hasn't crossed my mind you are.
Looking forawrd to your bold answers.
I have given them.
Yours friendly,
Rob
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Chris Lewis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Francis (as Rob):
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-AW%3A-Getting
Rob Smeets wrote:
Left me alone, Tapestry should be kicked from Apache because it's destroying
it's image.
If it was in my power, YOU would be kicked from Apache and all their m/l.
Chris, I see you constantly linking me to others. Who is that Francis? I
hope he/she (since that name sounds
I hope after reading my post you won't add me to this page -
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5Trolls
I really want to defend Rob :-) Since some of his points are real problems
of Tapestry.
I will say it again: backward compatibility.
Of course major releases shouldn't be compatible, i.e.
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 2:17 PM
To: Tapestry users
Subject: Re: AW: AW: Getting Answers on the User List
I hope after reading my post you won't add me to this page -
http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5Trolls
I really want to defend Rob :-) Since some of his points
Expressing dissent is not trolling. Sure one could argue that what
constitutes trolling is subjective, but almost any reasonable person can
discern when the line has been crossed. Francis is a lying mischievous
fool that periodically chimes in in hopes of pissing off users, or
scaring off newbies.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Jonathan Barker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You've been too active with technical issues on the list to be labeled a
troll... unless Rob has a split personality and you are the side that
actually knows something. Hmmm. An interesting email address, BTW,
Check this wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/tapestry/Tapestry5Trolls,
and then consider reporting him to the relevant abuse departments. A
couple of us now know a good deal about who this person is, and I am
hoping that he will consider the reputation of his actual identity and
back off.
chris
This person is beyond a troll and has
gone to a concerted effort to spread FUD and mis-information
Petros,
I want you to take a close look at the following points I've been making and
tell me which one is a misinformation.
1. Every Tapestry major release is backward incompatible with
Francis (as Rob):
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-AW%3A-Getting-Answers-on-the-User-List-p16679523.html
...not only are high profile Tapestry
users abandoning Tapestry, high profile sites which were using Tapestry are
also ditching Tapestry... - *FUD*
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Getting-Answers
-Getting-Answers-on-the-User-List-p16679523.html
...not only are high profile Tapestry
users abandoning Tapestry, high profile sites which were using Tapestry
are
also ditching Tapestry... - *FUD*
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Getting-Answers-on-the-User-List-p16634215.html
...Tapestry is now
mind you are.
Looking forawrd to your bold answers.
I have given them.
Yours friendly,
Rob
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Chris Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Francis (as Rob):
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-AW%3A-Getting-Answers-on-the-User-List-p16679523.html
...not only
at 10:59 AM, Chris Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Francis (as Rob):
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-AW%3A-Getting-Answers-on-the-User-List-p16679523.html
...not only are high profile Tapestry
users abandoning Tapestry, high profile sites which were using Tapestry
are
also ditching
]
wrote:
Francis (as Rob):
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-AW%3A-Getting-Answers-on-the-User-List-p16679523.html
...not only are high profile Tapestry
users abandoning Tapestry, high profile sites which were using Tapestry
are
also ditching Tapestry... - *FUD*
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Getting
I want you to take a close look at the following points I've been making
and
tell me which one is a misinformation.
1. Every Tapestry major release is backward incompatible with previous
releases.
That's true and really inconvenient. On the other hand I also complain about
frameworks,
1. Every Tapestry major release is backward incompatible with previous
releases.
Releases of many frameworks are incompatible with each other. The change
from 3 to 4 was minor
and with the change from 4 to 5, one can still use the same HTML templates
and do a fairly good upgrade.
Version
On 4/17/08, Chris Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob Smeets wrote:
Chris,
1. Every Tapestry major release is backward incompatible with previous
releases.
This is public knowledge and documented on the Tapestry website (5 not
compatible with 4).
Howard has stated many times
I don't mean to be rude but really...
WHY DO YOU GUYS EVEN REPLY TO THIS GUY
Can't you see how much fun he is having.
By replying to a discussion he is part of, I feel I am his puppet and my job
is to keep entertaining him. This is what we are all doing by reploying to
him. I am sure I am going
Ignoring trolls works well with one off messages trying to get old arguments
started but this case is different. This person is beyond a troll and has
gone to a concerted effort to spread FUD and mis-information to the point of
damaging a lot of good work.
I think the people that have politely
18 matches
Mail list logo
