I was checking to see what the scores for mailspike were on my server
and I noticed that there are two sets of scores.
50_scores.cf: score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_ZBI 2.7
50_scores.cf: score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 2.5
50_scores.cf: score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L4 1.7
50_scores.cf: score
and their associated values so that I can decide which
tags
could have their scores adjusted?
You can grep for the scores in /var/lib/spamassassin. Note that the
name
of a rule doesn't say everything: before tinkering with the score
you
should verify that the rule is doing what you e
gt;>> all tags and their associated values so that I can decide which tags
>>>> could have their scores adjusted?
>>>
>>>
>>> You can grep for the scores in /var/lib/spamassassin. Note that the name
>>> of a rule doesn't say everything: before
On 01/10/2017 04:49 PM, Michael B Allen wrote:
PS: Is it possible to see what values are associated with all tags for
debugging purposes? Meaning can I run a command that dumps a list of
all tags and their associated values so that I can decide which tags
could have their scores adjusted?
You
>> PS: Is it possible to see what values are associated with all tags for
>> debugging purposes? Meaning can I run a command that dumps a list of
>> all tags and their associated values so that I can decide which tags
>> could have their scores adjusted?
>
> You can g
can actually see the 0.0 scores directly in the logs at
/var/log/mail.log
on the spamassassin servers.
E.g.
Sep 11 21:07:19 ip-10-181-62-231 spamd[13929]: spamd: clean message
(0.0/5.0) for (unknown):65534 in 0.4 seconds, 8128 bytes.
Sep 11 21:07:19 ip-10-181-62-231 spamd[13929]: spamd: result
wrote:
>
>
> > I can actually see the 0.0 scores directly in the logs
>
>
> I tested one and it was out, but only by 0.04. I thought it was
> probably due to your cron job running a bit too early for this morning's
> update.
>
>
> > It must be the bayes is c
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 22:25:46 +0100
Peter Kelly wrote:
> I can actually see the 0.0 scores directly in the logs
I tested one and it was out, but only by 0.04. I thought it was
probably due to your cron job running a bit too early for this morning's
update.
> It must be the bayes is
Bill,
I checked there first, I always assume it is something I am doing wrong
first. Yes mailchecker (not that obsolete version) is the http service we
use and it in turn uses this Golang lib for spamc -
https://github.com/saintienn/go-spamc
I can actually see the 0.0 scores directly in the logs
On 11 Sep 2015, at 6:12, Peter Kelly wrote:
Hi,
Starting on 3rd Sept, I have seen a huge number of 0.0 scores being
returned from spamassassin - see attached screenshot from my logs that
show
I never once received a 0.0 score before 3rd Sept.
The default scores for the rules shown do not
On 09/11/2015 03:13 PM, Peter Kelly wrote:
Axb,
We have a SaaS app hosted in AWS that takes in 500k emails a month. We
parse these emails and convert them into tickets for the customer - they
see a Helpdesk system like Zendesk. Every incoming email gets run through
spamassassin via the daemon.
different, chances is that your app is not
doing the right thing and like Matus suspects, SA is not getting the
right thing.
Rules & scores do change via sa-update so depending on lots of stuff the
results may vary, possibly quite a lot.
As we don't have a sample msg of yours (pastebin)
On 11.09.15 14:13, Peter Kelly wrote:
We have a SaaS app hosted in AWS that takes in 500k emails a month. We
parse these emails and convert them into tickets for the customer - they
see a Helpdesk system like Zendesk. Every incoming email gets run through
spamassassin via the daemon.
does spama
Reindl Harald skrev den 2015-09-11 15:08:
in other words: you don't need to pay for them until you not have your
own recursion resolver because URIBL_BLOCKED won't go away in that
case
its just badly marketing :=)
Axb,
We have a SaaS app hosted in AWS that takes in 500k emails a month. We
parse these emails and convert them into tickets for the customer - they
see a Helpdesk system like Zendesk. Every incoming email gets run through
spamassassin via the daemon.
Here is a link to the output of --lint -D htt
Peter Kelly skrev den 2015-09-11 15:01:
This has nothing to do with URIBL. It has always been blocked for me.
I am in the process of paying for their service. It has always been
like that, yet the 0.0 scores only started last week. Been running for
months before that.
so you already have a
Am 11.09.2015 um 15:03 schrieb Peter Kelly:
Why Antony? What would that do for me other than save hits against
URIBL? I am signing up for their paid service so I will not have the
URIBL_BLOCKED issue anymore. It does not explain the 0.0 issue I am
having anyway.
what is so hard to understand
Why Antony? What would that do for me other than save hits against URIBL? I
am signing up for their paid service so I will not have the URIBL_BLOCKED
issue anymore. It does not explain the 0.0 issue I am having anyway.
On 11 September 2015 at 13:42, Antony Stone <
antony.st...@spamassassin.open.so
Hi Benny,
This has nothing to do with URIBL. It has always been blocked for me. I am
in the process of paying for their service. It has always been like that,
yet the 0.0 scores only started last week. Been running for months before
that.
Peter
On 11 September 2015 at 13:38, Benny Pedersen
> On 09/11/2015 01:17 PM, Peter Kelly wrote:
> > - Are you using a local, non forwarding, DNS resolver/caching server ?
> >
> > No
> > - Are you handling mail for a company, personal email, ISP, one domain,
> > many domains, etc?
> >
> > Handling mail for thousands of different companies - we r
Peter Kelly skrev den 2015-09-11 12:12:
Any help greatly appreciated,
google URIBL_BLOCKED
https://www.google.dk/search?q=uribl_blcoked
http://uribl.com/refused.shtml
plenty of other links to see how and why
do you miss a local dns resolver ?
if yes you use shared problems and things like
On 09/11/2015 01:17 PM, Peter Kelly wrote:
- How are you using SA?
(pls specify: amavis, MIMEDefang, a milter, Mailscanner, procmail,
Fuglu, etc, etc)
Just spamassassin on its own, calling the daemon from an app
an "app"? Pls be more explicit.
can you pastebin the output of
spamassassin --li
nd
domains.
On 11 September 2015 at 11:22, Axb wrote:
On 09/11/2015 12:12 PM, Peter Kelly wrote:
Hi,
Starting on 3rd Sept, I have seen a huge number of 0.0 scores being
returned from spamassassin - see attached screenshot from my logs that
show
I never once received a 0.0 score before 3rd Se
Peter Kelly writes:
> [1:multipart/alternative Hide]
>
>
> [1/1:text/plain Hide]
>
> Hi,
>
> Starting on 3rd Sept, I have seen a huge number of 0.0 scores being
> returned from spamassassin - see attached screenshot from my logs that show
> I never once receiv
On 09/11/2015 12:12 PM, Peter Kelly wrote:
Hi,
Starting on 3rd Sept, I have seen a huge number of 0.0 scores being
returned from spamassassin - see attached screenshot from my logs that show
I never once received a 0.0 score before 3rd Sept.
I use version 3.4.0 and process about 20k emails a
https://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists under the first faq.
Regards,
KAM
On September 11, 2015 6:12:14 AM AST, Peter Kelly
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Starting on 3rd Sept, I have seen a huge number of 0.0 scores being
>returned from spamassassin - see attached screenshot from my logs t
On 1/4/2015 10:40 PM, J.J. Day wrote:
Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the link. It's a starting point. As far as the two
functions are concerned, I was just hoping to short cut the process of
finding them.
Actually, I am a pretty good programmer in half a dozen languages -
it's just that I have never
Hi JJ, This is a question for the mimedefang list but yes, you need a semicolon
on the first line. That was just my quick cut and paste.
A quick Google finds this as perhaps a good starting point:
http://lists.roaringpenguin.com/pipermail/mimedefang/2007-April/032485.html
However, you might be
On 1/2/2015 8:33 PM, J.J. Day wrote:
Hi,
I am using SpamAssassin with MimeDefang as a sendmail milter. I would like each
recipient to have an individual user score configuration. None of the
recipients have an account on the host so MySQL was installed and the needed
lines added to the defaul
Hi,
I am using SpamAssassin with MimeDefang as a sendmail milter. I would like each
recipient to have an individual user score configuration. None of the
recipients have an account on the host so MySQL was installed and the needed
lines added to the default local.cf file to provide that capabil
(spammhaus/local.cf) score false positive?
> —>
> uridnsbl URIBL_SBLXBL sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org. TXT
> body URIBL_SBLXBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SBLXBL’)
> <—
>
> All of a sudden, it scores 40-50% false positive, latest 2-3 days. All
> summin' up to now - user
On Fri, 19 Dec 2014 14:12:47 +0100
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >On 12/19/2014 12:28 PM, Dharma Monie wrote:
> >>The rule is shipped with SA by default,
> >>regarding if it?s enabled by default - checking against that exact
> >>uribl - I?m affraid I can?t provide you with a satisfying answer
>
On 12/19/2014 12:28 PM, Dharma Monie wrote:
The rule is shipped with SA by default,
regarding if it’s enabled by default - checking against that exact uribl - I’m
affraid I can’t provide you with
a satisfying answer there, as I was not the initial admin configuring “this”
file.
On 19.12.14 12
t;
uridnsbl URIBL_SBLXBL
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org<http://sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org><http://sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org>.
TXT
body URIBL_SBLXBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SBLXBL’)
<—
All of a sudden, it scores 40-50% false positive, latest 2-3 days. All summin'
up to now - users missing a whol
BL_SBLXBL
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org<http://sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org><http://sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org>.
TXT
body URIBL_SBLXBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SBLXBL’)
<—
All of a sudden, it scores 40-50% false positive, latest 2-3 days. All summin'
up to now - users missing a whole l
On 12/19/2014 11:55 AM, Dharma Monie wrote:
Anyone experinced SA rule URIBL (spammhaus/local.cf) score false positive?
—>
uridnsbl URIBL_SBLXBL sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org<http://sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org>. TXT
body URIBL_SBLXBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SBLXBL’)
<—
All of a sud
Anyone experinced SA rule URIBL (spammhaus/local.cf) score false positive?
—>
uridnsbl URIBL_SBLXBL sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org<http://sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org>. TXT
body URIBL_SBLXBL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_SBLXBL’)
<—
All of a sudden, it scores 40-50% false positive, lat
>On 4/24/2014 6:12 AM, emailitis.com wrote:
>>Also, in the maillog, I would like to see spamd show not just the
>>tests, but the scores of each.
On Sunday 27 April 2014 at 19:03, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
add_header all Report _REPORT_
On 27.04.14 19:10, Antony Stone
On Sunday 27 April 2014 at 19:03, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >On 4/24/2014 6:12 AM, emailitis.com wrote:
> >>Also, in the maillog, I would like to see spamd show not just the
> >>tests, but the scores of each.
>
> I believe that
>
> add_header all Rep
On 4/24/2014 6:12 AM, emailitis.com wrote:
Also, in the mailllog, I would like to see spamd show not just the
tests, but the scores of each. At present we get just:
spamd[7403]: spamd: result: Y 4 -
DKIM_SIGNED,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_REMOTE_IMAGE
scantime=2.8,size
On 4/24/2014 2:14 PM, Axb wrote:
IMO this should be configurable as it could break stats/loggers/etc
The change right now just adds additional API functions. Nothing uses
them.
spamd could be configured to use them and should be a configuration
option, I agree.
sted but
passed tests.
Sure... I'm not picky about how it's implemented. ;) Just so long as
there's an official API to get the test names and scores, I'm happy.
It's in trunk if you want to test it and give feedback, that would be
helpful. From a quick basic print of o
picky about how it's implemented. ;) Just so long as
there's an official API to get the test names and scores, I'm happy.
It's in trunk if you want to test it and give feedback, that would be
helpful. From a quick basic print of output, looks sane.
svn commit -m '
ed. ;) Just so long as
there's an official API to get the test names and scores, I'm happy.
Regards,
David.
On 4/24/2014 11:04 AM, David F. Skoll wrote:
We integrate with SpamAssassin at the Perl library level, and we reach
into the innards to get at the test scores. Here's our code:
my $conf = $sa_status->{conf} || {};
my $scores = $conf->{scores} || {};
my $testn
On 4/24/2014 11:37 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2014-04-24 17:30:
Ahhh... Well not sure it warrants going on the list. I like the idea
but need someone to step forward and implement it and I don't think
enough will care.
replyed private
lots of idears, no coders :(
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2014-04-24 17:30:
Ahhh... Well not sure it warrants going on the list. I like the idea
but need someone to step forward and implement it and I don't think
enough will care.
replyed private
lots of idears, no coders :(
On 4/24/2014 11:28 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2014-04-24 17:12:
Sounds like overkill without enough demand, personally...
only thing i see here is that you writed to me personally
Ahhh... Well not sure it warrants going on the list. I like the idea
but need someone
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2014-04-24 17:12:
Sounds like overkill without enough demand, personally...
only thing i see here is that you writed to me personally
On 4/24/2014 11:06 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2014-04-24 16:50:
Always love people submitting
patches!
or opensource with think like:
make syslog plugin, make it basicly same options as in add_header just
for sysloging
then each admin can make there own login form
Kevin A. McGrail skrev den 2014-04-24 16:50:
Always love people submitting
patches!
or opensource with think like:
make syslog plugin, make it basicly same options as in add_header just
for sysloging
then each admin can make there own login format based on same tags as in
add_header
i wo
l, and we reach
into the innards to get at the test scores. Here's our code:
my $conf = $sa_status->{conf} || {};
my $scores = $conf->{scores} || {};
my $testnames = join(',', (map { (exists($scores->{$_}) &&
defined($scores->{$_})) ? $_ . &
On 4/24/2014 6:12 AM, emailitis.com wrote:
Can someone tell me how we can find out the Spamassassin rule scores?
Best way is to view the applicable 50_scores.cf directly, i.e.
/var/lib/spamassassin/3.004000/updates_spamassassin_org/50_scores.cf for
3.4.0 in the default location.
Also, in
et mad which is
reassuring!
Can anyone help with how to get scores showing in the maillog as well?
according to spamd.raw
my $yorn = $status->is_spam() ? 'Y' : '.';
my $score = $status->get_score();
my $tests = join(",",
sort(grep(length,$status->get
emailitis.com skrev den 2014-04-24 14:00:
Can anyone help with how to get scores showing in the maillog as well?
this needs a patch to spamassassin to support syslog
but spampd does what you want
note not spamc/spamd
Thank you very much Antony, I had been looking at
http://spamassassin.apache.org/tests.html before which is where the "Tests"
menu goes to from the page you gave me of
https://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_3_x.html. I'm not yet mad which is
reassuring!
Can anyone help with ho
On Thursday 24 April 2014 at 11:12, emailitis.com wrote:
> Can someone tell me how we can find out the Spamassassin rule scores?
https://spamassassin.apache.org/tests_3_3_x.html
Antony
--
I want to build a machine that will be proud of me.
- Danny Hillis, creator of The Connection Mach
Can someone tell me how we can find out the Spamassassin rule scores?
Also, in the mailllog, I would like to see spamd show not just the tests,
but the scores of each. At present we get just:
spamd[7403]: spamd: result: Y 4 -
DKIM_SIGNED,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_REMOTE_IMAGE
Hi list,
I'm trying to get a content analysis report with *not* rounded
(that is, 3-digit precision) scores, is this even possibile?
I'm aware this is documented
(http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RoundingIssues)
but I was wondering if there's one way around it.
I'm using
On 7/15/2013 12:08 PM, Scott Witte wrote:
Kevin A. McGrail wrote
A rule that solely checks for a domain ending in a digit cannot have a
3.5 score. It's far too high.
I'm adding a score of 1.0 to the rulesrc which should add a ceiling of
1.0 to this for masschecks.
Kevin,
I fear this didn't re
mail-tester.com who confirmed that they do a
sa-update nightly.
What am I to do
Scott
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Rule-TVD-FROM-1-causing-all-our-emails-spam-scores-go-up-tp104732p105825.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Excellent!
On 5/23/2013 4:55 AM, henrydraper wrote:
Thanks, Kevin, I checked and now this rule is only causing 1.0 spam score.
Thanks, Kevin, I checked and now this rule is only causing 1.0 spam score.
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Rule-TVD-FROM-1-causing-all-our-emails-spam-scores-go-up-tp104732p104800.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at
our emails' spam scores go up
Yep.
Regards,
KAM
henrydraper <[hidden email]>
wrote:
Thanks Kevin.
I'll check in a few days. All I have to do is a sa-update, right?
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Rule-TVD-FROM-1-causing-all-ou
Yep.
Regards,
KAM
henrydraper wrote:
>Thanks Kevin.
>I'll check in a few days. All I have to do is a sa-update, right?
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Rule-TVD-FROM-1-causing-all-our-emails-spam-scores-go-up-tp
On 05/17/2013 06:08 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 17:58:48 +0200
> Axb wrote:
>
> [Re domain name ends with digits]
>
>> my LOUD +1 to remove/disable this rule for good.
>> anybody else?
>
> Yes, +1. Rules like this and the 12-char-domain rule
> are much too dangerous.
IMHO
Thanks Kevin.
I'll check in a few days. All I have to do is a sa-update, right?
--
View this message in context:
http://spamassassin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Rule-TVD-FROM-1-causing-all-our-emails-spam-scores-go-up-tp104732p104765.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archi
assin.1065346.n5.nabble.com/Rule-TVD-FROM-1-causing-all-our-emails-spam-scores-go-up-tp104732p104764.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 05/17/2013 07:23 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 17 May 2013, Axb wrote:
On 05/17/2013 05:22 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 5/17/2013 10:59 AM, Axb wrote:
> On 05/17/2013 04:49 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > I think the issue is more than a local scoring issue.
> > > > A rule that solel
On Fri, 17 May 2013, Axb wrote:
On 05/17/2013 05:22 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 5/17/2013 10:59 AM, Axb wrote:
> On 05/17/2013 04:49 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > I think the issue is more than a local scoring issue.
> >
> > A rule that solely checks for a domain ending in a digit can
On 5/17/2013 12:08 PM, David F. Skoll wrote:
On Fri, 17 May 2013 17:58:48 +0200
Axb wrote:
[Re domain name ends with digits]
my LOUD +1 to remove/disable this rule for good.
anybody else?
Yes, +1. Rules like this and the 12-char-domain rule
are much too dangerous.
Perhaps change to a __ r
On Fri, 17 May 2013 17:58:48 +0200
Axb wrote:
[Re domain name ends with digits]
> my LOUD +1 to remove/disable this rule for good.
> anybody else?
Yes, +1. Rules like this and the 12-char-domain rule
are much too dangerous.
Regards,
David.
On 05/17/2013 05:22 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 5/17/2013 10:59 AM, Axb wrote:
On 05/17/2013 04:49 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I think the issue is more than a local scoring issue.
A rule that solely checks for a domain ending in a digit cannot have a
3.5 score. It's far too high.
Imo, th
On 5/17/2013 10:59 AM, Axb wrote:
On 05/17/2013 04:49 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I think the issue is more than a local scoring issue.
A rule that solely checks for a domain ending in a digit cannot have a
3.5 score. It's far too high.
Imo, this rule should be removed completely.
many TVD_*
On 5/17/2013 10:57 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
Add this line to your local.cf and restart spamd:
score TVD_FROM_1 0
I think the issue is more than a local scoring issue.
A rule that solely checks for a domain ending in a digit cannot have a
3.5 score. It's far too high.
That may be true, but s
On 05/17/2013 04:49 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
I think the issue is more than a local scoring issue.
A rule that solely checks for a domain ending in a digit cannot have a
3.5 score. It's far too high.
Imo, this rule should be removed completely.
many TVD_* rules are from 2006 or older...
wa
On 5/17/2013 10:49 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 5/17/2013 9:47 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 5/17/2013 2:17 AM, Henry Draper wrote:
Hi SpamAssassin PMC,
My name is Henry Draper. I’m from Comm100 Network Corporation. We use
SpamAssassin to detect our emails' spam scores.
lhow you'r
On 5/17/2013 9:47 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 5/17/2013 2:17 AM, Henry Draper wrote:
Hi SpamAssassin PMC,
My name is Henry Draper. I’m from Comm100 Network Corporation. We use
SpamAssassin to detect our emails' spam scores.
lhow you're invoking SpamAssassin – *with default conf
Henry Draper skrev den 2013-05-17 08:17:
Looking forward to your reply.
Yes, score=7.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_DOCTYPE_MISSING,
HTML_LINE_HEIGHT,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAGS_O_P,HTML_TITLE_MISSING,RELAY_CA,
RELAY_NL,RELAY_STAR,RELAY_US,SAGREY,SPF_PASS,TVD_FROM_1 autolearn=no
version=3.3.
On 5/17/2013 2:17 AM, Henry Draper wrote:
Hi SpamAssassin PMC,
My name is Henry Draper. I’m from Comm100 Network Corporation. We use
SpamAssassin to detect our emails' spam scores.
lhow you're invoking SpamAssassin – *with default configurations*
lwhat version of SpamAssassin yo
Hi SpamAssassin PMC,
My name is Henry Draper. I'm from Comm100 Network Corporation. We use
SpamAssassin to detect our emails' spam scores.
l how you're invoking SpamAssassin - with default configurations
l what version of SpamAssassin you're using - Version 3.3
On 5/8/2013 12:06 PM, Niamh Holding wrote:
Hello Bowie,
Wednesday, May 8, 2013, 4:35:35 PM, you wrote:
BB> makes a bit more sense.
Not a lot, though to have BAYES_20 and BAYES_$) scoring the same.
A 20-40% confidence level is not high enough to have a significant
positive score nor is it lo
Hello Bowie,
Wednesday, May 8, 2013, 4:35:35 PM, you wrote:
BB> makes a bit more sense.
Not a lot, though to have BAYES_20 and BAYES_$) scoring the same.
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpqBdg1MLCZD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
final score. In this case, Bayes thinks the message
is ham, but is not confident enough to merit a negative score. Take a
look at the full list of Bayes scores and it makes a bit more sense.
score BAYES_00 0 0 -1.5 -1.9
score BAYES_05 0 0 -0.3 -0.5
score BAYES_20 0 0 -0.001 -0.001
Hello
Same score for BAYES_20 and BAYES_40 seems a bit strange
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_20 0 0 -0.001 -0.001
50_scores.cf:score BAYES_40 0 0 -0.001 -0.001
--
Best regards,
Niamh mailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpY3KK2wQ_uW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
he default and customize it using the more
verbose (yet really terse) variant with scores, by adding an add_header
option to your site config, similar to the one in 10_default_prefs.cf.
> It seems this has changed somewhat from version to version so I can’t
> seem to find anything specificall
>>> On 12/18/2012 at 12:26 AM, Sean Tout wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I installed SA 3.3.3 on Debian. I'm looking to view and/or log (to file or
> db) individual tests scores in addition to the overall score. Could you let
> me know how I can configure SA to show o
Hello,
I installed SA 3.3.3 on Debian. I'm looking to view and/or log (to file or
db) individual tests scores in addition to the overall score. Could you let
me know how I can configure SA to show or log individual tests scores?
Your Help would be much appreciated.
Regards,
-Sean.
--
Please keep this on the list.
On 12/12/2012 8:09 PM, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
It doesn't matter how many messages SA has processed. What matters is
how many messages Bayes has learned via autolearn or manual sa-learn runs.
You can log in as the user SA runs as and check the bayes database:
$ sa
>>> On 12/12/2012 at 11:39 AM, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
>>
>>
>>Without seeing the messages, there's not much we can say about the
>>scores. Put the full messages in pastebin and give us the link so we
>>can look at it.
>>
>>The autolearn
>I send 5-10 messages daily. Spam only, tho, little ham seems to get by, mostly
>missed spam.
>
>joe a.
I meant, that number of forwarded messages for bayes to learn. Should be well
over 200 spam by now.
Will it accept unmarked mail as ham, if sent as such, or would that mess things
up?
joe
On 12/12/2012 11:39 AM, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
Without seeing the messages, there's not much we can say about the
scores. Put the full messages in pastebin and give us the link so we
can look at it.
The autolearn looks normal to me.
autolearn=unavailable -- This means that somethin
>
>
>Without seeing the messages, there's not much we can say about the
>scores. Put the full messages in pastebin and give us the link so we
>can look at it.
>
>The autolearn looks normal to me.
>
>autolearn=unavailable -- This means that something was lockin
T_REMOTE_IMAGE Message contains an external image
* 0.1 FROM_12LTRDOM From a 12-letter domain
The autolearn seems odd.
Without seeing the messages, there's not much we can say about the
scores. Put the full messages in pastebin and give us the link so we
can look at it.
The auto
Suddenly a lot of garbage is getting thru. Stuff with nonsense text, etc.
This is what I see:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on open-122
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=DECEASED_NO_ML,HTML_MESSAGE
autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.
On 8/7/2012 9:53 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
It's a good point and I sent a recommendation to ASF infrastructure.
FYI, Infra gave a good response which basically boils down to small
changes in the threshold equals LOTS of issues for them. They likely
get a LOT of spam. We need to focus on f
. All
spamassassin does (on its own) is classify. Certain
implementations, in this case, the ASF's, will block emails that
have been classified to a certain confidence level.
The default scores are not manually set, but (in my understanding)
are evaluat
pedantic...
Spamassassin does not blacklist, spamassassin does not block. All
spamassassin does (on its own) is classify. Certain implementations, in
this case, the ASF's, will block emails that have been classified to a
certain confidence level.
The default scores are not manually set
e modified?
>
> bare in mind: SpamAssassin is a framework and VERY flexible.
> It's aiming to be the global solution for spam filtering.
>
> The SpamAssassin project delivers a set of rules and scores.
>
> These may not fit all types fo traffic, globally - with minimal sk
.
It's aiming to be the global solution for spam filtering.
The SpamAssassin project delivers a set of rules and scores.
These may not fit all types fo traffic, globally - with minimal skills
you can modify the ruleset to work for your setup.
101 - 200 of 1170 matches
Mail list logo
