Well, here is the information
the platform (OS) redhat enterprise 6.4(64 bit)
- the Java JVM version used (1.7.45)
- the Tomcat version used (7.0.45)
- the APR version used (APR from redhat cd)
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:00 PM, André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com wrote:
杨华杰 wrote:
Tomcat
杨华杰 wrote:
Tomcat performance goes down after install apr.
I followed this doc
http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/, I think the different is I didn't set sslengine setting as I don't use it. And I saw the error in catilina.out, I simply ignore it as I don't use it.
I fired 300 concurrent
Tomcat performance goes down after install apr.
I followed this doc
http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/, I think the different is I didn't set
sslengine setting as I don't use it. And I saw the error in catilina.out, I
simply ignore it as I don't use it.
I fired 300 concurrent calls from
Hi
for better request handling you need to know all about tomcat connectors ,
just try jk_mod with tomcat
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-3.3-doc/mod_jk-howto.html
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Akbar Thanakalacheruvu
akb...@sumtotalsystems.com
On 9/11/2013 1:47 PM, Akbar Thanakalacheruvu wrote:
Hi All
We are deploying around 10 to 15 websites on a tomcat server where each website
will have concurrency of 100 users at a given time.
This concurrency will continue though out the day.
So, I need settings/configuration details of tomcat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Akbar,
On 9/11/13 1:47 PM, Akbar Thanakalacheruvu wrote:
We are deploying around 10 to 15 websites on a tomcat server where
each website will have concurrency of 100 users at a given time.
100 sessions or 100 simultaneous requests/connections
Hi All
We are deploying around 10 to 15 websites on a tomcat server where each website
will have concurrency of 100 users at a given time.
This concurrency will continue though out the day.
So, I need settings/configuration details of tomcat server to improve its
performance.
Please
Akbar Thanakalacheruvu wrote:
Hi All
We are deploying around 10 to 15 websites on a tomcat server where each website
will have concurrency of 100 users at a given time.
This concurrency will continue though out the day.
So, I need settings/configuration details of tomcat server to improve its
On 25/11/2012 00:50, Alex Moskvin wrote:
Hi,
I am using Tomcat 7.0.30 and OpenEJB 4.5 to host high loaded app and at
some point found with VisualVM there is a bottleneck when there is a lot of
concurrent requests (about 400-600 req/sec). Requests and responses are
small (usually not larger
a millisecond and then I started to see latency from network external to my
company.
Good Hunting.
-Tony
--- On Sat, 11/24/12, Alex Moskvin moskvin.alek...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Alex Moskvin moskvin.alek...@gmail.com
Subject: Tomcat performance problem
To: users@tomcat.apache.org, users-h
Hello Christopher,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Christopher Schultz
ch...@christopherschultz.net wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leon,
On 9/2/2011 4:19 PM, Leon Rosenberg wrote:
holywarfrom my experience there is no need for apache in your
setup anyway /holywar.
Message-
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 3:19 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
Hello Talha,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Talha Fazal tfa...@credera.com wrote:
PLEASE SEE MY ANSWERS BELOW IN UPPER
Background:
We have a moderately high traffic web application (between 8 to 21 million
hits/day) running Apache to serve static content (also to load balance and
create a DMZ) and Weblogic to serve dynamic content (Struts 1.1 based Java web
application).
We are trying to replace Weblogic with
Hello Talha,
from a quick glance at your post, do you have the same 30 max threads
limit in weblogic?
Because sending 525 users through 2x30=60 max threads seems a little
bottlenecky.
Which software are you using to produce the load? Does it keepalive
the connections?
regards
Leon
On Fri, Sep
From: Talha Fazal [mailto:tfa...@credera.com]
Subject: Tomcat Performance Turning.
In our staging environment for load testing, when we run the load
test using 525 concurrent users, the app doesn't perform at all.
The CPU usage (on Apache and Tomcat Servers) hovers between 7% to
8
Plz. see my answers below in UPPERCAPS.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:35 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
Hello Talha,
from a quick glance at your post, do you have
)
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:484)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
Sincerely, Talha.
-Original Message-
From: Caldarale, Charles R [mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:42 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance
.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 8:35 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
Hello Talha,
from a quick glance at your post, do you have the same 30 max threads
limit
From: Talha Fazal [mailto:tfa...@credera.com]
Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Turning.
We did take a thread dump and we found a lot of threads locked.
http-8014-9 daemon prio=10 tid=0x60965c00 nid=0x6c83 in
Object.wait()
at
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint
Hi Leon,
Please see any answers in CAPS below.
-Original Message-
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:06 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
Hello Talha,
seems that your tomcats are fine.
Question
[mailto:chuck.caldar...@unisys.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 9:16 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Turning.
From: Talha Fazal [mailto:tfa...@credera.com]
Subject: RE: Tomcat Performance Turning.
We did take a thread dump and we found a lot of threads locked.
http
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
Hello Talha,
seems that your tomcats are fine.
Question, you mention that the tomcat do not perform, but you don't
tell us how you come to this conclusion except for cpu load. ANSWER: LOOKING
INTO THE TOMCAT ACCESS LOGS, THE RESPONSE TIME (%D) IS HORRIBLE
Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
Hello Talha,
seems that your tomcats are fine.
Question, you mention that the tomcat do not perform, but you don't
tell us how you come to this conclusion except for cpu load. ANSWER: LOOKING
INTO THE TOMCAT ACCESS LOGS, THE RESPONSE TIME
mod_proxy_ajp and mod_proxy instead of mod_jk. Any
thoughts here?
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: R Batchelor [mailto:rsbat...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 10:10 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
Have you ruled out issues with db connection
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: R Batchelor [mailto:rsbat...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 10:10 AM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
Have you ruled out issues with db connection pooling? NO. IN FACT, THERE ARE
KNOWN DBCP CONNECTION POOLING
Tomcat from being exposed to outside attacks; B) Load balancing.
Thanks Leon!
-Original Message-
From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:rosenberg.l...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2011 3:19 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Tomcat Performance Turning.
Hello Talha,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Leon,
On 9/2/2011 4:19 PM, Leon Rosenberg wrote:
holywarfrom my experience there is no need for apache in your
setup anyway /holywar.
Uh, load-balancing?
- -chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG
,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Wed, June 29, 2011 5:10:33 PM
Subject: Re: Tomcat performance issues...
Thanks I did not spot the users group. I thought maybe the taglibs was a dead
project seemed like
2011/6/30 Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com:
Thanks for the link and it proved what I was concerned about and that is
Tomcat
6 does not have an approved standard library for JSP's which means 7 has more
issues with this Standard taglib.
I could be wrong but the highest level of support is
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Thu, June 30, 2011 9:19:49 AM
Subject: Re: Tomcat performance issues...
2011/6/30 Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com:
Thanks for the link and it proved what I was concerned about and that is
Tomcat
6 does not have an approved standard library for JSP's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 6/30/2011 11:23 AM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I suspect Tomcat might support the lib you mentioned
Tomcat does not need to support the library specifically: if a library
properly uses the Servlet and/or JSP APIs properly, it should work with
Thanks I did not spot the users group. I thought maybe the taglibs was a dead
project seemed like there was no version that supported Tomcat 6.0.x.
I will continue the message thread onto that group thanks for the advice.
I am a tester but the response time was 3-4 seconds.
I have not asked the
Folks:
I might be a little to this discussion. I have taken upon myself; (don't ask
why I asked for that kind of pain ;o) to review how IIS and tomcat inter
operate and just released in beta a new connector specifically for IIS7 /
tomcat (though this works in IIS6 as well).
You can download
Christopher Schultz schrieb am 01.03.2011 um 16:56 (-0500):
I find *NIX smaller, cleaner, simpler, more scriptable and
remotely administratable (is that a word? maybe administerable?)
than Windows.
The word is: administrable
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-abilis
Hi Chuck,
You did not see my earlier response where I came to the same conclusion about
the types after looking at some other sites including a wiki. Yes there was
some
confusion but now I am clear that it is compiler dependant as I said earlier.
Thanks,
-Tony
As stated in my message I was using the -server option for the server jvm.
-Tony
- Original Message
From: David kerber dcker...@verizon.net
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 2:23:45 PM
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
On 3/1/2011 4:07 PM
On 3/2/2011 12:03 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
As stated in my message I was using the -server option for the server jvm.
-Tony
My bad; I missed that.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional
I do not know what the My bad limit per day is but I am sure you are fine. :]
-Tony
- Original Message
From: David kerber dcker...@verizon.net
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Wed, March 2, 2011 10:20:57 AM
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
On 3/2/2011 12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/1/2011 6:27 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I believe the effect of compression is relative. In other words for a big
program with lots of 64-bit pointers and 64-bit longs it is helps but for
small
programs it does not.
A long in Java is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 3/1/2011 6:09 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
I don't understand why communicating a 64-bit value over a
64-bit bus
message.
Regards,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Wed, March 2, 2011 7:12:43 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3
, 2011 9:15:09 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
Actually according to the IBM porting guide longs are different byte lengths
depending upon what frame of reference they are speaking to.
On page 4 of the following port guide:
http://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/dw/jdk/64bitporting
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
On page 4 of the following port guide:
http://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/dw/jdk/64bitporting/64BitJavaPortingGuide.pdf
It states:For Windows, on 32-bit systems, integers, longs and
pointers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 2/28/2011 2:57 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Since the memory pointers are larger you may need to increase your heap size
but
you can compress the address pointers.
+1
Also, if you use JNI and it is 32-bit then you will have unexpected
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 2/28/2011 4:21 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I also use Native APR with Tomcat 7 which eliminates AJP and
supposedly is faster than Apache Web Server
It's probably the same as AWS, as the code is the same :)
/isapi/tomcat performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 2/28/2011 2:57 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Since the memory pointers are larger you may need to increase your heap size
but
you can compress the address pointers.
+1
Also, if you use JNI and it is 32-bit then you
?
Thanks,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 8:31:54 AM
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 2/28/2011 4:21
] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
Hi Chris,
The performance degregation for 64 bit versus 32 bit has been the subject of
much concern in the java community.
Here is the number I mentioned straight from Oracle itself:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/hotspotfaq-138619.html
What
On 02/28/2011 07:15 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Bruce Pease [mailto:bpe...@wth.com]
Subject: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
In performance tests I have found the configuration runs
dramatically slower than it's corresponding server in 32
bit Windows on 2000 Server and Tomcat 6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/1/2011 2:49 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I understand it is from the core AWS but the important thing for me was to
eliminate AJP because in a AWS standalone I had used to communicate AJP.
When I enabled ARP I did not have to do anything
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/1/2011 3:24 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Also, I have not programmed in assembly language or in hexadecimal for some
time but I would hope that for a 32-bit java process running on a 64-bit
processor I would fetch a 32-bit pointer and
Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 1:42:37 PM
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/1/2011 2:49 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I understand it is from the core AWS but the important thing for me was to
eliminate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
Good thing these are marked as [OT]... we have totally hijacked Bruce's
thread. Maybe we should start another.
On 3/1/2011 4:07 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I am just trying to figure out what is the fastest was to handle my app. I
was
Hi Chris,
I guess you have not read my last email yet. I think of it as putting two
32-bit pieces of info on a 64-bit data bus whereas for two 64-bit pieces of
information it takes two fetches or twice as long on the same hardware.
Depending upon the number of bytes for each data type for
On 3/1/2011 4:07 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
Thanks Chris I will take a look at it.
I am just trying to figure out what is the fastest was to handle my app. I was
shooting for less than 1msec at Tomcat which I not have done. Now I want to get
to 100 microseconds. Years ago from an logical
program.
Regards,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 2:17:46 PM
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
Good thing
Users List
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
Hi Chris,
I used Tomcat separately because JBoss was always somewhat behind the current
production version of Tomcat. Eventually I will remove JBoss and use JDBC
from
Tomcat to my database to reduce memory footprint and improve performance. I
am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/1/2011 4:33 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I used Tomcat separately because JBoss was always somewhat behind the current
production version of Tomcat. Eventually I will remove JBoss and use JDBC
from
Tomcat to my database to reduce memory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bruce,
On 3/1/2011 4:42 PM, Bruce Pease wrote:
I'm just curious if anyone is using a 64 bit version of Linux, and has seen
performance degradation. We are looking to move off the Windows platform
eventually anyway.
I'm not using 64-bit, but I am
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/1/2011 4:19 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I guess you have not read my last email yet. I think of it as putting two
32-bit pieces of info on a 64-bit data bus whereas for two 64-bit pieces of
information it takes two fetches or twice as
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
Are you saying that a 32-bit JVM running on a 64-bit machine
somehow utilizes the 64-bit bus? Malarkey.
I wouldn't bet on that. Intel goes to great pains to insure all
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
I don't understand why communicating a 64-bit value over a
64-bit bus would take longer than communicating a 32-bit
value over a 64-bit bus:
Because you get *two* 32-bit values
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chuck,
On 3/1/2011 5:42 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
Are you saying that a 32-bit JVM running on a 64-bit machine
somehow
Message
From: Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 2:45:39 PM
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/1/2011 4:33 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I used
From: Christopher Schultz ch...@christopherschultz.net
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 3:00:53 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
On 3/1/2011 4:19 PM, Tony Anecito wrote:
I guess you
to not get emotional about it but I do miss my 8080 and Z80.
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Caldarale, Charles R chuck.caldar...@unisys.com
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Tue, March 1, 2011 4:09:10 PM
Subject: RE: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
From: Christopher
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Subject: Re: [OT] IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
The question I have is how does the bus controller know
that there are multiple 32-bit values coming down the line,
and that it can send them simultaneously down the bus
Good Afternoon:
I am attempting to run a Windows x64 server with IIS7 and Tomcat 7. I have
64 bit versions of JDK (1.6.26) and Tomcat (7.0.8). The server is set up
with IIS using ajp1.3 to a local cluster of Tomcat servers. In performance
tests I have found the configuration runs
From: Bruce Pease [mailto:bpe...@wth.com]
Subject: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
In performance tests I have found the configuration runs
dramatically slower than it's corresponding server in 32
bit Windows on 2000 Server and Tomcat 6.
Until you quantify dramatically, better describe your
/isapi/tomcat performance
From: Bruce Pease [mailto:bpe...@wth.com]
Subject: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
In performance tests I have found the configuration runs
dramatically slower than it's corresponding server in 32
bit Windows on 2000 Server and Tomcat 6.
Until you quantify dramatically
is
using a similar setup, and has been able to get it to perform well.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Anecito [mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 1:40 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
I agree with Charles. I run a performance
JVM settings should not be the same.
Regards,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Bruce Pease bpe...@wth.com
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Mon, February 28, 2011 11:46:35 AM
Subject: RE: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
Perhaps my point is being missed here. The issue
Sent: Mon, February 28, 2011 12:40:43 PM
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
JVM settings should not be the same.
Regards,
-Tony
- Original Message
From: Bruce Pease bpe...@wth.com
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Mon, February 28, 2011 11:46:35 AM
Subject
Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Mon, February 28, 2011 12:57:03 PM
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
Since the memory pointers are larger you may need to increase your heap size
but
you can compress the address pointers.
Also, if you use
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
I forgot to mention new versions of Windows are slower than XP. So that would
contribute to your issues. Windows 7 got better but not as fast as 32-bit.
Also, you might want to measure from tomcat perspective so you have a new
baseline
[mailto:adanec...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 3:01 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
I forgot to mention new versions of Windows are slower than XP. So that
would
contribute to your issues. Windows 7 got better but not as fast as 32-bit.
Also
To: Tomcat Users List users@tomcat.apache.org
Sent: Mon, February 28, 2011 1:08:19 PM
Subject: RE: IIS7/isapi/tomcat performance
Thanks for the insight. It looks like we are going to go with server 2003 32
bit. I found some references that suggest ajp 1.3 has a performance issue in
64 bit server 2008
tuned but for some reason,
the file access is slow.
We haven't yet got the exact reason yet, so have to wait and see.
Vijay
From: vijay_me...@hotmail.com
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: RE: Tomcat performance under low load
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 08:42:30 +1000
Thanks for the replies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vijay,
On 10/16/2010 6:42 PM, Vijay Menon wrote:
Thanks for the replies. Based on that, we did change the connectors
to use executor threads. However, based on profiling the app, it
turned out to be a code issue.
Glad you solved your problem. Can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vijay,
On 10/13/2010 7:35 PM, Vijay Menon wrote:
We're scaling to satisfactory loads of 250 concurrent
requests serving pages in 0.5 seconds.
Excellent (assuming that 0.5 seconds is acceptable to your team).
The other test scenario is where the
Hi all
Thanks for reading this post.
We are currently having 2 requirements that are opposites. The first
requirement is performance under high loads and the other one is equivalent
performance for 1 request.
Our prod env currently uses Apache with mod_jk and ajp 1.3 to Tomcat 6.0.26 and
jdk
From: Vijay Menon [mailto:vijay_me...@hotmail.com]
Subject: Tomcat performance under low load
The other test scenario is where the tomcat instance is kept
idle and a single request is sent in every 90 or so seconds.
In this case, the response takes about 8 seconds out of which
about 6
Support,
I Installed tomcat 5.5.20 version in my Windows 2008 server and the java
version is Java 1.6.0.b105.We are using 2 Mbps Bandwidth Leased line.In
tomcat we hosted around 5(five) application.When the no of seesion increases
more than 1600 session the total application is slow and not
Rujin,
I Installed tomcat 5.5.20 version in my Windows 2008 server and the java
version is Java 1.6.0.b105.We are using 2 Mbps Bandwidth Leased line.In
tomcat we hosted around 5(five) application.When the no of seesion increases
more than 1600 session the total application is slow and not able
Hi,
I want to optimize the performance of tomcat.
Can anyone please point to some docs/wiki/direct answer.
Regards
Harpreet
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
From: Harpreet singh Wadhwa [mailto:harpreetsingh.wad...@gmail.com]
Subject: Required Help in tomcat performance optimization.
I want to optimize the performance of tomcat.
You probably want to optimize the performance of your webapp first.
Can anyone please point to some docs/wiki/direct
I have created a simple web service which simulates 250 msec worth of work when
called.
When I test this service from jmeter I make a SOAP request with 50 threads.
If I run this test against a Windows hosted tomcat all threads pretty much
start at the same time and end within 10-20 msec of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave,
On 5/28/2010 8:25 AM, Dave Siracusa wrote:
If I run this test against a Windows hosted tomcat all threads
pretty much start at the same time and end within 10-20 msec of each
other.
When I run the test against a linux hosted tomcat the
@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: tomcat performance differences between windows and linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dave,
On 5/28/2010 8:25 AM, Dave Siracusa wrote:
If I run this test against a Windows hosted tomcat all threads
pretty much start at the same time
On 5/28/10 10:06 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
What about network configuration? Are both servers the same distance
from you on the network?
That's a reasonable question.
The only thing I can add - and I wish I knew more about this than I do -
is that Linux is configurable to a fault
On 5/28/10 10:27 AM, Dave Siracusa wrote:
Yes both are on the same network and same distance. If I limit it to 30
threads their behavior is the same.
By this do you mean that the timing of both systems more closely match
each other if you produce just 30 threads on each?
As far as the
, 28 May 2010 10:35:07 -0400
From: jhubbsl...@att.net
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: tomcat performance differences between windows and linux
On 5/28/10 10:06 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
What about network configuration? Are both servers the same distance
from you
Hassan Schroeder wrote:
Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up
http://tomcatexpert.com/blog/2010/03/24/myth-or-truth-one-should-always-use-apache-httpd-front-apache-tomcat-improve-perform
because I don't know if the author (a certain mthomas) will mention
it here.
2010/3/27 André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com:
http://tomcatexpert.com/blog/2010/03/24/myth-or-truth-one-should-always-use-apache-httpd-front-apache-tomcat-improve-perform
Might this not also be worth preserving in the Tomcat FAQ/wiki ?
There is
-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/httpd-vs.-Tomcat-performance-tp28023360p28056376.html
Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Very entertaining reading! Thanks Chris and Mark for re-benchmarking,
explaining, and giving your opinions on the results. I'm not entirely sure
how I missed Chris' benchmark results email, almost exactly one year ago
now. Chris: there are no units on your results numbers, and I'm not seeing
Hi ,
We have a online shop developed as a suite of JSR168 portlets. On some
portlets we list products and images (so there are about 25 images per
page + other images).
One image has around 250k.
Performance was greatly improved after we put apache httpd in front
(images served by apache
On 25/03/2010 01:39, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
Chris deserves a lot of the credit. Without his figures, it is just opinion.
That's the second benchmark that I see today that has odd numbers.
What did you think was odd?
Mark
On 25/03/2010 07:01, Jason Brittain wrote:
Very entertaining reading! Thanks Chris and Mark for re-benchmarking,
explaining, and giving your opinions on the results. I'm not entirely sure
how I missed Chris' benchmark results email, almost exactly one year ago
now. Chris: there are no units
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark,
On 3/24/2010 8:50 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 25/03/2010 00:26, Hassan Schroeder wrote:
Just to get this into the archives for the next time it comes up
1 - 100 of 234 matches
Mail list logo
