I am really sorry it was mistake - I was yesterday very tired.
Back on-list. I'm not a personal help-line.
When I use spamassassin -t -D razor2 /tmp/spam so I dont get the hash and
so on but content analysis
details...bayes clasification and so on. I expected message like
debug: Razor is
Terry Carmen a écrit :
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:33:40 -0400
Terry Carmen te...@cnysupport.com wrote:
The backscatter would not have been received, since the sender is on
a number of RBLs.
It's the IP address of the botnet PC that's on the RBLs, the backscatter
doesn't come from there, it comes
I read spamassassin docs... I found out the following:
Sa-learn
--spam
Learn the input message(s) as spam. If you have previously learnt any of
the messages as ham, SpamAssassin will forget them first, then re-learn them
as spam. Alternatively, if you have previously learnt them as spam,
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
monolit xmull...@gmail.com wrote:
I changed the value on 1(I use this for testing and my
self-learning its my homework). According to me - spam bayes learning
was activated. When I use sa-learning so bayes learn that the mail is
spam. And bayes learn
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 18:15 -0700, Stefan Malte Schumacher wrote:
Evidence that it's not working? Show us some SA headers. In this case, a
spam sample that triggered DCC, cause the Report header does show the
rule's score.
Hmm, I wasn't clear enough. :) I meant an identified spam, where
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 02:00 +0100, RW wrote:
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 01:42:21 +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
when I learn bayes by hand (sa-learn --spam --file mail) that this
mail is spam? I have explicit set in local.cf bayes_min_spam_num 1.
This means that for bayes is sufficient one
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:15:52 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann guent...@rudersport.de wrote:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 02:00 +0100, RW wrote:
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 01:42:21 +0200 Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
It's a counter-measure against bad learning, to force at least
some MINIMAL manual training,
Getting kind of a headache, trying to wrap my head around this confusing
mess. Anyway, here's my shot at this.
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 03:31 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
When I use spamassassin -t -D razor2 /tmp/spam
so I dont get the hash and so on but content analysis
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 18:31 +0100, RW wrote:
AFAIK it doesn't affect autoleaning at all, bayes_min_spam_num
bayes_min_ham_num control when scoring starts.
Well, it *does* nonetheless. *shrug*
If you read back you'll see that that's consistent with what I wrote and
the opposite of
I understand that I must read whole output(message(TOP message)). But the
output this command is very fast and it stop at the end. I dont catch TOP of
message. I tried | more switch but it didint help. I tried redirecting
output to the file but it doesnt work. The file was empty:( I dont know how
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 11:17 -0700, monolit wrote:
I understand that I must read whole output(message(TOP message)). But the
output this command is very fast and it stop at the end. I dont catch TOP of
message. I tried | more switch but it didint help. I tried redirecting
output to the file but
FROM SA WWW
bayes_min_ham_num (Default: 200)
bayes_min_spam_num (Default: 200)
To be accurate, the Bayes system does not activate until a certain
number of ham (non-spam) and spam have been learned. The default is 200 of
each ham and spam, but you can tune these up or down with these two
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 11:53:53 -0700 (PDT), monolit xmull...@gmail.com
wrote:
What is strange when I use SA-LEARN so database dont expand the size, but
the time of modification is the same when I sa-learn started.
question is ?
Your command works! I found in spamassassin -D razor2 sample.msg 21 |
less message the following:
check[9444]: [ 6] a=ce=4ep4=7542-10s=4uO_brp3_KWEDuqMYXBVHI-4-FwA
But I dont know how to recognize that is a signature(hash) of the mail. In
the old version it was clearly marked for example:
Question is logical. When SA learnt new spam/ham so SA have to write new info
to the database and I think that database have to increase size. If you have
for example *.doc file and you modify it. You add several words - *.doc will
be bigger(increase his size).
--
View this message in context:
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 11:53 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
I have theory ...I know you will think thats bad but I tried explain how I
understand SA documentation. When I set the bayes_min_spam_num 1 so it
means that Bayes learn system will be activate. And now for example: I got
As I
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 13:20:41 -0700 (PDT), monolit xmull...@gmail.com
wrote:
Question is logical.
so are google :)
When SA learnt new spam/ham so SA have to write new info
to the database and I think that database have to increase size.
no, my bayes db is around 150M, but all my mail is in
I'm starting to seriously wonder, what your homework actually is about.
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 13:05 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
Your command works! I found in spamassassin -D razor2 sample.msg 21 |
less message the following:
check[9444]: [ 6]
To Benny Pedersen: I understand your explanation about increasing of
spamassassin database. Your example with md5 is clearly. Ok thank you very
much!
To by Karsten Bräckelmann-2: I want to apologize for my approach - I use
Ubuntu and other forums because I am hopeless because my homework was
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 14:43 -0700, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
To by Karsten Bräckelmann-2: I want to apologize for my approach - I use
Ubuntu and other forums because I am hopeless because my homework was
install configure and run antispam(spamassassin, ClamAV, Clamsmtp,razor,
postfix).
monolit wrote:
Question is logical. When SA learnt new spam/ham so SA have to write new info
to the database and I think that database have to increase size. If you have
for example *.doc file and you modify it. You add several words - *.doc will
be bigger(increase his size).
The database
21 matches
Mail list logo
