On 2024-01-31 at 08:16:13 UTC-0500 (Wed, 31 Jan 2024 14:16:13 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
is rumored to have said:
On 2024-01-30 at 12:08:18 UTC-0500 (Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:08:18 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
is rumored to have said:
[...]
autolearn may help if your DB is well maintained,
On 2024-01-30 at 12:08:18 UTC-0500 (Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:08:18 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
is rumored to have said:
[...]
autolearn may help if your DB is well maintained, although I have
disabled nearly all rules with negative scores, like
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_*
RCVD_IN_IADB_* DKIMWL_WL_*
On 2024-01-30 at 12:08:18 UTC-0500 (Tue, 30 Jan 2024 18:08:18 +0100)
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
is rumored to have said:
[...]
autolearn may help if your DB is well maintained, although I have
disabled nearly all rules with negative scores, like
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_*
RCVD_IN_IADB_* DKIMWL_WL_*
On 30.01.24 09:59, joe a wrote:
Advisable to "prune" Bayes data based on age?
While cleaning up recent Ham/Spam, found my "saved SPAM" goes back
to 2013.
Why that's over . . . wait, I need to take off my socks . . .
So, how old is "too old". For saved SPAM?
On 1/30/2024 10:58:52, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 30.01.24 09:59, joe a wrote:
Advisable to "prune" Bayes data based on age?
While cleaning up recent Ham/Spam, found my "saved SPAM" goes back to
2013.
Why that's over . . . wait, I need to take off my socks . . .
On 2024-01-30 at 09:59:52 UTC-0500 (Tue, 30 Jan 2024 09:59:52 -0500)
joe a
is rumored to have said:
Advisable to "prune" Bayes data based on age?
Yes. That is why it has an expiration model. Expiration may be de facto
blocked on some busy systems so you may need to explic
On 30.01.24 09:59, joe a wrote:
Advisable to "prune" Bayes data based on age?
While cleaning up recent Ham/Spam, found my "saved SPAM" goes back to
2013.
Why that's over . . . wait, I need to take off my socks . . .
So, how old is "too old". For saved SPAM
Advisable to "prune" Bayes data based on age?
While cleaning up recent Ham/Spam, found my "saved SPAM" goes back to
2013.
Why that's over . . . wait, I need to take off my socks . . .
So, how old is "too old". For saved SPAM?
paclan.it <mailto:giova...@paclan.it>>>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > To create the stopwords regexp I used the script I shared in
> a previous email and a list of words one per line.
> > > Could you share the list you are using ?
> > >
u share the list you are using ?
>
> Giovanni
>
> On 12/29/23 09:22, Jimmy wrote:
> > I use SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14)
> >
> > $ spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep bayes:
> > Dec 29 1
ist you are using ?
> >
> > Giovanni
> >
> > On 12/29/23 09:22, Jimmy wrote:
> > > I use SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14)
> > >
> > > $ spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep bayes:
> > > Dec 29 15:17:5
Could you share the list you are using ?
Giovanni
On 12/29/23 09:22, Jimmy wrote:
> I use SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14)
>
> $ spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep bayes:
> Dec 29 15:17:56.919 [17420] dbg: bayes: stopword found lang=en
&g
you share the list you are using ?
>
>Giovanni
>
> On 12/29/23 09:22, Jimmy wrote:
> > I use SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14)
> >
> > $ spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep bayes:
> > Dec 29 15:17:56.919 [17420] dbg: bayes: stopword found lang=en
> > D
To create the stopwords regexp I used the script I shared in a previous email
and a list of words one per line.
Could you share the list you are using ?
Giovanni
On 12/29/23 09:22, Jimmy wrote:
I use SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14)
$ spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep bayes:
Dec 2
I use SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14)
$ spamassassin -D --lint 2>&1 | grep bayes:
Dec 29 15:17:56.919 [17420] dbg: bayes: stopword found lang=en
Dec 29 15:17:56.919 [17420] dbg: bayes: stopword found lang=th
Dec 29 15:17:56.919 [17420] dbg: bayes: stopword found lang=ru
Dec 29 15:17:56.919
rds-th.txt and
it produces a working regexp.
Bayes stopwords languages must also be enabled using "bayes_stopword_languages"
config keyword, by default only english is enabled.
Giovanni
On 12/28/23 17:06, Jimmy wrote:
bayes_stopword_th https://pastebin.pl/view/0838138d
<https://pastebin.p
one that, and I am also editing Plugin/Bayes.pm to
> investigate why it is not being skipped. I suspect that if words are not
> separated by spaces, longer words may not match those patterns.
> >
> > Jimmy
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 10:13 PM giova...@paclan.it>>
patterns.
Jimmy
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 10:13 PM mailto:giova...@paclan.it>> wrote:
"spamassassin -D bayes" will tell you, you should see a line like:
bayes: skipped token 'from' because it's in stopword list for language 'en'
Giovanni
On 12/28/23 15
Yes, I have done that, and I am also editing Plugin/Bayes.pm to investigate
why it is not being skipped. I suspect that if words are not separated by
spaces, longer words may not match those patterns.
Jimmy
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 10:13 PM wrote:
> "spamassassin -D bayes" will
"spamassassin -D bayes" will tell you, you should see a line like:
bayes: skipped token 'from' because it's in stopword list for language 'en'
Giovanni
On 12/28/23 15:45, Jimmy wrote:
The pattern has successfully passed the test script, but it needs to check
whether Baye
The pattern has successfully passed the test script, but it needs to check
whether Bayes learning will identify and possibly exclude the word from
matching this pattern.
Thank you.
On Thu, Dec 28, 2023 at 9:22 PM wrote:
> On 12/28/23 12:59, Jimmy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I
used Regexp::Trie to create Bayes stopwords in the past, code is similar
to:
---
use strict;
use warnings;
use Encode;
use Regexp::Trie;
my @input = ;
my $rt = Regexp::Trie->new;
for
Hi,
I'm seeking assistance in incorporating a stopword for Asian languages in
Unicode. Although I possess comprehensive word lists, my attempts to
generate a regex pattern and test it have been unsuccessful; the pattern
fails to match or skips tokens in the newly added stopword list.
I created
something to strip off all of the email headers?
For the BAYES_99, as already mentioned you probably need to retrain
bayes, making sure to correct any incorrectly trained email messages.
-jeff
On 2023-12-13 at 01:49:24 UTC-0500 (Wed, 13 Dec 2023 07:49:24 +0100)
Pierluigi Frullani
is rumored to have said:
Hello all,
I'm facing a strange problem.
Not really. MANY people run into this issue...
I've feed the bayes db for a while and now I would like to put it in
use
but all
Hello all,
I'm facing a strange problem.
I've feed the bayes db for a while and now I would like to put it in use
but all messages get a BAYES_99 and very high spam point.
I would like to understand why, and troubleshoot this problem but I can't
find a way.
Spamassassin version is:
root@puma
On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 07:06:10PM +0200, Robert Senger wrote:
> I've set up a testing environment that also uses master-master
> replication of the mysql bayes database, with priority in dns set to
> equal for both mx to get incoming mail distributed evenly to both
> systems. So far
Am Sonntag, dem 09.07.2023 um 19:21 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
>
> Am 09.07.23 um 19:06 schrieb Robert Senger:
> > But bayes data may be updated by either the primary mx or the
> > backup
> > mx, since email may arrive at either server.
>
> in a smart setup
Hi there,
I am running two mailservers, first one serving two domains, other one
serving one domain.
Both serve as backup mx for each other. Both know about users and
aliases of the other domain(s).
On both systems, spamassassin is configured to read/store userprefs and
bayes data (per user
joe a skrev den 2023-02-28 17:37:
Curious as to why these scores, apparently "stock" are what they are.
I'd expect BAYES_999 BODY to count more than BAYES_99 BODY.
Noted in a header this morning:
* 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.]
* 0.2
From: "Bill Cole"
It is my understanding that an automated rescoring job was run quite some
time ago (before I was on the PMC) to generate the Bayes scores, which
determined that to be the best supplemental score to give to the greater
certainty.
I was around in those days. My me
joe a skrev den 2023-02-28 17:37:
Curious as to why these scores, apparently "stock" are what they are.
I'd expect BAYES_999 BODY to count more than BAYES_99 BODY.
Noted in a header this morning:
* 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.]
* 0.2
at they
are.
> I'd expect BAYES_999 BODY to count more than BAYES_99 BODY.
>
> Noted in a header this morning:
>
> * 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
> * [score: 1.]
> * 0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probabilit
pam, go with 2
or more; if you have several false positives, keep the score low.
I learnt the hard way that BAYES depends on the corpus used to grow the
database.
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 7:39 PM joe a wrote:
> On 2/28/2023 12:05 PM, Jeff Mincy wrote:
> > > From: joe a
> >
er this morning:
>
> * 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
> * [score: 1.]
> * 0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
> * [score: 1.]
>
> Was this discussed recently? I added a local score to mollify
> From: joe a
> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:37:34 -0500
>
> Curious as to why these scores, apparently "stock" are what they are.
> I'd expect BAYES_999 BODY to count more than BAYES_99 BODY.
>
> Noted in a header this morning:
>
> * 3.5 BAYES_
Curious as to why these scores, apparently "stock" are what they are.
I'd expect BAYES_999 BODY to count more than BAYES_99 BODY.
Noted in a header this morning:
* 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
* [score: 1.]
* 0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam p
as
too difficult for users to deal with. I was considering 2 folders:
'Spam Training Set' and 'Ham Training Set' which would always
represent the set of messages that Spamassassin was currently trained
with. If you changed the contents of these mboxes, a cron job would
delete the old bayes tok
From: "Reindl Harald"
in other words a system for morons - morons which will drag mails to spam
instead click on "unsubscribe"
per-user bayes don't work well, never
Well Harald, you are certainly welcome to your opinion. It would be nicer if
you had kept it yoursel
Subject: Re: Strange findings debugging bayes results
On 20 February 2023 12:28:00 CET, Loren Wilton wrote:
>
> A cron job that will harvest Spam and Ham mboxes and feed them to sa-learn
once a day, then archive the learned messages. Per-user bayes and learning.
Mail is hand-moved into
On 20 February 2023 12:28:00 CET, Loren Wilton wrote:
>
> A cron job that will harvest Spam and Ham mboxes and feed them to sa-learn
> once a day, then archive the learned messages. Per-user bayes and learning.
> Mail is hand-moved into the spam and ham learning folders, and for my
> Can you please give me some details on your bayes setup?
> Headers exclusion, bayes_token_sources, how do you "sa-learn" messages...
Standard options on Bayes. No autolearn. A cron job that will harvest Spam and
Ham mboxes and feed them to sa-learn once a day, then arc
Can you please give me some details on your bayes setup? Headers
exclusion, bayes_token_sources, how do you "sa-learn" messages...
thank you
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 11:53 PM Loren Wilton wrote:
> > The real question is: has bayes still its use case in 2023 ? Is it still
>
> The real question is: has bayes still its use case in 2023 ? Is it still used
> with important scores or just to flag messages for a review?
It works fine for me here.
>
>
> bayes_token_sources none visible uri mimepart
>
I added this line to my config with no changes in the tokens used to sum
the bayes score, headers still used. It may be a command only recognized
during learning but I should check the sources.
> perhaps OP has bayes_token_
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 01:02:25PM +0200, Henrik K wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:18:50AM +0100, hg user wrote:
> > Every score is based on headers, very generic headers. and some
> > related to my setup.
> >
> > Not a single token from the message body
>
I've updated 23_bayes_ignore_header.cf
(last update was from 2016 :)
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/axb/23_bayes_ignore_header.cf
Axb
On 2/16/23 14:17, Dave Wreski wrote:
Here's also another 50+ headers we've collected over the years that I
believe started
of bitcoin spam: different titles,
different senders (all from gmail), different text, different pdf
attachment.
Unfortunately in those days my bayes db was polluted and they all got
a BAYES_50, 0.8.
I tested the messages now with a recreated bayes db and got some
BAYES_999. So I dug to understand if I
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:18:50AM +0100, hg user wrote:
> I was investigating a bunch of bitcoin spam: different titles,
> different senders (all from gmail), different text, different pdf
> attachment.
>
> Unfortunately in those days my bayes db was polluted and they all got
&g
I was investigating a bunch of bitcoin spam: different titles,
different senders (all from gmail), different text, different pdf
attachment.
Unfortunately in those days my bayes db was polluted and they all got
a BAYES_50, 0.8.
I tested the messages now with a recreated bayes db and got some
Grant wrote:
Does anyone have a working example of storing Bayes and user prefs in
SQLite? I only see mysql and postgres schemas in
/usr/share/doc/spamassassin/sql/
Michael Grant
Does anyone have a working example of storing Bayes and user prefs in
SQLite? I only see mysql and postgres schemas in
/usr/share/doc/spamassassin/sql/
Michael Grant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Just off the top of my head:
rawbodyONEDRIVE_DOWNLOADm'https://onedrive\.live\.com/download[?]cid='
score ONEDRIVE_DOWNLOAD0.5
describeONEDRIVE_DOWNLOADDownload link to a file on Onedrive
Personally I'd be inclined to put an i on the end of that.
body
rules for a sneaky SPEAR-VIRUS spam that gets past bayes because legit
content from hijacked emails are copied into the spam, making it look
like a follow-up msg of an existing legit conversation. Catch using
these rules below. (Perhaps also add more to this to prevent rare FPs
On 2022-01-18 22:34, Bill Cole wrote:
Well, maybe? I don't currently have a system using per-user Bayes and
it's been a bit since I set one up so hopefully someone who has a
working rig will speak up...
fuglu have pr user bayes pr default, and it recently fixed that local
part before could
> Note that SA will try to create an empty DB if none exists. I'm not sure that
> I can think up a circumstance (other than a disappearing user) where fallback
> > to global Bayes would happen. SA will not fall back to a global Bayes DB
> just because an otherwise perfectly g
and look in the
/opt/sa-bayes-users/%u directory for the existence of bayes database
and if it finds one, it will use it provided it's properly seeded. If
not, it will fall back to the global bayes. Is that correct?
Well, maybe? I don't currently have a system using per-user Bayes and
it's been
Hi, thanks for the quick reply. So when amavis calls on SA for an incoming
message, it will pass the recipient (e-mail address) in the %u variable and
then SA will take that variable and look in the /opt/sa-bayes-users/%u
directory for the existence of bayes database and if it finds one
On 2022-01-18 at 11:12:01 UTC-0500 (Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:12:01 +)
Dino Edwards
is rumored to have said:
Hi,
Trying to implement user specific bayes. My current setup is setup as
follows in regards to global bayes. I'm also using amavis:
bayes_path /opt/sa-bayes/bayes
bayes_file_mode
Hi,
Trying to implement user specific bayes. My current setup is setup as follows
in regards to global bayes. I'm also using amavis:
bayes_path /opt/sa-bayes/bayes
bayes_file_mode 0777
use_bayes 1
use_bayes_rules 1
bayes_auto_learn 0
bayes_auto_learn_threshold_spam 15
On Sat, 23 Oct 2021, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-10-20 16:58, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021, Axb wrote:
On 10/19/21 8:06 PM, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
Where do I find a starter toks file?
You don't need a "starter" file.
Your Bayes starter is your training corpora,
On 2021-10-20 16:58, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021, Axb wrote:
On 10/19/21 8:06 PM, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
Where do I find a starter toks file?
You don't need a "starter" file.
Your Bayes starter is your training corpora, which you should retain
in case you ever need to
I am starting over with a clean install of SA on an AWS Linux2 EC2. I'm
am struggling with getting Bayes set up correctly. I have a very old
bayes_toks file from a Jam Windows install from about 4 years ago. I
created a userId for spamd, and I put the bayes_toks file in
/home/spamd/bayes
On Wed, 20 Oct 2021, Axb wrote:
On 10/19/21 8:06 PM, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
Where do I find a starter toks file?
You don't need a "starter" file.
Your Bayes starter is your training corpora, which you should retain in
case you ever need to start over from scratch as you're
On 10/19/21 8:06 PM, Jerry Malcolm wrote:
Where do I find a starter toks file?
You don't need a "starter" file. As soon as it needs them, SA
automagically creates the necessary files if it can write into the
defined path.
Just feed it some spams and hams as per docs and you'll see the
I am starting over with a clean install of SA on an AWS Linux2 EC2. I'm
am struggling with getting Bayes set up correctly. I have a very old
bayes_toks file from a Jam Windows install from about 4 years ago. I
created a userId for spamd, and I put the bayes_toks file in
/home/spamd/bayes
On Mon, 10 May 2021 20:39:31 +0200
Bert Van de Poel wrote:
> Based on what I've read, I agree that this is indeed a bug (or
> actually several). I've filed the following bug reports:
> https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7904 (missing body
> types, as mentioned by RW)
>
ups
Dear Loren,
Thank you very much for your email. Based on your message I could deduce
there were earlier messages (which I then read through a web archive).
For some unexplained reason I never received the previous 3 responses to
my email. I hope the university network isn't randomly
so you don't have points from body rules.
your mentioned URI_DEOBFU_INSTR is a meta rule:
meta URI_DEOBFU_INSTR __URI_DEOBFU_INSTR && !__MSGID_OK_HOST
so maybe it's not considered.
They are treated as header, or ignored if marked as net.
I think a bug report should be submitted for this.
On Sun, 9 May 2021 20:03:27 +0200
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> so you don't have points from body rules.
>
> your mentioned URI_DEOBFU_INSTR is a meta rule:
>
> meta URI_DEOBFU_INSTR __URI_DEOBFU_INSTR && !__MSGID_OK_HOST
>
> so maybe it's not considered.
They are treated as header, or
On 09.05.21 04:17, Bert Van de Poel wrote:
Dear fellow Spamassassin users,
I recently noticed that quite a lot of spam emails with high scores
weren't marked for Bayes autolearning. While some senders and
receivers were a common match, explaining why autolearn was nog, there
was no clear
On Sun, 9 May 2021 04:17:26 +0200
Bert Van de Poel wrote:
> Within the same realm, I'm also wondering whether these expected
> numbers for body and header can be tweaked and if so, how.
You can create a meta-rule for definite spam and set:
tflags autolearn_force
a hit on any rule with
Dear fellow Spamassassin users,
I recently noticed that quite a lot of spam emails with high scores
weren't marked for Bayes autolearning. While some senders and receivers
were a common match, explaining why autolearn was nog, there was no
clear explanation for other cases. I therefore put
On 2021-02-11 12:58 pm, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I've had good luck with using mariadb and galera to share the spamassassin
>> database across systems. I run a small 3-node setup for email, 2x servers
>> running dovecot replicating to each other, and a 3rd galera quorum server.
>> Mariadb
On Thursday 11 February 2021 at 17:21:41, deano-spamassas...@areyes.com wrote:
> Is there an easy/efficient way of converting an existing mariadb bayes
> database to redis?
>
> Perhaps "sa-learn --backup", set up redis, then restore?
https://www.mail-archive.com/users@s
On 2021-02-11 9:54 am, Alex wrote:
> Hi,
> There is no real question, but what I would like to find out is (and to ask),
> does it scale and are any pitfalls? Naturally, we would look at doing HA, but
> am asking for that any comment, any tip, any opinion on using redis for
&
Hi,
> > There is no real question, but what I would like to find out is (and to
> > ask), does it scale and are any pitfalls?
> > Naturally, we would look at doing HA, but am asking for that any
> > comment, any tip, any opinion on using redis for bayes.
>
> Been us
Hi Brent,
On 2/10/21 12:21 PM, Brent Clark wrote:
Good day Guys
I just want to check with the community, is there anybody using SA's
bayes with the Redis backend?
I work at a largish ISP, so we talking lots of mail.
There is no real question, but what I would like to find out
Good day Guys
I just want to check with the community, is there anybody using SA's bayes with
the Redis backend?
I work at a largish ISP, so we talking lots of mail.
There is no real question, but what I would like to find out is (and to ask),
does it scale and are any pitfalls?
Naturally
, I'd like to move over to a global redis system, but I don't see an easy
way to convert from bayes SQL to redis bayes.
Is this somewhere and I can't find it?
"sa-learn --backup" with old config and "sa-learn --restore" with new one
should do what you need.
Giovanni
H
move over to a global redis system, but I don't see an
> easy way to convert from bayes SQL to redis bayes.
>
> Is this somewhere and I can't find it?
>
"sa-learn --backup" with old config and "sa-learn --restore" with new one
should do what you need.
Giovanni
bayes SQL to redis bayes.
Is this somewhere and I can't find it?
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---
On 21.01.21 13:41, Emanuel Gonzalez wrote:
anyway, the error is still represented even with low configuration values.
Jan 21 10:39:43 eternia6 spamd[28053]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/var/spamassassin/bayesdb/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists
Jan 21 10:39:43 eternia6 spamd[28299
On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 14:08:59 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> journalling may help a bit, but it makes no sense to parse more mail
> within one CPU at the same time.
That's true provided that everything remains completely CPU limited.
The problem is that if you run any network tests and
anyway, the error is still represented even with low configuration values.
Jan 21 10:39:43 eternia6 spamd[28053]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/var/spamassassin/bayesdb/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists
Jan 21 10:39:43 eternia6 spamd[28299]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/var
: Error "cannot open bayes databases" lock failed: File exists
The problem can be generated by the number of processes?
# Server CPU
cpu family : 6
model : 60
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4790 CPU @ 3.60GHz
# SpamAssassin
SPAMDOPTIONS="-u spamd --min-ch
On 20.01.21 18:31, Emanuel Gonzalez wrote:
The problem can be generated by the number of processes?
number of concurrent processes trying to write to the bayes DB at the same
time.
journalling may help a bit, but it makes no sense to parse more mail within
one CPU at the same time
ld=60 --max-conn-per-child=150
what change i need to apply?
Regards, Emanuel.
De: Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Enviado: miércoles, 20 de enero de 2021 15:28
Para: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Asunto: Re: Error "cannot open bayes databases" lock fail
On 20.01.21 14:50, Emanuel Gonzalez wrote:
Hello Matus, thanks for your reply.
# ls -la /var/spamassassin/bayesdb/bayes
ls: no se puede acceder a /var/spamassassin/bayesdb/bayes: No existe el fichero
o el directorio
I see an error of inexistent file.
sorry, that was supposed to be:
ls
lly need so many child processes? You have 40 in Bayes
alone and in a previous post you had "--round-robin" with
"--max-children=180", i.e. a fixed number of 180 in total.
: miércoles, 20 de enero de 2021 13:39
Para: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Asunto: Re: Error "cannot open bayes databases" lock failed: File exists
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 20.01.21 11:07, Emanuel Gonzalez wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:07:59 +00
On Wed, 20 Jan 2021, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 20.01.21 11:07, Emanuel Gonzalez wrote:
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:07:59 +
From: Emanuel Gonzalez
To: SA Mailing list
Subject: Re: Error "cannot open bayes databases" lock failed: File exists
Hello everyone, i'm back from my
Hello Matus, thanks for your reply.
# ls -la /var/spamassassin/bayesdb/bayes
ls: no se puede acceder a /var/spamassassin/bayesdb/bayes: No existe el fichero
o el directorio
I see an error of inexistent file.
# lsof /var/spamassassin/bayesdb/bayes_journal
/var/spamassassin/bayesdb/bayes_seen
On 20.01.21 11:07, Emanuel Gonzalez wrote:
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:07:59 +
From: Emanuel Gonzalez
To: SA Mailing list
Subject: Re: Error "cannot open bayes databases" lock failed: File exists
Hello everyone, i'm back from my vacations, i try solved this problem but i
cou
Hello everyone, i'm back from my vacations, i try solved this problem but i
could not.
I still see in the spamsassin error logs the mentioned error:
bayes_learn_to_journal 1
use_bayes yes
bayes_path /var/spamassassin/bayesdb/bayes
bayes_auto_learn 0
bayes_auto_expire 0
#
- rw--- 1 spamd
.48.0/22,168.181.184.0/22,138.219.40.0/22,138.36.236.0/22,66.97.32.0/20"
Putting aside your Bayes error (which I'm pretty sure Matus answered),
this seems like an awful lot of individual systems allowed to connect to
a single spamd instance - it's not generally an end-user-accessible
service. Do
On 30.12.20 13:53, Emanuel Gonzalez wrote:
Dec 30 09:56:57 eternia6 spamd[15993]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/var/spamassassin/bayesdb/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists
Dec 30 09:56:57 eternia6 spamd[15915]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/var/spamassassin/bayesdb/bayes_* R/W
Good Morning everyone,
In the logs of spamassassin i see this error:
Dec 30 09:56:57 eternia6 spamd[15993]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/var/spamassassin/bayesdb/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists
Dec 30 09:56:57 eternia6 spamd[15915]: bayes: cannot open bayes databases
/var
micah anderson wrote:
Kris Deugau writes:
There will only be one database and set of tables, but one of the fields
in each table is the user identifier. Fair warning - if you go full
per-user on a large system, this will MASSIVELY balloon the size of your
Bayes database, and most users
1 - 100 of 4555 matches
Mail list logo
