On Oct 31, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Christopher Ivanyi wrote:
My question to you -- my challenge to you would be, to stop vlogging
altogether. If you don't need an audience, and you vlog in order
achieve the pleasure of having done them, and you don't need the
validation of an audience -- then just
Verdi wrote:
On Oct 31, 2005, at 5:55 PM, Christopher Ivanyi wrote:
My question to you -- my challenge to you would be, to stop vlogging
altogether. If you don't need an audience, and you vlog in order
achieve the pleasure of having done them, and you don't need the
validation of an audience
Hey Michael:
There are no words to describe how much I respect, and admire what you have done, and what you are doing. Thanks for your words and deeds. I hope to meet you some day, and shake your hand.
Christopher Ivanyi
SPONSORED LINKS
Christopher Ivanyi wrote:
I think alot of vloggers are absolutely fooling themselves! Every
vlogger wants/needs an audience - that's the absolute truth. But
here's the trick. When that someone gets their audience, there is
this ineffable something that creeps into the pyche -- the desire to
the beauty ofvideoblogging is that it doesnt HAVE to matter - Steve said
I agree that it doesn't HAVE to matter, but, speaking personally, I feel that great pangs when my qualitative audience diminishes, and exhiliration whenitincreases. I have in the past easily been able to ignore the
I just wanted to add one clarification ... un-themed real life content is often very popular in main stream media ...
... first of all start with sitcoms (which are most traditionally about
the everyday lives of white males, though now often about other
ethnic/gender groups), but all about
On Oct 31, 2005, at 12:20 PM, Christopher Ivanyi wrote:
But honestly, I could never ever put up a video, if I knew no one
would watch it -- that would be an excercise in futility?
Interesting. I don't feel that way though. I believe that there are
many things in this world that can be
Monday, October 31, 2005, 6:20:35 PM, Christopher Ivanyi wrote:
But honestly, I could never ever put up a video, if I knew no one
would watch it -- that would be an excercise in futility?
I can understand how you would feel like that, but can you explain how
it could even be possible to know
Frank Carver wrote:
And I truly
believe that almost everyone would want to have as large an audience as
possible, I know I would.
Honestly I don't want that.
What I want is an audience that is as interested and involved as
possible. I'd much rather connect with ten new
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Ivanyi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the beauty of
videoblogging is that it doesnt HAVE to matter - Steve said
I agree that it doesn't HAVE to matter, but, speaking personally,
I feel
that great pangs when my qualitative audience diminishes, and
On Oct 26, 2005, at 12:54 PM, LeanBackVids.com wrote:
As you can tell, this is something I get fired up about. It is my
opinion that theme-based vlogs will thrive while personal vlogs will
generally be reserved for friends/family.
It's seems to me what your not saying in this statement is
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's seems to me what your not saying in this statement is that it's
somehow better to have a theme-based vlog, ie they thrive while
personal vlog will be reserved. I think the whole point about
videoblogging is that
On Oct 27, 2005, at 10:33 AM, LeanBackVids.com wrote:
What type of site is most likely to gain more readers (aka be more
popular)? In my opinion, that would be themed content because a a
particular subject will relate to more people than an individual.
I think you're right about that.
in my case, perhaps
more than a couple times ;)
--
Dave McClure
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.simplyhired.com
www.simplyFIRED.com
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com on behalf of
VerdiSent: Thu 10/27/2005 8:48 AMTo:
videoblogging@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: top
feedburner vlog
Id agree but modify that sentiment slightly. Rather than saying that
none of it matters and is besides the point, the beauty of
videoblogging is that it doesnt HAVE to matter. Having not so many
viewers is no longer a barrier to publishing stuff, the economies of
scale dont break and are somewhat
Sent: Thu 10/27/2005 8:48 AMTo: videoblogging@yahoogroups.comSubject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: top feedburner vlogs.. steve garfield gets bumped by the boob On Oct 27, 2005, at 10:33 AM, LeanBackVids.com wrote: What type of site is most likely to gain more readers (aka be more "popular")? In
Oh the longtail.The way I see it, it is not particularly the themed
content that will bring in the masses but the fact that this so called
popular themed content is centered around a very specific audience:
internet geeks out there. Ok lets see here...Rocketboom has a wide
variety of topics
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tell you
that if i had themed content specifically centered around Grand Rapids,
Backpacking, Geocaching, or folk music, I would not be appealing to the
majority of the internet crowd that makes up our viewership. Sure
As you can tell, this is something I get fired
up about. It is my
opinion that theme-based vlogs will thrive
while personal vlogs will
generally be reserved for friends/family.
My though on Themed Content Vlogs -VS- Personal
Content Vlogs is that both will Thrive depending on
which side of
On 10/27/05, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The final
example that we brought up is the KItkastum SEXwhat does the
internet revolve around? SEX. I tell you that if i had themed content
specifically centered around Grand Rapids, Backpacking, Geocaching, or
folk music, I would not be
Well I can't stress enough that 400 readers is not that many.
There are more than 400 people out there who want sex news. In
addition, there is probably that many people interested in any given
topic, however, there may not be that many people who want to watch a
video about a single
21 matches
Mail list logo
