Hi all,
I'm having a little trouble with my Spamassassin v3 and the
autowhitelist. I'm trying to remove an email address from the list, but
it is not working. If anyone has any ideas, please let me know.
Here is what I'm doing:
#cat auto-whitelist | strings | grep jason
[EMAIL
Apologies for asking this if the answer is obvious, but I couldn't see it
anywhere in the wiki
we
currently use 2.64
What
are the reasons for upgrading to 3.0?
TIA
R
---
This email from dns has been validated by dnsMSS Managed Email
Certainly better spam catching if you aren't using addon
rules.
Probably better spam catching if you are.
Gives you a chance to tell your boss you need to upgrade all
the email servers to 3GHz/4GB, and thus you need a pay raise!
Version is supported.
Basically, 2.64 is now old and dead, and
Good day.
I've been having some problems with URIDNSBL plugin for Spam Assassin.
One of blocked mail came from emailframer.com .
After investigating issue this came up:
host -t ns emailframer.com
emailframer.com name server ns1.barak.net.il.
emailframer.com name server ns.barak.net.il.
host
On Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 2:58:32 AM, Eli Yukelzon wrote:
http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL22121
The problem is - barak.net.il is one of the MAJOR Israel's ISPs,
and since MANY hosts have NS record matching it, this SBL record
block ALL sites hosted on it.
Please complain
On Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 5:08:32 AM, Jeff Chan wrote:
Please complain to Barak that their customer walla.com is sending
spam. The problem is not really with SpamHaus but that Barak
apparently continues to allow walla.com to be mentioned in
thousands of reported spam (and probably many
Is
there a way to log the number of times a specific rule has hit within
spamassassin. Ideally I'd like to see how often a rule hits, and the average
score of the messages that it hit on, but anything along those lines would help
At
the minute the best idea I have come up with is to use an
I believe you could do this using the information that SA
puts in syslog now. It lists each rule hit for a spam as well as the
score.
--Benjamin Story, CCNA CCDAClient Server Technical
Analystwww.dotfoods.comIT Helpdesk x2312
From: Gray, Richard
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,
Hrm, this may be a reason to upgrade to 3.0
then
From: Ben Story [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 February 2005 13:55To: Gray, Richard;
users@spamassassin.apache.orgSubject: RE: Tracking Rule
Hits
I believe you could do this using the information that SA
puts in syslog now. It lists
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 07:32:44AM +0100, Philipp Snizek, seaan.net ag wrote:
mx.seaan.net is approved for belfin.ch, so that mail should have been
accepted.
What should I do?
Well, I did wait a while but I just got back NDRs. Could you please
investigate that?
From a quick check,
From: Arvinn Løkkebakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jdow wrote:
Do not disable it. Fix the cause.
It's time to hit the wiki and learn how.
{^_^}
I hit the wiki and found this patch:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2508
Is it the fix you were thinking about?
I
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Rich Puhek wrote:
From: Rich Puhek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Dan Mahoney, System Admin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 10:29:57 -0600
Subject: Re: detecting brute-force spams
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey all,
I host
Arvinn Løkkebakken wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
From: Arvinn Løkkebakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jdow wrote:
Do not disable it. Fix the cause.
It's time to hit the wiki and learn how.
{^_^}
I hit the wiki and found this patch:
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/attachment.cgi?id=2508
Is
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:46:33AM -0700, Jason Bennett wrote:
Any other help would be greatly appreciated.
Do you by chance have a sitewide auto-whitelist setup? If so, are you
sure that you are reading the correct database with check_whitelist?
Run with -D and see if that gives you any
Actually, I just figured it out. The database for my autowhitelist was
not in root's home directory. I didn't realize the
--remove-from-whitelist option was trying to remove it from a
.spamassassin/auto-whitelist from the current user's home directory.
I had to change to the user I actually
Hi
I'm seeing a lot of messages about and version error in the bayes db in
my log file:
spamd[6562]: bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting!
at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore/DBM.pm
line 160.
I'm using SA 3.0.2.
The output of sa-learn show a
Hi all,
I'm new to this mailling lists and to SpamAssassin too.
In the past mounths, i have built severals smtp gatewas using the followings :
- Postfix 2.13
- Amavisd-new (The lastest Stable Version)
- Clamav (0.80)
- Mail::SpamAssassin (Lastest Version)
Every works great, no crash,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:55:38AM -0700, Jason Bennett wrote:
I had to change to the user I actually run as and it removed fine. Is
there a spamassassin command line option to specify a whitelist database
file when I use the --remove... option?
Check out auto_whitelist_path in perldoc
Is clamd running? Is clamav.conf set up to scan via a tcp socket? If
neither of those are happening, then you may be experiencing an amavis
timeout while it tries to communicate with clamd.
RO
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 11:23 AM
Subject: Incredibly slow
ClamAV is running and the amavis log_level=5 setting shows it scanning very
very fast. It is whatever takes place next that is boggin things down.
- Gary
Richard Ozer wrote:
Is clamd running? Is clamav.conf set up to scan via a tcp socket? If
neither of those are happening, then you may be
Title: Message
Hi SA
Users,
I have a question
for anyone who may have added their own custom URIDNSBL
lookups.
I have set up
RBLDNSD (successfully as far as I can see) to support both IPs and
URIs.
A command line DNS
call returns the expected results, but SA 3.0.0and URIDNSBL do not
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:37:50PM -0300, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
I'm seeing a lot of messages about and version error in the bayes db in
my log file:
spamd[6562]: bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting!
at
From: Arvinn Løkkebakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bowie Bailey wrote:
From: Arvinn Løkkebakken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jdow wrote:
Do not disable it. Fix the cause.
It's time to hit the wiki and learn how.
{^_^}
I hit the wiki and found this patch:
Michael Parker wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:37:50PM -0300, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
I'm seeing a lot of messages about and version error in the bayes db in
my log file:
spamd[6562]: bayes: bayes db version 0 is not able to be used, aborting!
at
Does anyone know the email address of the correct person to report problems
with the Apache mailing list archives? The mailing list archives have been
sick for over a week. Fortunately the MARC archives have come back to life.
I tried sending a report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] some 3 days ago, but
On Tuesday 08 February 2005 2:14 pm, Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Tuesday, February 08, 2005 11:14 AM -0700 Brian Godette
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
care must be taken to have the expiry times
reasonable or the iptables rule lists becomes much too large and
eventually chews up all available
At 02:56 PM 2/8/2005, Shane Metler wrote:
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x898ffe4)
implements 'check_tick'
debug: URIDNSBL: query for broadcastemail.us took 1 seconds to look up
(auth2.homes.com.:broadcastemail.us)
debug: URIDNSBL: domain broadcastemail.us listed
On Tuesday, February 8, 2005, 3:37:05 PM, Matt Kettler wrote:
At 02:56 PM 2/8/2005, Shane Metler wrote:
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x898ffe4)
implements 'check_tick'
debug: URIDNSBL: query for broadcastemail.us took 1 seconds to look up
28 matches
Mail list logo
