On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 18:31 +0100, RW wrote:
> > > AFAIK it doesn't affect autoleaning at all, bayes_min_spam_num &
> > > bayes_min_ham_num control when scoring starts.
> >
> > Well, it *does* nonetheless. *shrug*
> If you read back you'll see that that's consistent with what I wrote and
> the opposite of what you wrote.
Nah, I did set the thresholds to 1. :)
> I said that the limits don't effect autolearning, just scoring
> (activation).
Damn. My test-case was non-conclusive, I failed to crosscheck. :/
You are correct, auto-learning is not affected by these thresholds. SA
does bootstrap Bayes training, even if nspam/nham still is below the
limits. Sorry, my bad.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
