At 09:26 PM 9/16/2004, Robert Bartlett wrote:
I remember someone saying something about memory usage per email that
spamd uses to scan? But cannot find the email, what is the estimated
amount of memory used per SA scan? I also have clamav set up
Varies a lot depending on your configuration
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 6:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Memory usage question
At 09:26 PM 9/16/2004, Robert Bartlett wrote:
I remember someone saying something about
Update on the previous, interestingly the HTML renderer in The
Bat! 1.62q did not make the link clickable, but the plaintext
message renderer did.
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.surbl.org/
Jeff Chan wrote to SpamAssassin Users:
Update on the previous, interestingly the HTML renderer in The Bat!
1.62q did not make the link clickable, but the plaintext message
renderer did.
That's because the HTML did not actually contain a link (anchor); just
the plaintext URI. Many plaintext
On 16 Sep 2004 13:39:30 -0700, Daniel Quinlan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we could use a better way to merge Bayesian results into the
SpamAssassin score, though.
Hm.
An idea that just occurred to me, that would have been prohibitively
expensive with the GA but maybe isn't with the
Hi, I just got a nigerian spam with a huge Reply-To: line!
Never seen that trick before, but I suppose it works with quite a few of
the recipients. Should we create a new rule for that? I can't think of a
legitimate reason to have more than one address in the Reply-To line, right?
Here goes a
Will anyone please help me?
I've recently had a working sitewide install of spamassassin stop working
and it's very upsetting! :(
Many thanks.
hugh
-- My problem:
As far as I can tell spamd starts correctly, spamc then tries and fails to
connect to it and
Hi
I would like to know if it is possible to have a per domain
configuration using spamassassin 2.64 + amavisd p10 on a single server.
I mean having one pair of spamassassin 2.64 + amavisd p10 processes
handling with domain1 and domain2 for example , another pair handling
with for domain3 etc
Declan,
Running both with -p 15505 returns the same error.
Any more ideas?
Many thanks...
hugh
- Original Message -
From: Declan Moriarty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 12:54 AM
Subject: Re: After starting spamd, spamc fails to connect to it
Thanks for the reply! Here is the deal, we are currently deciding what
we want to do next. Currently we have a Celeron 2.4 gig system with 256
megs of ram and a 40 gig hdd. In the past week or so our system has come
to a halt, under 3 megs available, due to a bunch of emails coming in at
At 06:56 PM 9/16/2004 -0700, Robert Bartlett wrote:
Thanks for the reply! Here is the deal, we are currently deciding what
we want to do next. Currently we have a Celeron 2.4 gig system with 256
megs of ram and a 40 gig hdd. In the past week or so our system has come
to a halt, under 3 megs
Hi Loren,
I suspect that is more of a broken spammer than a new trick.
Maybe both? :-)
I can't see what good that line is going to do for the spammer.
Well, whoever replys to the spammer, telling him no matter what
mails his reply (usually including the quoted original mail) to everyone in
the
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 6:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Memory usage question
At 06:56 PM 9/16/2004 -0700, Robert Bartlett wrote:
Thanks for the reply! Here is the deal, we
-Original Message-
From: Robert Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 9:24 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Memory usage question
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 7:02 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: After starting spamd, spamc fails to connect to it and spamd
stops running!?
Will anyone please help me?
I've recently had a
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 12:02:18PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will anyone please help me?
I've recently had a working sitewide install of spamassassin stop working
and it's very upsetting! :(
Wotcher Hugh :)
Do you have any monitoring task scanning port 783 ? There's a bug
in spamd
At 09:23 AM 9/17/2004, Robert Bartlett wrote:
Are you using the -m parameter of spamd to limit the number of children
it
will spawn? I'd suggest something like -m 6 to start with.
Yeah it is setup for 50:
-d -c -a -m50 -u user -v -H
50 is a LOT of spamd's... even at the low-end of 15mb each that's
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 10:42:20AM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
Since your box has 256mb of physical ram, I'd limit it to maximum of
256mb/15mb = 17 spamd's at the highest. I'd really suggest using something
much lower like 10 unless you add some ram.
Even this seems to be dangerous
Hello all, I was wondering is someone can help me out? 3.0 RC1 was real
stable for me. Should I downgrade or do I need to update additional
software. This machine is RH FC2 with all security updates, and patches.
Thanks,
Jeff
Sep 16 15:23:21 mail1 kernel: [ cut here ]
I had similar problems, not related to SA though, and found that the mm
application was trying to allocate randomly high memory locations. Turned out
to be a bad memory chip. Using the Fedora core 2 boot disk I did a
memtest86... Might be worth the extra hour...
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 11:04, jeff jones wrote:
Hello all, I was wondering is someone can help me out? 3.0 RC1 was real
stable for me. Should I downgrade or do I need to update additional
software. This machine is RH FC2 with all security updates, and patches.
Thanks,
Jeff
Sep 16
I found this type of rule to be very helpful in catching 'zombie spam
relay' emails from specific 'problem' networks.
The problem I faced with an all inclusive ban on these networks was that
our customer's connect to our SMTP servers from all around the world.
Banning Dynamic, DSL, Cable, or
On Friday 17 September 2004 07:05, Chris Santerre wrote:
Yeah, bring that 50 down a little :) Maybe 10. More memory NEVER hurt
anyone!
Currently with BigEvil I'm running 51 megs for spamd!!! But the record on a
production server is something like 145. I think it was a crazy german ;)
Your
-Original Message-
From: Robert Bartlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004 10:12 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: Memory usage question
-Original Message-
From: Brook Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2004
I checked the doc's archive however, I can not find a solution to my
problem. What I am trying to do is have different users in Mysql bayes
db. I am using Spamd with the following start options:
-d -c -m6 -H -i0.0.0.0 -A192.168.0 -D -x -s /var/log/spamd.log
When I do a spamassassin --lint -D it
Quoting James [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I checked the doc's archive however, I can not find a solution to my
problem. What I am trying to do is have different users in Mysql bayes
db. I am using Spamd with the following start options:
-d -c -m6 -H -i0.0.0.0 -A192.168.0 -D -x -s /var/log/spamd.log
When I
On Wednesday 15 September 2004 10:55, Dougie Nisbet wrote:
Yesterday I changed my list settings to Digest mode. I'm still getting
individual emails. Does anyone know how long it takes for the change to
take effect?
Dougie
Ok, perhaps I'm looking in the wrong place. Is it
I'm running spamassassin 3.0rc4 on OpenBSD sparc64.
Dnsbl tests don't appear to be running, and when running make test, I
get:
t/dnsbl.skipped
all skipped: no reason given
I had originally checked the option to skip network checks during the
test, but ran make clean
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 03:17:52PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
And, in any event, the checks should be working when SA itself is run,
right? I checked and RBL checks etc. aren't disabled in my user_prefs or
As usual, run with -D it tells you what's going on.
Running SA on a mailbox or message
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 06:20:47PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 03:17:52PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
Running SA on a mailbox or message in debug mode does not appear to show
any dnsbl tests happening.
You have Net::DNS installed and the debug output shows it's
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 03:30:36PM -0700, Will Yardley wrote:
Shouldn't the SA build test process be a little more verbose about
this, though, and at least spit out some warnings about missing Perl
modules? While the dnsbnl tests may not be necessary for SA to work,
it's certainly a lot more
Loren Wilton wrote:
In my logic, there is no valid reason that a remote sender would connect
directly to our SMTP server from their dynamic/DSL/cable IP to send our
customer's an email ... I think ? Valid 'remote to local' emails being
sent from these DSL/cable/dialup IP would normally
32 matches
Mail list logo
