On 27.01.15 03:01, Reindl Harald wrote:
with "bayes_auto_learn 0" there is no reason to lock the bayes
database and the spamd-service should be happy with
"ReadOnlyDirectories=/var/lib"
the bayes databaase contains not only tokens, but also timestamps used for
expiration. That's why you need t
: spamd: result: . 0 -
ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
scantime=0.5,size=804,user=sa-milt,uid=189,required_score=5.5,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=20782,mid=<54c6ef78.8090...@testserver.rhsoft.net>,bayes=0.40,autolearn=disabled
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 09/09/2014 03:50 PM, Alex Regan wrote:
Hi,
Did you understand that all
tokens are learned, regardless whether they have been seen before?
That doesn't really matter from a user perspective, though, right? I
mean, if there are tokens that have already been learned are learned
again, the net
Hi,
Did you understand that all
tokens are learned, regardless whether they have been seen before?
That doesn't really matter from a user perspective, though, right? I
mean, if there are tokens that have already been learned are learned
again, the net result is zero.
Very much not zero. Each
Hi,
Please use plain-text rather than HTML. In particular with that really
bad indentation format of quoting.
It doesn't seem possible with gmail directly any longer, so I've set up
thunderbird for this. Maybe it is, but not after clicking around in the obvious
places.
It's possible. A li
On Sep 8, 2014, at 7:17 PM, Alex Regan wrote:
>> Please use plain-text rather than HTML. In particular with that really
>> bad indentation format of quoting.
>
> It doesn't seem possible with gmail directly any longer, so I've set up
> thunderbird for this. Maybe it is, but not after clicking a
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Alex Regan wrote:
Did you understand that the number of previously not seen tokens has
absolutely nothing to do with auto-learning?
Yes, that was a mistake.
Did you understand that all
tokens are learned, regardless whether they have been seen before?
That doesn't reall
age?
spamassassin -D learn
Unsurprisingly, the -D debug option shows information on that decision.
In this case limiting debug output to the 'learn' area comes in handy,
eliminating the noise.
The output includes the important details like auto-learn decision with
human readable e
e using the respective
> > non-Bayes scoreset.
>
> Very helpful, thanks. Is there a way to see more about how it makes that
> decision on a particular message?
spamassassin -D learn
Unsurprisingly, the -D debug option shows information on that decision.
In this case limit
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Karsten Bräckelmann
wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 23:50 -0400, Alex wrote:
>
> > > > I looked in the quarantined message, and according to the _TOKEN_
> > > > header I've added:
> > > >
> > > > X-Spam-MyReport: Tokens: new, 47; hammy, 7; neutral, 54; spammy,
On Wed, 2014-09-03 at 23:50 -0400, Alex wrote:
> > > I looked in the quarantined message, and according to the _TOKEN_
> > > header I've added:
> > >
> > > X-Spam-MyReport: Tokens: new, 47; hammy, 7; neutral, 54; spammy, 16.
> > >
> > > Isn't that sufficient for auto-learning this message as spa
, RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2=0.01, RDNS_NONE=0.793,
> > RELAYCOUNTRY_CN=0.1, RELAYCOUNTRY_HIGH=0.5, SAGREY=0.01] autolearn=no
> > autolearn_force=no
> >
> > I've re-read the autolearn section of the docs,
>
> The one I linked to above?
Yes, and the FAQ entry regarding reasons why aut
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 21:16 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 02 Sep 2014, at 20:50 , Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 20:22 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> >> I believe the score threshold is the base score WITHOUT bayes.
> >>
> >> Try running the email through with a -D flag and see what
On 02 Sep 2014, at 20:50 , Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 20:22 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
>> On 02 Sep 2014, at 19:11 , Alex wrote:
>>
>>> However, spam with scores greater than 9.0 aren't being autolearned:
>>
>> I believe the score threshold is the base score WITHOUT bayes.
On Tue, 2014-09-02 at 20:22 -0600, LuKreme wrote:
> On 02 Sep 2014, at 19:11 , Alex wrote:
>
> > However, spam with scores greater than 9.0 aren't being autolearned:
>
> I believe the score threshold is the base score WITHOUT bayes.
>
> Try running the email through with a -D flag and see what
On 02 Sep 2014, at 19:11 , Alex wrote:
> However, spam with scores greater than 9.0 aren't being autolearned:
I believe the score threshold is the base score WITHOUT bayes.
Try running the email through with a -D flag and see what you get.
(And that is only a partial answer, the threshold num
01, RDNS_NONE=0.793,
> RELAYCOUNTRY_CN=0.1, RELAYCOUNTRY_HIGH=0.5, SAGREY=0.01] autolearn=no
> autolearn_force=no
>
> I've re-read the autolearn section of the docs,
The one I linked to above?
> and don't see any reason why this 16-point email wouldn't have any new
&g
BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.347, RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT=1.449, RCVD_IN_PSBL=2.3,
RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1=0.01, RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2=0.01, RDNS_NONE=0.793,
RELAYCOUNTRY_CN=0.1, RELAYCOUNTRY_HIGH=0.5, SAGREY=0.01] autolearn=no
autolearn_force=no
I've re-read the autolearn section of the docs, and don't see any
Please do not reply to a list post, if you want to start a new topic.
Merely removing the quoted body and changing the Subject does not make
it a new thread.
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 07:57 -0700, Cathryn Mataga wrote:
> use_bayes 1
> use_auto_learn 0
Try running 'spamassassin --lint'.
> But
,SPF_HELO_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED
autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
Received: from ecuador.junglevision.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ecuador.junglevision.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4HD4xMW030941
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
for ; Fri, 17
>>> On 11/5/2012 at 6:44 PM, "Joseph Acquisto" wrote:
On 11/5/2012 at 10:34 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
>> On 11/4/2012 10:10 PM, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
>> On 11/4/2012 at 4:09 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
04.11.2012 22:33, Joseph Acquisto kirjoitti:
> I'd love to use RBL but unders
>>> On 11/5/2012 at 10:34 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 11/4/2012 10:10 PM, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
> On 11/4/2012 at 4:09 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
>>> 04.11.2012 22:33, Joseph Acquisto kirjoitti:
I'd love to use RBL but understand I can't, as the "last IP" is always the
>>> same, as I
On 11/4/2012 10:10 PM, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
On 11/4/2012 at 4:09 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
04.11.2012 22:33, Joseph Acquisto kirjoitti:
I'd love to use RBL but understand I can't, as the "last IP" is always the
same, as I fetch all mail
from a single POP.Perhaps I am missing somethin
>>> On 11/4/2012 at 7:10 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 15:33 -0500, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
>> >>> On 11/4/2012 at 8:34 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 07:55 -0500, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
>> >> >>> On 11/3/2012 at 9:15 PM, "Joseph Acquisto"
>> >> >>> wr
>>> On 11/4/2012 at 4:09 PM, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> 04.11.2012 22:33, Joseph Acquisto kirjoitti:
>> I'd love to use RBL but understand I can't, as the "last IP" is always the
> same, as I fetch all mail
>> from a single POP.Perhaps I am missing something?
> Yes. You put that "single POP" E
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 15:33 -0500, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
> >>> On 11/4/2012 at 8:34 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 07:55 -0500, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
> >> >>> On 11/3/2012 at 9:15 PM, "Joseph Acquisto"
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> > Why do these score 0 ?
> >> >
> >> > http://pa
04.11.2012 22:33, Joseph Acquisto kirjoitti:
> I'd love to use RBL but understand I can't, as the "last IP" is always the
> same, as I fetch all mail
> from a single POP.Perhaps I am missing something?
Yes. You put that "single POP" ESP address to your "trusted networks".
Then it works as desi
>>> On 11/4/2012 at 8:34 AM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 07:55 -0500, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
>> >>> On 11/3/2012 at 9:15 PM, "Joseph Acquisto" wrote:
>> > Why do these score 0 ?
>> >
>> > http://pastebin.com/U4zFu8wk
>> > http://pastebin.com/MV9KbnbU
>>
> I ran the second o
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 07:55 -0500, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
> >>> On 11/3/2012 at 9:15 PM, "Joseph Acquisto" wrote:
> > Why do these score 0 ?
> >
> > http://pastebin.com/U4zFu8wk
> > http://pastebin.com/MV9KbnbU
>
I ran the second one through my testing SA system: it got hits from
several black
>>> On 11/3/2012 at 9:15 PM, "Joseph Acquisto" wrote:
> Why do these score 0 ?
>
> http://pastebin.com/U4zFu8wk
> http://pastebin.com/MV9KbnbU
Two more this AM. I did not bother posting these, they're virtually identical.
Pastebin will expire the evening.
Obvious SPAM/MAlware. I had once
. . .
> Joe, what exactly do you mean below when you describe the message? The
> subject was only a FTP link (which the hits suggest is not the case)? Or
> the subject was empty and the body was only a FTP link?
>
> Perhaps SA should only autolearn when the body of the
a FTP link?
Perhaps SA should only autolearn when the body of the message is some
minimum size, to avoid mislearning on spams like this?
On 10/21, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
Today I found a missed SPAM that contained this in the header:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,MISSI
atus: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,MISSING_SUBJECT,
> T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
>
> The subject was empty with a link starting with "ftp:"
>
> I guess it's the autolearn that is most puzzling me.
>
> joe a.
&
IL_FROM,MISSING_SUBJECT,
>> T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
>>
>> The subject was empty with a link starting with "ftp:"
>>
>> I guess it's the autolearn that is most puzzling me.
>
> What is your "bayes_auto_learn_thr
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
> Today I found a missed SPAM that contained this in the header:
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,MISSING_SUBJECT,
> T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
>
> The
Today I found a missed SPAM that contained this in the header:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,MISSING_SUBJECT,
T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
The subject was empty with a link starting with "ftp:"
I guess it's the aut
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:17:49 +0100
Simon Loewenthal wrote:
> >> BAYES_00 and BAYES_99 hit on other ham/spam without any problem.
> >> Only then the result will mention autolearn=disabled instead of
> >> autolearn=unavailable. I don't follow why it w
ham on a server because Bayes
>>>> seems reasonably well trained. It works well.
>>>>
>>>> I noticed that emails that did not hit BAYES_00 (so no shortcircuit)
>>>> were not autolearnt by SA. Even though these were well below the
>>>> autol
It works well.
>>>
>>> I noticed that emails that did not hit BAYES_00 (so no shortcircuit)
>>> were not autolearnt by SA. Even though these were well below the
>>> autolearn threshold of -1.
>>>
>>> In the example below, the score was -7.8. Be
not hit BAYES_00 (so no shortcircuit)
>> were not autolearnt by SA. Even though these were well below the
>> autolearn threshold of -1.
>>
>> In the example below, the score was -7.8. Below this, the bayes
>> settings in the local.cf are listed. A score of beneath -1 should
SA. Even though these were well below the
> autolearn threshold of -1.
>
> In the example below, the score was -7.8. Below this, the bayes
> settings in the local.cf are listed. A score of beneath -1 should
> have been autolearnt.
>
> No, score=-7.8 required=
On 2/27/12 5:48 AM, Simon Loewenthal wrote:
seems reasonably well trained. It works well.
I noticed that emails that did not hit BAYES_00 (so no shortcircuit)
were not autolearnt by SA. Even though these were well below the
autolearn threshold of -1.
In the example below, the score was -7.8
Good morning everyone,
Recently I enabled shortcircuit for ham on a server because Bayes
seems reasonably well trained. It works well.
I noticed that emails that did not hit BAYES_00 (so no shortcircuit)
were not autolearnt by SA. Even though these were well below the
autolearn threshold of
ndary MX for one of our two domains).
>
> It is catching and quarantining some spam (so far all ham is still
> transiting through the primary MX) and we see that in the header
> X-Spam-Status keyword, which has changed format, there is at the end
> one of these
>
> autolea
still
transiting through the primary MX) and we see that in the header
X-Spam-Status keyword, which has changed format, there is at the end
one of these
autolearn=unavailable
autolearn=no
autolearn=spam
The first one seems to occur for very high score spam, the second for
On 04.04.11 10:34, Andreas Schulze wrote:
> > -forget Forget a message
>
> I do
> sa-learn --forget ; sa-learn --spam
> right ?
you don't need to forget the message. Learning it again will do change
values properly.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantom
Hi,
> -forget Forget a message
I do
sa-learn --forget ; sa-learn --spam
right ?
--
Viele Grüße
Andreas Schulze
=[HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MTX_NONE=0.001,
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on andreasschulze.de
How can I tell SA this was spam ?
I would try "sa-learn -spam
But does this let SA really forget the "previous
,
T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on andreasschulze.de
How can I tell SA this was spam ?
I would try "sa-learn -spam
But does this let SA really forget the "previous state ham" ?
Thanks,
Andreas
On Tue, 2010-09-21 at 14:45 +0200, Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:42:22 -0400, Randy Ramsdell wrote:
> > Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
> >> Sep 20 12:25:06 hostname spamd[6157]: plugin: eval failed: bayes: (in
> >> learn) locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp lockfile
> >> /home/USER/.s
On tir 21 sep 2010 14:45:59 CEST, Cédric Jeanneret wrote
So, is there a way to say to SA "Hey man, don't go in /home/ but
in // instead!" ?
and poison ones linux box
:)
if virtual is so hard use sql
--
xpoint http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:42:22 -0400, Randy Ramsdell
wrote:
> Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have an error with SA using autolearn plugin:
>> Sep 20 12:25:06 hostname spamd[6157]: plugin: eval failed: bayes: (in
>> learn) locker: safe_lock: cannot
Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
Hello,
I have an error with SA using autolearn plugin:
Sep 20 12:25:06 hostname spamd[6157]: plugin: eval failed: bayes: (in
learn) locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp lockfile
/home/USER/.spamassassin/bayes.lock.host.domain.ltd.6157 for
/home/USER/.spamassassin
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
I have an error with SA using autolearn plugin:
Sep 20 12:25:06 hostname spamd[6157]: plugin: eval failed: bayes: (in
learn) locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp lockfile
/home/USER/.spamassassin/bayes.lock.host.domain.ltd.6157 for
/home/USER
Hello,
I have an error with SA using autolearn plugin:
Sep 20 12:25:06 hostname spamd[6157]: plugin: eval failed: bayes: (in
learn) locker: safe_lock: cannot create tmp lockfile
/home/USER/.spamassassin/bayes.lock.host.domain.ltd.6157 for
/home/USER/.spamassassin/bayes.lock: Permission denied
Is
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Cédric Jeanneret wrote:
I'm using spamassassin for some weeks, and all is working fine. I just
have two questions:
1. While checking my logs, I find this string each time a mail is
filtered:
Sep 9 10:59:45 HOSTNAME spamd[3126]: spamd: handle_user unable to find
user: 'USER
now what to do to prevent this error.
I fgrep-ed into spamassassin configuration, there seems to be no mention
of a user configuration.
2. While checking mail headers, I see autolearn=unavailable in
X-Spam-Status header. Is autolearn a good thing ? I have a script running
once a day on my spa
> Hmm, so it's not possible to use a tflag for telling bayes to learn
>> the message? What else can I do?
>
> I'm not familiar with how scores work under short-circuiting, but I
> would imagine that auto-learning would work if you simply define
> neither flag, i.e.
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 04:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Daniel Lemke wrote:
>
>
> RW-15 wrote:
> >
> >
> > The default is learn, not noautolearn - either prevents autoleaning.
> >
> >
>
> Hmm, so it's not possible to use a tflag for telling bayes to learn
> the message? What else can I do?
I'm not famil
RW-15 wrote:
>
>
> The default is learn, not noautolearn - either prevents autoleaning.
>
>
Hmm, so it's not possible to use a tflag for telling bayes to learn the
message? What else can I do?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Enable-a
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 00:30:18 -0700 (PDT)
Daniel Lemke wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to enable bayes auto learn for a specific shortcircuit rule.
> This is what I've got:
>
> shortcircuit BAYES_00 on
> score BAYES_00 -50
> tflags BAYES_00 learn
>
> It's declared in site wide local.cf. A test sho
he "noautolearn" flag. I added the
"learn" tflag instead, same result:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-50.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled,
shortcircuit=BAYES_00 (ham)
X-Spam-Report:
* -0.0 SHORTCIRCUIT SHORTCIRCUIT
* [score: 0.]
* -50 BAYES
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:41:39 -0500
Jason Bertoch wrote:
> On 2010/03/11 9:10 AM, RW wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:41:06 -0500
> > Jason Bertoch wrote:
> >
> >
> >> For what it's worth, whitelisted addresses are excluded from Bayes
> >> a
On 2010/03/11 9:10 AM, RW wrote:
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:41:06 -0500
Jason Bertoch wrote:
For what it's worth, whitelisted addresses are excluded from Bayes
autolearn.
No, they can be autolearned. The autolearn plugin computes
it's own version of the score that ignores noautol
7;s users receive quarantine Emails from other
>> providers
>> that contain lots of spam-tokens without being spam. As different rules
>> detect these mails as spam it is accidently learned as spam by autolearn.
>> Whitelisting ist no option as it only puts a ham bonus of 100 po
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 08:41:06 -0500
Jason Bertoch wrote:
> For what it's worth, whitelisted addresses are excluded from Bayes
> autolearn.
No, they can be autolearned. The autolearn plugin computes
it's own version of the score that ignores noautolearn rules.
etect these mails as spam it is accidently learned as spam by autolearn.
Whitelisting ist no option as it only puts a ham bonus of 100 points to the
mail. Consequently spam tokens in these mails would be wrongly learned as
ham by autolearn.
A work around could be to detect these mail and let them be forg
arned as spam by autolearn.
Whitelisting ist no option as it only puts a ham bonus of 100 points to the
mail. Consequently spam tokens in these mails would be wrongly learned as
ham by autolearn.
A work around could be to detect these mail and let them be forgotten.
Is there a way within spamass
h Bayes.
> We see that with -98.7 points and option
> "bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -10",
> but "autolearn=no". Why?
20_compensate.cf: tflags ALL_TRUSTED nice userconf
tflags userconf rules are ignored for auto-learning [1]. Thus, as far as
the AutoLea
On Thu, July 2, 2009 08:43, Trushin Igor wrote:
> We see that with -98.7 points and option
> "bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -10",
> but "autolearn=no". Why?
why learn anything from trusted ip ?
--
xpoint
=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=60081,mid=<569856404.20090702121...@xxx..xx>,autolearn=no
We see that with -98.7 points and option
"bayes_auto_learn_threshold_nonspam -10",
but "autolearn=no". Why?
99 too high??? :-[
(amavisd as a 'bounce_killer_score' that is 100 in the
amavisd.conf-dist). does something similar.
Justin Mason wrote:
have you changed the score of the vbounce rules from 0.1? this is why
you shouldn't ;)
--j.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 16:51, Michael Scheidell wrote:
have you changed the score of the vbounce rules from 0.1? this is why
you shouldn't ;)
--j.
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 16:51, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> Just found out why, all of a sudden, users who never got blocked, now are
> getting blocked.
>
> Christmas, these brilliant people set up 'I am o
Just found out why, all of a sudden, users who never got blocked, now
are getting blocked.
Christmas, these brilliant people set up 'I am out of the office'
messages, which spamassassin 'vbounce' sees as a 'bounce'.
(seriously, is a OOO backscatter?)
if you don't set tflags noautolearn on you
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:05, Paweł Sasin wrote:
>> >>> Yes, more specifically, it's mostly going to be updating the
>> >>> "atime", or time of last access, records for tokens. This time is
>> >>> used by the expiry process to drop the least recently used tokens.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> What does SA d
> >> On 20.01.09 19:45, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >>> Yes, more specifically, it's mostly going to be updating the "atime", or
> >>> time of last access, records for tokens. This time is used by the expiry
> >>> process to drop the least recently used tokens.
> > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> Wha
> >>> Yes, more specifically, it's mostly going to be updating the
> >>> "atime", or time of last access, records for tokens. This time is
> >>> used by the expiry process to drop the least recently used tokens.
> >>>
> >>
> >> What does SA do, if it can't r/w open bayes database? Will it skip
> >>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:48, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>>
>> On 20.01.09 19:45, Matt Kettler wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, more specifically, it's mostly going to be updating the "atime", or
>>> time of last access, records for tokens. This time is used by the expiry
>>> process t
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> On 20.01.09 19:45, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> Yes, more specifically, it's mostly going to be updating the "atime", or
>> time of last access, records for tokens. This time is used by the expiry
>> process to drop the least recently used tokens.
>>
>
> What d
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 04:49:12PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >
> >> Why does it update the journal? Why does it try to open journal in R/W
> >> mode?
> Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> > $ man sa-learn
Oh, sorry for missing that in docs :(
> > In other words, the journal isn't just
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 04:49:12PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
>> Why does it update the journal? Why does it try to open journal in R/W mode?
>>
>
> $ man sa-learn
> [...]
>bayes_journal
>While SpamAssassin is scanning mails, it needs
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 04:49:12PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> Why does it update the journal? Why does it try to open journal in R/W mode?
$ man sa-learn
[...]
bayes_journal
While SpamAssassin is scanning mails, it needs to track which tokens
it uses in its cal-
Hello,
on my systems I turned bayes filter off by default:
cd /etc/mail/spamassassin/
grep bayes *
local.cf:use_bayes 0
local.cf:bayes_auto_learn 0
local.cf:bayes_auto_expire 0
local.cf:bayes_learn_to_journal 1
...I keep the journal default so any user who turns on bayes, would use
journalling
essage-
From: Duane Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 4:27 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: autolearn=yes but sa-learn dump magic shows no new spam
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Brett Millett wrote:
> I've been googling quite a bit today to find the ans
the best way to do that. Did I miss something?
Thanks for all who have helped.
Brett
-Original Message-
From: Karsten Bräckelmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 3:59 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: autolearn=yes but sa-learn dump magic shows no n
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008, Brett Millett wrote:
I've been googling quite a bit today to find the answer to what I'm
seeing that is happening on my mail server. However, I just can't seem
to find a definitive answer. When looking at my mail logs I see a number
of autolearn=spam, however
On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 15:28 -0600, Brett Millett wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been googling quite a bit today to find the answer to what I'm
> seeing that is happening on my mail server. However, I just can't seem
> to find a definitive answer. When looking at my mail logs
Hi,
I've been googling quite a bit today to find the answer to what I'm
seeing that is happening on my mail server. However, I just can't seem
to find a definitive answer. When looking at my mail logs I see a number
of autolearn=spam, however when I run "sa-learn --dump m
fchan wrote:
Hi,
Can someone tell me what is the cause of these "autolearn=unavailable"
messages and there is a possible solution. I get them occasionally but
wanted to know why are they appearing. Below is a sample of the log:
Mar 5 11:42:27 s1 spamd[13422]: spamd: identified s
Hi,
Can someone tell me what is the cause of these
"autolearn=unavailable" messages and there is a possible solution. I
get them occasionally but wanted to know why are they appearing.
Below is a sample of the log:
Mar 5 11:42:27 s1 spamd[13422]: spamd: identified spam (110.5
Luis Hernán Otegui escribió:
Hola, Diego
2008/2/21, Diego Pomatta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello list.
Does the bayes system use a separate db for the "autolearn" mode?
Today I noticed that my SA bayes has 50 spam and 45 ham mails learned,
when I thought the db had a l
Hola, Diego
2008/2/21, Diego Pomatta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello list.
>
> Does the bayes system use a separate db for the "autolearn" mode?
>
> Today I noticed that my SA bayes has 50 spam and 45 ham mails learned,
> when I thought the db had a lot
Hello list.
Does the bayes system use a separate db for the "autolearn" mode?
Today I noticed that my SA bayes has 50 spam and 45 ham mails learned,
when I thought the db had a lot more, because bayes IS being used.
# sa-learn --dump magic
0.000 0 3 0
Matthias Leisi escribió:
Is there any way to tweak the score used to trigger autolearning for HAM ?
Diego
Ah, SA version is 3.2.1
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AutoLearnThreshold.html
--- cut ---
The following configuration settings are used to co
> Is there any way to tweak the score used to trigger autolearning for HAM ?
>
> Diego
> Ah, SA version is 3.2.1
http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_AutoLearnThreshold.html
--- cut ---
The following configuration settings are used to control auto-learning:
bay
Lars Ippich escribió:
Diego Pomatta schrieb:
Ok, but then why is "auto-learn" learning spam, but not ham?
Diego
Have a look at this, maybe it explains what you are wondering about:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutolearningNotWorking
Lars
Yup. I'd read that already.
It explai
Diego Pomatta schrieb:
> Ok, but then why is "auto-learn" learning spam, but not ham?
>
> Diego
Have a look at this, maybe it explains what you are wondering about:
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/AutolearningNotWorking
Lars
the server.
[...]
So, is there any other option that needs to be set somewhere? Because I
don't think that bayes is even being used at all.
Maybe an autolearn ham score threshold or something like that?
There is a threshold of 200 hams and 200 spams, which have to been fed
to the bayes fil
server.
> [...]
> So, is there any other option that needs to be set somewhere? Because I
> don't think that bayes is even being used at all.
> Maybe an autolearn ham score threshold or something like that?
There is a threshold of 200 hams and 200 spams, which have to been fed
Hello list!
I was under the impression that autolearn was going to start self
learning ham at some point, when enough messages had been processed.
Checking the spamd log I see only no-learning or spam-learning. And I
can't feed anything to sa-learn because we drop spam into oblivion.
101 - 200 of 497 matches
Mail list logo
