I say that what happens in stars reflects the environment in stars. All bets
are off IMHO when it comes to engineered resonant force fields, for example
magnetic force fields, that can facilitate nuclear transformations in coherent
engineered systems unlike what occur in a star.
Bob Cook
Axil—
I agree with your notion of current science. IMHO what’s happening (slowly) to
physics and chemistry and the other sciences is a gradual change in the
scientific community to accepting facts instead of hiding their head in dogma
and more myths because of the lack good solid facts, often
Jones stated:
“I am not sure what he hope (sic) to gain by these endless and inane pro-Rossi
postings - but it is not respect for his technical ability. Apparently, since
Rossi has made a fool out of him, he wishes to share the blame, instead of
admitting his gullibility.”
I concluded some tim
Bob—
Mills and Rossi do not hold a candle to the hype made by the hot fusion
community over the years and the golden eggs they have accumulated.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Bob Higgins
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2017 9:16 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Should Mills
Jones—
You note regarding the Lugano test and Higgins assessment the following:
“The systemic optical false assumptions have rendered any further conclusion
unscientific. Levi was reportedly paid an enormous amount of money by Elforsk
and yet made stupid errors, notably failing to use high temp
Jones—
I assume you lump Rossi’s one-month Lugano test in with your definition of
scam-built “half-truths” tests.
We will see.
Bob Cook.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2017 6:49 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Should Mills and Rossi be l
Adrian—
I thought the very same thing.
The established physics community ignores logic that would upset their
apple cart with their rotting apples, and a growing hoard of golden eggs.
In this regard IMHO Mills and Rossi should be lumped together. However, their
new breed of geese, may be lay
Is it well known based on real data that the charge of the electron remains
constant at short distances from another charge-- positive or negative?
An interesting recent paper addresses this question.
“ Understanding the discrete nature of angular momentum of electron in hydrogen
atom with (3G,
The Quark-x temperatures are much higher. However, I do not believe there is a
true plasma. Cooling would be to great with the Li vapor around. I would say
small drops of Ni may be present with a structure that still could promote
LENR, assuming the drops have the correct fuel to support a n
VORTS—
Finally a theory coupling electron orbital energy states with nuclear energy
states involving magnetic fields and isotopic shifts to lower potential energy.
It fits the LENR multibody reaction model and explains the lack of energetic
particles associated with two- body nuclear reactio
Jones—
I agree with your sentiments about windows-10. It’s a nightmare compared to
Vista, for example.
In the future I will look for greener grass and a user friendly operating
system—probably Apple.
Bob Cook
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 2:07 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.c
John---
I actually consider there is no such thing as a supernatural phenomena. All
phenomena happen as a result of the “laws of nature,” otherwise known as the
doctrine of pantheism.
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: John Shop
Sent: Friday, M
The quote you note is NOT MINE!
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 7:05 AM
To: Vortex
Subject: Re: [Vo]:12 years from now
wrote:
“I don't think machines will be able to duplicate what a bird brain can do, any
time, ever. Machines which we
“I don't think machines will be able to duplicate what a bird brain can do, any
time, ever. Machines which we can invent are things that we can understand
almost completely. However consciousness, even animal consciousness, is
something we will never understand sufficiently to create it, becau
Eric—
I would agree that Ni-56 could be a transition result, except it was not
reported by the Indians.
Furthermore other transitions may occur without electric force fields ejecting
charged entities from the coherent system. 3 virtual muons may fuse to a
proton or a neutron during the tr
Fusion of 2 Si-28 to Fe 56 produces about 18 Mev excess mass energy, or about 1
muon mass for for 18 fusion transitions. Muons that were to carry away mass
may not be noticed.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: H LV
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 4:06 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sub
The issue of the Coulomb barrier being a concern in transitions of a coherent
system makes no sense IMHO. Two-body interactions yes, but for a many bodied
entangled systems no.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 8:19 PM
To: vortex-l
The mass differential between 2 Si-28 (27.9769) and Fe-56 at a.m. of 55.93494
is not very much. It may be that Si fusion is involved in the Indian steel
plant.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2017 8:35 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [
Eric—
One must look at all the mass involved, not just the Fe. Oxides and carbon
mass may also be involved.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Eric Walker
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2017 2:04 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20
Sent from my iPhone
On Ma
The trueism suggested is based on two- bodied interactions where large energy
releases are the norm.
It is obvious that6 that “trueidm” does not appl,y to LENR.
Small changes within a many-bodied coherent system are the LENR norm.
Many different nuclear changes apparently become possible wi
4 tons of carbon electrodes would be a production problem. Plus the resulting
steel would have strange specifications—welding may be impossible—
Bob cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2017 11:44 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Sleeper fro
Jones—
You mention a dense hydrogen isomer. What do you mean? Hydrogen metal with
all nuclei having the same spin direction? Are you suggesting a dense
molecular hydrogen?
BOB COOK
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 12:35 PM
To: Vortex List
Subject: [Vo]:Mayer, Mills and hop
In addition the new order remains, since it is embodied in stable nuclear
order. Each nuclear transition produces cooling –less phonic energy of the
coherent system.
Bob Cook
From: bobcook39...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 3:56 AM
To: Brian Ahern; VORTEX; Jones Beene; Jean-Francoi
A change in entropy (decrease) as measured by order of the various coherent
nano systems would produce cooling of the aggregate system of nano particles.
Bob Cook
From: Brian Ahern
Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 3:04 AM
To: VORTEX; Jones Beene; Jean-Francois Leitner; jeff driscoll; Robert Yahn;
Brian—
You need a sensitive gauss meter—one with a volts output to use the OS to
monitor changes with an integrating function—maybe a software package The
fastest response you can afford .
A software that allows construction of magnetic fields, both H and B fields
will be necessary. I would
Dave-
The “snap” you identify may be nothing more than a coherent system “phase
change” nuclear potential energy to lattice electron mechanical energy.
It would be interesting to calculate or measure the increase in the magnetic
system energy and compare to potential nuclear spin energy tran
As more and more fuel elements fail with sea water cooling, an increase in
monitored radiations levels could be expected. It would be helpful to know
which isotopes make up the monitored levels.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 11:00 A
bRIAN---
You may wantg to contact UCAR, who seems to have a good knowledge of magnetics
regarding reverse engineering the Manelaes device. Trace elements may be an
important ingredient which will be hard to detect without destructive
examination.
Gadolinium is used in MRI (nuclear magnetic
Jones—
I’m glad you are relatively civil regarding our good brethren of the scientific
cloth. I trust they are familiar with Dr R Mill GUTCP.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 5:10 PM
To: Vortex List
Subject: [Vo]:Dark matter discovered
Axil—
IMHO you have finally got the picture at least with respect to LENR.
Bob Cook
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2017 3:47 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DESCRIBING THE MANELAS Phenomenon
Whenever we can get the spin of an atom to move: whenever we can get a spin to
lose O
If the nuclear potential energy source is tapped, then that would greatly
supplement the latent heat which is the phonic energy you note.
Bob
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Chris Zell
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 11:55 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK
Chris-
I have understood that phonons are “virtual” particles that represent a
localized energy in a crystal lattice made up of kinetic energy and potential
energy in a resonant stable dynamic state. It is primarily thought to be an
electric field that couples the nuclei and electrons in the l
Brian—
I also thought there might be a connection between the Manelas device and
Dragone theory. Again the possibility of reversal of the 2nd Law of T/D is
very interesting.
One thought I had was the orbital spin quanta are involved since in a coherent
system they are limited to changing on
Jones—
I have concluded that Jed frequently draws conclusions that IMHO are not
logical. The one you point is one I decided not to even address, since I
thought it was obvious to most.
Bob Cook
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2017 7:50 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo
The beta from Ni-63 is WITHOUT a gamma. Its energy is 0.0669 Mev, not very
penetrating and could be missed. It has a half life of 101 years, not the 3
months that Jones reported.
It’s a byproduct of common fission reactors, primarily from the activation of
Ni-62 found in reactor components
Jones-
The article notes that centrifuges will be used to enrich “Ni-62” not Ni-63?
That may be correct, since Ni-62 is what is used for LENR.
Bob Cook
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2017 8:29 AM
To: Vortex List
Subject: [Vo]:Nickel isotopes, cat-mouse and Russia
Interesting art
Higgins—
Consistent with my previous comments regarding the IH/Rossi contract, and
with respect to Jed’s recent comment: ”You have to be a PHOSITA to replicate.
Who that would be and what they have to know is often disputed. It is possible
the I.H. people are not PHOSITA enough….”, I consider
Dragone discussed the idea of decreasing entropy (increasing order of matter)
as a an effect of the magnetic device he described. That may include better
nuclear order.
Another interesting item is the assessment of the Dragone document.
http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Research/DragoneA
Jones—
I also have thought that Cooper pairs of protons, acting as a bose particle
with 2 electrons (neutral), may be involved in LENR. That was my original
thought in 1989 with respect to the Pd face-center lattice and high magnetic
susceptibility.
It would to know if the potential energy
Here is a reflection on the history of the Manelas device.
The following link is my source:
http://atlantisrisingmagazine.com/article/tiny-tornadoes-of-magnetism-keys-to-free-energy/
This history smacks of a dark (classified) program established in the 60’s
regarding the strontium ferrite tec
Brian—
The cooling effect is unexpected. It seems that it may be a reversal of the
2nd Law of T/D—a decrease in entropy instead of an increase.
Do you know what the thermal conductivity is? I would guess it may be very
low, similar to the electrical conductivity.
Also is there an open ci
Brian—
Thanks for those very pertinent references .
The LENR dots are coming together I think; maybe coupled by magnetism?
Bob
From: Brian Ahern
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 3:28 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Regarding what BOB COOK THINKS ABOUT THE NAE
The Manelas billet i
Roibin—
I agree that dimensionless constants are ok. I stand corrected.
Bob cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: H LV
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 7:13 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tresino, EZBW, Barut, h and bound state of spinning magnets
On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 8
The Frederick J. Mayer/ John R. Reitz paper references R Mills work from 1991.
The ideas sound much like Randy’s conclusions stemming from his GUTCP.
Interesting.
The reference made by U Car ( https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.01880 ) to a paper
stemming from work in 1991 also reflects simplificat
The following link has an instructive discussion of the various scales,
including the Compton scale which Jones has identified.
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/lengths.html
Bob Cook
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 9:40 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Tresino, EZ
Maybe we are seeing the beginning of the explanation of many of the so called
constants found in physical theories. For example, might not an electron’s
charge be explained as a tightly curled magnetic field disturbance with small
dimensions in the realm of the Planck scale?
Constants in the
The 1-D nature of strong magnetic fields IMHO is what increases the odds of
resonant coupling among particles with a magnetic moment. I can imagine that
this coupling would also work to couple with the magnetic dipole entities
making up nuclei, whether these entities are quarks per the standa
Dave—
I think the reaction time for the mechanism you suggest if too long to explain
the results of the “run-away” phenomena. It seems to me that an entire
coherent system must change in a very short instant with the appearance of
phonic energy (high orbital valence electron spin) evenly
Axil—
A 20 nanometer particle would include a million or more atoms, plenty to create
a lattice that could vibrate with addition of heat. In other words the atoms
do not stay in one position but move rhythmically about a point in the lattice.
The electronic bonding within the crystal lattice
Jones –
Good questions and fair to midland conclusions.
What was the nature of the reactants in each of the run-away reactions?
--Pd-D, Ni-H, Li involved, Ti involved etc?
Was the size of the likely coherent system in the various cases limited?
Were sharply peaking resonance conditions like
Funny—I thought Axil’s rating was i^2.
Bob Cook
From: Brian Ahern
Sent: Thursday, February 9, 2017 5:58 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A LENR molten salt LENR fission reactor.
I cannot believe it. You are quoting Rossi and his fictional Quark X!
Your credibility rating must include i for an
Jones—
I too reviewed the SRI report. The first thing I looked for was a relief valve.
There was none. As you point a poor design.
The report was not very positive about the cause of the explosion. I concluded
the SRI report indicated they did not know the cause with certainty.
Bob Cook
It seems that large energy releases that even kill folks are not very good
proof of LENR. So sad. Sloppy records maybe are to blame.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Monday, February 6, 2017 6:04 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nickel powder size is important
Jo
Jones—
Melting the SS vessel may have been pretty good proof, but as I recall when
P&F’s experiment melted the concrete floor it did not cut any ice with the DOE
folks as far as their disbelief was expressed—so sad.
Bob Cook
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Monday, February 6, 2017 1:35 PM
To: vortex-l
The following link:
https://phys.org/news/2016-12-laser-pulses-scientists-complex-electron.html#jCp
discusses a phenomena that involves resonances and large electronic energy
changes that may relate to nuclear-electronic coupling discussed in this thread.
Bob Cook
From: bobcook39...@gmail.co
Jones—
Not finding data in the open IMHO means it is classified or being held close by
a few people.
I find it hard to believe the USA atomic power laboratories like Bettis and
KAPL with lots for fancy instruments and funds for research have not
investigated the Mizuno work.
The large
Some folks think another type of “superconductivity” may occur involving the
motion of positive holes in an electric field as opposed to the motion of
electrons with mass and other particle characteristics.
Bob Cook
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2017 6:35 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject:
Eric—
I have reviewed the entire Agreement and Amendments between Rossi etal. and IH
etal.
The definition of E-Cat IP at paragraph 16.1 and the listing of E-Cat IP in the
Exhibit A make it clear that IP does not include intangibles. Only documents,
records and other forms of documented data a
Back to significant speculation..
There are many other isotopes with above non- 0 nuclear magnetic moments.
Most if not all have quasi stable states with differing spin and angular
momentum. The local B magnetic field affecting such an isotope modifies those
states and will cause an alig
Higgins--
A key question is what constitutes “Intellectual Property” legally. The IP
identified in the contract did not spell out the “art” of operating a plant
built in accordance with the design described in the patent and the other
documents listed in the contract that were transferred to
Jones—
I smiled at your conjectures about Rossi: his reasons to sue, his perceived
problems with IH/Cherokee, his greed for a bigger share, his probable belief of
IH deep pockets.
You could provide a popular sequel to Sherlock.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Jones Beene
Se
Adrian—
I got your point the first time. I came to the same conclusion nearly 1 year
ago upon Rossi’s filing his complaint in court and as more lawyers came to
Rossi’s legal team.
Fraudsters do not file complaints against those they defraud!
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: a.
I do not recall that the IH/Rossi contract says anything about the nature of a
customer being a manufacturer. The customer may have only been an energy sink,
a steam condenser for example.
The objective of the test was to produce energy for 350 days out of a year.
I’ll review the contract
Adrian—
IMHO if anyone is blundering its IH. They way under estimate Rossi’s resolve
and intelligence, not even considering his lawyers input and their incentives.
I agree with your conclusions.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: a.ashfield
Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2017 9:10
Higgins’s question about the schematic plan of the plant should settle
everything.
Normally a system producing steam as the heat transfer agent will have a
condenser with a condensate pump in the sump of the condenser. There is a
negative pressure—not a back pressure as Jed has suggested.
The enthalpy calculations of Ahern do not appear to account for the change of
the phase of water to steam at about 100 C. This is about 540 calories per
gram and should add to the heating of the liquid phase over about 30 C.
This amounts to 540 /30 or about 1800% additional enthalpy—joules
Axil—
What is the nature of the fission energy released by Thorium fission reactions?
Normal energy is gamma and highly energetic fission debris. What is the
coupling mechanism you think occurs to transfer this energy to the SPP’s?
Bob Cook
FRom: Axil Axil
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2017 2:
Criticality based on fast neutrons in regular fission reactors is a bad
accident, and it has happened many times—killing workers in some cases.
I would guess that any fission reaction could release fast neutrons. However,
I may be wrong and would like to review the data on fission cross sect
Jones—
That INEA report from 1980 is a gold mine of data and many interesting ideas
about the mechanics of various nuclear reactions. It does NOT say a word
about quarks even though the idea of quarks was popularized in the early
1970’s.
Good work.
Bob Cook
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Th
Jones—
You note: “The aim of any alternative energy effort is generally this - go
small, go simple and go cheap - forget the large expensive grid plant and find
solutions for small scale implementation.”
Not to be critical, but you sound like a progressive with the design objectives
you identi
Robin—
You note: "Runaway" not possible, because the fuel isn't fissile anyway. You
also say: 14 MeV neutrons are more than fast enough to fission Th (or any
Actinide for that matter, including U238) directly without
conversion to a fissile isotope.
These two comments seem to contradict eac
Jones –
I My earlier answer to your comment about Thorium fission, I thought you were
suggesting fissioning by neutrons.In reading your earlier comment on the
Holmild process I realize you meant muon induced fission of Th-232.
I agree with you that would be possible, but it would create a
Jones—
What isotope of thorium is it that you believe could replace U as a target for
energy production?
I do not think there are any naturally occurring Th isotopes that fission.
The closest reaction is a thorium-232 transmutation by a thermal neutron to
U-233, which does fission.
In
Holmild’s laser source description does not indicated a chirped laser source
IMHO.
Axil—What do yo mean by “carrier material”?
As Axil has pointed out, the experimental process would not seem to produce
much plasma, if any, and I doubt a plasma would support the surface reaction
Holmild sug
I agree with Axil’s comments about micro and nano domains. However I would add
that the domains are what I call coherent QM systems that can initiate the
change of nuclear potential energy/angular momentum to phonic lattice
vibrations (thermal energy) of the coherent QM system with minor modif
I would question why a neutral KAON CAN NOT DECAY INTO 2 NEUTRAL MUONS? IF THE
DATA ON NORMAL KAON DECAY IS FROM HIGH ENERGY 2-BODY REACTIONS, THEN RESONANT
STIMULATION OF D AND P BY EM MAY RESULT IN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT RESULTS
STATISTICALLY—I.E., 2 NEUTRAL KAONS INSTEAD OF A + AND – PAIR BEING
Eric---
You would think so that the high energy folks at CERN would comment, unless
they are concerned about their future at CERN.
I would pick others to give reputable reports on muons.
I would look to the comments of retired high energy physicists that worked on
the super collider in Texas
Eric--
In other words. DOA, dead on arrival…
Bob Cook
From: Eric Walker
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 9:44 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.
Has Holmlid enlisted outside help in characterizing these charged and neutral
radiations in this latest paper? I'v
IMHO the Holmild reactiom is not LENR—LOW energy nuclear reaction nor a LATTICE
assisted nuclear reaction. The high energy particles belie LENR.
The key question is: “HOW DO ALL THE NEUTRAL PARTICLES GET THEIR SIGNIFICANT
ENERGY”.
It seems from Holmild’s description of the experiment that
Does anyone understand how 75% of the particles produced are neutral with
significant kinetic energy? It would seem that the neutral particles must come
from decay of another particle with significant kinetic energy to start with,
and that the neutral particle shares some of that energy and mom
If the muons are charged, they can be focused and polarized in a magnetic
field. Hence they can be made to react more readily with polarized electrons
in a lattice and their energy harvested in a cylindrical catching device.
ARE THE MUONS NEUTRAL OR CHARGED that Holmlid claims?
Bob Cook
Vorts—
Rossi seemed to like an item about WHIMPS brought to his attention on his blog.
It seems WHIMP advocates are having a hard time finding any.
The Sci Am editor seems to think dark matter theories may entail “fringe
science”. Maybe hydrinos?
Mills claims to have some data that are c
Robin—
I think it’s a mistake to consider a coherent system with target nuclei.
Target nuclei make sense in two or three body reactions, but not in a solid
state coherent system with many bodies coupled together with a single energy
and spin state at any given instant.
Bob Cook
Sent from
There’s only one miracle.That is a many-bodied reaction with no kinetic
energy to conserve—only spin and potential energy and angular momentum—not
really a miracle.
Bob Cook
From: Russ George
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 6:11 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Speaking of Two M
Russ—
You say “data speak to me”. I agree with that idea. The high energy electron
scattering experiments on protons and neutrons that W. Stubbs has evaluated
are pretty good evidence for constituents of those particles not being primary
particles of fractional charges, quarks. I have bee
I wonder if Ni Nano particles are involved? Is there a patent in the USA for
the IPB HHT?
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2017 1:29 PM
To: Vortex
Subject: [Vo]:Brillouin Energy press release
See:
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.ph
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LochakGlowenergyn.pdf
This report addresses Higgins comment regarding the #1 issue. It would appear
neutrons are not involved in the LENR reactions reported using Ti foils. See
the discussion on page 7&8 of the report.
Russ- That was a good find.
Bob Cook
Fro
Higgins—
If neutrons are involved in making fissile isotopes, I would imagine that it
may be tough to keep the newly created fissile material from fissionning right
after its creation.
I can imagine metastable isomers having a role.
Bob
From: Bob Higgins
Sent: Wednesday, January 4, 2017 10:4
I can guess a large coherent—QM entangled—system could host a large reaction
throughout that system, but not beyond it boundaries. Beyond the initial
coherent system would have to be other coherent systems which would require
resonant conditions, possibly provided by the thermal pulse or othe
The concept of temperature is a classical physics concept as far as I know.
This reflects my own brain dribbles. I try to avoid brain dribbles about
zero-point energy being the result of Heisenberg’s brain dribbles spun as
principle.
Bob Cook
From: Brian Ahern
Sent: Wednesday, January
Stephen—
Cold has to due with temperature. Thus, you must have a careful, precise
definition of temperature to understand what you are asking.
There is a lowest temperature called absolute zero. It refers to a
hypothetical condition of a closed 3-D space system where there is no motion
betwe
Axil--
Unless the Atomic Energy Act changes or is supplemented by a different act
controlling LENR, regulation will be accomplished by the various states,
consistent with new health and safety laws.
Or LENR my come to be regulated by ordinances like electricity, plumbing and
heating in a h
George Egely’s item on transmutation by dust fusion reported sulfur from oxygen
maybe. See the current issue of Infinite Energy. A plasma is involved in the
phenomena.
Bob Cook
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Monday, January 2, 2017 7:16 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: Gaslighting
Axil—
You sound like a fear monger. I don’t think the Sun Cell makes muons.
Try heavy-heavy water (hydrino type water)or merely gastro intestinal blockage.
That will get the attention of the old folks.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Monday, January 2, 2017
Axil—
It is more likely muon catalyzed fusion of two oxygen nuclei—the appearance of
sulfur that is. Or it may be a low output Sun Cell with hydrino’s clouding the
water and eventually settling out.
Bob Cook
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Sunday, January 1, 2017 10:21 PM
Axil and Mark—
I do not believe superconductivity as such is important in LENR. As you and
others have suggested the importance of the generation of plasmons SPP’s with
their intense local B magnetic fields is the key effect IMHO. The resonant
coupling created by the varying B field at the
Another interesting item from 2 years ago regarding NUCLEAR SPIN coupling in a
small group of coherent atoms can be found here:
http://phys.org/news/2014-08-evidence-symmetry-atoms.html
I have long considered that the synchronization of electronic spin states with
the nuclear states is necess
A related question regarding frequency shifts of photons is associated with the
apparent changes associated with the expansion of space and the emission of
photons from distant objects receding at a great velocity from a
receptor/monitor on earth.
The explanation I have heard is that it’s li
The neutron decays as we all know….to 2/3 of a proton and a “W-“ which in, turn
quickly changes to an electron, a full proton and a anti neutrino—Standard
Theory--think. It’s the “W-“ that only exists virtually for 10e-27 seconds!
That’s enough time to allow it to get away from the proton in
Adrian--
IMHO the devil is in the DETAILS.
Bob Cook
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 8:14 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov presentation translated into English
a.ashfield wrote:
I find it strange that you didn't know there were 2 MW of reactors in the pla
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo