hc...@mail.ewind.com wrote:
> re: CP/M
>
> No S-100 bus systems mentioned yet?
>
> My first home computer was a Godbout S-100 bus system running a dual
> 8085/8088 CPU board. At that time, the future in operating systems was
> going to be CP/M 86.
I'm surprised nobod
On fre 18 dec 2009 15:57:18 CET, Per Jessen wrote
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the ZX80/1 yet.
or even spectrum hacked to run cpm :)
I've also got a Newbrain stashed away somewhere, manuals, circuit
diagrams an' all.
add it to ebay if you want to sell it, if i remember newbrain has
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On fre 18 dec 2009 15:57:18 CET, Per Jessen wrote
>
>> I'm surprised nobody has mentioned the ZX80/1 yet.
>
> or even spectrum hacked to run cpm :)
>
>> I've also got a Newbrain stashed away somewhere, manuals, circuit
>> diagrams an' all.
>
> add it to ebay if you want
On Friday 18 December 2009, jdow wrote:
>From: "Gene Heskett"
>Sent: Thursday, 2009/December/17 21:21
[...]
>
>Now, if you want to "get me rolling" about an incompetent computer
>company just mention GRiD and their Compass not really a laptop computer.
>Even the bugs were themselves buggy. (We had
On Friday 18 December 2009, John Hardin wrote:
>On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> I got to work for several months as a bench tech for an outfit building
>> the first pair of the then smallest tv cameras in the world.
>>
>> Later I found out that one of those civies was Jacques Cousteau,
On Friday 18 December 2009, Per Jessen wrote:
>hc...@mail.ewind.com wrote:
>> re: CP/M
>>
>> No S-100 bus systems mentioned yet?
>>
>> My first home computer was a Godbout S-100 bus system running a dual
>> 8085/8088 CPU board. At that time, the future in op
R-Elists wrote:
> as far as museum pieces go, i submit that my first was an Apple 2E if i
> remember correctly..
>
> BRUN BEERRUN
>
> was an interesting game, or something to that effect... ;-)
>
> ...and (snore) i also programmed a helicopter to fly across the top and drop
> a bomb on a "space i
Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Friday 18 December 2009, Per Jessen wrote:
>>hc...@mail.ewind.com wrote:
>>> re: CP/M
>>>
>>> No S-100 bus systems mentioned yet?
>>>
>>> My first home computer was a Godbout S-100 bus system running a dual
>>
On Fri 18 Dec 2009 07:09:03 PM CET, Per Jessen wrote
Completely agree, but the ZX80/1 made computers very, very affordable. I
was 15 when I managed to convince my parents that I desperately needed
one of those. Back in 1981,
zx80 was 1980 imho, and had just 1k ram, and 8k rom, fully expandeble
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Fri 18 Dec 2009 07:09:03 PM CET, Per Jessen wrote
>> Completely agree, but the ZX80/1 made computers very, very
>> affordable. I was 15 when I managed to convince my parents that I
>> desperately needed
>> one of those. Back in 1981,
>
> zx80 was 1980 imho, and had jus
From: "Gene Heskett"
Sent: Friday, 2009/December/18 09:25
On Friday 18 December 2009, Per Jessen wrote:
hc...@mail.ewind.com wrote:
re: CP/M
No S-100 bus systems mentioned yet?
My first home computer was a Godbout S-100 bus system running a dual
8085/8088 CPU board. At that
On Friday 18 December 2009, jdow wrote:
>From: "Gene Heskett"
>Sent: Friday, 2009/December/18 09:25
>
>> On Friday 18 December 2009, Per Jessen wrote:
>>>hc...@mail.ewind.com wrote:
>>>> re: CP/M
>>>>
>>>> No S-100 bus syste
Sorry for the trouble for others.I just know many antispam tech-hackers here including some antispam company's guys.So I ask it here,:-)
-jeff
-原始邮件-发件人:"Jim Maul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>发送时间:2006-09-14 22:01:15收件人:users@spamassassin.apache.org抄送:(无)主题:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 10:01:29PM +0800, Jeff wrote:
> Sorry for the trouble for others.I just know many antispam tech-hackers here
> including some antispam company's guys.So I ask it here,:-)
My guess is that the majority of people would say use SpamAssassin, probably
with some form of third-p
From: Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: RE: 2 different scores?
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 10:13:11 -0400
I'm not familiar with the procmail syntax. When you do "|program",
what is the expected output of the command? If it expect
Evan Platt wrote:
> > From: Bowie Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > I'm not familiar with the procmail syntax. When you do
> > > "|program", what is the expected output of the command? If it
> > > expects to get the filtered email back from the program, you will
> > > need to leave off the
At 11:30 AM 10/9/2006, you wrote:
spamc is a small executable that hands off the message to spamd for
processing.
Ahh ok.
You can run it from the command line the same way you do with
spamassassin.
spamc < inputfile > outputfile
You also might want to check the process that is running
Evan Platt wrote:
> At 11:30 AM 10/9/2006, you wrote:
>
> > spamc is a small executable that hands off the message to spamd for
> > processing.
>
> Ahh ok.
>
>
> > You can run it from the command line the same way you do with
> > spamassassin.
> >
> > spamc < inputfile > outputfile
> >
>
At 12:58 PM 10/9/2006, you wrote:
Network tests are definitely missing. There are two ways to turn off
network tests. The first is with the '-L' option to spamd. The
second is with config options in local.cf. Using the config options
should affect both spamd and spamassassin, so based on the
Evan Platt wrote:
> At 12:58 PM 10/9/2006, you wrote:
>
> > Network tests are definitely missing. There are two ways to turn
> > off network tests. The first is with the '-L' option to spamd. The
> > second is with config options in local.cf. Using the config options
> > should affect both spa
Thanks to everyone for their help...
Charles pointed me in the right direction, I had 2 copies of
spamassassin. But just removing one didn't do the trick. Recompiled
from source after that, and I think it's good to go.
So far spam has been scored above 5, so I'm keeping my fingers crossed.
I'm sorry, but your query below does not parse. The envelope sender
does not change depending on which host it arrives from when using
Thunderbird et al. The host from which it arrives changes, but that's
not part of the envelope.
And yes, you can disable anything with a network profile. rt
Well ok... if you want to pick nits :-)
I guess I should have said:
The listserver, and one of the email accounts, originate mail on the
host (the email account, using pine) - so, for SPF purposes, the mail
comes from an IP address listed in the SPF record for the domain in the
envelop sender
Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 23:17 +0200, Matthias Leisi wrote:
Yves Goergen schrieb:
What do you mean? My mail server uses the DNS servers of the computing
centre. What SpamAssassin does, I don't know. The IP addresses are:
The same as everyone else..
John Hardin wrote:
On Tue,
16 Sep 2008, Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking from opinions from people running rbl blacklists.
I have a list that contains a lot of name based information. I'm
about to add a lot more information to the list and what will happen
is that when you look up a name you migh
Rob McEwen wrote:
John
Hardin wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2008, Marc Perkel wrote:
Looking from opinions from people running rbl blacklists.
I have a list that contains a lot of name based information. I'm
about to add a lot more information to the list and what will happen
is that when you look u
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:11:25PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
> The Doctor wrote:
> > All right why is AWL going to score 30+ when it was told to go to -1000
> >
> > as in
> >
> > score AWL -1000
>
> You can't assign static scores to the AWL, this goes against the
> definition of what it is. It's
The Doctor wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:11:25PM -0400, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> The Doctor wrote:
>>
>>> All right why is AWL going to score 30+ when it was told to go to -1000
>>>
>>> as in
>>>
>>> score AWL -1000
>>>
>> You can't assign static scores to the AWL, this goes a
On Thu, March 26, 2009 13:22, The Doctor wrote:
> All right then this is really odd!!!
> The person has always sent me mail from the intranet no problem.
> I just updated the perl to 5.10.0 threading
> and then I am like how did AWL change?
spammers begin to use your friends email addr as sender,
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Thu, March 26, 2009 13:22, The Doctor wrote:
> > All right then this is really odd!!!
> > The person has always sent me mail from the intranet no problem.
> > I just updated the perl to 5.10.0 threading
> > and then I am like how did AWL change?
>
> spammers begin to use
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On Thu, March 26, 2009 13:22, The Doctor wrote:
>
>> All right then this is really odd!!!
>> The person has always sent me mail from the intranet no problem.
>> I just updated the perl to 5.10.0 threading
>> and then I am like how did AWL change?
>>
>
> spammers begi
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, Jeff Mincy wrote:
*someone* is getting their AWL reputation trashed every time a
spammer forges their e-mail.
AWL stores the IP/16 address with the email address. So your awl
reputation is not being trashed by forged e-mail that comes from a
different IP address.
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009, LuKreme wrote:
On 29-Apr-2009, at 15:31, Charles Gregory wrote:
Apologies for original brevity, but my comment was a criticism of the
proposal to start weighing *all* mail from a specific sender according to
whether the IP was the 'most common' used for that address Ess
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I have no problem going over there but I am not convinced that the
Amavis program is the problem. The header field is changed by
spamassassin. Doesn't the email simply get handed to Spamassasin by
Amavis where the headers are modified by spam report et
Charles Gregory wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
I have no problem going over there but I am not convinced that the
Amavis program is the problem. The header field is changed by
spamassassin. Doesn't the email simply get handed to Spamassasin by
Amavis where the headers are mo
In an older episode (Wednesday 11 May 2005 21:12), Kenneth Porter wrote:
> Is there a way to process an mbox folder to add the full report
> unconditionally to all the messages in it?
> so I don't want to globally
> request a full report on every message.
> So I'd like to add another command to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
wolfgang writes:
> In an older episode (Wednesday 11 May 2005 21:12), Kenneth Porter wrote:
> > Is there a way to process an mbox folder to add the full report
> > unconditionally to all the messages in it?
> > so I don't want to globally
> > reques
--On Wednesday, May 11, 2005 6:01 PM -0700 Justin Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I think you want to run something like "spamassassin --mbox --test <
in.mbox > out.mbox".
Ok, I'll give that a try. I think I'll need to dig up mailutil so I can
lock the input and output files during processing.
Hi!
Go Here to Order Online: RxRealness.com
How would one go about adding checks for the omission of http:// ?
Only things that hit were: bayes, base64 raw and drugs_erctile by the way.
may be too resource intensive to check for every possible domain
that doesn't have a URI method. Does this gi
On Thursday, June 9, 2005, 12:23:09 PM, Tom Kern wrote:
> Well, here's one that just got thru.
> if your SA doesn't block it, here it is-
> Easy, convenient and discreet - order prescription drugs online.
> http://lpjth.bqe4xctm83tjxcb.bullionismia-MUNGED.com
BTW That domain got added to JP an
From: "Jeff Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thursday, June 9, 2005, 12:23:09 PM, Tom Kern wrote:
>
> > Well, here's one that just got thru.
> > if your SA doesn't block it, here it is-
>
>
>
> > Easy, convenient and discreet - order prescription drugs online.
> > http://lpjth.bqe4xctm83tjxcb.bu
Hi All,
It's 5 SA actually :-D - and I've not noted any problems that didn't
come down to slight differences in config between SA servers, once
standardised they run much the same.
The single MySQL is working well, my only concern being that I still
haven't managed to eliminate a potential singl
-1644 (w)
315-356-0597 (f)
AIM/Yahoo: MAPolceNOC
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Frankcom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2005 1:52 PM
To: JamesDR
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Re: shared SQL DB
Hi All,
It's 5 SA actually :-D
M>Hello martin,
M>
M>
M>SARE has been playing around with URI rules lately, and when
M>we need to test for something in the host/domain area, we use
M>something like:
M>> uri rule_name m'(?:https?://)?[^/]*testgoeshere'
M>In other words, the test must precede any/all slashes except
M>for those
Don Saklad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 09/08/2004 11:46:34 AM:
> Who do you believe actually set it up?... stormloader.com/saklad
>
>
>IFRAME:
>http://216.98.142.114/cgi-bin/advertpro/banners.fcgi?
> region=7&keyword=NULL
>Click Here!
>
>The Don
I'm not sure what is going on there, but it really looks like you were
running two different configurations, which would imply either different
local.cf values, or you have user rules enabled and got differerent user
rules.
Following is the rules from those two messages. Note that the indented
ru
> Is it possible that SA is making some mess with user_prefs, making
> some personal whitelists / blacklists to global ?
There seem to be some occurances of spamd picking up bits of user
preferences from the wrong places. This may or may not be related. But if
any of your users to have white
> BTW: Thanks to trying understand my english! :D
You have good English! I'd have a much harder time understanding your
Portugese, even though I'm sure it is excellent. :-)
Loren
John Fleming wrote:
Bayes in the current version will not autolearn against itself (will
not auto-learn as ham something it thought was spam, or v.v.) -- it
might be a good enhancement to also have bayes look at AWL if active,
and if AWL disagrees with the auto-learn judgment, then do not
auto-lear
Hi Chris,
Chris Thielen wrote:
John Fleming wrote:
Bayes in the current version will not autolearn against itself (will
not auto-learn as ham something it thought was spam, or v.v.) -- it
might be a good enhancement to also have bayes look at AWL if active,
and if AWL disagrees with the auto-learn
On Jul 14, 2005, at 5:52 AM, Robert Menschel wrote:header FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS From:addr =~ /^\d{6,}\S+\@/i The email address used in the From header begins with 6 (or more) digits. it's not hitting on 360SkinCare.com, but on the user part of the email address (doesn't even look at the domain
> header FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS From:addr =~ /^\d{6,}\S+\@/i
> The email address used in the From header begins with 6 (or more)
> digits. it's not hitting on 360SkinCare.com, but on the user part of
> the email address (doesn't even look at the domain name).
> The From line didn't start with
Christopher Scott wrote:
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH(0x8430ec8)
implements 'parse_config'
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Hashcash=HASH(0x8e687ec)
implements 'parse_config'
config: SpamAssassin failed to parse line, skipping: rewrite_subject 1
config
On Aug 16, 2005, at 1:51 PM, Kevin Peuhkurinen wrote:
Christopher Scott wrote:
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL=HASH
(0x8430ec8) implements 'parse_config'
debug: plugin: Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::Hashcash=HASH
(0x8e687ec) implements 'parse_config'
config: SpamAssass
Search your drive for stray copies of local.cf. See if you ended up with an
etc/spamassassin directory or have a local.cf in your home directory.
RO
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 11:30 AM
Subje
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:48:26AM -0700, Richard Ozer wrote:
> Search your drive for stray copies of local.cf. See if you ended up with
> an etc/spamassassin directory or have a local.cf in your home directory.
Or even better, as with anytime you have a question about what's going on with
SA,
Hello James,
Saturday, September 17, 2005, 6:33:43 PM, you wrote:
JL> Re[any single digit or number ie a-z or 0-9] email is discarded
JL> Re[more then one digit or letter] email is allowed through
JL> As I see it, this rule matches perfectly. The chance that someone will
JL> send
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Martin [iso-8859-1] Schr?der wrote:
On 2005-11-08 17:37:01 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
Actually, more to the point.. Habeas doesn't use or support plain-SWE anymore.
Thanks. Habeas didn't bother to tell their "customers".
http://www.habeas.com/en-US/FAQ_Miscellaneous.php#
From: Robert Menschel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 1:47:24 PM, you wrote:
>
> SL> I guess if this is the case I need to lower
> SL> the score for that rule as my kill value is a 3.5, ...
>
> SpamAssassin scores are optimized for a "this is spam" threshold of 5.
>
when you run ./rbldnsd -h
you should see:
-b address[/port] - bind to (listen on) this address (required)
So you can bind the rbldnsd to another alias IP address,diff from the IP that
your BIND server is listening to.
I think there is no conflict between the rbldnsd and the BIND.
>Jeff Peng wrot
Jeff Peng wrote:
> when you run ./rbldnsd -h
> you should see:
> -b address[/port] - bind to (listen on) this address (required)
>
> So you can bind the rbldnsd to another alias IP address,diff from the
> IP that your BIND server is listening to. I think there is no
> conflict between the rbldnsd
On 06/07/2014 12:19 PM, hospice admin wrote:
Just wondering if anyone had any advice along the lines "you really
must do this", or "you'd be crazy to do that" re- all the new stuff,
etc?
I'm particularly 'interested' in things relating to Bayes, which
> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 12:49:32 +0200
> From: axb.li...@gmail.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Advice re- SA 3.4.0
>
> On 06/07/2014 12:19 PM, hospice admin wrote:
> > Just wondering if anyone had any advice along the lines "you really
&g
On 06/07/2014 01:09 PM, hospice admin wrote:
I was wondering about this one and had put it to one side until I had
a chance to look at the memory implications in more detail. We run a
VM infrastructure here, so I'll load it up on one server and keep
throwing resources at it until I have something
> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 13:22:13 +0200
> From: axb.li...@gmail.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Advice re- SA 3.4.0
>
> On 06/07/2014 01:09 PM, hospice admin wrote:
> > I was wondering about this one and had put it to one side until I had
>
On 06/07/2014 01:33 PM, hospice admin wrote:
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 13:22:13 +0200 From: axb.li...@gmail.com To:
users@spamassassin.apache.org Subject: Re: Advice re- SA 3.4.0
On 06/07/2014 01:09 PM, hospice admin wrote:
I was wondering about this one and had put it to one side until I
had
> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 13:43:37 +0200
> From: axb.li...@gmail.com
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Advice re- SA 3.4.0
>
> On 06/07/2014 01:33 PM, hospice admin wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 13:22:13 +
On 06/07/2014 01:47 PM, hospice admin wrote:
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 13:43:37 +0200
From: axb.li...@gmail.com
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Advice re- SA 3.4.0
On 06/07/2014 01:33 PM, hospice admin wrote:
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 13:22:13 +0200 From: axb.li...@gmail.com To
On 17/11/2014 04:49, Niamh Holding wrote:
> WARNING: contains undecipherable part
>RH> don't get me wrong but you need first to learn how to operate your OS
>Condescending or what?
In the context you quote - yes,
but upon reading Harry's original - *no* it was not condescending (and
he
Hello Noel,
Monday, November 17, 2014, 1:42:35 AM, you wrote:
NB> In the context you quote - yes,
NB> but upon reading Harry's original - *no* it was not condescending (and he
made a valid point)
Been more tactful to make it a day earlier when I pondered-
"I'm tempted to try-
yum install M
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:46:38PM +0100, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 November 2014 at 21:05:30 (EU time), John Hardin wrote:
>
> > Moderator, I am making an official request to ban Nick Edwards
> > for abuse. There is no call for and no excuse
> > for such behavior.
>
> From just an "
tion(undef,@_);
}
}
return $delta;
}
===
Regards,
Carlos Velasco
Original Message
Subject: Re: TxRep $msgscore warning
From: Kevin A. McGrail
To: J.J. Day , Joe Quinn
Cc: "users@spamassassin.apache.org" ,
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2015 13:15:07 -0400
> On 4/30/2015 11:44
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] says...
> Alexis Manning wrote:
> > I'm using FuzzyOCR 3.4.2 - does 3.5.1 have any additional support for
> > animated GIFs?
>
> Yes, it uses gifsicle.
Ah... thanks! Ran into problems last time I tried upgrading, but maybe
it's worth another go.
tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599, PYZOR_CHECK=3.7]
Though they did not tag it as spam, they still have a mis-configured
setup,
note the [ALL_TRUSTED].
Also note the Bayes_00. If they have bayes trained to think spam is ham,
they have a problem.
Loren
And frankly, disabling a rule by logically making it never hit is the
better approach anyway. Just re-define rules to disable them:
meta FOO 0
> That last one is really important, because without it, you'll still stop
> getting hits on the dnswl rules, but you'll still be sen
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 12:39:45PM +0100, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > score __RCVD_IN_DNSWL 0
>
> It is a non-scoring "double underscore" sub-rule. It does not have a
> score. It cannot have a score. Setting its score to zero does nothing,
> and certainly not prevent the DNS query.
Surprise, i
ead, you need to meta out the rule, overwriting the rule definition.
>
> And frankly, disabling a rule by logically making it never hit is the
> better approach anyway. Just re-define rules to disable them:
>
> meta FOO 0
I asked about this on the dev list a week ago. I gu
On 03/07/2012 03:47 PM, Leveau Stanislas wrote:
Hi
I have the same problem but no idea
Regards
Stan
Le 07/03/12, Andrea gabellini - SC a
écrit :
Hello,
I noticed that sought rules are not updated from many weeks?
Is the project alive?
FYI:
SOUGHT rule updates are working again.
Thank
Axb wrote:
> SOUGHT rule updates are working again.
That is truly wonderful news! The last update I had was from
2011-11-10. Looking forward to the revivied goodness!
> Thanks JM!
Yes. Thanks!
Bob
> how more longer will it take to make 3.4.3 realease by looking ? :=)
Right now, I'm working through bugs found by myself and my staff to make
sure the release is up to snuff.
The biggest delay is a lack of feedback and testing. Please grab rc6
and give feedback.
Regards,
KAM
--
Kevin A.
On 11/15/19 1:02 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>
>> how more longer will it take to make 3.4.3 realease by looking ? :=)
>
> Right now, I'm working through bugs found by myself and my staff to make
> sure the release is up to snuff.
>
> The biggest delay is a lack of feedback and testing. Please
On 9/25/2021 5:08 AM, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
MIMEDefang might be another program that can help you. I personally don't know
much about it, but it seems to be robust.
MIMEDefang can fix Alex issue ("one domain may wish to allow html files while
another would like to block them"),
we can talk ab
Quoting Giampaolo Tomassoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
From: Jeff Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sometimes it's temporary, sometimes it's not. Sometimes temporary
solutions remain in place for many years.
Then you're not obeying to the agreements with your registrar.
Delegation is a primary func
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
i need help with Spamassassin. Once in a month we have to send a
massive amount of mails at the same time. These are Invoice mails to
our customers.
The problem is, that spamd controls all these mails, which are send
from a different Server in our network. It happ
Oh, the irony.
On 29/05/09 9:26 AM, "Doni Mediono Indrawan" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How are you doing recently? I would like to introduce you a very good
> company which I know. Their website is
> <<>>
>
> They can offer you all kinds of electronic products Please
> take some time to have a
Start by training bayes that these are bad things, it will eventually get
the idea and start helping rather than hurting.
Are you runing net tests? It sounds like someone has a broken zombie net
that is supposed to be sending out gif spams, but they forgot the images.
Net tests would probably
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 8:08 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Over the last week, my machine (Fedora, SA 3.1.3, qmail,
> qmail-scanner-queue.pl) has been recieving a fair amo
> At the risk of appearing to be (or revealing myself to be ;-) an
> anti-Windows bigot (actually, I'm more of a pro-Open Standards
> cheerleader), we mark all of the "charset=Windows-125[0-8]"
> messages by 4.85...
>
> Why? Because none of the Windows charsets do anything that
> the ISO-8859-x c
> At the risk of appearing to be (or revealing myself to be ;-) an
> anti-Windows bigot (actually, I'm more of a pro-Open Standards
> cheerleader), we mark all of the "charset=Windows-125[0-8]"
> messages by 4.85...
>
> Why? Because none of the Windows charsets do anything that
> the ISO-8859-x c
On Tue, November 14, 2006 02:44, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> At the risk of appearing to be (or revealing myself to be ;-) an
> anti-Windows bigot (actually, I'm more of a pro-Open Standards
> cheerleader), we mark all of the "charset=Windows-125[0-8]"
> messages by 4.85...
got this in the mailhe
so what is the conclusion to this issue?
why when I set ok_locales to it th en does it allow any Charset with
"Windows" in the name
to bypass that setting?
Why is it that is_charset_ok_for_locales written to give exceptions
sub is_charset_ok_for_locales {
my ($cs, @locales) = @_;
$cs =
I would say that this issue in general (and this file in particular) is
more than overdue for a revisiting.
I haven't seen UCS, CP125?, or IBM852 for a long time. Likewise
for "UNICODE" or "XUNKNOWN".
As for "ISO" (tout court) from Magellan... that's broken, and if it
hasn't been fixed by now, t
This is Japanese
# Japanese: Peter Evans writes: iso-2022-jp = rfc approved, rfc 1468,
created
# by Jun Murai in 1993 back when he didnt have white hair! rfc
approved.
# (rfc 2237) <-- by M$.
'ja' => 'EUCJP JISX020119760 JISX020819830 JISX020819900
JISX020819970 '.
'JISX0212
>>
>> The bottom line is you don't need specific characters for
>> "oe" and "ij", etc. You just need a rendering engine that
>> understands when using a ligature is appropriate (same
>> as with "ss" in German, or "ff", "fl", etc. in English).
>>
>> Making these distinct characters was folly.
>>
You'd think, wouldn't you
-Philip
Robert Nicholson wrote:
> This is Japanese
>
> # Japanese: Peter Evans writes: iso-2022-jp = rfc approved, rfc 1468,
> created
> # by Jun Murai in 1993 back when he didnt have white hair! rfc
> approved.
> # (rfc 2237) <-- by M$.
> 'ja' => 'EUCJP JIS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>The bottom line is you don't need specific characters for
>>>"oe" and "ij", etc. You just need a rendering engine that
>>>understands when using a ligature is appropriate (same
>>>as with "ss" in German, or "ff", "fl", etc. in English).
>>>
>>>Making these distinct cha
John D. Hardin wrote:
>On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, twofers wrote:
>
>
>
>>I would like to know what local rule I could invoke to tag email that the
>>subject is not in english.
>>
>> header NOT_IN_ENGLISH Subject !~ /English/i
>> describe NOT_IN_ENGLISH Subject Contains Non Engl
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Of course, that would exclude messages with ISO Latin 1 (8859.1)
> characters like Yen, Pound Sterling, Trademark, etc. Plus, there are
> words in English that when properly written do contain accents,
> such as resume, dais, cliche, cooperation, et
On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, twofers wrote:
> I would like to know what local rule I could invoke to tag email that the
> subject is not in english.
>
> header NOT_IN_ENGLISH Subject !~ /English/i
> describe NOT_IN_ENGLISH Subject Contains Non English Characters
> score
Daniel Madaoui wrote:
> So I restart the spamd daemon whith this options
>
> /usr/local/bin/spamd -d -m10 -u spamassassin ( spamassassin in an user
> with its directory /home/spamassassin/.spamassassin )
>
> He try to use the .spamassassin directory who belong to root
> (/root/.spamssassin/ )
401 - 500 of 68915 matches
Mail list logo
