At 06:03 PM 2/10/2005, Jason Bennett wrote:
I agree whole heartedly, so I've set all the amavisd rules to D_REJECT,
but I still get the "Undeliverable:Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender"
bounces. How do I turn these off?
If you're post-queue, you can't use D_REJECT.. It's too late. You've got to
I agree whole heartedly, so I've set all the amavisd rules to D_REJECT,
but I still get the "Undeliverable:Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender"
bounces. How do I turn these off?
Thanks a lot for the hlp!
J.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday
At 05:33 PM 2/10/2005, Jason Bennett wrote:
2. How can I reduce or even dump the bounces all together so my queue's
aren't filling up with junk bounces with invalid destinations?
Just don't use bouncing as a spam action at all if you filter after queue..
this is just a bad thing to do in general.
At 05:39 PM 2/10/2005, Scott Moss wrote:
Ok this is kind of driving me nutty. I've changed ever version of any
local.cf file on my machine and SA is still sending with default rules. Is
there any way to find out where the current installation is reading the
config file from ? I've searched all o
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 08:39:09AM +1000, Scott Moss wrote:
> local.cf file on my machine and SA is still sending with default rules. Is
> there any way to find out where the current installation is reading the
> config file from ? I've searched all of the machine for any type of rogue
When in
At 05:27 PM 2/10/2005, Vicki Brown wrote:
I want to bump the score if neither the To: nor the Cc: field contains my
address.
I'm guessing I want something like this:
header __NOT_TO_ME To !~ /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
header __NOT_CC_ME Cc !~ /vlb~cfcl.com/
meta NOT_FOR_ME ( __NOT_TO_ME && __NO
Ok this is kind of driving me nutty. I've changed ever version of any
local.cf file on my machine and SA is still sending with default rules. Is
there any way to find out where the current installation is reading the
config file from ? I've searched all of the machine for any type of rogue
loca
Sorry if this isn't the right place for this, but I'd thought I'd ask:
I'm using postfix, spamassassin and amavisd-new. I'm using the filter
after queue method to accept mail and process them afterward - of
course, this can generate more bounces than the filter before queue
method.
Here are my
I want to set up a High-scoring rule for mail that looks like this :(
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:53:31 +0200
From: Morris Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Is your daughter a a sick person
To: Katydid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm not in the To: list (the To: is a nonexistent address but that's be
At 05:06 PM 2/10/2005, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
Just a question,
It is worth to train the bayes filter with messages already detected and
flagged as spam by spamassassin? That would do any good?
Yes. And even if they are already flagged as BAYES_99 it is still
worthwhile.
The reason why is tha
Hi
Just a question,
It is worth to train the bayes filter with messages already detected and
flagged as spam by spamassassin? That would do any good?
BR,
Matías.
Jonathan Nichols wrote:
> This oughta replace GTUBE!
>
> http://lowendmac.com/lite/05/0210.html
Heh. I spent an afternoon going through SA tests and very carefully
assembling a spam that would trip as many tests as possible. I copied
headers from a message that tripped all kinds of RBLs, I copi
>
>Hi!
>
>I attach a 'funny' Mail I got bounced from one of our
>Users, because it looks like 'broken/misconfigured Ratware'.
>Maybe somebody can update Rules for such things/structures?
>
>The most interesting point seems to be, that the
>Tool creates three 'Received-Headers' to fool
>'first-hop'
Mike Jackson wrote:
http://lowendmac.com/lite/05/0210.html
I sent it to myself...
X-Spam-Report:
* 1.8 URG_BIZ BODY: Contains urgent matter
* 0.7 SARE_MONEYTERMS BODY: Talks about money in some way.
* 0.7 SARE_URGBIZ BODY: Contains urgent matter
* 2.6 NA_DOLLARS BODY: Talks about a million Nor
http://lowendmac.com/lite/05/0210.html
I sent it to myself...
X-Spam-Report:
* 1.8 URG_BIZ BODY: Contains urgent matter
* 0.7 SARE_MONEYTERMS BODY: Talks about money in some way.
* 0.7 SARE_URGBIZ BODY: Contains urgent matter
* 2.6 NA_DOLLARS BODY: Talks about a million North American dollars
*
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:50:21AM -0800, Adam Harrison wrote:
> This forwards just fine and procmail reads the ~sw000100/.promailrc
> file and runs:
>
> :0fw
> | /usr/bin/spamc -f
>
> Spamc connects with spamd just fine, and it reads the MySQL
> prefferences just fine. But some how the full ad
Hi,
I just received the spam below. T-online.de, a spinoff of former state telekom,
is one of the
major providers in germany for private internet access.
The IP addresses in the header are valid, but there is no reverse DNS for the
server
mailing.t-online.de listed in the body of the mail, and
Hi!
I attach a 'funny' Mail I got bounced from one of our
Users, because it looks like 'broken/misconfigured Ratware'.
Maybe somebody can update Rules for such things/structures?
The most interesting point seems to be, that the
Tool creates three 'Received-Headers' to fool
'first-hop' IP/Domain c
This oughta replace GTUBE!
http://lowendmac.com/lite/05/0210.html
Hopefully this isn't a FAQ, I looked over the list on the website and
while there is some useful info there I didn't see answers to all my
questions (or maybe I just didn't realize they were answered as this is
all new to me ;))
THE PROBLEM: Recently the hit %age has dropped significantly (to ab
I'm running SpamAssassin 3.0.2 with Perl 5.8.0 and MySQL 4.0.20.
I run spamd in daemon mode, calling spamc from a users .procmailrc to
test. Eventually it will be in the system procmailrc.
I host a number of domains, and I would like to have domain
preferences, but _DOMAIN_ is always test to NUL
Can you file a bug against this in bugzilla.spamassassin.org? Attach an
example message too please.
Thanks.
--
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
Chris,
Wow, she emailed a lot of people individually (not me, though ;-). You
can always forward stuff like this to the PMC at
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> since we might miss it on the higher-volume
users list.
Daniel
--
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/
Hi,
I'm relatively new using SA and I have a couple of doubts about the
bayes db and the awl db.
I'm running a 3.0.2 site wide install, and I have saw that for each user
there is an .spamassassin directory, storing Bayesian and awl databases
a part from the user preferences file.
The bayes and
Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2005 17:26 schrieben Sie:
> Did you do a clear_headers prior to adding X-Spam-2ndCheck?
>
> Note that clear_headers should not remove the existing ones in the message.
> It should, theoretically, clear your header *settings*.
Yes, I did this to get rid of spamassassins (
I have upgraded MIME::Tools to version 5.417 but that didn't fix it.
Thanks though.
Stuart Johnston
Martin Hepworth wrote:
Stuart
there are known problems with the MIME::tools perl module which are
fixed in version 5.417. If you have this and it's used by amavis-new
it's best to make sure you a
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:50 AM 2/10/2005, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
Thanks for the info Matt.
It would be better(faster/reliable) to use DCC apart from SA(dccm), or
using SA with dccifd is a better choice?
It's not going to be faster or more reliable.. It's really a matter of
what you want DCC
> 3) Stop using AWL. Seriously, I found it did more harm then
> good and got big too fast.
I don't have any problem with it, and it is doing it's job quite well
actually. BUT I do think that it will only work if you have a good working
setup, in which there is a clear distinction in score's for
At 09:52 AM 2/10/2005, Robert Szerwinski wrote:
I have the following problem: my mail comes in tagged with X-Spam-* headers
and I want to make decisions inside *my* spamassassin based on those tags.
How can I force spamassassin to leave the old headers untouched?
(I have added a X-Spam-2ndCheck hea
At 09:50 AM 2/10/2005, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
Thanks for the info Matt.
It would be better(faster/reliable) to use DCC apart from SA(dccm), or
using SA with dccifd is a better choice?
It's not going to be faster or more reliable.. It's really a matter of what
you want DCC to do.
If you call
>-Original Message-
>From: Janine Bonk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 4:18 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Spamassasin
>
>
>Hello,
>
>we are doing a market research on the threat of spam and
>possible solutions. As
>the market of spam solutions is very c
>-Original Message-
>From: Johann Spies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 2:20 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Less spam blocked with 3.02 - AWL-related?
>
>
>I have upgraded spamassassin on three mail (2.63 -> 3.02 on two and
>2.64 -> 3.02 on the other) se
>> You need to be absolutely sure someone is who they say they are. I'd
>> probably be lynched if I signed someone's key without checking a
>> government issued ID. (Hence, why I have signed very few keys.)
>
>Lynched by who?
Being its Duncan, either the greys or the men in black ;)
--Chris (Ho
Alan -
(BI ran into this same issue earlier - the IP address your message came from
(Bis incorrectly marked in the current version of Spamassassin as being a
(Breserved IP address. It sounds like this issue has been fixed in future
(Bversions of Spamassassin, but meanwhile you can use the fix
At 09:19 AM 2/10/2005, kutt wrote:
so how do i fix this bug ? (or "feature"?)
btw: why was this added in first place ? most mail servers have a
extension + virus filters ...
OS: Debian
Mailserver: postfix (sql), amavis, uvscan, spamassassin
Sounds like it's an amavis feature.. you might want to ask
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 04:12 PM 2/9/2005, Matias Lopez Bergero wrote:
It's dccm a better implementation rater than dccproc for those who are
using Sendmail? And if this is yes, how do I need to configure SA to
work with dccm? I couldn't find anything about dccm and SA.
You can't configure SA to
Hi list,
I have the following problem: my mail comes in tagged with X-Spam-* headers
and I want to make decisions inside *my* spamassassin based on those tags.
How can I force spamassassin to leave the old headers untouched?
(I have added a X-Spam-2ndCheck header to show decisions based on my loc
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 10:47:12PM -0900, John Andersen wrote:
> Lynched by who?
I'm guessing the Debian people. When it comes to GPG signatures,
they're ... extreme.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Why don't you just come move in with me?" -Bender
"Really? That would be great! You sure I w
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 03:19:26PM +0100, kutt wrote:
> to:
> DEFANGED-
>
> i didn't find any notes about that in the doc's or upgrade notes.
> even when i grep for it i cant find it.
Of course not, it's not SpamAssassin doing it.
> btw: why was this added in first place ? most mail servers hav
hey all!
i upgradet my spamassassin recently to version: 3.0.2-1
well works like a charm so far.
but i noticed that it changes the filenames of attached files.
to:
DEFANGED-
i didn't find any notes about that in the doc's or upgrade notes.
even when i grep for it i cant find it.
but it's 100
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 11:48:18AM +0100, Sander Holthaus -
> Orange XL wrote:
> > Your (mail)logs might come in handy for this, if you write out
> > SpamAssassin's basic output there. With a basic Perl-script
> (you can
> > do this in almost any other script-language of course) you can see
I am using spamassassin version 2.64 on SuSE 8.2
I have a problem with qmail and spamassassin.
In my logfile of qmail (/var/log/qmail/current) I get the following error:
@4000420b375904f72fd4 delivery 401: success:
Argument_"\010802984^Q7^KB"_isn't_numeric_in_numeric_gt_(>)_at_/usr/lib/perl5/s
Your (mail)logs might come in handy for this, if you write out
SpamAssassin's basic output there. With a basic Perl-script (you can do this
in almost any other script-language of course) you can see most likely
everything you need. Spam, ham and mail-scores, scan-times, tests that where
hit (!), et
Stuart
there are known problems with the MIME::tools perl module which are
fixed in version 5.417. If you have this and it's used by amavis-new
it's best to make sure you are up to the latest version.
--
Martin Hepworth
Snr Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
Stuart J
Johann Spies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Average spam blocked per minute for the last
>
> Day WeekMonth Year (Since April-June last year)
> mail1 5.946.217.678.20
> mail2 5.045.956.486.69
> mail3 4.954.67* 6.236.85
This is not an especial
On Wednesday 09 February 2005 04:26 pm, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> You need to be absolutely sure someone is who they say they are. I'd
> probably be lynched if I signed someone's key without checking a
> government issued ID. (Hence, why I have signed very few keys.)
Lynched by who?
--
___
I have upgraded spamassassin on three mail (2.63 -> 3.02 on two and
2.64 -> 3.02 on the other) servers about two weeks ago.
On the old system I have disabled AWL and Auto-learn because they
corrupted my bayesian database on at least one occasion.
I have decided to try out AWL with 3.02.
At firs
At 08:12 PM 2/9/2005, Jason Bennett wrote:
debug: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
debug: DCCifd is not available: no r/w dccifd socket found.
In that spamassassin config file I have (I tried without this entry and
get same thing):
dcc_dccifd_path /var/dcc
In the /var/dcc I have:
s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony Yat-Tung Cheung wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I have configured spamassassin to filter my mails and move the
| spams to a mail folder. It works fine for a while (e.g. several
| weeks) and then it would start forwarding all mails, include those
| marked as SPAM
https://moin.conectiva.com.br/EditMoin
That's the editmoin web page. This program allows you to edit [WWW]Moin
pages with your preferred editor. It means you can easily edit your pages,
without the usual limitations of most web browsers' text areas.
--j.
Today I got an email thru which hit ALL_TRUSTED. My mail server isn't
(BNAT'd. I haven't specifically setup trusted_networks or
(Binternal_networks but this is the first I've had a problem with it.
(B
(BI'm running RH 9 with Sendmail 8.13.3, MIMEDefang 2.49, SpamAssassin 3.02.
(B
(Bthe Recei
Stuart Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone have ideas here? Why would SA decode the same attachment
> sometimes, but not always. My server is running SA 3.0.2, Postfix 2.0
> and amavisd-new 2.1.2.
^
If you run SpamAssassin directly, then amavisd-new is not invo
As I'm sure others will point out, SA doesn't "move spams" to any folders,
it just marks them up. You have some other filtering mechanism doing
that, and that's where the problem is.
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Tony Yat-Tung Cheung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have configured spamassassin to filter my mails and
Hi,
I have configured spamassassin to filter my mails and move the spams to
a mail folder. It works fine for a while (e.g. several weeks) and then
it would start forwarding all mails, include those marked as SPAM and
not marked as SPAM, to the mail folder.
Once, the problem arises, I found that
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 05:23:46PM -0500, Chris Santerre wrote:
> >From: Rod Begbie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >If anyone's going to be at Boston Linux World next week, there's going
> >to be a GPG keysigning party on Tuesday evening. Details are at
> >http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?ev=68156. A
When I run spamassassin in debug, I get
debug: config: read file /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
debug: DCCifd is not available: no r/w dccifd socket found.
In that spamassassin config file I have (I tried without this entry and
get same thing):
dcc_dccifd_path /var/dcc
In the /var/dcc I have:
56 matches
Mail list logo
