thomas malloy wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 17, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
> I think you missed my point. If you don't want something public then
> don't make it so yourself.
Actually it appears you did miss something. If you are so concerned
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 17, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
> I think you missed my point. If you don't want something public then
> don't make it so yourself.
Actually it appears you did miss something. If you are so concerned
and you want your addr
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Lowrance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Banned from Steorn
> OrionWorks wrote:
> > Paul,
> >
> > ...whose email address is clearly displayed in all my vortex-l
> > messag
aul Lowrance"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Banned from Steorn
OrionWorks wrote:
Paul,
...whose email address is clearly displayed in all my vortex-l
Try this logic --> By my choice I submit to Vortex-l. Dr. Mike has not submitted
his email to this
OrionWorks wrote:
> Paul,
>
> ...whose email address is clearly displayed in all my vortex-l
> messages every-single-time as: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Try this logic --> By my choice I submit to Vortex-l. Dr. Mike has not submitted
his email to this list. People should not submit another persons ema
Paul,
...whose email address is clearly displayed in all my vortex-l
messages every-single-time as: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
For someone who claims he is in pursuit of the "truth", that his
motivations are driven by pure logic I find it incredibly
contradictory for you to express the amount of LOLing
Horace Heffner wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
>
>> Horace Heffner wrote:
>>
>> > I think you missed my point. If you don't want something public then
>> > don't make it so yourself.
>>
>>
>> I didn't miss anything. The moral of this story --> There will always
>> be
On Jul 17, 2007, at 5:38 PM, R.C.Macaulay wrote:
We can be civil and respectful in our decorum or we can degrade
each other . The VortexL group has a persona of it's own. Unique in
that there is little profanity or demeaning of one another.
Three levels of conversation.. low is talking about
On Jul 17, 2007, at 3:54 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
> I think you missed my point. If you don't want something public
then
> don't make it so yourself.
I didn't miss anything. The moral of this story --> There will
always be mindless jerk who doesn't give a rats a**
We can be civil and respectful in our decorum or we can degrade each other .
The VortexL group has a persona of it's own. Unique in that there is little
profanity or demeaning of one another.
Three levels of conversation.. low is talking about oneself, next is talking
about somebody else. High i
Horace Heffner wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I have no idea how many spammers are subscribed to this list, but I
>> don't see Dr Mike here.
>>
>> Again you're missing the point. We're trying to deter spam. Google and
>> other friendly sites spend a lot of
On Jul 17, 2007, at 2:41 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
I have no idea how many spammers are subscribed to this list, but I
don't see Dr Mike here.
Again you're missing the point. We're trying to deter spam. Google
and other friendly sites spend a lot of money trying to deter
spammers.
I
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 17, 2007, at 1:43 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 17, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
My email address is publish -->
http://energymover.googlepages.com/
Yet it's in javascript to prevent spiders, but I certainly do *not*
want peo
On Jul 17, 2007, at 1:43 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 17, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
My email address is publish -->
http://energymover.googlepages.com/
Yet it's in javascript to prevent spiders, but I certainly do
*not* want people blasting my email
Paul Lowrance wrote:
There are indeed sites that post your email address, which is why I try
my best to maintain minimum posting at such sites.
As stated, there are sites that have poor educate. Generally smaller sites who
can't afford to program proper anti-spam server code. Google is a pri
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jul 17, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
My email address is publish -->
http://energymover.googlepages.com/
Yet it's in javascript to prevent spiders, but I certainly do *not*
want people blasting my email address all over the Internet. If one
must pass it
On Jul 17, 2007, at 1:09 PM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
My email address is publish -->
http://energymover.googlepages.com/
Yet it's in javascript to prevent spiders, but I certainly do *not*
want people blasting my email address all over the Internet. If one
must pass it on, then *please* do
Horace Heffner wrote:
>
> On Jul 17, 2007, at 6:59 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
>
>> Exactly. Post his profile url, silly. People have no business posting
>> his email & phone # until you get his permission, period. That's
>> common Internet educate. If Dr. Mike wants to remove his email from
>> the I
On Jul 17, 2007, at 6:17 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
... and I'll add that a persons email and phone # should *not* be
published on the Internet without his or her permission. I'm still
a little appalled that someone at Vo publishing Dr. Mike's email &
phone #.
It was published on his web
On Jul 17, 2007, at 6:59 AM, Paul Lowrance wrote:
Exactly. Post his profile url, silly. People have no business
posting his email & phone # until you get his permission, period.
That's common Internet educate. If Dr. Mike wants to remove his
email from the Internet then he merely needs to
Exactly. Post his profile url, silly. People have no business posting his email
& phone # until you get his permission, period. That's common Internet educate.
If Dr. Mike wants to remove his email from the Internet then he merely needs to
delete it from his profile. How's he going to remove it
Dr. Mike's email is posted in his profile on Steorn. Marissa is
listed as an experimentalist on Earthtech's web site:
http://earthtech.org/principals/index.html
Youse guys are being silly.
Curmudgeon
On 7/17/07, Paul Lowrance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... and I'll add that a persons email a
... and I'll add that a persons email and phone # should *not* be published on
the Internet without his or her permission. I'm still a little appalled that
someone at Vo publishing Dr. Mike's email & phone #.
R.C.Macaulay wrote:
As an internet group that is widely read we should refrain from
- Original Message -
From: "R.C.Macaulay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 2:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Banned from Steorn
> As an internet group that is widely read we should refrain from mentioning
> someone's daughter by name.
July 17, 2007 6:24 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Banned from Steorn
Me, courteous? I have earned the right to be a curmudgeon.
On 7/17/07, Zachary Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll make an admittedly off-topic statement when I say that, as with
your need to label Marissa a "littl
Me, courteous? I have earned the right to be a curmudgeon.
On 7/17/07, Zachary Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'll make an admittedly off-topic statement when I say that, as with
your need to label Marissa a "little girl," you seem to have been
rabble-rousing. (you even went out of your
I'll make an admittedly off-topic statement when I say that, as with
your need to label Marissa a "little girl," you seem to have been
rabble-rousing. (you even went out of your way, because the
alliteration of "Little's little" is just terrible) Perhaps we can
keep this on-topic by notin
- Original Message -
From: "Terry Blanton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 4:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Banned from Steorn
>I identified one of the scientists as Scott Little's little girl,
> Marissa.
If you mean one of the 12 in the jury,
I identified one of the scientists as Scott Little's little girl,
Marissa. Some igit who thinks he's protecting some secret banned me
for commenting on the fact that one can discern interesting facts from
those threads deleted and people banned.
I was instantly reinstated; so, it was a ego trip
Terry,
What's this all about? If there was a prior related thread, I missed it.
thx
s
Subject:re; Banned
Hi Terry
I didn't want to have to ban you ( I don't like doing that), but you
need to understand that if you start up about all the stuff that is
moderated, you will end up causin
ROFL, here is the "official's" statement:
Date:Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:17:34 -0300
From: "Magnatrix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Add to Address BookAdd to
Address Book Add Mobile Alert
Yahoo! DomainKeys has confirmed that this message was sent by
gmail.com. Learn more
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
Simply for identifying the mysterious Marissa:
http://eyres.home.texas.net/bios/Marissa.htm
I also commented to the fact that they were giving away much
information simply by the threads which they deleted.
Something smells in Ireland.
Terry
32 matches
Mail list logo
