Thanka Justin! This is exactly what I was looking for.
--
Best regards,
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Justin Bertram
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2024 9:00 PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about core consumer parameters
> Is there an explanation of paramet
> Is my assumption correct?
Yes, but I also recommend you test and verify. Let us know if you have any
further questions!
Justin
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 8:32 AM Bisil wrote:
> I am using JBoss with the embedded Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Message
> Broker 2.16.0.
>
> Looking at the source code of
> Is there an explanation of parameters which are logged in this event?
I'm not aware of any documentation explaining the meaning of the
parameters. However, you can look in the source code to see what the logged
values represent. For example, in this case you can look at the
createConsumer method
Hi All,
When user connects to Artemis and creates core consumer, event is logged to
audit journal. Is there an explanation of parameters which are logged in this
event?
For example, I have two events of creating consumer for queue INPUT_QUEUE with
filter.
First is created by application, secon
I am using JBoss with the embedded Apache ActiveMQ Artemis Message
Broker 2.16.0.
Looking at the source code of ActiveMQ RA I suspect using JMS message
grouping with a JBoss MDB that is fed by a JMS queue (for example with
10 MDB workers/instances and the default number of 15 sessions / JMS
c
So to have specific configuration for topic, what i should do ?
because if i add this
DLQ
true
.DLQ
5
Artemis can't start
If i remove, it's work
Thanks
Le mar. 13 févr. 2024 à 15:50, Justin Bertram a
écrit :
> > AMQ224110
> AMQ224110: Configuration 'whitelist' is deprecated, please use the
'allowlist' configuration
This WARN message is based on the fact that you're using the "whitelist"
configuration element in your management.xml. It has nothing to do with
your address-setting.
Justin
On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 8:
Hello
i try to add specific configuration for one topic
But when i start artemis i have this error
AMQ224110: Configuration 'whitelist' is deprecated, please use the
'allowlist' configuration
And i don't know how to solve it
My broker.xml is like this
DLQ
34 Washington Street, Suite 205 Wellesley Hills, MA 02481
>
> *M: *+1 7209385761 <+1%207209385761> | john.lil...@redpointglobal.com
>
> *From:* Justin Bertram
> *Sent:* Monday, January 29, 2024 1:55 PM
> *To:* users@activemq.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Question about
PM
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about HA configuration failover problem
*** [Caution] This email is from an external source. Please use caution
responding, opening attachments or clicking embedded links. ***
> Is this a bug in the AMQ JMS client?
At this point I don't believe it is a
> Is this a bug in the AMQ JMS client?
At this point I don't believe it is a bug in the ActiveMQ Artemis core JMS
client.
I talked about AMQ219014 previously, but I suppose it bears repeating here.
The timeout is ultimately ambiguous. The client can't reliably conclude
that the broker has failed
Greetings,
This is something of a follow-up on previous failover issue reports, but we’ve
taken careful notes and logs and hopefully we have enough information to
diagnose what is happening.
We are experiencing an error during AMQ broker failover from live to backup.
We are testing this using
Hello Pham-
You most likely ran into an old bug, where the log files were not deleted for
some use case. ActiveMQ 5.6 is over 10 yrs old at this point, and upgrading to
a newer version will resolve this issue.
FWIW— the KAHA_REMOVE_MESSAGE_COMMAND is ActiveMQ internals about message
processing
Hello,
I am using activemq 5.6. Recently the kahadb log has increased and the old
logs do not get deleted. When I check one log file for example, I can see
only this kind of message and nothing else. What does this mean and why is
the log file not deleted then?
16664 CommandType: KAHA_REMOVE_MESS
I'm stuck in using PooledConnectionFactory
and CachingConnectionFactory.
Because PooledConnectionFactory does not cache consumers, as described in
the documentation:It does not 'pool' consumers, this is because, even if a
consumer is idle, ActiveMQ will keep delivering messages to the consumer's
Ok, I created the following Jira ticket: ARTEMIS-3598
Thanks.
C2 - Restricted
-Original Message-
From: Gary Tully
Sent: Thursday, 2 December 2021 12:04
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about charset supported by Artemis
[Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de
> Pierre-Henry
>
>
> C2 - Restricted
>
> -Original Message-
> From: BRASSEUR Pierre-Henry
> Sent: Tuesday, 30 November 2021 12:42
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Question about charset supported by Artemis
>
> Hello,
>
> From ActiveMQ 5.15.9, the
Hello,
Regarding Artemis and the stack trace here under, are we facing to a bug?
Regards,
Pierre-Henry
C2 - Restricted
-Original Message-
From: BRASSEUR Pierre-Henry
Sent: Tuesday, 30 November 2021 12:42
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: RE: Question about charset supported by
rtemis-commons-2.17.0.jar:2.17.0]
Regards,
Pierre-Henry
Sent: Tuesday, 30 November 2021 12:14
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question about charset supported by Artemis
[Vous ne recevez pas souvent de courriers de la part de gary.tu...@gmail.com.
Découvrez pourquoi cela peut êt
can you post some code and/or the exception stack trace?
On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 08:46, BRASSEUR Pierre-Henry
wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know if Artemis can support other charset than UTF-8?
>
> The post of message in charset ISO-8859-15 was working with previous version
> ActiveMQ 5
Hello,
I would like to know if Artemis can support other charset than UTF-8?
The post of message in charset ISO-8859-15 was working with previous version
ActiveMQ 5.15.9.
We upgraded to Artemis 2.16 and messages with special characters are now
rejected by Artemis (exception on
org.apache.acti
Hello,
I have couple of questions about certs in broker keystore and which cert is
used
in ssl protocol.
I could not find any info in the doc. I did find couple of old queries in
this forum. But,
there are no replies. So, hoping someone can comment on these questions:
1. If there are multiple cer
As we've mentioned previously, replicated LevelDB is not a supported
configuration and support is being removed in the next release, no one on
this mailing list knows enough about it to help you troubleshoot problems,
and if you do choose to use it despite those things you should be prepared
to use
Hello
I have set the policy of not discarding the dead letter queue, and set the
message will enter the dead letter queue after expiration. When I restart the
broker of three nodes, I sometimes find that the statistics of activemq.dlq of
each node are inconsistent, mainly the value of QueueSize
<
> tb...@alumni.duke.edu>;
> 发送时间: 2021年7月8日(星期四) 晚上7:50
> 收件人: "ActiveMQ Users"
> 主题: Re: I have a question about levedb
>
>
>
> Thanks for the link. To the best of my knowledge, that particular
> experiment never bore fruit and there is no current effor
Thanks for you reply, The main reason why I don't use NFS is that I need to
ensure the high availability of the NFS cluster or rely on third-party storage,
which will increase my cost.
The leveldb + zookeeper mode, when building a cluster, can ensure that each
node can store a piece of data, so
"users"
> <
> tb...@alumni.duke.edu>;
> 发送时间: 2021年7月7日(星期三) 晚上8:08
> 收件人: "ActiveMQ Users"
> 主题: Re: I have a question about levedb
>
>
>
> Can you please
Hello, you may have misunderstood me. First ,??Can you please provide the link
where you saw KahaDB replication discussed???This is the website[1]
Second:
"In the KahaDB on NFS case, your statement that the data is unavailable when
a broker fails is inaccurate. Because the data is written to an NF
ot;users"
> <
> tb...@alumni.duke.edu>;
> 发送时间: 2021年7月5日(星期一) 晚上7:40
> 收件人: "ActiveMQ Users"
> 主题: Re: I have a question about levedb
>
>
>
> Let m
发件人:
> "users"
> <
> tb...@alumni.duke.edu>;
> 发送时间: 2021年7月5日(星期一) 晚上7:40
> 收件人: "ActiveMQ Users"
> 主题: Re: I have a question about levedb
>
>
I learned from the official website that the master-slave modes currently
supported are "shared file system master slave" and "JDBC master slave".
"Shared file system master slave": the mode depends on shared files and only
exists on one node. If the host of the node is down, the master-slave m
eeper + ActiveMQ to build master-slave mode。
>
>
>
>
> -- 原始邮件 --
> 发件人:
> "users"
> <
> jbert...@apache.org>
I know the levedb was removed.
but now I use zookeeper + ActiveMQ to build master-slave mode??
-- --
??:
"users"
Support for LevelDB was revoked in ActiveMQ 5.14.2, although the store
implementation was still present in the code-base. The store implementation
was removed in 5.17.0.
Justin
On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 9:48 PM ヤ艾枫o.-- <1169114...@qq.com.invalid> wrote:
> Hi
>
> https://github.com/apache/activemq
Hi
https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/activemq-5.15.x/activemq-leveldb-store/src/main/scala/org/apache/activemq/leveldb/replicated/MasterElector.scala#L120
what is means "members"??
Refers to the number of brokers started in the current cluster, or the number
of brokers registered in the zoo
> From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre
> Sent: 10 June 2021 11:34
> To: users@activemq.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Question about files in the `bin` directory
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
> links or
Hi Jean-Baptiste,
All right, thank you very much! I suppose I can safely remove the
"bin/wrapper.jar" file as well, isn't it?
Best regards,
Fabrice
From: Jean-Baptiste Onofre
Sent: 10 June 2021 11:34
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subjec
Hi Fabrice,
Those directories are only useful if you want to use the wrapper (tanuki
service wrapper) to easily integrate in OS.
If you "only" use bin/activemq to start your broker (like bin/activemq console
or bin/activemq start), you don’t need these folders.
Regards
JB
> Le 10 juin 2021 à
08:55
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Question about files in the `bin` directory
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content
is safe.
Hello everyone,
The official ActiveMQ
Hello everyone,
The official ActiveMQ tarball
(https://archive.apache.org/dist/activemq/5.16.2/apache-activemq-5.16.2-bin.tar.gz)
has a "bin" directory. In this "bin" directory, I can see three
subdirectories: "linux-x86-32", "linux-x86-64" and "macosx".
Could someone please explain to me what
Samuel-
If you are getting a response from port 61616, there is a good chance you have
it going. However, your best bet is to check with the Debian Package
maintainer. It sounds like the installation moved some files to different
locations than the default from the Apache ActiveMQ distribution.
Dear all,
I’m completely new to ActiveMQ and only have very little prior experience with
message queues, so please bear with me.
I just installed ActiveMQ 5.15.8 on Debian 10, using the package from the
official repositories:
https://packages.debian.org/buster/activemq
If I understand correct
stored in the db-x.log ? when it has been
sent or when it will be available at delay expiration ?
Best Regards.
-Original Message-
From: AntonR [mailto:anton.roskv...@volvo.com]
Sent: lundi 17 février 2020 15:15
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: Question
Hi,
Yes, when all messages are removed in db-1 it will get removed and all new
ones will get added to db-3. The message log is append only, so new db files
will get created and old ones removed as part of normal operations.
Beware of mixing slow and fast consumers though, as just one single messa
nsumer (eg faster than the producer)
on this queue, will the db-2.log file removed ?
Second question about delayed message:
- For normal message, we are able to see inqueue and dequeuer counters
increasing.
- What about delayed message, until they haven't been delivered,
This looks like a bug to me. Could you describe a simple way to reproduce
the issue?
Justin
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Daniel Hutchison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently upgraded to artemis 2.5 from an old version of activemq.
> I've been running in my test environment for about 2 weeks
Hi,
I've recently upgraded to artemis 2.5 from an old version of activemq.
I've been running in my test environment for about 2 weeks now, and I
notice that artemis is displaying about 22,000 addresses that look like
this:
Address:ID:esbtst-51076-1516925608717-1:1413:18
Address
I'd echo Gary's suggestion that you capture thread dumps or perform
sampling during the slow events. That would make it clear where the time is
being spent.
Tim
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:16 PM, alprausch77
wrote:
> Yes, we use XA transactions.
>
> I don´t think that the NIO mixes this up some
Yes, we use XA transactions.
I don´t think that the NIO mixes this up somehow. We can run our system with
a standalone ActiveMQ using tcp or nio but also in an embedded mode inside
Wildfly using the VM protocol.
I just run our tests again with the enableAckCompaction set to false for the
kahaDB -
XA transactions?
normally the transaction is on the session and connection... so any async
call will complete before the commit.. unless maybe nio is mixing this up
some.
do you have some code that will show the rollbackOnlyOnAsyncException case
where the tx is null.
There is a test case that can
Hello Gary.
Thanks for your reply.
I already tried the rollbackOnlyOnAsyncException. But this one only works if
the transaction still exists when the error in the async send happens.
But if the TX is already finished, than there is no such action because the
code which looks up the transaction retu
in addition, try the latest Artemis release, there has been a bunch of work
on latency w.r.t gc on exactly that flat send latency (reliable enqueue)
use case.
On Wed, 14 Feb 2018 at 14:29 Gary Tully wrote:
> transaction commit is a sync operation... if an async send in a
> transaction fails, the
transaction commit is a sync operation... if an async send in a transaction
fails, then the commit will rollback via: rollbackOnlyOnAsyncException
w.r.t spikes in send, have you enabled the preallocation strategy on
kahadb, it may be worth toggling to see the effect in your env. Also,
ackCompactio
Hello Tim.
Thank you for your suggestion but I already checked the GC (forgot to
mention it).
The times of the slow JMS sends doesn´t correlate with the garbage collector
events.
Btw: we use CMS as collector.
Any other ideas?
Thanks.
Joachim
--
Sent from: http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/
:
> Hello.
> I have a question about the AMQ-3166 issue and the introduced
> 'rollbackOnlyOnAsyncException' flag.
> In the comments of the AMQ-3166 task Gary Tully says
> /async exceptions on transactional ops - message send and message ack
> will result in the tra
Hello.
I have a question about the AMQ-3166 issue and the introduced
'rollbackOnlyOnAsyncException' flag.
In the comments of the AMQ-3166 task Gary Tully says
async exceptions on transactional ops - message send and message ack
will result in the transaction being marked rollback-on
Hello.
I have a question about the AMQ-3166 issue and the introduced
'rollbackOnlyOnAsyncException' flag.
In the comments of the AMQ-3166 task Gary Tully says
/async exceptions on transactional ops - message send and message ack
will result in the transaction being marked rol
Thank you
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/A-question-about-memory-usage-jvm-tp4728197p4728209.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
rect ?
> <http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n4728197/1.gif>
>
> If you look at the picture above it uses more then that ? Could anyone can
> explain it ? Or correct me if i'm wrong?
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http:
4728197/1.gif>
>
> If you look at the picture above it uses more then that ? Could anyone can
> explain it ? Or correct me if i'm wrong?
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/A-quest
om/file/n4728197/1.gif>
If you look at the picture above it uses more then that ? Could anyone can
explain it ? Or correct me if i'm wrong?
Regards.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/A-question-about-memory-usage-jvm-tp4728197.html
Sent from the Ac
> Is it possible to achieve the same functionality for dynamically created
> queues ?
In short, no.
Justin
- Original Message -
From: "Maciej Gałkowski"
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2017 3:52:16 AM
Subject: Artemis 1.5.1 question about the E
This is sort of follow up to my previous message.
I am evaluating STOPM v1.2 protocol implementation. In our use case STOMP
message consumers have to call an unreliable third party dependency, and
this call can fail from time to time.
The subscription is set in the ack:client-individual mode.
As t
ndom?
> Once a connection to local2 is established, the client will not attempt to
> connect to local1 unless the connection to local2 is disrupted. Is that
> correct?
>
> Thanks,
> - Arkin
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
>
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-priorityURIs-feature-tp4713129.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
ted. Is that
correct?
Thanks,
- Arkin
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-priorityURIs-feature-tp4713129.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
83324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-priorityURIs-feature-tp4713129.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ent based on your
application needs and future plans.
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/question-about-activemqCPP-compatability-tp4700963p4701135.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing
PP API for our usage,
> seperating it from the application so that any future changes to the API
> or the broker can be implemented without change to the core of the
> application?
>
> Thanks in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/questi
nly 3 vm's. Do you see any problems with having both on
same server/vm?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/question-about-activemq-and-zookeeper-cluster-tp4692965.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
o you see any problem with using just 2
> zookeepers?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://activemq.2283324.n4.
> nabble.com/question-about-replicated-level-DB-Store-tp4692850.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
ing 2 zookeeper
servers should be fine. If one goes down, we still have other zookeeper.
Just 3 might be redundant. Do you see any problem with using just 2
zookeepers?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/question-about-replicated-level-DB-Store-tp4692850.htm
t;
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Network-Brokers-tp4686054p4686102.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
send the message to other cluster?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Network-Brokers-tp4686054p4686102.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
t;
> Client 1 (Version 1) message-> Cluster master/slave broker
> --message> Server 1
> Client 2 (Version 2) message-> Cluster master/slave broker
> --message> Server 2
>
> How could it?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Network-Brokers-tp4686054.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
t; Server 1
Client 2 (Version 2) message-> Cluster master/slave broker
--message> Server 2
How could it?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Network-Brokers-tp4686054.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
By the way I just debugged my Consumer code and found it was stopped in
ActiveMQConnection#syncSendPacket. it looks like Consumer is waiting for
ActiveMQ's response but no any reply.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Some-question-about-static-and-mult
4.n4.nabble.com/Some-question-about-static-and-multicast-for-network-broker-tp4679838.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ds or might
use a shared pool.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/question-about-producer-flow-control-tp4677629p4677721.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
always handles (tries to handle)
messages once it receives them.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/question-about-producer-flow-control-tp4677629p4677713.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Any pointers, links, etc?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/question-about-producer-flow-control-tp4677629p4677709.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Also, what about the per-destination limits, are those enforced?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/question-about-producer-flow-control-tp4677629p4677652.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ew this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/question-about-producer-flow-control-tp4677629.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
twork bridge to all of those brokers.
If they're up, then yes, you could potentially have messages forwarded
to all of them. In your case, you mention that you have M/S failover
on JDBC, so the slave brokers are not fully started. The network
bridge won't be able to connect to them becaus
orward to all these uris?
or forward to only one url ?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/question-about-static-network-connector-tp4674057.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
sumers in our demo can't
> bahave like yours?
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Multiple-Consumers-Same-Queue-tp4665585p4668391.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
.
How did you configure your ActiveMQ because consumers in our demo can't
bahave like yours?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-Multiple-Consumers-Same-Queue-tp4665585p4668391.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archi
figuration and this example (too simple)
> couldn't be sustainable in time.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-listeners-performance-tp4666024p4666441.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User maili
p://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-listeners-performance-tp4666024p4666441.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
<http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n4666330/recordedObject.png>
hotspots.png
<http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/file/n4666330/hotspots.png>
I hope it could give more information to my problem...
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324
27;t understand how this too simple example, works like that
...
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-listeners-performance-tp4666024p4666329.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Why not perform a heap memory analysis to see what objects are living in the
heap and whether they are reachable?
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-listeners-performance-tp4666024p4666317.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list
.
For that I don't understand what resources are increasing, if when i consume
them should be released.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-listeners-performance-tp4666024p4666316.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes, you can not expect the exact time when JVM will perform the GC
operation, since your memory is low and the JVM may never perform GC...
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-listeners-performance-tp4666024p4666315.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ
ge in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-listeners-performance-tp4666024p4666314.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Are they(include the broker) all running on the same box?
If so non-persistent messages will occupy the heap memory before they are
flushed into the disk.
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-listeners-performance-tp4666024p4666313.html
Sent
aphic, the GC can't release all the memory and
he can't come back to the initial situation. In the last graphic, the
tenured memory is not release properly as well.
Does anybody know why occur that? I'm getting a little lost...
Thanks in advance
Regards
--
View this message i
tion?.
SouNayi, have you ever closed any session at your 24x7 application
eventually, on that case, how can I do it without stop the service?.
Thanks in advance
Regards
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-listeners-performance-tp4666024p4
ler 7.2.2 profiling tool.
I'm specially interesting in know if i should do something with my sessions,
because i'm not closing them (actually, I can't do it, because it should
work 24x7).
Thanks
Regards
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.na
e,
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Question-about-listeners-performance-tp4666024.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
*Christian Posta*
http://www.christianposta.com/blog
twitter: @christianposta
again the profiler tool, I noticed, that the memory leak grows
slower. Does it have any sense?.
We are not closing the session and the conexion instances because we reuse
them all the time.
Thank you in advance,
Regards
--
View this message in context:
http://activemq.2283324.n4.nabble.com/Q
1 - 100 of 309 matches
Mail list logo
