > my proposal is to remove the "oagis" specialpurpose component from the > > trunk and record the event in our Attic page [*]. > > If we will do this, the consequence will be that the component will no

Re: Proposal: sending the specialpurpose/oagis component to Attic

+1 Thanks, Michael Am 23.09.16 um 10:44 schrieb Jacopo Cappellato: Hi all, my proposal is to remove the "oagis" specialpurpose component from the trunk and record the event in our Attic page [*]. If we will do this, the consequence will be that the component will no more be av

Re: Proposal: sending the specialpurpose/oagis component to Attic

+1 Thanks Jacopo for detailing the current status and problems as it makes it a lot easier to make a decision. Thanks Sharan On 2016-09-23 10:44 (+0200), Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Hi all, > > my proposal is to remove the "oagis" specialpurpose component from the >

Re: Proposal: sending the specialpurpose/oagis component to Attic

+1 Best regards, Pranay Pandey HotWax Systems http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/ On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > my proposal is to remove the "oagis" specialpurpose component from the > trunk

Re: Proposal: sending the specialpurpose/oagis component to Attic

+1 > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < > jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > my proposal is to remove the "oagis" specialpurpose component from the > > trunk and record the event in our Attic page [*]. >

Re: Proposal: sending the specialpurpose/oagis component to Attic

> > jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > > > > > my proposal is to remove the "oagis" specialpurpose component from the > > > trunk and record the event in our Attic page [*]. > > >

Re: Proposal: sending the specialpurpose/oagis component to Attic

On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: my proposal is to remove the "oagis" specialpurpose component from the trunk and record the event in our Attic page [*].

Re: Proposal: sending the specialpurpose/oagis component to Attic

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Mike wrote: > Great. So everyone seems to agree to dump oagis. Obviously someone took > the time to create this component. My understanding it is used for > automating B2B communication for purchase orders, inventory, etc. If you > want ofbiz to play with the

Re: Proposal: sending the specialpurpose/oagis component to Attic

The component has been removed in rev. 1763454 Thanks, Jacopo On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Mike wrote: > >> Great. So everyone seems to agree to dump oagis. Obviously someone took >> the t

Re: Proposal: sending the specialpurpose/oagis component to Attic

> "Thank you for the feedback Mike. I do agree that providing some EDI functionality out of the box is very important for an ERP system. OFBiz already has a few mechanisms for data exchange that can be leveraged to implement specific or custom integrations." I remember looking in the oagis code an

  1   2   >