To Benny Pedersen: I understand your explanation about increasing of spamassassin database. Your example with md5 is clearly. Ok thank you very much!
To by Karsten Bräckelmann-2: I want to apologize for my approach - I use Ubuntu and other forums because I am hopeless because my homework was install configure and run antispam(spamassassin, ClamAV, Clamsmtp,razor, postfix). Now I am under pressure because tomorrow I have to deliver my solution to my chief... I must explain to him how it works and so on. the number of spam exceeding the bayes_min_spam_num value does not activate Bayes *learn*ing. It means that Bayes will classify mail -- based on what it learned before. it keeps track of *tokens*, and the number they have been seen in ham or spam. Your explanation is confusing for me, because you claim value of min_spam_num means that Bayes will classify mail -- based on what it learned before My min_spam_num value is 1. I get the first mail. Subject: viagra; body: viagra. I use sa - learn -spam for this mail. I get new mail: Subject: viagra; body: viagra. What will do Bayes according to you? Keep in mind your words The bayes_min_(ham|spam)_num values ONLY control, how many messages Bayes needs to have learned, before it should start classifying mail. => my Bayes can classifying mail(because min_spam_num value is 1 => the condition is accomplish). What now? Will be my new mail mark like spam? Or will get any higher score...? And again, 1 is not a sane number. - I endeavour to explain to you that this is only homework. Why number 1? Because I want to see on my own eyes how bayes works. I dont have time find many really spam(I know the number must be bigger about 1000 - its OK I knew it). -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SA-learn-%28spamassassin%29-tp24773517p24782439.html Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
