On Nov 25, 2014, at 2:59 AM, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for what Nux said - freezing new development for CloudStack and
polishing new stuff.
We already discussed this during CCCEU14, and I really think this should be
priority - but discussion during CCCEU14 and really
On Nov 25, 2014, at 2:48 AM, Madan Ganesh Velayudham madangan...@me.com wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone tried to bring up simulator on any of the public cloud platforms
(AWS, Google Compute or others).
We’re trying to install cloudstack simulator on Google Compute VM.
Appreciate your
+1 loved your email Lucian!
On 25-Nov-2014, at 6:35 am, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Slightly pissed at the switched to Openstack remark.
Using Openstack as a means to force/suggest new features into ACS is silly.
I also want KVM snapshotting to happen, but I think there are more important
How about a LTS version (basically what 4.3 currently is) that undergoes
longer testing and receives bugfix releases for a certain amount of time?
This is not a true proposal, just venting the idea. I'd even say that new
features would have to be in one normal release before it's included in a
Sebastien, there is a difference.
The users and devs are split in that users want something that works well,
doesn't give them nightmares or heart palpitations.
Devs hate maintaining old code, especially that is not theirs.
Members who can't code (like me, should've stayed in school) can vote
Erik,
It will complicate release management and it will also attract most of the
users.. who will tests the rest of the releases?
However as someone who is using CentOS instead of Fedora, I do like the idea.
:-)
Would be interesting to hear ideas from some of the more hard core devs on this.
Those who wants the new features? Those who're not running production?
Labs?
I agree that the idea isn't bulletproof, and might not even be possible
with the way things are, but I do like the thought of LTS.
Erik
On Tue Nov 25 2014 at 10:51:32 AM Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Erik,
It will
+1 for LTS
As Nux and probably majority of other users, I also have no coding
knowledge, so will also do my best meaning to test/report/complain...this
where I see differrence between devs and the rest of us in my opinion.
On 25 November 2014 at 11:24, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
I don’t want to takeover this thread so I’ll kick start a thread on officially
recognising and working towards LTS releases (will cc to users@).
On 25-Nov-2014, at 4:27 pm, Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for LTS
As Nux and probably majority of other users, I also have no
Hi,
During CCCEU14 conference and over emails, I spoke with many CloudStack users
and I think most of us would like to have and use LTS releases. I propose that;
- We encourage a habit to backport a bugfix to all qualifying branches whether
or not those branches are LTS
- We contribute (unit,
Hi Tejas,
The network mode set to 'bridge' mode.
#xe-switch-network-backend bridge
I think Xenserver 6.2 comes with the CSP package, so you need to install it
explicitly.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 25-Nov-2014, at 4:47 PM, Tejas Sheth tshet...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
We are configuring
I did this on AWS, works like a charm.
Sent from my iPhone
On 25 Nov 2014, at 1:19 pm, Madan Ganesh Velayudham madangan...@me.com
wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone tried to bring up simulator on any of the public cloud platforms
(AWS, Google Compute or others).
We’re trying to install
- Original Message -
From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 25 November, 2014 1:05:39 AM
Subject: Re: Xenserver and CEPH ?
Slightly pissed at the switched to Openstack remark.
Using Openstack as a means to force/suggest new features into ACS
is
Hi!
Same problem here with CS 4.4.1 and 5 XenServers in one Cluster: Two
hosts are in maintenance mode, and canceling maintenance mode results in
Internal Server Error. Here's my backtrace:
2014-11-25 13:08:45,448 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher]
(API-Job-Executor-54:ctx-a076520e
+1 for the LTS releases. Majority of falks in production needs to have a stable
release.
I agree that it will make the release cycle more complex, however, if the
result will improve the stability of the product i think it's worth the extra
hustle.
Also, it might improve the release times
Like Wido, I also agree with LTS, but also think 4.3 is kind of old by now and
4.4.2 is looking good.
Perhaps take a step back and see how 4.5 goes and start with that one?
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Rohit Yadav
Andrei,
There's a thread LTS Releases in the dev list, we should continue this
discussion there.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 25
- Original Message -
Hi,
During CCCEU14 conference and over emails, I spoke with many
CloudStack users and I think most of us would like to have and use
LTS releases. I propose that;
- We encourage a habit to backport a bugfix to all qualifying
branches whether or not those
Sorry, will do
- Original Message -
From: Nux! n...@li.nux.ro
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 25 November, 2014 1:10:03 PM
Subject: Re: Xenserver and CEPH ?
Andrei,
There's a thread LTS Releases in the dev list, we should continue
this discussion there.
--
Hi Wido and Lucian,
There are many ways to get to a stable product including fixing coverity
issues, unit/integration tests etc. but one of those ways is to simply support
existing releases with bugfix releases because most CloudStack users just don’t
care about git workflows, or coverity or
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
The 4.4 branch does not contain many bugfixes which are in 4.3 and on
master/4.5.
That is worrying, Rohit. As the rest of your mail is already a vote of
distrust, this part says we should not release 4.4.2 as it
Rohit,
Agreed, I know very well how it is to get stuck with a certain version and
your (and everyone's) need for backports.
Your decision re 4.3 seems to make sense, it looks in good (blue?) shape.
4.5 is starting to look very interesting.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Daan,
I like 4.4 better than 4.3 for my use case and despite the bugs I hit it does
its job.
If I were to deploy today it would still be with 4.4. Hope this makes you feel
better. :-)
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
Hello Jayapal,
Thanks for reply, I have understood the bridge configuration part but can
you clarify CSP package part.
if CSP package comes with xenserver 6.2 then do we need to install it
explicitly?
It would be really helpful if you can send link to install CSP in
xenserver 6.2 because
I do prefer 4.4 as well because it has GPU sharing and we actively test it.
Other bugs are not so important for us right now.
Vadim.
-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 4:48 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
I like 4.4 better than 4.3 for my use case and despite the bugs I hit it does
its job.
If I were to deploy today it would still be with 4.4. Hope this makes you
feel better. :-)
It makes me feel the hero;) Seriously, I don't feel
This worked like a charm! Thanks Sebastien,
https://docs.docker.com/installation/google/
https://registry.hub.docker.com/u/runseb/cloudstack/
Cheers,
Madan
On 25-Nov-2014, at 2:09 pm, Sebastien Goasguen run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 25, 2014, at 2:48 AM, Madan Ganesh Velayudham
XenServer does not need any package to be expicitly installed. When you add
host to CS it copies some files to the host itself and you don't need to bother
about them usually.
Vadim.
-Original Message-
From: Tejas Sheth [mailto:tshet...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014
Thanks,
So can i take it as confirmation and proceed with only following bridge
configuration in xenserver 6.2?
# xe-switch-network-backend bridge
# vi /etc/sysctl.conf
net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables = 1
net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables = 0
Hey Daan,
On 25-Nov-2014, at 7:26 pm, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
That is worrying, Rohit. As the rest of your mail is already a vote of
distrust, this part says we should not release 4.4.2 as it contains
regressions.
Looks like you skimmed my email and missed the following
The sysctl.conf bit seems correct.
Get back if your security groups will not work.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Tejas Sheth tshet...@gmail.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 25 November, 2014
For 6.2 you no need to install CSP. My typo mistake in last mail.
sysctl.conf is fine.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 25-Nov-2014, at 8:45 PM, Tejas Sheth tshet...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks,
So can i take it as confirmation and proceed with only following bridge
configuration in xenserver 6.2?
#
Hi, Vadim,
Thanks a lot and that's a bit clear now, but still confused about how to
partition the network, the four NICs of SSVM are generated automatically by
cloudstack, so how do you know which subnet is matched to which NIC?
According to what principle should the partition be made( 4 subnet
Rohit, I consider you my friend and colleague, I could reply on
everything said but do not want to escalate on all the details. The
only remark I want to make is that 4.4 is open for commits from here
on in.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com wrote:
Hey Daan,
Top posting here as my remarks are mainly on the original topic.
I’m not in favor of supporting LTS releases as a community. The reasoning here
is that there is a huge chance that we will fragment the community in people
that just want to work on the latest and greatest and some other folks who
Thanks for all the responses everyone.
Version of CS = 4.2.1
Status of Primary storage = unused, all VMs on local storage
The VMs that wont expunge were on a CS host that doesnt exist anymore. The
VMs were stored on local storage on that CS host. The VMs files dont exist
anymore.
--
I have tested this upgrade multiple times, from a fresh 4.4.0 — 4.4.1. I am
encountering a tomcat 404 error after starting CS, post-upgrade. I have
followed the instructions provided here:
http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgrade-4.4.html
Here is an email from Mutty Cruz:
I finally was able to upgrade successfully Cloudstack 4.4.0 to Cloudstack
4.4.1. I used this guider:
http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgrade-4.4.html
Download System VMs from here: http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/systemvm/4.4/
I
Hi Willard,
this issue came up in the list a few weeks ago, it is resolve!
I solved the problem.
The column display from the snapshot _policy was missing after update.
Just do: ALTER TABLE `snapshot_policy` ADD `display` TINYINT( 1 ) NOT
NULL DEFAULT '1'
Regards,
Thanks,
Motty
btw 4.4.2 is expected to be release in about a week to mitigate this
upgrade issue.
*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
t 855.652.5683
*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w
That worked perfectly. Thanks
Willard Rathjen
Cloud Systems Engineer
Office +1.800.735.7104 tel:+1.800.735.7104 | Direct +1.515.612.7813
tel:+1.515.612.7813
willard.rath...@appcore.com mailto:willard.rath...@appcore.com |
www.appcore.com http://www.appcore.com/
Switching from the realhostip.com certificate to a commercial certificate
caused some grief. It was eventually sorted out, so if others run into this
issue, maybe this could be useful.
We have a dev instance of cloudplatform 4.3.0.x. After uploading the CA root
and intermediate certs and the
Hi
LTS is a very good idea I think. Waiting for new releases is not a good
solution for existing bugs. After waiting monthes for new release you may don't
see any solution to existing bugs but also you may face with some new bugs! (In
Persion we say you are going to make up eyebrow but you make
When I try to take a snapshot now I just get an error like this, Failed to
create a snapshot due to an internal error creating snapshot for volume ... has
anyone run into this, if so what was the fix, I tried restarting the cloud
services on the SSVM, but that did not help.
Hello,
I have made the bridge configuration, but when i am selecting advance
zone. it is not showing public network configuration. only guest and
management is availabel. also internal CIDR ip configuration is also not
available.
i think it is cinverting to basic zone if we select security
Hi all,
on CS 4.2 we experience the issue that taking snapshots (disk snapshots to
secondary storage) cause heavily problems.
Once the network becomes busy (because of taking the snapshots) CS starts to
shutdown all the virtual machines.
I'm able to restart them again but if the copy job for
Hello Dan,
I have done simple networking for XenServer and it worked well. All
guest and management IP-s belonged to 192.168.1.0/24 network and public net in
my case was 10.0.0.0/24. If you don't have external switch/router that can be
programmed to handle different nets on different
That should not be the case, you can pick up traffic types icons from your
left. Can you share some screenshots with us?
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Tejas Sheth tshet...@gmail.com
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Hi all,
on CS 4.2 we have the problem that the agent on the hypervisors consumes a lot
of memory sometimes.
If that happens the OS starts to kill the virtual machines.
Are there any solutions out there or some java configurations for the agent?
Thanks and regards,
Ingo
--
This email was
Please attach the management logs for further invetigation...what OS, what
storage, etc...
On 26 November 2014 at 01:51, Jeff Barnett jbarn...@prokarma.com wrote:
When I try to take a snapshot now I just get an error like this, Failed to
create a snapshot due to an internal error creating
Hello,
What kind of zone do you have? Are you using the same physical link for primary
and secondary storages?
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Ingo Jochim ingo.joc...@bautzen-it.de
To:
Had exact same issue, fixed in 4.3...
Not sure how to limit it with some java option maybe... ?
On 26 November 2014 at 08:41, Jochim, Ingo ingo.joc...@bautzen-it.de
wrote:
Hi all,
on CS 4.2 we have the problem that the agent on the hypervisors consumes a
lot of memory sometimes.
If that
52 matches
Mail list logo
