lling to isolated and VPC networks.
Jon
From: Francisco Germano
Sent: 11 August 2019 22:51
To: 'users@cloudstack.apache.org'
Subject: Question about Basic and Advanced Network
Greetings,
My team and I are working for open-source software and our n
possible to control the
Public IPs using just the CloudStack API? If yes, how?
About Advanced Network:
2 - Is it possible to use Security Group in the Isolated Network?
Best regards,
Francisco Germano
e security groups on advanced network mode or can I
set a network acl specifying source and destination?
Thanks
Is there someway to use security groups on advanced network mode or can I set a
network acl specifying source and destination?
Thanks
e segregated physically what is the point of VLAN
tagging?
Thanks!
Josh
From: Nux!
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 21:16
Subject: Re: Advanced network configuration
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Here's the readable version, so others waste less time on this.
Mate you really need to l
nd guest
traffic instead. Would it be advisable to trunk them or have dedicated networks?
Also, if all networks are segregated physically what is the point of VLAN
tagging?
Thanks!
Josh
From: Nux!
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 21:16
Subject: Re: Advanced network configuration
To: users@
Here's the readable version, so others waste less time on this.
Mate you really need to learn how to format emails, if you expect any kind of
positive response.
==
Hi all,
I've decided to go with the advanced network. I have some questions:
1. Should the HV management interfa
Hi all,
I've decided to go with the advanced network. I have some questions:
1. Should the HV management interface be on a public IP or is it sufficient to
have it on the private management network?2. I have 2 NICs on each HV to be
split between Public, Guest & Management traffic
Hi all,
I was wondering if it is possible to implement EIP (Elastic IP) with VPC or
Advanced zones
Thanks for your help
David
Hello,
I want to create Zone with two shared networks, so I create Advanced
Zone via cloudmonkey, add 3 physical networks, (one for Storage +
Management, and last two for Guest traffic's). After that when I try to
enable zone, I got error, that zone need physical network with Public
traffic t
quot;
> To: ""
> Sent: Saturday, 4 April, 2015 5:04:50 PM
> Subject: Re: Advanced Network Changing Public IP Range
> I understand, when we tried this on a test account we weren't able to
> release IP addresses without deleting user vms before, so what you
> are saying
Take a backup of cloud database
before you attempt any changes to db.
Thanks,
Praveen
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Sam Ceylani
mailto:s...@mistercertified.com>
<mailto:s...@mistercertified.com>> wrote:
We have almost 13 public IP's in an advanced network with 4-5 isolated
netwo
, if you have any deployed VMs in your mentioned 4-5 isolated
> networks, you need to mark all the respective public IPs in mysql database
> for "user_ip_address" table as removed. Take a backup of cloud database
> before you attempt any changes to db.
>
> Thanks,
> Praveen
>
>
; table as removed. Take a backup of cloud database
before you attempt any changes to db.
Thanks,
Praveen
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Sam Ceylani
mailto:s...@mistercertified.com>> wrote:
We have almost 13 public IP's in an advanced network with 4-5 isolated
networks and I couldn
; table as removed. Take a backup of cloud database
before you attempt any changes to db.
Thanks,
Praveen
On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Sam Ceylani wrote:
> We have almost 13 public IP's in an advanced network with 4-5 isolated
> networks and I couldn't find anything in documen
We have almost 13 public IP's in an advanced network with 4-5 isolated networks
and I couldn't find anything in documentation about changing them. What is the
best way to handle this situation? We are moving to a new data center and some
people suggested creating templates of vms and
What is the current state of supported technologies and their maturity
besides vlan and security groups?
Anyone with experiences to share?
Erik
n Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Vadim Kimlaychuk wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Have read nice article about CS and advanced network set-up
> here:
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack/understanding-cloudstacks-physical-networking-architecture/,
> but have problem with routing.
>
Hello,
Have read nice article about CS and advanced network set-up here:
http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack/understanding-cloudstacks-physical-networking-architecture/,
but have problem with routing.
Let me say I have only 1 NIC with all the trunks 100, 200, 300
I have a step-by-step guide at
http://shankerbalan.net/blog/cloudstack-simple-advanced-network-example/ which
could use.
Hth.
--
@shankerbalan
M: +91 98860 60539 | O: +91 (80) 67935867
shanker.ba...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue
ShapeBlue Services India LLP, 22nd flo
sing advanced network and
KVM hypervisor?
Hi,
I have followed this run book to set up my first CS instance successfully with
basic networking: http://people.apache.org/%7Eke4qqq/runbook/index.html .
Now I want to try advanced networking with kvm hypervisor where CS management
server and kvm hyperv
Hi,
I have followed this run book to set up my first CS instance successfully with
basic networking: http://people.apache.org/%7Eke4qqq/runbook/index.html .
Now I want to try advanced networking with kvm hypervisor where CS management
server and kvm hypervisor are running on two separate physic
Noel Kendall writes:
>
> Reply, sorry, spoke too soon. Stop and start did not resolve the issue.
> Noel
>
> > From: Chiradeep.Vittal@...
> > To: users@...
> > Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
> > Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:00:29 +
>
S is supported check out the installation
> > > link, I propose to use it with LTS 12.04 very easy link is enclosed.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/latest/installation.html
lation.html
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> http://www.greenhills.co.uk/2013/08/30/cloudstack-single-server-on-ubuntu-with-kvm.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Kind Regards
> > >> Amin
> > >>
> > >> -Original Messa
ttp://www.greenhills.co.uk/2013/08/30/cloudstack-single-server-on-ubuntu-with-kvm.html
> >>
> >>
> >> Kind Regards
> >> Amin
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Владислав Старков [mailto:vladislav.star...@gmail.com]
> &
s
>> Amin
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Владислав Старков [mailto:vladislav.star...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, 23 April 2014 1:26 AM
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: CloudStack 4.3 proper Advanced Network setup
>&g
ds
> Amin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Владислав Старков [mailto:vladislav.star...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 April 2014 1:26 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: CloudStack 4.3 proper Advanced Network setup
>
> Hi there,
>
> I just installed
-server-on-ubuntu-with-kvm.html
Kind Regards
Amin
-Original Message-
From: Владислав Старков [mailto:vladislav.star...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 23 April 2014 1:26 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: CloudStack 4.3 proper Advanced Network setup
Hi there,
I just installed
up ifconfig $IFACE 0.0.0.0 up
down ifconfig $IFACE down
The approximate network setup schema is depicted here:
http://cl.ly/image/3z2D0w370H1M/o
While setting up the first zone in administrator's UI I've faced with
difficulties in setting up my advanced network correctly. (Fo
Subject: Basic network setup to Advanced network setup
Hi folks,
is there any way to "migrate" a basic network setup to an advanced network with
isolated vlans to storage, management and etc?
--
Rafael Weingärtner
Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infr
Hi folks,
is there any way to "migrate" a basic network setup to an advanced network
with isolated vlans to storage, management and etc?
--
Rafael Weingärtner
Hi All,
In my CS 4.2.1, I set a load balancing with its real servers. The real
servers run apache 2.4.
I want to only allow my company's ip to access them, but failed.
I checked and found the ip access real server was my vrouter's ip.
How to implement my destination?
Thank you.
Steven
Thank you for updating, Daan.
On 02/22/2014 05:11 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Steven Liang wrote:
My Guest CIDR set to 10.1.1.0/24, when I created Advanced network mode CS.
After I added guest network
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 11:27 PM, Steven Liang wrote:
>
>
> My Guest CIDR set to 10.1.1.0/24, when I created Advanced network mode CS.
> After I added guest network 10.3.4.0/24, and used it on vms, it works.
> But when I added guest network 192.168.20.0/24, it doesn't work
Hi,
My Guest CIDR set to 10.1.1.0/24, when I created Advanced network mode CS.
After I added guest network 10.3.4.0/24, and used it on vms, it works.
But when I added guest network 192.168.20.0/24, it doesn't work.
Why?
Thank you.
Steven
:users@cloudstack.apache.org>"
mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Date: Thursday, 17 October 2013 10:29 AM
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>"
mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: Creating advanced network
Hi Murali,
I saw
rg<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>"
mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Date: Thursday, 17 October 2013 10:29 AM
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>"
mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: Creating advanced network
Hi
e a load balancer like the internal
cloudstack one or even the F5 and it seems it's not supported.
No cloudstack support for internal LB (the VR one) or F5 ? Really !!!
According to the advanced network and security groups specification (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTA
he VLAN on the hypervisor.
>>> I added the vlan to the hypervisor now and bound cloudbr1 to it and
>>> using it untagged in cloudstack.
>>> Finally all is up. :-)
>>>
>>> Now I was looking how to use a load balancer like the internal
>>> cl
one or even the F5 and it seems it's not supported.
No cloudstack support for internal LB (the VR one) or F5 ? Really !!!
According to the advanced network and security groups specification (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Isolation+based+on+
Security+Groups+in+Advance
it seems it's not supported.
>No cloudstack support for internal LB (the VR one) or F5 ? Really !!!
>According to the advanced network and security groups specification (
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Isolation+based+on+
>Security+Groups+in+Advance+zone)
5 ? Really !!!
According to the advanced network and security groups specification (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Isolation+based+on+Security+Groups+in+Advance+zone)
AddF5LoadBalancerCmd api commands will just fail in SG enabled zone.
That's just a joke.
I'm rea
The traffic type "public" is gone when using SG and advanced network in 4.2
How I'm supposed to use the cloudstack loadbalancing (VR) in this
constellation ?
Bjoern
PhysicalNetworkCmd
>> com.cloud.exception.**InvalidParameterValueException**: Can't add vnet
>> range to the physical network in the zone that supports Advanced network,
>> Security Group enabled: true
>> at com.cloud.network.**NetworkServiceImpl.**
>
com.cloud.exception.InvalidParameterValueException: Can't add vnet
range to the physical network in the zone that supports Advanced
network, Security Group enabled: true
at
com.cloud.network.NetworkServiceImpl.updatePhysicalNetwork(NetworkServiceImpl.java:2527)
-448b-8a75-b68ffeb52d56 ]) Unexpected exception while
executing
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.network.UpdatePhysicalNetworkCmd
com.cloud.exception.InvalidParameterValueException: Can't add vnet range
to the physical network in the zone that supports Advanced network,
Security
day, September 16, 2013 1:26 PM
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>"
mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: Advanced network set-up - Physical network name
Hi guys,
I am setting up a CS using the advanced network wizard.
We have curre
Hi guys,
I am setting up a CS using the advanced network wizard.
We have currently 3 configured VLANs network in each hypervisor host,
So, on the wizard when I am asked for Physical network name, what
identifier should I use ? the actual interface name (eth0.0, etho.2 and
eth1.3)?
--
Rafael
gt;somethingthat should be fixed?
>Thanks for the simple and rather effective suggestion!
>Noel
>
>> From: chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
>> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:00:29 +
&
Reply, sorry, spoke too soon. Stop and start did not resolve the issue.
Noel
> From: chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:00:29 +
>
> Suggest that you stop and star
That has worked Chiradeep. What could have caused this problem? Is it
somethingthat should be fixed?
Thanks for the simple and rather effective suggestion!
Noel
> From: chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
&g
e VR is being
>bypassed... that is, the packets are being forwarded without SNAT being
>performed on them correctly.
>Noel
>
>> From: jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
>> Date:
jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
> Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 05:14:53 +
>
> Hi,
>
> I think when the packets are going out the packets are NATed with private ip,
> that can't reach back t
I will have a look at that Jayapal - it's a good suggestion and useful bit of
data. Doesn't the SNAT rule on created on the VR take care of this though?Noel
> From: jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not work
It's very mysterious, I have never seen anything like this before. There are
> two other VRs, both having same issue.
> I will try your suggestion.
> Noel
>> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 21:20:41 +0100
>> Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
>> From: msweet@gmai
t; > not show up.
> > In short:
> > wget from VR to www.xyz.com works, response received and saved
> > wget from guest to www.xyz.com does not work, network not available
> > displayed on guest, response packets not seen on the public i/f of VR at all
> > Noe
at all
> Noel
>
> > Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 18:16:17 +0100
> > Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
> > From: msweet@gmail.com
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> >
> > Hi Noel,
> >
> > Can you answer: Does the traffic come back
available displayed
on guest, response packets not seen on the public i/f of VR at all
Noel
> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 18:16:17 +0100
> Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
> From: msweet@gmail.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>
> Hi Noel,
>
> Can you answ
un, 15 Sep 2013 13:15:20 +0100
> > Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
> > From: msweet@gmail.com
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> >
> > Hi Noel,
> >
> > Does the traffic come back on the public interface? and then onto the
Indeed, yes, a wget executed on the VR to a public website works just fine.
Noel
> Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 13:15:20 +0100
> Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
> From: msweet@gmail.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>
> Hi Noel,
>
> Does the traffic
6ed2 de56 0x0020:
> a002 3908 516c 0204 05b4 0402 080a0x0030: 01a3 7444
> 0103 0304
>
>
> > Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 19:29:53 +0100
> > Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
> > From: msweet@gmail.com
> > To:
0 3f06 2d13 0a0b 4fb20x0010: 416e c660
98a2 0050 6ed2 de56 0x0020: a002 3908 516c 0204 05b4
0402 080a0x0030: 01a3 7444 0103 0304
> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 19:29:53 +0100
> Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
> From: msweet
> > Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
> > From: msweet@gmail.com
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> >
> > Hi Noel,
> >
> > Could you put the IP tables on pastebin? GMail has collapsed the lines
> > horrifically.
> > Have you a
http://pastebin.com/3FZmFnvZ
Many thanks Marty.
Noel
> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 18:07:55 +0100
> Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
> From: msweet@gmail.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>
> Hi Noel,
>
> Could you put the IP tables on pastebin? GMail
tcp
> -- anywhere 67.xxx.xxx.56 tcp dpt:ssh to:
> 10.11.79.178:22 DNAT tcp -- anywhere 67.xxx.xxx.56
> tcp dpt:ftp to:10.11.79.178:21 DNAT tcp -- anywhere
> 67.xxx.xxx.56 tcp dpt:5901 to:10.11.79.178:5901
>
>
67.xxx.xxx.56 tcp dpt:ftp
to:10.11.79.178:21 DNAT tcp -- anywhere 67.xxx.xxx.56
tcp dpt:5901 to:10.11.79.178:5901
> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 17:25:14 +0100
> Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
> From: msweet@gmail.com
&g
Hi Noel,
Can you try using telnet to connect to an external webserver? telnet
www.google.com 80
Can you also clarify: do you see the response packets reach the VR and/or
on what interfaces?
Thanks,
Marty
On Saturday, September 14, 2013, Noel Kendall wrote:
> Guest OS cannot receive responses to
Guest OS cannot receive responses to http GETs from resources on the Internet.
Network is advanced, VLAN isolated.
What is working:
- can browse guest website from internet- can ssh to guest from internet- can
VPN to guest network from internet
- network VR can access internet sites no problem
Wha
That's the insight I needed, and indeed, you are correct. Appreciate the very
quick response from you fellows.
Noel
> From: jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: V4.1 Advanced Network, VR reboot, NAT rules gone
> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 20
Are you rebooting the VM with the "reboot" command in the VM? If so,
try the rebootRouter API or the UI instead. There's no agent in the
virtual router so CloudStack may not be aware of a reboot performed
outside of CloudStack. This is even the case for a reboot of a virtual
router by vSphere na
How are you rebooting the VR? Through CloudStack or outside?
On 13/09/13 5:10 AM, "Noel Kendall" wrote:
>FW rules are not persistent in VR? I am trying to figure out why a V4.1
>VR does not properly NAT, and of course,reboot several times to reset
>state. I see that after each reboot, the NAT r
Hi,
Rebooting the VR outside the cloudstack, will not program the NAT/firewall
rules.
If you reboot the VR from the cloudstack then rules get programmed.
Thanks,
Jayapal
On 13-Sep-2013, at 5:10 AM, Noel Kendall
wrote:
> FW rules are not persistent in VR? I am trying to figure out why a V4.1
FW rules are not persistent in VR? I am trying to figure out why a V4.1 VR does
not properly NAT, and of course,reboot several times to reset state. I see that
after each reboot, the NAT rules are gone. If I go to the mgr, and touchthe
rules for the network in some way, the rules are re-instated
>
> Anthony
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Anton Rubets [mailto:plejik@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 11:43 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Advanced network
>
> Hello everyone.
> First of all i have
>
ort management network on VLAN.
Anthony
-Original Message-
From: Anton Rubets [mailto:plejik@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 11:43 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Advanced network
Hello everyone.
First of all i have
1. Centos + CS 4.1 - mgnt server
2. test se
Hello everyone.
First of all i have
1. Centos + CS 4.1 - mgnt server
2. test server with xcp1.6
3. cisco router
4. Vlan41 where located my server(mgnt net)
5. Vlan42 where i located my VM (public & gst merge in future, so i wanna
have real adress@ local network)
And problem
First i try to create n
> >> >>>>>> I login to the VRouter VM, Can I change the rules to get work?
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>
>
be send to
>> the
>> >>>>>> FW_OUTBOUND chain.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> *iptables rules:*
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> *Default rules:*
>> >>>>>>
>> >>
>
> >>>>>
> >>
>
> >>>>>> root@r-4-VM:~# iptables -L
> >>>>>> Chain INPUT (policy DROP)
> >>>>>> target prot opt so
t;> root@r-4-VM:~# iptables -L
> >>>>>> Chain INPUT (policy DROP)
> >>>>>> target prot opt source destination
> >>>>>> NETWORK_STATS all -- anywhere anywhere
> >>>>>> ACCEPT al
udp -- anywhere anywhereudp
>>>>> dpt:bootps
>>>>>> ACCEPT udp -- anywhere anywhereudp
>>>>> dpt:domain
>>>>>> ACCEPT tcp -- anywhere anywherestate NEW
>>&
ELATED,ESTABLISHED
> >>>> ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state NEW
> >>>> ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywherestate
> >>>> RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> >>>> ACCEPT all --
anywherestate
> >>> RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> >>> ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere
> >>>
> >>> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)
> >>> target prot opt source destination
> >>> NETWORK_
CCEPT all -- anywhere anywherestate
>>>> RELATED,ESTABLISHED
>>>> ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere
>>>> ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywherestate
>>>> RELATED,ESTABLISHED
>>>>
nywhere
>>> all -- anywhere anywhere
>>> tcp -- anywhere anywhere
>>> tcp -- anywhere anywhere
>>> all -- anywhere anywhere
>>> all -- anywhere anywhe
createEgressFirewallRule'
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Jayapal
> >>
> >> On 22-May-2013, at 12:05 PM, wq meng
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello Jayapal,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https
after that.
> >> Try to add rules using the API 'createEgressFirewallRule'
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Jayapal
> >>
> >> On 22-May-2013, at 12:05 PM, wq meng
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello Jayapal,
> >
ked Network -> Guest Network (Name) ->
>>>
>>> I can not find out any Egress fire rule tab.
>>>
>>>
>>> Have I missed something?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you very much.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
ayapal Reddy Uradi <
> > jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Did you configure the egress firewall rules on the guest network ?
> >> You need to add egress rules to allow guest traffic.
> >>
> >> After add
es rules.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jayapal
>>
>> On 22-May-2013, at 4:10 AM, wq meng wrote:
>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> Anyone have faced this problem? CS4.02 KVM Advanced Network, VM instance
>>> can not access public IP. NAT(Source)
>
Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
> On 22-May-2013, at 4:10 AM, wq meng wrote:
>
> > Hello
> >
> > Anyone have faced this problem? CS4.02 KVM Advanced Network, VM instance
> > can not access public IP. NAT(Source)
> >
> >
> > That the VM instance running
aced this problem? CS4.02 KVM Advanced Network, VM instance
> can not access public IP. NAT(Source)
>
>
> That the VM instance running, but inside the VM instance, it is not
> possible to access outside.
>
>
> It can ping VMs each other, It can ping google.com in th
Hello
Anyone have faced this problem? CS4.02 KVM Advanced Network, VM instance
can not access public IP. NAT(Source)
That the VM instance running, but inside the VM instance, it is not
possible to access outside.
It can ping VMs each other, It can ping google.com in the* Virtual Router
VM
gt;wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 03:30:08AM +0800, wq meng wrote:
> > > How kindly show how to set-up advanced network with the VLan
> > configuration
> > > of a switch.
> > >
> > > I have searched much, but not find any documents to show how to
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 03:30:08AM +0800, wq meng wrote:
> > How kindly show how to set-up advanced network with the VLan
> configuration
> > of a switch.
> >
> > I have searched much, but not find any documents to show how to setup the
> > VLan for a Advanced net
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 03:30:08AM +0800, wq meng wrote:
> How kindly show how to set-up advanced network with the VLan configuration
> of a switch.
>
> I have searched much, but not find any documents to show how to setup the
> VLan for a Advanced network deployment of CS4.01.
>
How kindly show how to set-up advanced network with the VLan configuration
of a switch.
I have searched much, but not find any documents to show how to setup the
VLan for a Advanced network deployment of CS4.01.
I am confused by the Vlan setup on the switch side, is all the nodes
switch ports
98 matches
Mail list logo
