>
> Just as in 3.2.1, I still get this error when trying to build:
>
> REQUIRED module out of date: HTML::Parser
>
> But I already installed HTML::Parser 3.56 with no errors.
>
> I can't be the only one who has received this error, but nothing is
> indicating that I am missing any other depende
>
> RHEL3, perl 5.8.8, sendmail 8.13, SA 3.1.9
>
> rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.2.tar.gz throws the error
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Skip
Skip,
When I do this
rpm -qa | grep arser
I get this
perl-XML-Parser-2.34-5
perl-HTML-Parser-3.55-1.el4.rf
you might go to
http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/pa
>
> Check in a day or so.
>
Last time there was a release update someone posted a good link that I
cannot find in the list archives quite yet.
Someone please feel free to repost.
Thanks!
- rh
Now I using SA 3.1.7. How to update the higher versions. Please help me.
--
Sg
Hi Sg,
Um if you are using CentOS just do this
Backup your /etc/mail/spamassassin directory and all of it's file contents,
mainly for safety and good admin work protection
Then if you have
>
> Just to make it clear what I and others keep saying on this topic:
> I'm using 4 different systems that have various 3.x versions of
> spamassassin, all of which use sa-update, and none of which are doing
> an adequate job of catching gif, pdf or ecard spam. It's upwards of
> 20 an hour on se
>
> Apparently with alternate virus files, which I had not yet tested.
> Someone mentioned that earlier today and I'm investigating it.
>
> --
> Jo Rhett
Jo
I don't use alternative files that I am aware of anyways... just stock
clamav
And... I hear ya, yet clamav plugin *integration* into SA
>
> I'm using stock clamav with freshclam, and getting 10-12 an hour in
> each maibox. So no, stock clamav does not catch these.
>
> --
> Jo Rhett
Hmm interesting
I was telling the same thing recently on this same thread.
YES, they do catch and quarantine them all them rotten buggers.
Wh
>
> I'm using stock clamav with freshclam, and getting 10-12 an hour in
> each maibox. So no, stock clamav does not catch these.
>
> --
> Jo Rhett
Hmm interesting
I was telling the same thing recently on this same thread.
YES, they do catch and quarantine them all them rotten buggers.
Wh
>
> Sigh, I give up.
>
> Kai
>
Give up what?
Trying to run destructive interference or consider helping Jo ?
:-)
- rh
>
> I have *always* run SA through MailScanner. This configuration is not new,
> I
> have run it this way for *years*. The only thing that's new is the version
> of SA. As soon as I upgraded to v3.2.3, the problems started.
>
> If you can't be helpful, I can certainly understand. But I don't nee
>
> I've read this list for a long time. I've seen some really, truly STUPID
> questions come through...and seen them be answered, civilly, helpfully.
> The
> only difference is I don't have a masculine username. I truly hate coming
> off as a cranky feminist who complains I am being treated unf
>
> What's with this? There's no need for this on this list.
>
Maybe not... pray for victory over the moron stick for me please.
>
> You've asked many a question here that the above would have applied to
>
No kiddin? :-)
Im sure I would agree...
I imagine the ESR smart questions faq wou
>
> I have a FreeBSD machine running qmail, SpamAssassin and ClamAV. The
> machine is receiving 200,000 e-mail messages per day, courtesy of
> Rumpelstiltskin attacks from thousands of different IP addresses each day,
> and SpamAssassin appears to be overwhelmed. I have about 50,000 e-mail
> mes
>
> I've read Life with qmail and the SpamAssassin documentation at
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/ but I'm not connecting the dots.
> Unfortunately, I didn't set up this machine and I don't have a good grasp
> of qmail, SpamAssassin and ClamAV.
>
> Thanks in advance for any guidance and all pr
>
> #/usr/local/etc/rc.d/sa-spamd stop
>
> > If anyone knows how to temporarily disable ClamAV too, I'd be
> > ecstatic to learn how to do that too.
>
> Disable the daemon:
> #/usr/local/etc/rc.d/clamav-clamd stop
>
> Disable the sendmail milter:
> #/usr/local/etc/rc.d/clamav-milter stop
>
> Y
>
>
> Bingo! SpamAssassin and ClamAV are supposedly stopped.
>
Right, problem is, there is code or a codeset on your machine that requires
they be present and activated or your server will barf on incoming messages.
I sent a coupla posts last night to direct you towards looking for a file
cal
> >
>
> I would think stopping these may prevent any mail from passing through
> your
> system. If you can't figure out how to reconfigure qmail to stop sending
> mail to spamd then you might consider adding the --local argument to the
> spamd daemon. This would make spamd run considerably faster
> >
>
> It's not a solution. It's an attempt to get the toilet unplugged while the
> plumber is on the way. The change should be reverted one the system is
> properly configured. The main problem is all we really know is that the
> MTA
> is qmail.
>
Gary,
U it doesn't unplug the toilet... y
snipsnipsnip
None of this spam is the really easy to catch stuff. We all can block the
easy stuff.
I hate spam and spammers. I'm already sending these feeds to several URIBL
lists and IP Blacklists. Many of the blacklists you use is running off of
this data. But - if anyone else wants some of thi
>
> Please do not feed the trolls.
>
> Michael
I understand...
One problem though, filtering, ignoring, or not feeding the trolls doesn't
change their purposing, thinking, or behaviors (plural)
Can I be list daddy? ;->
- rh
>
> DOB, for example, is run by ar.com, who are a registrar. Since they are a
> domain registrar, they have full, direct access to the whois database.
>
> Jeff C.
>
Well there ya go Jeff...
Become a registrar and bam! More data to help you cause
- rh
>
> Thats the easy answer, but do you know what it costs to become a
> registrar?
>
> Just for com/net from verisign you have $6500 up front, and $4k
> recurring. To get your icann credentials, you have $2500 up front with
> application, $4k yearly. A variable fee to icann once you start
> re
>
> At 08:10 AM 9/28/2007, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> >Is there a new PayPal phish going about? This almost looks
> >legitimate, and I imagine it would have a lot of appeal to the
> >survey-lovers. (I had no communication with PayPal this week, so I
> >know this is bogus.)
some time ago when set
If you need to reject unknown accounts at smtp time, go to
http://qmail.jms1.net
and check out validrcptto patch among other things
please read site in full to make good decisions re qmail
i.e. browser will not work there.
- rh
>
> But hey, that is a too big cut from Internet, so in some way it is
> cultural imperialism.
>
> Bests,
>
> Olivier
Oliver
uu, by default, all organizations get to specifically (or not) define
network policies on their own networks.
Like it or not that is the way it is.
I don't know
>
> Just got a thing that claims to come from "email-109.paypal.com". It
> backtracks to there, too.
>
(Snip)
>
> Clam seems to think it is a phish. I think it is a phish. It looks like
> a
> phish.
>
> The disturbing thing is it seems to have come from the real Paypal
> servers,
> AND, it h
>
> As part of my efforts to track and control spam, I bought a domain and
> created a unique alias to give to every distinct company with which I
> do business. For example, the address I gave to my bank might be
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], while the one I gave to an online bookseller
> might be [EMAI
>
> Not exactly, just looking to set up a rule that says (per the earlier
> example) any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] that is *not* coming from
> mybank.com is almost certainly spam. Likewise, I would like to set up
> a rule to say that mail from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to that address is
> more likely (b
I was happily humming along with Spamassassin on Win2k3 with Exchange 2003
for some time now (yes, you can do it all on one box). I was using Chris
Lewis' ESA sink which worked great. However, after an upgrade to Exchange
2007, I've come to realize that the old smtp sinks have been deprecated
Ummm you could always try the outlook import function
;->
- rh
>
> When I say "tarpit" I don't mean an MTA-native "slow the SMTP
> conversation down" model, I mean a genuine TCP tarpit that plays games
> with window sizes to trap the attacker - that's what LaBrea does.
>
> I don't think the MTA should be tasked with tarpitting. Tarpitting is
> a job for a
>
> I have asked before but have been unable to get a usable solution. I am
> running qmail, spamassassin, clamav, etc from the qmr package on one of
> our FBSD 6.2 servers. If you email via squirrelmail, your outbound email
> does not get labeled spam. If you send out via a client with smtp,
>
> Nope sorry...
>
> Here's what I did:
> I removed the botnet files from /etc/mail/spamassassin and restarted
> spamd.
> I ran --lint which confirmed that no there was no botnet installation.
> I downloaded Botnet 0.8 *again* from
> http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/spamassassin/Botnet-0.8.tar
> I
>
> Well here is what I have...
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls -la /etc/mail/spamassassin/
> total 148
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2008-01-11 22:54 .
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2007-12-29 19:48 ..
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 4706 2008-01-11 22:54 Botnet.cf
> -r--r--r-- 1 root root 28616 2008-
>
> Sounds like you've been hit by bug 5519 [1] before the upgrade in Oct.
> Setting rules scores to 0 did *not* prevent these tests from being
> evaluated for SA 3.2.x before 3.2.3.
>
> Fixed since 3.2.3. Plugin eval rules with 0 scores are meant no not be
> evaluated, and of course to not sho
>
> You can't run the rules in score-order without driving SA's performance
> into the ground.
>
> The key here is SA doesn't run tests sequentially, it runs them in
> parallel as it works its way through the body. this allows for good,
> efficient use of memory cache.
>
> By running rules in sc
>
> Just wanted to point out, this topic came out when site dns
> cache service started to fail due to excessive dnsbl queries. My
> slowdown was due to multiple timeouts and/or delay, probably
> related to "answering joe-job rbldns backscatter" -- that's the
> reason I was looking for early exit
Greetings
Is using sa-compile the standard now?
... or are most organizations still just using the stock formatted rulesets?
If not the standard, is it the SA recommended standard?
I know there can be problems or issues, yet if we do use sa-compile as
instructed by the documentation, should we
>
> I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its
> performance benefits. There aren't many (any?) drawbacks to using it.
>
> That said, I still cannot get it to work on my system. Everything works
> fine with the standard rulesets, but as soon as I enable the compiled
> rules
>
> I don't use it here because it takes too long (over 20 minutes) to
> compile.
> (This is with SA v3.2.4, which is a big improvement over v3.2.3)
>
> L
Why would how long it takes to compile matter as long as you get some return
on investment?
Is the machine heavily loaded or just a small u
>
> Probably /var/log/maillog or wherever syslog logs your mail facility.
>
> Daryl
Daryl,
Hey, that is kinda neat...
telnet localhost 783
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1).
Escape character is '^]'.
PING SPAMC/1.0
SPAMD/1.4 0 PONG
Connection closed by foreign
>
> This is the SpamAssassin users list. For people who are using SpamAssassin
> and having trouble with it.
>
> My post was absolutely within the remit of this list. And I provided as
> much
> information as I thought was relevant, including the header tags added by
> SA, the local.cf file, the
>
> Funnily enough that's the useful response. This would be a much more
> useful
> list if instead of pouncing on non-experts with tangential rants people
> simply offered a link or two, or said precisely what kind of test info is
> needed.
>
> I have now seen these pages:
>
> http://wiki.apac
>
>
> (sorry my poor english)
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a machine with qmail+qmail-scanner+spamassassin 3.0.0. Some time
> ago,
> I have saw that some spam are passing through filter with 0 score. Then, I
> activated sa_debug='1' and sa_hdr_report='1' in qmail-scanner for see how
> SA
> are giving th
> This was way too long but I'm waiting on a couple buildworlds and the more
> I think about this the more shady it feels to me.
>
> Good luck regardless,
> ---
> Andy Dills
Andy
Think about it like this... in terms of just your immediate family or
businesses
If you are so overloaded helping ot
> but I don't send "messages to you from the users mailing list seem to
> have been bouncing".
> What do I have to do to resolve the problem?
>
> Andrea
Andrea
If you are using SA on your mail server, make sure that you whitelist all
the lists that you are subscribed to... sometimes they will b
>
> I'll defer to the wisdom of the people who invest their time and effort to
> provide the services and develop the software that the rest of us have
> come to rely on. If you guys don't have a problem with it, then that's
> good enough for me.
> ---
> Andy Dills
Andy
You are a smart person, j
>
> Quotes from this thread (and the nolisting site which was posted as a
> response):
>
> Michael Scheidell -> "Do NOT use a bogus mx as your lowest priority."
> Bowie Bailey -> "I would say that it is too risky to put a non-smtp
> host as your primary
> MX"
>
> nolisting.org -> "longterm us
> Can't find commercial pricing, but 'corporate' pricing is $168,000 per
> year
> for unlimited use. (100,000 per year is only $10,000 per year)
Michael
Corporate up to 100 users is $500 a year
http://www.spamhaus.org/datafeed/index.html
click on the service price check button
then select appr
>
> System: Debian with Qmail + QmailScanner + SpamAssassins + ClamAV
> Installation: qmailrocks.org
>
> I've updated SA (original from qmailrocks.org 3.0.2) to 3.2.4
> my locale.cf is :
>
> rewrite_header Subject *SPAM*
> report_safe 0
> required_score 4
> required_hits 5
> use_bayes 1
>
> Que
>
> Dear List
>
> I am running qmail + SA + Clamav on FC 5, my problem is when ever
> concurrent smtp connections cross 30+ SA gets slow and take too much
> time to process mails through qmailscaner
>
> qmail-queue.log
> ===
> Fri,
In regards to
backhair.cf
backhair is a set of rules designed to catch those ugly, unsightly HTML
tags. Created by: Jennifer Wheeler
are unsightly HTML tags just referring to basic HTML coding or something
else we should better understand as spam fighting warriors
Thank you
- rh
>
> The last two messages I sent were duplicated on this list. I'm not sure
> why and I hope this one isn't duplicated. I'm using Exim and I'm only
> seeing one entry in my log. If anyone knows what might be causing this
> I'd be more than happy to fix the problem. Until then, I apologize for
> t
>
> If I understand your question correctly... The latter. Obfuscation.
>
> You did have a look at the rules file and the rules description, right?
> It's about injected HTML tags "inside" words or to hide part of the
> gibberish as a means of preventing plain word matching, IIRC. It's been
> a w
>
> Not with any 3.x version.
>
> guenther
>
:-)
Oops, my fault... I missed that part even though I was looking for it
What about this Chinese ruleset, anyone in the USA using it to help with
occasional or massive incoming foreign spam?
I would guess it puts quite a load on the system eh?
>
> On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 14:42 -0800, Robert - elists wrote:
> > What about this Chinese ruleset, anyone in the USA using it to help with
> > occasional or massive incoming foreign spam?
>
> Is there any particular need for additional rules, or are you just
> fish
>
> Thanks very much for your kindly help. I have done some testing this
> morning.
>
> And found that, all the SA 3.2.x versions are unworkable.
>
> Here are some output:
>
> #spamassassin -V
>
> SpamAssassin version 3.2.4
> running on Perl version 5.8.5
>
> The OS is CentOS 4.4 with perl
>
> I have a file that contains a list of all the IP's that have
> successfully POP3'ed there email within last 15 minutes. Its used for
> POPB4SMTP. Naturally the IP's in the file are constantly changing.
>
> /etc/virtual/pophosts
>
> Is there anyway to setup Spamassassin to whitelist all IP
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the reply. In as much as I'd like to help the community,
> I'm under a set of constraints. Starting a whole other server to start
> doing
> this isn't something that fits under those constraints. It looks like
> I'll probably just end up having to /dev/null them as I hav
Seriously...
How hard is it to setup the MX boxen to only allow 4 email addresses to pass
for that particular domain, rejecting all others in the SMTP conversation?
Unless the customer is dropping BIG DADDY $$$ with you, tell him policy
change and that he isn't losing any email if you do not do a
Well, you could always change
QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue" ; export QMAILQUEUE
To this
QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue" ; export QMAILQUEUE
And bypass the scanner logic on valid auth
Couldn't you?
;->
Otherwise, it would appear you need to better understand qmail an
>
> ok; fixed it by removing the 192.168.0.0/16 from
> 'internal_networks'. But problem still persists that senders
> from the private 192.168.0.0/16 network are tagged with
> SPF_FAIL.
>
> Enrico
Having watched the thread and not fully recalling every post...
I have not checked this,
>
> aha, so you should check now, why do those fail. Is that your domain SPF
> checks fail for? If so, your users should probably use SMTP authentication
> when sending e-mail.
> --
> Matus UHLAR
Matus
You are bright, and as you know, that will not fix SPF issue if they are
still SA scanning
From:
http://search.cpan.org/src/OLAF/Net-DNS-0.63/Changes
Fix rt.cpan.org #30316 Security issue with Net::DNS Resolver.
Net/DNS/RR/A.pm in Net::DNS 0.60 build 654 allows remote attackers to
cause a denial of service (program "croak") via a crafted DNS
response (http://nvd.nist.gov/n
My searching came up a tad short on this...
I am guessing there is a howto already on this, I just didn't find it, so I
went digging in the internals some more.
Are all tests for DNS type RBL's in this default 20_dnsbl_tests.cf SA file?
Do I need to grep all the other files to check for where th
>
> don't modify "standard" rule files.
>
> instead, create a /path/to/site/rules/scores.cf (same directory where
> you have local.cf) and override the scores there (use a 0 score to
> disable a test). look at 50_scores.cf to get an idea.
>
> I hope you have valid reasons to disable network te
>
> You probably know this, but make sure you put the zeroed-out scores in
> your local config dir (i.e. /etc/mail/spamassassin or the like) so that
> they won't be overwritten the next time you upgrade and/or run sa-update.
>
> --
> Kelson Vibber
> SpeedGate Communications
Kelson
Thanks, I h
I am not a ccache expert...
I came across it in the last few months and just today had some time to
install it on a centos 4.6 box and play for a second or two.
If anyone on the list is familiar with using it?
If so, then the questions would be, is it appropriate to use it, or
something similar,
Snip
> If anyone has tested HostKarma already... and found it promising, but a
> little lacking... I suggest testing it again. It is even better now.
>
> In fact, most DNSBLs do not suddenly come on the scene "perfect". Most
> have had MUCH growing pains. Therefore, all newer DNBSLs shoul
Yes Marc
Please start a JMF general support maillist for those that want to be part
of it.
Make sure it cannot become a spam forum in itself and is truly opt in with
verify
I highly suggest that you post to it frequently, before any major or minor
changes to JMF hardware or software
I am not sure how to ask this
We have a test URIBL
#
#
#
###
#
urirhssub URIBL_TEST uri.test.local.A 2
body URIBL_TEST eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_TEST')
describe URIBL_TEST Contains an URL listed in the TEST blackl
>
> If you are referring to this:
>
> [42778] warn: config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, "test_rule .1" is
> not valid for "score", skipping: score test_rule .1
> [42778] warn: lint: 1 issues detected, please rerun with debug enabled for
> more information
>
> You have to prefix all decima
> From: mouss
>
> http://www.dnsbl.com/
>
I have never paid attention to it so... questions..
Was dsbl.org widely used?
In general, is it considered a major and necessary dnsbl tool for the war
against spam?
Does anyone have any idea how much sustained bandwidth in and out that it
took to r
>
> I am trying to use SA to test a DNSBL and I am not having any luck
> getting the rule to hit. I've looked through 20_dnsbl_tests.cf, and read
> the appropriate section in the docs.
>
> http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#
> rule_definitions_and_privileged
>
> It's great how far SA is already, I give props to all the developers that
> spend their free time on it. But just imagine what it could be, if for
> example Justin would be paid to work on it 8 hours a day? :)
Henrik,
Decent money isn't really that hard to come by overall...
The legal lan
Since they seem to have zillions of outbound mx machines
I did this in response to some email latency issues.
dig google.com txt
google.com. 31 IN TXT "v=spf1
include:_netblocks.google.com ~all"
then i
dig _netblocks.google.com txt
_netblocks.google.com. 47 IN
Ok
Yellow then.
What I am talking about is not greylisting google based upon those addresses
and sending right to SA for scoring
- rh
>
> I think he meant whitelisting when the rDNS is verified (FcrDNS) by a
> "double lookup". That's what a postfix check_client_access will do.
>
> [snip]
Mouss
I think I wanted to whitelist inside my greylist the google IP netblocks
space.
They have a zillion outbound MX servers and some cli
I noticed that the sought rules compile faster in 3.2.5
Typically 5 to 7 minutes faster which translates to roughly 1/3
Does anyone else notice this?
Is there a specific reason why?
:-)
- rh
>
> Yeah, it's easy enough doing that conversion -- let us know if he's
> happy for that to happen. It'd be a good way to "port" those sigs
> to SpamAssassin
>
> --j.
JM,
Would that be announced on the list somehow?
Many of us use the CLAMAV SA plugin with those sigs already, and I think
Does a larger Bayes DB add significant processing overhead to SA cpu needs?
Or are people mainly talking about it today only because of size reduction
needs?
- rh
Seeing that Jari posted a large channels.txt file with lots of sare rule
updates...
I am wondering...
When was the last time any of the sare rules were updated?
I actually do not recall any of the ones we use being updated in many
months, and it appears he checks hourly...
Anyone?
- rh
> > - rh
>
> lol.. Maybe I should put them in a separate sare_channels.txt and run it
> yearly?
>
Heheh
Ummm, it isn't a knock on the sare rules.
We appreciate them a lot.
I am truly wondering if maybe we just are updating from the wrong place by
going directly to the rulesemporium website ma
>
> They are not being updated and they won't in the close future.
> Any update would be announced *loudly* all over the place.
>
> Running any type of updates (sa-update with SARE channel or
> rules_du_jour) is a waste of bandwidth and useless load on donated
> server resources.
>
> SARE recom
> >
> I have made some early progress on this (I don't want to make it
> generally avalaible yet until Steve from Sane gets back off vacation).
> The biggest problem I have at the moment is the size of the rule set
> that it generates - a subset of the rules (i.e. the ones that I have
> managed t
Typically we do something like this basic outline
login to non-root account and change to proper directory
wget
http://www.apache.org/dist/spamassassin/source/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.5.tar.g
z
rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.5.tar.gz
su to root and change to proper directory
yum localinstall
Does anyone think that
10 FM_BIG_REASON Lot's of CAP words, BIG, REASON, BEST
Is scored high or?
- rh
>
> Seems high to me, but needs to be put in the context of your threshold.
>
> --
> Sahil Tandon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Threshold?
Huh?
You are joking right?
The default SA scoring spam tagging threshold is half that...
:-)
- rh
>
> mouss is french, you must know ;-)
>
French mouse?
;-)
http://disney.go.com/disneyvideos/animatedfilms/ratatouille/
No offense intended of course... it really was a cute movie...
Time for vacations!
- rh
Is anyone else currently seeing this since 3.2.5 upgrade?
We updated when it came out and have only seen the error a few times
since...
Centos 4.6 and perl 5.8.8 and SA 3.2.5 with sought rules and compiled
Jun 25 09:22:57 mxi spamd[18530]: rules: failed to run TVD_STOCK1 test,
skipping:
Jun 25
Please forgive me for top post and replying to my own, yet I forgot to add
the code from line 243 in the BodyEval.pm file
foreach ( $rnd =~ /^\s*([^:\s][^:\n]{2,29})\s*:\s*\S/mg ) {
:-)
- rh
>
> Is anyone else currently seeing this since 3.2.5 upgrade?
>
> We updated when it came out and h
>
> you seem not to reject viruses at SMTP level ;) otherwise clamav couldn't
> score them :)
>
One can score an email and still reject during the SMTP session if the
systems are setup to do so.
- rh
>
> one does need to score viruses in SA if (s)he can reject them directly
> --
Yes, we do that.
See the SA clamav plugin
- rh
>
> no, you do not do that. See the clamav-milter or other apropriate program.
> SA is very CPU intensive so it's better to scan with clamav directly,
> instead of using SA clamav plugin
Matus...
You are smart person.
Maybe you could tell the clamav plugin people...
;-)
Actually, yes, we do
The registrars I'm talking about are extremely expensive and very exclusive.
Spammers couldn't afford it.
Hmm, check out markmonitor.com
The really interesting point is this.
Since so much spam is about getting brand recognition in the peoples faces
and not necessarily gettin
>
> I'm sorry, but what MUA recognizes those? Why don' t you set Reply-
> To: which will be honored by all MUAs?
>
snip
>
>
> He is acted as is common and expected. Others who, like you, don't
> want private copies set Reply-To.
>
> --
> Jo Rhett
> Net Consonance : consonant endings by net
> >
> Heh, in my case I really don't like having to re-train anything. I like
> to be sure when I train that if I tell sa-learn that a mail is spam, it
> is 100% spam. That's why I weekly collect spammy mail from a bunch of
> trusted users and re filter it myself before passing it to sa-learn.
>
I didn't see anything on the www, so after a lil investigation, it appears
that on a centos 4.6 box with SA 3.2.5, that the default compiled SA ruleset
is in
/var/lib/spamassassin/compiled
And below...
Question(s)
So, to go back to standard SA processing config, basically I just need to
admin
>
> Robert - elists wrote:
> >
> > I didn't see anything on the www, so after a lil investigation, it
> appears
> > that on a centos 4.6 box with SA 3.2.5, that the default compiled SA
> ruleset
> > is in
> >
> > /var/lib/spamassassin/compile
Ron
You are kinda shooting in the dark on the memory leak thread stuff.
You need to get a lil deeper in the system(s) to know.
I don't know what programming tools you are familiar with yet you could do
some tracing and know exactly what is going on and when it is happening and
then you can immed
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
