On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 01:00:02 +0200, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote
> On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 17:38 -0400, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > > Well, that does not explain why or how the
> > > stock rules ended up in your site config dir --
> > > neither why their version changes, t
On Friday 22 April 2011 5:17:20 pm Karsten
Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 16:55 -0400, Dimitri
Yioulos wrote:
> > Don't know how I managed to mangle my SA
> > configuration, but how you all will help me
> > untangle. I used the Dag repo for version
&
On Friday 22 April 2011 4:44:57 pm Karsten
Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 16:19 -0400, Dimitri
Yioulos wrote:
> > Over the past few days, I've had some spam
> > leaking through what has been an old, but
> > reliable system (consisting of the latest
> &g
On Friday 22 April 2011 4:31:37 pm Bowie Bailey
wrote:
> On 4/22/2011 4:19 PM, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > Greetz, all.
> >
> > My question may have been answered in the
> > past, but I wouldn't even know what search
> > terms to use. Apologies if that
Greetz, all.
My question may have been answered in the past,
but I wouldn't even know what search terms to
use. Apologies if that's the case
Over the past few days, I've had some spam leaking
through what has been an old, but reliable system
(consisting of the latest Sendmail, MailScanner,
All,
I posted a question regarding SpamAssasssin errors which MailScanner --lint
seemed to detect. It was suggested to me that this is an SA issue so, with
your indulgence, I'd like to ask here.
I'm now running mailscanner-4.68.8-1 on a CentOS 3 box, along with
spamassassin-3.2.4-1.el3.rf fro
On Thursday 07 June 2007 12:21 pm, Jim Maul wrote:
> Chris Santerre wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Jim Maul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 12:02 PM
> > > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: 404 while getting RDJ updates?
> >
On Friday 11 May 2007 5:00 pm, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> >Most common usage is:
> >
> >$ sa-update
> >
> >Or, if you want to see what it's doing:
> >
> >$ sa-update -D
> >
> >Unless you are adding extra channels or doing something strange with it,
> >you shoul
On Friday 11 May 2007 3:04 pm, Kevin W. Gagel wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> >sa-update
>
> Usage info is located where?
>
> =
> Kevin W. Gagel
> Network Administrator
> Information Technology Services
> (250) 562-2131 local 448
> My Blog:
> http://mail.cn
On Thursday 01 February 2007 3:10 pm, z3r0 wrote:
> Is it enough to create a cf file using notepad and save the file like
> "yourfile.cf" (with quotes)
>
> I notice that files that I make that way have the wordpad icon, but the
> original cf files
> I have in my ftp, has no icon.
>
> So perhaps tha
On Thursday 25 January 2007 10:10 am, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > On Thursday 25 January 2007 6:33 am, Michael Connors wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I am new to spamassassin so sorry if my question is a bit stupid.
> >> I have mail spamassassin 3.1
On Thursday 25 January 2007 6:33 am, Michael Connors wrote:
> Hi,
> I am new to spamassassin so sorry if my question is a bit stupid.
> I have mail spamassassin 3.1.0 running with mailscanner.
> It updates it self via RulesDuJour on a regular basis and I get an email
> which informs me of the updat
On Thursday 04 January 2007 2:53 pm, Jens Schleusener wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, John Rudd wrote:
> > Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > > First, I wish all a very happy and healthy New Year.
> > >
> > > I hope this is the proper place to ask this: several days ago,
John Rudd wrote ..
> Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > First, I wish all a very happy and healthy New Year.
> >
> > I hope this is the proper place to ask this: several days ago, I upgraded
> to
> > Botnet-0.7 from 0.6; the latter had apparently been working fine with
>
First, I wish all a very happy and healthy New Year.
I hope this is the proper place to ask this: several days ago, I upgraded to
Botnet-0.7 from 0.6; the latter had apparently been working fine with the
installed SA 3.1.7. I installed as per instruction (no heavy lifting there).
Now, no Botn
On Monday 04 December 2006 5:19 pm, Rubin Bennett wrote:
> Ok, so like the rest of you, I've been getting swamped by stock and
> other spam for the past couple of months. I've been beating me head on
> the wall trying to come up with the magic combination of things that
> make my client's SpamAssa
On Thursday 16 November 2006 12:43 pm, Evan Platt wrote:
> At 08:53 AM 11/16/2006, you wrote:
> >Hi all.
> >
> >Recently, I upgraded from spamassassin-3.0.4 to spamassassin-3.1.7.
> > Whereas previously I had whitelisted my domain so that SA wouldn't score
> > mail coming from my domain, after the
On Thursday 16 November 2006 9:49 am, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 09:29:15AM -0500, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > Recently, I upgraded from spamassassin-3.0.4 tp spamassassin-3.1.7.
> > Whereas previously I had whitelisted my domain so that SA wouldn't score
Hi all.
Recently, I upgraded from spamassassin-3.0.4 tp spamassassin-3.1.7. Whereas
previously I had whitelisted my domain so that SA wouldn't score mail coming
from my domain, after the upgrade it is. How can I correct this?
Thanks.
Dimitri
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
On Friday 10 November 2006 2:22 pm, Jim Maul wrote:
> Evan Platt wrote:
> > At 11:08 AM 11/10/2006, you wrote:
> >> What!? You gotta be kidding me! My message was BLOCKED because it
> >> had damnn in it? People actually use crap like this?
> >>
> >> Wow...
> >>
> >> -Jim
> >>
> >> Origi
Hello to all.
I'm currently running spamassassin-3.0.4-1 on a CentOS 3.8 server, along with
sendmail-8.12.11-4.RHEL3.6. I don't want to upgrade either just yet. But, I
do want to keep SA default rules up to date. Alas, sa-update doesn't work;
it simply doesn't do anything that I can see, and
On Wednesday September 06 2006 3:51 pm, Chris Santerre wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Doc Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:53 PM
> > To: spamassassin
> > Subject: Re: Antidrug.cf, call to cease RDJ updates.
> >
> > DAve wrote:
> > > Rick
On Tuesday August 15 2006 12:41 pm, BG Mahesh wrote:
> hi
>
> /etc/rulesdujour/config reads,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] RulesDuJour]# more /etc/rulesdujour/config
> TRUSTED_RULESETS="TRIPWIRE SARE_ADULT SARE_OBFU0 SARE_OBFU1
> SARE_URI0 SARE_URI1"
> SA_DIR="/etc/mail/spamassassin"
> MAIL_ADDRESS="[EMAIL
Hello everyone.
I'm running the following:
CentOS 3.7
sendmail-8.12.11-4.RHEL3.6
spamassassin-3.0.4-1
mailscanner-4.54.6-1
mailwatch-1.0.3
This setup works very well. However, one feature in mailwatch, the
ability to send a piece of mail through bayes and report it to dcc,
razor, and pyzor ("
On Thursday July 27 2006 5:48 am, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > Looks like he is using some "unofficial" SARE rules.
> >
> > http://rulesemporium.com/rules/99_FVGT_meta.cf
> > http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules/88_FVGT_body.cf
>
> Fred writes good rules. ;-)
>
> Loren
Indeed! Score on the stoo
On Wednesday July 26 2006 2:36 pm, Stuart Johnston wrote:
> Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > On Wednesday July 26 2006 2:10 pm, Stuart Johnston wrote:
> >> Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday July 26 2006 12:57 pm, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> >>>>
On Wednesday July 26 2006 2:10 pm, Stuart Johnston wrote:
> Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > On Wednesday July 26 2006 12:57 pm, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> >> Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> >>> Hello to all.
> >>>
> >>> I'm wondering why the following
On Wednesday July 26 2006 12:57 pm, Martin Hepworth wrote:
> Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > Hello to all.
> >
> > I'm wondering why the following isn't hitting more rules:
> >
> > Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Received: from braunconsult.c
Hello to all.
I'm wondering why the following isn't hitting more rules:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from braunconsult.com (216-130-126-2.cimcoisp.net
[216.130.126.2] (may be forged))
by mail1.firstbhph.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id
k6QG52CZ028664
fo
On Thursday July 13 2006 9:28 am, Jack Gostl wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Steven Stern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Spamass"
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 4:31 PM
> Subject: Re: Image only spam
>
> > Jack Gostl wrote:
> >> Thanks for the response.
> >>
> >> Take it slow with me
On Wednesday July 12 2006 2:36 pm, Jack Gostl wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Loren Wilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 1:48 PM
> Subject: Re: Image only spam
>
> > (1) I currently have no local.cf. I assume the default location
> > is /etc/mail/spamas
On Wednesday July 12 2006 1:48 pm, Loren Wilton wrote:
> (1) I currently have no local.cf. I assume the default location is
> /etc/mail/spamassassin.
>
> This seems rather amazing. This is the normal place that the
> standard SA options live.
>
> Grep around for *.cf files and see where they live.
On Monday June 26 2006 5:17 pm, you wrote:
Tracey Gates wrote ..
> Well that's just itI don't know where it's getting these. I
> don't have SARE_URI2 in my rules_du_jour file to update. The
> listing for the "ARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM" is listed as
> "SARE_BAYES_POISON_NXM". I can't seem to find
non-vowel letters, I'd
> >> like
> >
> > to
> >
> >> reduce the score associated with this rule. Problem is, I can't
> >> seem to locate it. Can anyone point me to it?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Dimitri
On Tuesday June 06 2006 5:29 pm, Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote:
> On 6 Jun 2006, at 19:43, Rainer Sokoll wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:10:08PM -0400, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> >> Thanks, everyone, for your responses. I only see that rule hit
> >> when someone i
On Tuesday June 06 2006 2:22 pm, Giff Hammar wrote:
> I'm seeing a few e-mails with a subject that contains only digits
> or is blank and a body that contains a random number of digits,
> usually three to six. There is nothing else in the body. Is anyone
> else seeing this? New software a botmaster
On Tuesday June 06 2006 2:28 pm, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > On Tuesday June 06 2006 12:54 pm, you wrote:
> > > On Tuesday June 06 2006 12:39 pm, you wrote:
> > > > Will Nordmeyer wrote:
> > > > > Just put
> > > >
On Tuesday June 06 2006 12:54 pm, you wrote:
> On Tuesday June 06 2006 12:39 pm, you wrote:
> > Will Nordmeyer wrote:
> > > Just put
> > > score FROM_DOMAIN_NOVOWEL
> > >
> > > in your local.cf
> > >
> > > (IE:
> > > score FROM_DOMAIN_NOVOWEL 0.3
> > >
> > > You don't want to adjust it in the mast
Hi, all.
It seem that, just lately, the following rule is being hit:
FROM_DOMAIN_NOVOWEL domain has series of non-vowel letters
As our domain name contains a series of non-vowel letters, I'd like to
reduce the score associated with this rule. Problem is, I can't seem
to locate it. Can an
On Tuesday May 02 2006 1:55 am, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > What I don't get is who in his/her right mind would respond to a piece of
>
> spam
>
> > that uses so much obfuscation as to be almost unreadable. But, as they
>
> say,
>
> > if it didn't work nobody would be doing it.
>
> Perhaps spammer's t
On Saturday April 29 2006 12:44 am, Richard Ozer wrote:
> I've purchased HUNDREDS of fake degrees and I feel much smarter because of
> it!
>
> Serious answer many spammers are probably paid per email. Others
> figure that more retries to a given address will result in a higher
> likelihood of
On Friday April 07 2006 4:57 pm, mouss wrote:
> Bob McClure Jr wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:51:05AM -0700, Gary W. Smith wrote:
> >> Now we get to watch the body part's fly across the room. :)
> >>
> >> You know there are 3 things in life which you never ever talk about in
> >> public; r
(hmmm... top-posting)
In truth, nothing I've read in this thread has seemed inciteful; not
inflamatory at all. I think we all understand the passion we hold for the
distros we use, but it appears we've been mature enough (ok, I'm sucking my
thumb right now, so I guess I'm out) to give the OP s
On Thursday April 06 2006 3:31 pm, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Ask List wrote:
> > We can not seem to come to an agreement on the best operating system
> > to run spam assassin. So we have decided to post this question to the
> > mailing list so we can have other opinions. I realize everyone will
> > hav
On Friday March 24 2006 6:47 am, Num ber wrote:
> >the last question,
> >What rules i need to take ? all ? or only somes (but what ...)
>
> Nobody ??
> They have to many rules on the SARE website...
> And i don't know what rules i need to take .. ALL ?
>
> (Can i test if the new rules was installed
On Tuesday March 21 2006 10:37 am, Iain Smith wrote:
> Payal Rathod wrote:
> > Hi,
> > To my various email addresses I am getting lot of "Re: news" spam.
> > SA is not catching all of it. I have pasted a links of headers and body
> > at, http://pastebin.ca/46477
> > Can someone advise on it please?
On Tuesday March 21 2006 9:29 am, Payal Rathod wrote:
> Hi,
> To my various email addresses I am getting lot of "Re: news" spam.
> SA is not catching all of it. I have pasted a links of headers and body
> at, http://pastebin.ca/46477
> Can someone advise on it please?
> With warm regards,
> -Payal
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:48:15 -0500, Payal Rathod wrote
> On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 02:21:56PM -0500, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I'm happy to say that with your help, and some very minor tweaking, the
> > "Pharama" mail is now tag
All,
I'm happy to say that with your help, and some very minor tweaking, the
"Pharama" mail is now tagged in my system as high scoring spam, and dealt
with accordingly ("bad pharma spam, bad!"). Still looking forward to new
rules that Loren spoke earlier, though.
Thanks so much.
Dimitri
Thank you!
On Friday March 17 2006 10:47 am, Randal, Phil wrote:
> http://www.uribl.com/usage.shtml
>
>
> Phil Randal
> Network Engineer
> Herefordshire Council
> Hereford, UK
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Dimitri Yioulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
IN_SPAMHAUS_SBL_XBLListed in SPAMHAUS SBL+XBL
> > 5.00URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
> >
> > HC_NEWS just checks for the word "news" in the Subject line.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > Phil
quot; in the Subject line.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Phil
>
> Phil Randal
> Network Engineer
> Herefordshire Council
> Hereford, UK
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Warren Howard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 17 March 2006 14:40
> > To:
On Friday March 17 2006 9:49 am, Loren Wilton wrote:
> Don't know why you are getting bayes_00, but we are working on some rules
> for these things that are looking pretty good. Should be available fairly
> soon.
>
> Loren
Thanks, Lauren.
Dimitri
--
This message has been scanned for vi
Hello to all.
I apologize for earlier posts on this subject; they were tagged by the list
because I included the body of the spam which is being delivered to my users!
So, there's hope that I can quash this. I searched the archive, but didn't
find anything (my search criteria may have been wr
On Thursday February 23 2006 1:25 pm, Peter P. Benac wrote:
> Mike,
>
> You obviously haven't heard all the news about what AOL and Yahoo are
> about to do.
>
> First AOL blocked you be cause one or more of those people you
> forward mail for has hit that little button that says "This is S
MAP daemon than with
> > Sendmail (unless you're talking about authenticated SMTP). Perhaps you
> > should see about getting them to authenticate via LDAP or SMB.
> >
> >
> > - Original Message - From: "Dimitri Yioulos"
> > <[EMAIL PRO
authenticate via LDAP or SMB.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dimitri Yioulos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 12:11
> Subject: OT = Sendmail + winbind
>
> > Hello to all.
> >
> > I apologize
Hello to all.
I apologize for this off-topic post, but I'm getting no feed-back from the
sendmail news group:
I have sendmail-9.12.11-4.RHEL3.1 installed on a box in out DMZ. Our internal
Linux boxes have samba installed, authenticate users against Win2k3 Active
Directory, and file- and print
ed correctly for 3.1.0, but the
> --lint check is failing it.
>
> --j.
>
> Dimitri Yioulos writes:
> > On Thursday 22 September 2005 12:18 pm, Justin Mason wrote:
> > > Bowie Bailey writes:
> > > > From: Dimitri Yioulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > &
On Thursday 22 September 2005 12:18 pm, Justin Mason wrote:
> Bowie Bailey writes:
> > From: Dimitri Yioulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > On Thursday 22 September 2005 9:17 am, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> > > > From: Dimitri Yioulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 22 September 2005 9:17 am, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> From: Dimitri Yioulos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > As I understand it. DCC is no longer free, under some circumstances,
> > and is therefore disabled by default in 3.1.0. I guess you have to
> > manually ena
On Thursday 22 September 2005 1:48 am, Beast wrote:
> After upgrading from 3.0.4 to 3.1.0, I've receive this folowing warning:
> root]# spamassassin --lint
> [28678] warn: config: failed to parse, now a plugin, skipping:
> ok_languages all
> [28678] warn: config: failed to parse line, skipping: use
ail/browse_thread/thread
>/ab7e000e21b4cfc8/e0ff0117317ee5fd?q=active+directory&rnum=10&hl=en#e0ff0117
>317ee5fd
>
> Andy
>
>
>
>
> Dimitri Yioulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 07/28/2005 10:02 AM
>
> To
> users@spamassassin.apache.org
> cc
>
>On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 11:02:43AM -0400, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
>> It seems as though I've seen references to using winbind or ldap to do the
>>sendmail authentication, but I can't seem to find any good documentation. I
>> readily admit that it might be my bad
Hello to all.
I've been using sendmail successfully in our shop for the past year+. Our
network is ADS-based (the only Windows machine, btw), but I've been creating
users on the mail server so that our users can authenticate and use sendmail.
That's been easy up to now, because the comapny's
On Monday June 13 2005 7:46 am, Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> On Sunday June 12 2005 7:07 pm, Chris Thielen wrote:
> > Hi Tim, Dimitri,
> >
> > Sorry to resurrect such an old thread! I'm a bit concerned with the 500
> > error code being downloaded into the SA_DIR.
>
On Sunday June 12 2005 7:07 pm, Chris Thielen wrote:
> Hi Tim, Dimitri,
>
> Sorry to resurrect such an old thread! I'm a bit concerned with the 500
> error code being downloaded into the SA_DIR.
>
> Tim Jackson wrote:
> >>Lint output: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping:
> >> confi
On Friday June 10 2005 11:16 am, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 08:06 -0700, James Bucanek wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I consider myself a "weekend" spam assassin. I run my own server
> > (co-located), and have about a dozen users (mostly friends and family,
> > but a few paying c
On Thursday May 26 2005 4:19 pm, Chris Santerre wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: David Brodbeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 4:05 PM
> >To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: Adjusting the AWL value
> >
>
On Thursday May 26 2005 3:54 pm, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Jim Maul wrote:
> > Hey, do you know any commands to remove things from other peoples' ASS?
> >
> > Maybe something like --remove-stick-from ? My boss really needs this!
>
> No, usually the only thing you can try on someone else is
> --remove-
On Thursday May 26 2005 1:13 pm, Loren Wilton wrote:
> > Given the rather complete set of rules that ship with SA and which can
> > expanded with SARE, does bayes learning really help? Won't the rules
>
> catch
>
> > pretty much everything anyway?
>
> Um, maybe, maybe not.
>
> Bayes *necessary*?
I can only speak from the perspective of a small (but growing, thank you)
shop. I was committed to using Linux and FOSS from the get, anyway, but as
a start-up, commercial solutions to a great many of our needs were out of
reach, price-wise. Our email solution was
sendmail-spamassassin-rdj-c
On Thursday May 26 2005 10:30 am, Chris Santerre wrote:
> >-Original Message-
> >From: aecioneto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 8:36 PM
> >To: users
> >Subject: Re: Comparison of SA and commercial solutions
> >
> >
> >Loren and Chris,
> >thanks for your replies.
I've seen it. Are you using RDJ? I posted a similar message on this list not
long ago. I was told I needed to upgrade to the latest version of RDJ, which
I did. However, it didn't fix the problem for me, so now I periodically use
wget to download the Bogus Virus Warning rule.
I hope someone
On Thursday May 12 2005 8:20 am, Tim Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2005 07:48:40 -0400
>
> Dimitri Yioulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've had RDJ fetching rules updates successfully until just
> > recently. It seems that some part of my set-up now chokes o
Godd morning/evening to all.
I've had RDJ fetching rules updates successfully until just recently. It
seems that some part of my set-up now chokes on downloading and installing
Tim Jackson's Bogus Virus Warnings ruleset. Here's some output:
Subject: RulesDuJour/plymouth: Tim Jackson's (et al)
On Friday May 6 2005 12:45 pm, Stewart, John wrote:
> > >Although not the ideal solution, it will suffice, I suppose.
> >
> > I wouldn't
> >
> > >think at this point (assuming they make this change) that it warrants
> > >submission to any RBLs.
> >
> > I do. I think that if they don't offer an opt
On Friday May 6 2005 10:55 am, Stewart, John wrote:
> So, I was taking a shower this morning and was thinking I might send out a
> confessional email to this list... and then something else happened that
> has changed my outlook.
>
> The story is this... in my town, I've not been able for the longe
Hello to all.
WHile I've been running sendmail/spamassassin/clamav/mailscanner/mailwatch
successfully for some time. Up to now, I've largely been using sare
rulesets, and have had quite good success. But recently I've been trained
bayes.
Is there an "optimal" combination of bayes and other r
-Original Message-
From: Chris Thielen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 11:44 AM
To: Dimitri Yioulos
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: RulesDuJour problem - help please
Hi Dimitri,
Dimitri Yioulos wrote:
> Happy New Year to all.
>
> I&#x
Loren,
Cron is set to get the rules at 1:30 AM each day. Even those fetches fail.
So, although I appreciate the tip, it's not the cause of my problem.
Dimitri
-Original Message-
From: Loren Wilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 10:28 AM
To: Dimitri Yi
) how do I fix?
Dimitri
From: Richard Ozer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 10:21 AM
To: Dimitri Yioulos
Subject: Re: RulesDuJour problem - help please
I notice that all your sa paths are pointing to /root/.spamassassin Is this
correct?
Is it possible that you have a
Happy New Year to all.
I’ve searched the list archive, and found some
references to my problem, but no solutions, so here goes again (sorry for the
long post, but I want to provide as much info. as necessary):
I recently upgraded to spamassassin 3.0.2 running on CentOS
3.3. I’m als
83 matches
Mail list logo
