P.S. in workers.properties we use the template then with
worker.myhost.reference=worker.template_01
worker.myhost.host=10.20.30.40
worker.myhost.port=8809
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 31. August 2016 um 14:10 Uhr
> Von: "Hildegard Meier"
> An: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Betreff
Running:
Ubuntu Trusty 14.0.4 LTS 64 Bit
mod_jk/1.2.37
Apache/2.4.7 (Ubuntu)
Hello,
I have much investigated into this, but have no idea, why the AJP connections
from the Apache (MPM worker) to the AJP backends pile up.
They do not get closed, they stay in state ESTABLISHED.
Over night, the
uot; 1) Did I put the ssl.conf in the correct
>>>>> directory? 2) What else can I check?
>>>> If you want Apache HTTPD to serve HTTPS content (in addition to
>>>> HTTP content), you'll need to install the mod_ssl RPM.
>>>>
>>>> 2.
>>> HTTP content), you'll need to install the mod_ssl RPM.
>>>
>>> 2.4.23-3.fc23.x86_64.rpm
>>>
>>> is the latest release I believe. I'm not sure - my laptop died and
>>> with it my Fedora install (time to get a new laptop).
>>&g
rectory? 2) What else can I check?
>> If you want Apache HTTPD to serve HTTPS content (in addition to
>> HTTP content), you'll need to install the mod_ssl RPM.
>>
>> 2.4.23-3.fc23.x86_64.rpm
>>
>> is the latest release I believe. I'm not sure
he TomEE" proxyName="www.myDomain.com" proxyPort="80"/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> proxyName="www.myDomain.com" proxyPort="80"/>
>>>>> Changing the redirectPort= on both XML elements to 443
&
;>>>> server="Apache TomEE" proxyName="www.myDomain.com" proxyPort="80"/>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> proxyName="www.myDomain.com" proxyPort="80"/>
>>>> Changing the redirectPort= on both XML el
on both XML elements to 443
>>> causes the https page to have a "Unable to connect" error.
>> What should I try next?
>>>>> BTW if you aren't using TomEE for HTTPS directly, you can remove that
>>>>> entirely. If you are using AJP to
hanging the redirectPort= on both XML elements to 443
>> causes the https page to have a "Unable to connect" error.
> What should I try next?
>>>> BTW if you aren't using TomEE for HTTPS directly, you can remove that
>>>> entirely. If you are using AJP to
AJP to proxy from httpd ->
>>> TomEE, then you need no other connectors besides the AJP one. It will
>>> make your TomEE configuration simpler, use fewer resources, and cause
>>> less confusion (like what was happening above, because TomEE was
>>> handling th
mEE, then you need no other connectors besides the AJP one. It will
>> make your TomEE configuration simpler, use fewer resources, and cause
>> less confusion (like what was happening above, because TomEE was
>> handling the requests, not httpd).
>>
>>> Later, a
t support ajp, and/or I don't need the ajp protocol. Is that
> > correct? AJP is just for Tomcat?
>
> AJP actually stands for Apache JServ Protocol, which was invented
> solely for the purposes of proxying to Java-based application servers.
> It's mostly outlived its us
ajp protocol. Is that
> correct? AJP is just for Tomcat?
AJP actually stands for Apache JServ Protocol, which was invented
solely for the purposes of proxying to Java-based application servers.
It's mostly outlived its usefulness, but there are some of us die-hard
fans out there that simp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Paul,
On 7/22/16 4:24 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> On 7/22/2016 4:14 PM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> You can even use either HTTP or AJP as the protocol to connect
>> httpd -> Tomcat. I would recommend mod_proxy_http just because
>> it's basically the
On 7/23/2016 4:12 AM, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote:
> On 23.07.2016 02:37, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>>> I tried going with ajp with the following configuration after reading
>>> >the ajp documentation.
>>> >Adding a Load module for ajp was not needed as per this message.
>>> >==
On 23.07.2016 02:37, Paul Roubekas wrote:
I tried going with ajp with the following configuration after reading
>the ajp documentation.
>Adding a Load module for ajp was not needed as per this message.
>==
httpd, then it should be accessible via http://host/bugzilla
>>> >> (or whatever the path is). Tomcat would be accessible via
>>> >> http://host:8080/. If you wanted tomcat to be accessible via
>>> >> http://host/tomcat, then you'd have to proxy to i
is). Tomcat would be accessible via
>> >> http://host:8080/. If you wanted tomcat to be accessible via
>> >> http://host/tomcat, then you'd have to proxy to it.
>> > understood.
>> >>
>> >>> It is also my understanding that I needed
ssible via
> >> http://host/tomcat, then you'd have to proxy to it.
> > understood.
> >>
> >>> It is also my understanding that I needed mod_jk to have the
> >>> httpd route to TomEE (Tomcat 7). I have TomEE running on the
> >>> serve
e. If you install Bugzilla and phpBB
>> in httpd, then it should be accessible via http://host/bugzilla
>> (or whatever the path is). Tomcat would be accessible via
>> http://host:8080/. If you wanted tomcat to be accessible via
>> http://host/tomcat, then you'd have to
t Users List
>>> Subject: Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?
>>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA256
>>>
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>> On 7/20/16 12:12 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
>>>> I am trying to install the mod_
On 22.07.2016 09:18, Jäkel, Guido wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 5:51 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Paul
>-Original Message-
>From: Christopher Schultz [mailto:ch...@christopherschultz.net]
>Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 5:51 PM
>To: Tomcat Users List
>Subject: Re: No binary distribution for mod_jk?
>
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA256
>
>Paul
at would be accessible via http://host:8080/. If you wanted
> tomcat to be accessible via http://host/tomcat, then you'd have to
> proxy to it.
understood.
>
>> It is also my understanding that I needed mod_jk to have the httpd route to
>> TomEE (Tomcat 7). I have TomEE
ble via http://host/tomcat, then you'd have to
proxy to it.
> It is also my understanding that I needed mod_jk to have the httpd route to
> TomEE (Tomcat 7). I have TomEE running on the server now.
Unless you only have an AJP connector on TomEE (which isn't likely)
it's
Actually my requirement is not that complex. All I need to do is host
TomEE (a Tomcat 7 superset), Bugzilla and phpBB (forum software) on the
same server. It is my understanding the I need httpd to do this. It is
also my understanding that I needed mod_jk to have the httpd route to
TomEE
Is there some reason that you can't use mod_proxy_balancer instead of
mod_cluster (if you don't want to be vulnerable to the known CVEs)? I
assume that you're looking for some specific logic offered by
mod_cluster, but since you're considering mod_jk I'm not so sure. If
ply I will have build mod_jk
myself. Since I have never done any such thing I am not looking forward
it.
On 7/21/2016 11:51 AM, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Paul,
>
> On 7/20/16 12:12 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> > I am trying to install the mod_jk on httpd for my tomcat 7.0.68
> &g
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Paul,
On 7/20/16 12:12 PM, Paul Roubekas wrote:
> I am trying to install the mod_jk on httpd for my tomcat 7.0.68
> (TomEE) server.
>
> I am reading this
> https://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webserver_howto/apache.html
>
I am trying to install the mod_jk on httpd for my tomcat 7.0.68 (TomEE)
server.
I am reading this
https://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/webserver_howto/apache.html
documentation which points to this
http://tomcat.apache.org/download-connectors.cgi download page. But
there is no binary
e 2.4.7 (Ubuntu)
>> as the front and forward eveything to tomcat. I installed mod_jk using
>> Ubuntu's software
>> center.. Things are working. But I have errors in
>> /var/log/apache2/mod_jk.log:
>>
>> [Mon Jul 11 20:19:32.261 2016] [1175:140389159810944] [info
Am 12.07.2016 um 19:44 schrieb Wayne Li:
Hi,
I have a servlet/jsp application running on tomcat 7.0.47. There are no
static html files.
Now I am try to use apache 2.4.7 (Ubuntu)
as the front and forward eveything to tomcat. I installed mod_jk using
Ubuntu's software
center.. Things are wo
On 12.07.2016 19:44, Wayne Li wrote:
Hi,
I have a servlet/jsp application running on tomcat 7.0.47. There are no
static html files.
Now I am try to use apache 2.4.7 (Ubuntu)
as the front and forward eveything to tomcat. I installed mod_jk using
Ubuntu's software
center.. Things are working
Hi,
I have a servlet/jsp application running on tomcat 7.0.47. There are no
static html files.
Now I am try to use apache 2.4.7 (Ubuntu)
as the front and forward eveything to tomcat. I installed mod_jk using
Ubuntu's software
center.. Things are working. But I have errors in
/var/log/ap
ns "OK" or "RC=".
> However, mod_jk gets impatient, and after about 5 minutes, it
> decides to send the request to Tomcat again, which kicks off
> another instance of the back-end process (obviously not what I
> want). Following is from the mod_jk log:
>
>>>
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Jerry Malcolm
wrote:
> I am calling a JSP to start a fairly long-running process in Tomcat. I'm
> not using the page response data. The JSP is simply a way to initiate the
> process. The JSP simply returns "OK" or "RC=". How
I am calling a JSP to start a fairly long-running process in Tomcat.
I'm not using the page response data. The JSP is simply a way to
initiate the process. The JSP simply returns "OK" or "RC=". However,
mod_jk gets impatient, and after about 5 minutes, it decide
All,
I haven't yet tried the obvious -- to just slam this value into the
balancer working using a FORM POST -- but I was wondering if it was
possible to "reset" the "errors" stat for a balancer worker without
resetting all of the stats.
For example, I have these two workers here:
[S|E|R]
Hello Good People -
I'm trying to determine the best route in which to load balance multiple
tomcats, what should I be taking into consideration when choosing between
SonicWall's NetScaler or in continuing to use mod_jk? This question isn't
meant to fuel a purchase decision as
are being
proxied to Tomcat, so presence in that log file doesn't mean that
something is wrong.
If you turn-up the log level for mod_jk, then you should be able to
see what mod_jk is doing.
Most common mistake with mod_jk configuration: placing JkMount
directives at the top-level of httpd.con
I am running
Red Hat Linux version 7.2
Apache version 2.4.6
Tomcat version 9.0.0.M1
Tomcat connector version 1.2.41
I have configured Tomcat and Apache for Tomcat calls to be handled by Apache.
I am not getting any errors when starting up Tomcat or Apache, but how can I
tell if the Tomcat calls
On 28.01.2016 15:55, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2016-01-28 16:44 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Kolinko :
2016-01-28 15:00 GMT+03:00 André Warnier (tomcat) :
Hi.
On the page
http://apache.lauf-forum.at/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/,
the following mod_jk binaries are available
2016-01-28 16:44 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 2016-01-28 15:00 GMT+03:00 André Warnier (tomcat) :
>> Hi.
>>
>> On the page
>> http://apache.lauf-forum.at/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/,
>> the following mod_jk binaries are available :
>>
On 28.01.2016 14:44, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2016-01-28 15:00 GMT+03:00 André Warnier (tomcat) :
Hi.
On the page
http://apache.lauf-forum.at/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/,
the following mod_jk binaries are available :
tomcat-connectors-1.2.40-windows-i386-httpd-2.0.x.zip
2016-01-28 15:00 GMT+03:00 André Warnier (tomcat) :
Hi.
On the page
http://apache.lauf-forum.at/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/,
the following mod_jk binaries are available :
tomcat-connectors-1.2.40-windows-i386-httpd-2.0.x.zip 2014-04-14 21:40
130K ZIP compressed archive
2016-01-28 15:00 GMT+03:00 André Warnier (tomcat) :
> Hi.
>
> On the page
> http://apache.lauf-forum.at/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/,
> the following mod_jk binaries are available :
>
> tomcat-connectors-1.2.40-windows-i386-httpd-2.0.x.zip 2014-04-14 21:40
&
Hi.
On the page http://apache.lauf-forum.at/tomcat/tomcat-connectors/jk/binaries/windows/, the
following mod_jk binaries are available :
tomcat-connectors-1.2.40-windows-i386-httpd-2.0.x.zip 2014-04-14 21:40 130K ZIP
compressed archive
tomcat-connectors-1.2.40-windows-i386-httpd-2.2
ogLevel to debug. On that log
level, you should be able to see the REMOTE_USER forwarding in the
mod_jk logs. First check how the line looks when using HTTPD 2.2. Then
check, whether that info is present when using 2.4. If "yes", then your
problem is on the Tomcat (configuration, webapp
With Apache/2.2.15 the REMOTE_USER is passed to the application (Jboss),
while with Apache/2.4.6 is lost.
In the log of the application we see this error: "REMOTE_USER variable
not assigned."
Il 19/11/2015 14:02, Teresa Fasano ha scritto:
Hi,
I'm using Apache 2.4.6 with mod_
2015-11-19 16:02 GMT+03:00 Teresa Fasano :
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Apache 2.4.6 with mod_jk and mod_shib 2.5.5, so Shibboleth as SSO
> authentication.
>
> Routing Apache request to tomcat (JBoss) we are not able to retreive
> REMOTE_USER.
>
> It seems that the
Hi,
I'm using Apache 2.4.6 with mod_jk and mod_shib 2.5.5, so Shibboleth as
SSO authentication.
Routing Apache request to tomcat (JBoss) we are not able to retreive
REMOTE_USER.
It seems that the REMOTE_USER is lost.
In the configuration file shibboleth2.xml we have REMOTE_USER
Rainer,
>
> On 10/29/15 5:31 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Am 29.10.2015 um 03:59 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
>>> Youngho,
>>>
>>> On 10/28/15 10:35 PM, Youngho Cho wrote:
>>>> Just before I upgrade to OSX 10.11.1
>>>>
>>>>
Rainer,
On 10/29/15 5:31 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 29.10.2015 um 03:59 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
>> Youngho,
>>
>> On 10/28/15 10:35 PM, Youngho Cho wrote:
>>> Just before I upgrade to OSX 10.11.1
>>>
>>> And try to compile Ap
Am 29.10.2015 um 03:59 schrieb Christopher Schultz:
Youngho,
On 10/28/15 10:35 PM, Youngho Cho wrote:
Just before I upgrade to OSX 10.11.1
And try to compile Apache mod_jk 1.2.41.
But the make is fail.
YounghoiMac:native youngho$ sudo make
Making all in common
usr/share/apr-1/build-1
Youngho,
On 10/28/15 10:35 PM, Youngho Cho wrote:
> Just before I upgrade to OSX 10.11.1
>
> And try to compile Apache mod_jk 1.2.41.
>
> But the make is fail.
>
> YounghoiMac:native youngho$ sudo make
>
> Making all in common
> usr/share/apr-1/build-1/l
Hello,
Just before I upgrade to OSX 10.11.1
And try to compile Apache mod_jk 1.2.41.
But the make is fail.
YounghoiMac:native youngho$ sudo make
Making all in common
usr/share/apr-1/build-1/libtool --silent --mode=compile
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/OSX10.11
On 10/19/2015 06:04 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:request.
Is the below a capture between your client and HTTPD? (as opposed to
one between HTTPD and Tomcat)
The capture is between client and httpd
Note that Basic auth sends password in plain text (encoded in base64).
So you password is
The issue is currently reproduced using Apache httpd 2.4.16, mod_jk 1.2.41
> and tomcat 8.0.28.
>
> I've created a very very simple JSP page that does nothing but print a small
> string, but I've tried changing the jsp page to print a very very large
> string (1+ characte
mcat
users list (separate messages) but hoping for any ideas at all.
The issue is currently reproduced using Apache httpd 2.4.16, mod_jk
1.2.41 and tomcat 8.0.28.
I've created a very very simple JSP page that does nothing but print a
small string, but I've tried changing the jsp page to pr
Hi all,
I'm seeing a weird problem that I'm running out of ideas on. I'm going
to send this email to both the apache httpd users list and the tomcat
users list (separate messages) but hoping for any ideas at all.
The issue is currently reproduced using Apache httpd 2.4.16, mod
r the vote to finish... I believe we have 3 votes
>> to release.
>
>> http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/evury5r6rwcls5df
>
>> -chris
>
>>> -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas
>>> [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2015 10:16 PM
>&
gt; available.
>
> Or you can wait for the vote to finish... I believe we have 3 votes
> to release.
>
> http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/evury5r6rwcls5df
>
> -chris
>
>> -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas
>> [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, Ju
inal Message- From: Mark Thomas
>> [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2015 10:16 PM To:
>> Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: AW:
>> Question concerning mod_jk Security Fix CVE-2014-8111
>>
>> On 20/07/2015 10:58, Kreuser, Peter wrote:
>>
>>
a...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2015 10:16 PM To:
> Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: AW:
> Question concerning mod_jk Security Fix CVE-2014-8111
>
> On 20/07/2015 10:58, Kreuser, Peter wrote:
>
>
>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> I appreciate your open comment and th
e 3 votes to
release.
http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/evury5r6rwcls5df
- -chris
> -Original Message- From: Mark Thomas
> [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2015 10:16 PM To:
> Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: AW:
> Question concerning mod_jk Security Fix CVE-2014-
Hi,
When can we expect the release of JK 1.2.41 source code?
Regards,
Chinoy
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2015 10:16 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: AW: Question concerning mod_jk Security Fix CVE-2014-8111
On 20/07/2015
I send you here the link so you can read it
http://httpd.markmail.org/search/?q=Alex%20Soto#query:Alex%20Soto+page:1+mid:74py424qest6gnj3+state:results
El dt., 28 jul. 2015 a les 17:33, Christopher Schultz (<
ch...@christopherschultz.net>) va escriure:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alex,
On 7/28/15 2:25 AM, Alex Soto wrote:
> Well the answer comes from httpd team do I expect they aware of
> this. Moreover they explained me this about ticketing and why it is
> normal this behaviour
If this is expected behavior, it's certainly
Well the answer comes from httpd team do I expect they aware of this.
Moreover they explained me this about ticketing and why it is normal this
behaviour
Alex
El dl., 27 de jul., 2015 a les 23.32 Christopher Schultz <
ch...@christopherschultz.net> va escriure:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alex,
On 7/27/15 7:36 AM, Alex Soto wrote:
> finally I found what was happening. It was a problem with the
> ticketing system of SSL. To avoid it and makes everything works you
> only need to set SSLSessionTickets to off. And that's all, now
> every
Hi guys,
finally I found what was happening. It was a problem with the ticketing
system of SSL. To avoid it and makes everything works you only need to set
SSLSessionTickets to off. And that's all, now everything works as expected.
Thank you very much for all your help.
Alex.
El dl., 13 jul. 201
On 20/07/2015 10:58, Kreuser, Peter wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I appreciate your open comment and that clarifies the lengthy wait. I
> trust that now the solution gets going and will be solved soonish.
>
> I'm in no position to criticize any wrongdoing on this CVE. I only
> hope to find a clearer c
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Juli 2015 12:33
> An: Tomcat Users List
> Betreff: Re: Question concerning mod_jk Security Fix CVE-2014-8111
>
> On 16/07/2015 13:16, Kreuser, Peter wrote:
> &
k was
entirely the fault of the RedHat security team.
The mod_jk releases involve producing a large number of Windows binaries
and experience with tc-native suggests that figuring out the build
process - even with the available documentation - will be non-trivial.
To give you an idea of what is likely
l us, when the fixed mod_jk-Version 1.2.41 will be publicly
available?
The webpage does not mention any vulnerability at all, plus no newer release
than the vulnerable 1.2.40.
For now RedHat mentions only the fix to the source code from December 2014.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisio
Mark
Look for ***>>> for my response.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Eggers [mailto:its_toas...@yahoo.com.INVALID]
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 2:13 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: Form authentication with Tomcat 7.0.63 behind Apache HTTPD and
mod_jk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNE
Tomcat 7.0.62 -- examples
> Browser -- Tomcat 7.0.62 -- examples
> Browser -- Tomcat 7.0.63 -- examples
>
> Architecture where this fails (brings up invalid login page)
>
> Browser -- Apache HTTPD -- mod-jk -- Tomcat 7.0.6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Konstantin,
On 7/9/15 6:30 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Please do not top-post, Rules:
> http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html#tomcat-users -> "6."
>
> 2015-07-09 13:07 GMT+03:00 Alex Soto :
>> yes (LogFormat "%H %{SSL_SESSION_ID}e %h %l %u %t \"
er -- Apache HTTPD -- mod-jk -- Tomcat 7.0.62 -- examples
Browser -- Tomcat 7.0.62 -- examples
Browser -- Tomcat 7.0.63 -- examples
Architecture where this fails (brings up invalid login page)
- -----
5. Get the error login page
>
> Quick test with direct access to Tomcat and examples webapp =
> success.
> (http://localhost:8080/examples/jsp/security/protected/index.jsp)
>
> Possible areas to test: 1. httpd / mod_jk : Do you have failure
> with direct access to Tomcat ?
>
me links around.
>
> Here is a rundown of my environment:
>
[]
How it fails? (Steps, maybe also Access Log output)
Quick test with direct access to Tomcat and examples webapp = success.
(http://localhost:8080/examples/jsp/security/protected/index.jsp)
Possible areas to test:
1.
nment:
Structure
- -
CentOS 6.6 - latest updates
Apache HTTPD 2.2.15-39.el6.centos.x86_64
mod_jk 1.2.40
Tomcat 7.0.62 (7.0.63)
JRE 1.8.0_45
uriworkermap.properties
- ---
/jenkins|/*=loki
/RPets|/*=loki
worker.properties
- -
worker.list=jk-status,jk-ma
Hello yes I have raised the question to httpd mailing list. Just to keep
you informed. Look what I have discovere. If I run in Chrome or Firefox I
get next log messages:
HTTP/1.1 - on TLSv1.2 Initial 172.17.42.1 - - [09/Jul/2015:13:57:18 +]
"GET /hello/hello HTTP/1.1" 200 89
HTTP/1.1 - on TLSv1
Please do not top-post, Rules:
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html#tomcat-users
-> "6."
2015-07-09 13:07 GMT+03:00 Alex Soto :
> yes (LogFormat "%H %{SSL_SESSION_ID}e %h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b")
> note that in both cases %H is the same value. I think it is correct.
Agreed. HTTP/1.1 is correct her
gt; appears after some time again. So I think I am not changing the
> protocol
> >>> from https to http. In fact the browser complains about that the
> >>> certificate is homemade. So yes I think so.
> >>>
> >>> In first mail I sent the Docker projec
lordofthejars/apache-tomee-ssl just in case you
didn't
know it.
Also one thing I done was to inspect the debugging file of mod_jk and I
can
see the session id is not sent by mod_jk. But if it is because mod_jk
misses or not, I just don't know.
Alex, what I think that your tests show,
t changing the protocol
> > from https to http. In fact the browser complains about that the
> > certificate is homemade. So yes I think so.
> >
> > In first mail I sent the Docker project
> > https://github.com/lordofthejars/apache-tomee-ssl just in case you
> didn&#
https to http. In fact the browser complains about that the
certificate is homemade. So yes I think so.
In first mail I sent the Docker project
https://github.com/lordofthejars/apache-tomee-ssl just in case you didn't
know it.
Also one thing I done was to inspect the debugging file of mod_jk
fact the browser complains about that the
certificate is homemade. So yes I think so.
In first mail I sent the Docker project
https://github.com/lordofthejars/apache-tomee-ssl just in case you didn't
know it.
Also one thing I done was to inspect the debugging file of mod_jk and I can
see the se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Alex,
On 7/8/15 10:18 AM, Alex Soto wrote:
> I have tried what you mention. When SSL_Id is there both
> request.getAttribute("javax.servlet, ."); and
> request.getAttribute("SSL_SESSION_ID"); returns valid sslId and in
> the same way if one is
he way in which this should work. But
> Tomcat
> >> is open-source
> >> and free software, and its development and debugging benefit from the
> help
> >> of any
> >> benevolent user, particularly if that user is interested in solving a
> >>
r is interested in solving a
particular problem
that he is having.
El dt., 7 jul. 2015 a les 19:17, André Warnier () va
escriure:
Alex Soto wrote:
Thank you so much but it is already set.
https://github.com/lordofthejars/apache-tomee-ssl/blob/master/httpd.conf#L171
This is so strange.
But there i
; > escriure:
> >
> >> Alex Soto wrote:
> >>> Thank you so much but it is already set.
> >>>
> >>
> https://github.com/lordofthejars/apache-tomee-ssl/blob/master/httpd.conf#L171
> >>> This is so strange.
> >> But there is al
7 jul. 2015 a les 19:17, André Warnier () va
escriure:
Alex Soto wrote:
Thank you so much but it is already set.
https://github.com/lordofthejars/apache-tomee-ssl/blob/master/httpd.conf#L171
This is so strange.
But there is also this phrase : "In order to make SSL data availabl
gt; Thank you so much but it is already set.
> >
> https://github.com/lordofthejars/apache-tomee-ssl/blob/master/httpd.conf#L171
> > This is so strange.
>
> But there is also this phrase : "In order to make SSL data available for
> mod_jk in Apache,
> you need to set
Alex Soto wrote:
Thank you so much but it is already set.
https://github.com/lordofthejars/apache-tomee-ssl/blob/master/httpd.conf#L171
This is so strange.
But there is also this phrase : "In order to make SSL data available for mod_jk in Apache,
you need to set SSLOptions +StdEn
SSL Session ID is not passed to Tomcat. You can see the logs
> here
> >> https://gist.github.com/lordofthejars/226d8ed605f2a58b52f3 (I have
> created
> >> a gist to not add here a lot of lines).
> >>
> >> Now the question is is it happens because of
mod_jk or because of Apache?
Alex.
OK. You've reached the limits of my conform zone. You need someone more
familiar with the httpd side of things at this point. Rainer?
Mark
Not Rainer, but maybe this helps :
http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/reference/apache.html
Look for "Jk
On 07/07/2015 09:28, Alex Soto wrote:
> Hi Mark, SSL Session ID is not passed to Tomcat. You can see the logs here
> https://gist.github.com/lordofthejars/226d8ed605f2a58b52f3 (I have created
> a gist to not add here a lot of lines).
>
> Now the question is is it happens becau
Hi Mark, SSL Session ID is not passed to Tomcat. You can see the logs here
https://gist.github.com/lordofthejars/226d8ed605f2a58b52f3 (I have created
a gist to not add here a lot of lines).
Now the question is is it happens because of mod_jk or because of Apache?
Alex.
El dl., 6 jul. 2015 a les
201 - 300 of 4408 matches
Mail list logo
