RE: Apache 2.0.59/Solaris8-sparc / Lösung: mod _auth_ldap wird korrekt kompiliert

2006-11-23 Thread Vogel, Thomas (BOT)
Richtig schick ist das nicht aber mit der Salami-Taktik hat es funktioniert. Zunächst nur das APR bauen, dann das APR-UTIL mit --with-ldap erstellen, dann Apachen auf Basis dieser APR kompilieren. Leider unterstützt mod_ldap so noch keine Verbindungen zu SSL-LDAP-Servern. [Thu Nov 23 13:06:44

Re: Apache 2.0.59/Solaris8-sparc / Lösung: mod_auth_ldap wird korrekt kompiliert

2006-11-23 Thread Rainer Sokoll
Vogel, Thomas (BOT) wrote: Leider unterstützt mod_ldap so noch keine Verbindungen zu SSL-LDAP-Servern. [Thu Nov 23 13:06:44 2006] [notice] LDAP: Built with OpenLDAP LDAP SDK [Thu Nov 23 13:06:44 2006] [notice] LDAP: SSL support unavailable Du mußt natürlich auch das OpenLDAP mit SSL bauen:

RE: Apache 2.0.59/Solaris8-sparc / Lösung: mod _auth_ldap wird korrekt kompiliert

2006-11-23 Thread Vogel, Thomas (BOT)
und das SMC-LDAP das ich auf dem Build System ist höchstwahrscheinlich nicht so erstellt worden. sunfreeware ist dann halt doch nur nur was für 08/15 Konfig´s Wenn ich´s geschafft habe poste ich das ganze Rezept. thx, t.v. -Original Message- From: Rainer Sokoll [mailto:[EMAIL

mod_bw funktioniert nicht ?

2006-11-23 Thread Vladislav Vorobiev
Hallo, Ich versuche zu verstehen ob mod_bw funktioniert. Die Funktionsweise ist soweit klar, das modul ist auch geladen. In meinem VirtualHost habe ich BandWidthModule On BandWidth all 358400 MinBandWidth all 15360 MaxConnection all 200 LargeFileLimit .avi 500 358400 #BandWidthDebug On

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.x modules

2006-11-23 Thread arun kumar
Hi Guys, Any difference is there in handling(Configuring) the below modules between apache 1.3.x and apache 2.2.x - server side includes - mod_cgi - mod_setenvif - mod_rewrite Arun --- Boyle Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Fenlason, Josh [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.x modules

2006-11-23 Thread Boyle Owen
-Original Message- From: arun kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 9:26 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.x modules Hi Guys, Any difference is there in handling(Configuring) the below modules between apache

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Could I have some help on installing Apache SSL

2006-11-23 Thread charlene lee
Yes. We have openSSL installed. It was during installing Apache that's when we got that error message saying that it cannot find the Toolkit. Richard de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have openSSL installed?

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Could I have some help on installing Apache SSL

2006-11-23 Thread charlene lee
Yes. We have openSSL installed. First we installed openSSL and all went well. Then we tried to install Apache and it was during installing Apache that's when we got that error message saying that it cannot find the Toolkit. Richard de Vries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache fails to detect client closing connection with windows firewall on client

2006-11-23 Thread Frode E. Moe
Hi again, sorry for the late reply. I just tried disabling KeepAlive, but it did not help much. I'm still experiencing windows/firefox clients sending FIN+ACK to close connection mid-download if it receives Content-Type: text/html when it expects and Accept: image/png;*. This is followed by

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Could I have some help on installing Apache SSL

2006-11-23 Thread charlene lee
Your guess is absolutely correct! I am running Linux Slackware 10.2. Where could I get hold of a copy of openssl-dev package and the SSL library please? Could I find them on the www.openssl.org website? You mentioned Ubuntu. Do you mean www.ubuntu.com? Also if I want to implement digest

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache fails to detect client closing connection with windows firewall on client

2006-11-23 Thread Roman Fiedler
Hi, seems to be just a firewalling/networking problem. The httpd cannot operate on the protocol stack level since it does not have the right privileges. It could be that your client closes the socket (FIN-ACK), but the the firewall blocks further TCP-packets from the server to your local

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache fails to detect client closing connection with windows firewall on client

2006-11-23 Thread Frode E. Moe
Exactly, but for a public-facing web site we have no saying in whether clients use a firewall or not :( Also, doesn't this mean that someone could effectively take down the entire server by opening (MaxWorkers) requests every 5 minutes and then just not respond to / read the response at all?

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers

2006-11-23 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 23.11.06 11:28, Dan Nelson wrote: I'm running Apache 2.0 on Debian Sarge. I have a non-standard application for Apache, and don't want to send any headers in the response. I thought I'd be able to do so using mod_headers. Why do you want to use apache (HTTP server) when you want your

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: mod_headers

2006-11-23 Thread paul
Dan Nelson schrieb: I'm running Apache 2.0 on Debian Sarge. I have a non-standard application for Apache, and don't want to send any headers in the response. I thought I'd be able to do so using mod_headers. I can use the 'Header' directive to add my own header, and then append to and

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers

2006-11-23 Thread Nick Kew
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:28:51 +0800 Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running Apache 2.0 on Debian Sarge. I have a non-standard application for Apache, and don't want to send any headers in the response. No headers at all? You can't do that in response to an HTTP/1.x request,

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2.2 cannot start: undefined symbol: proxy_hook_post_request error (in file /etc/apache2/modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so)

2006-11-23 Thread Michael Hulet
Hello all, I'm upgrading from Apache 2.0.54 to Apache 2.2.3, as I would like to try the proxy_balancer module. I'm running a Debian Sarge box. I uninstalled Apache 2.0.54 and I compiled and installed Apache 2.2.3 in /etc/apache2: # wget http://apache.scarlet.be/httpd/httpd-2.2.3.tar.gz

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers

2006-11-23 Thread Dan Nelson
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:32 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Why do you want to use apache (HTTP server) when you want your application send no headers (e.g. no HTTP response)? Because Apache is robust, efficient, flexible, bulletproof, easy to interface to virtually any database, easy to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: mod_headers

2006-11-23 Thread Transcom
We use: VirtualHost *:80 ... Header set Server This is the new header ... on apache-2.2.3. Doesn't work for me, maybe it doesn't work for 2.0. Thanks Dan - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers

2006-11-23 Thread Dan Nelson
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:21 +, Nick Kew wrote: No headers at all? I'd like to get rid of as many as I can. But I can't seem to get rid of any, well, except the ones I create myself. You can't do that in response to an HTTP/1.x request, because (bugs aside), Apache won't break HTTP at

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers

2006-11-23 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/23/06, Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 11:32 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: Why do you want to use apache (HTTP server) when you want your application send no headers (e.g. no HTTP response)? Because Apache is robust, efficient, flexible, bulletproof,

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2.2 cannot start: undefined symbol: proxy_hook_post_request error (in file /etc/apache2/modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so)

2006-11-23 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/23/06, Michael Hulet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I'm upgrading from Apache 2.0.54 to Apache 2.2.3, as I would like to try the proxy_balancer module. I'm running a Debian Sarge box. I uninstalled Apache 2.0.54 and I compiled and installed Apache 2.2.3 in /etc/apache2: #

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2.2 cannot start: undefined symbol: proxy_hook_post_request error (in file /etc/apache2/modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so)

2006-11-23 Thread Michael Hulet
Joshua Slive a écrit : On 11/23/06, Michael Hulet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I'm upgrading from Apache 2.0.54 to Apache 2.2.3, as I would like to try the proxy_balancer module. I'm running a Debian Sarge box. I uninstalled Apache 2.0.54 and I compiled and installed Apache 2.2.3 in

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers

2006-11-23 Thread Dan Nelson
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:18 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote: But what you don't want is an HTTP server. True, although http would be suitable if I could reduce the unecessary bandwidth from the headers. Luckily, the 2.x version has been designed to support multiple protocols. See mod_echo (or

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2.2 cannot start: undefined symbol: proxy_hook_post_request error (in file /etc/apache2/modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so)

2006-11-23 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/23/06, Michael Hulet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the tip, Joshua. So here is my new httpd.conf: LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so LoadModule proxy_http_module modules/mod_proxy_http.so LoadModule proxy_balancer_module modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so The

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers

2006-11-23 Thread Frode E. Moe
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 22:31:48 +0800, Dan Nelson wrote: Luckily, the 2.x version has been designed to support multiple protocols. See mod_echo (or mod_pop3 or mod_ftpd) for an example of how to substitute another protocol module for the http protocol module. Does that mean I'm

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers

2006-11-23 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/23/06, Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:18 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote: But what you don't want is an HTTP server. True, although http would be suitable if I could reduce the unecessary bandwidth from the headers. But the headers are an inherent part of HTTP

Fw: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with SQL statment

2006-11-23 Thread Jorge Bastos
Guys, Anyone? - Original Message - From: Jorge Bastos To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 10:24 PM Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with SQL statment Hi There People, I have all setup, compiled the libaprutil with mysql support from svn yesterday, all

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2.2 cannot start: undefined symbol: proxy_hook_post_request error (in file /etc/apache2/modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so)

2006-11-23 Thread Michael Hulet
Joshua Slive a écrit : On 11/23/06, Michael Hulet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the tip, Joshua. So here is my new httpd.conf: LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so LoadModule proxy_http_module modules/mod_proxy_http.so LoadModule proxy_balancer_module

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2.2 cannot start: undefined symbol: proxy_hook_post_request error (in file /etc/apache2/modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so)

2006-11-23 Thread Nick Kew
On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 16:05:33 +0100 Michael Hulet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I wanted to remove apache2-utils but it wants to remove a lot of dependencies that I don't want to remove (phpMyAdmin, Webmin, php, ...). What do you think I should do first? Does Debian's documentation not help

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2.2 cannot start: undefined symbol: proxy_hook_post_request error (in file /etc/apache2/modules/mod_proxy_balancer.so)

2006-11-23 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/23/06, Michael Hulet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But what really concerns me here is that you said you were downloading and compiling directly from apache.org, yet you are using apache2ctl, which I believe is debian-specific. This could be causing any number of problems, and could also

Re: Fw: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with SQL statment

2006-11-23 Thread John Meyer
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 14:58 +, Jorge Bastos wrote: Guys, Anyone? I suggest you post this at mysql@lists.mysql.com This is an Apache list, not a MySQL one. But just to give you a hint, % is a wildcard character in MySQL. It is not replaced with the username.

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse Proxy woes

2006-11-23 Thread Rod R
Thanks for the reply. If you would please look at the complete request you would see that I am using AJP to communicate to one host and http to communicate with the other. The AJP connection is working fine, it's the http to the IIS6 machine that's problematical. ProxyRequests Off

Re: Fw: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problem with SQL statment

2006-11-23 Thread Jorge Bastos
Well... AuthDBDUserPWQuery select password from users where username='%s' the % in %s for sure that is the username that cames in HTTP AUTH as the docs describe in: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_authn_dbd.html So... why isn't apache sending the username, anyone? Jorge -

[EMAIL PROTECTED] undefined symbol: zend_ini_string

2006-11-23 Thread Mauro
Hi all, I got a problem while i try to use php with my apache: httpd: Syntax error on line 65 of /data/programs/apache2/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /data/programs/apache2/modules/libphp5.so into server: /data/programs/apache2/modules/libphp5.so: undefined symbol: zend_ini_string I compiled

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2 behind Linksys router

2006-11-23 Thread Daniel L . McGrew
I have Apache2 on a Debian, Sarge computer. I'm behind a Linksys (WRT54GS) router. I've installed the packages to enable this computer (DELL Optiplex GX1) to be a webserver. I can run through the perfect debian server setup, but still have some questions. How do I make this server's webpages

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2 behind Linksys router

2006-11-23 Thread Stephen
1) Set the Apache server to have a static IP. If the gateway on the router is 192.168.1.1 give the server something like 192.168.1.50 2) Have the router DHCP assign IPs in a different range, starting at 192.168.1.100 for other computers on your network 3) Update the IP routing table in the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache2 behind Linksys router

2006-11-23 Thread Bill Angus
This is router setup -- not apache setup. It is described pretty well in the router docs, and is the same for most LinkSys routers (in case you lost the docs to yours they post docs online at linksys.com). Routers have an external IP address for the WAN -- which you can set, and they have a

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache2 behind Linksys router - Thanks

2006-11-23 Thread Teresa Dannette McGrew
I appreciate the help... that answer is 50+% correct... the apache2.conf file doesn't tell apache2 what port to listen on, at least not directly. It refers it to another file named ports.conf... in that file it says, listen=80... change that to 8080 and I'm set... Thanks, I wouldn't have known

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Re: Apache2 behind Linksys router - Thanks

2006-11-23 Thread Sander Temme
On Nov 23, 2006, at 11:36 AM, Teresa Dannette McGrew wrote: I appreciate the help... that answer is 50+% correct... the apache2.conf file doesn't tell apache2 what port to listen on, at least not directly. It refers it to another file named ports.conf... in that file it says, listen=80...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache doesnt close the socket

2006-11-23 Thread Filip Kolendo
Hello, I notice strange (in my opinion erroneous and dangerous) behaviour of Apache; very easily can be completely locked by wrong/malicious clients. I think it can have something common with the situation discussed in the thread I point below, although I'm not sure whether the reason is the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache doesnt close the socket

2006-11-23 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/23/06, Filip Kolendo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I notice strange (in my opinion erroneous and dangerous) behaviour of Apache; very easily can be completely locked by wrong/malicious clients. I think it can have something common with the situation discussed in the thread I point

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Authn_dbd with MySQL problem

2006-11-23 Thread Jorge Bastos
People, I did a few more tests, and the user i enter in the browser when it goes to Auth, i can see in apache logs: [Fri Nov 24 00:34:45 2006] [error] [client 192.168.1.1] user oi: authentication failure for /: Password Mismatch But looking at MySQL logs: 061124 0:34:45 218 Connect

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers

2006-11-23 Thread Dan Nelson
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:43 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote: On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:18 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote: But what you don't want is an HTTP server. True, although http would be suitable if I could reduce the unecessary bandwidth from the headers. But the headers are an

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers

2006-11-23 Thread Dan Nelson
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 15:40 +0100, Frode E. Moe wrote: On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 22:31:48 +0800, Dan Nelson wrote: Luckily, the 2.x version has been designed to support multiple protocols. See mod_echo (or mod_pop3 or mod_ftpd) for an example of how to substitute another protocol

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] How to send WHOLE SSL_CLIENT_CERT in reverse proxy?

2006-11-23 Thread Max Dittrich
Lucuk, Pete schrieb: The backend server is a 3.x version of Jboss that uses Jetty as the Servlet engine. Can you use AJP with Jetty? If not, is there some simple way to yank out the new lines in SSL_CLIENT_CERT on the reverse proxy? I just looked up the Apache Docs, because I remembered those

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Close browser session while CGI is still active

2006-11-23 Thread Steve Swift
Can a CGI script close the session with the browser before it exits? I tried closing STDOUT and STDERR in the hope that Apache might notice, and clean up the session, but the browser remained waiting. I have a CGI script that send its page to the browser then has a batch job to do, which takes

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_headers

2006-11-23 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:43 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote: On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:18 -0500, Joshua Slive wrote: But what you don't want is an HTTP server. True, although http would be suitable if I could reduce the unecessary bandwidth from the headers. But the headers are

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Close browser session while CGI is still active

2006-11-23 Thread long
Since you already using a detached task to run the batch job, if it's not too much work and the result of the batch job is not a requirement for the response, can you just pass your variables to the batch job? Steve Swift [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can a CGI script close the session with the