Ed's theory requires peer review. The soliton theory of LENR is
incompatible with Ed's theory as it stands now but with a little adjustment
Ed could be promulgating the correct LENR doctrinaire. Ed is a prominent
voice in the LENR community, if Ed can be converted to the truth, then
others may
but from my perspective, you always seem to think there is only one way
of perceiving/interpreting the evidence.
Most LENR theories are based on emergent LENR phenomena that exist far
above the primary causation. The Root cause of LENR is a single all
encompassing mechanism. The many cause
Axil -- You're all over the place. Seriously. Ed's theory has been
peer-reviewed by JCMNS, Infinite Energy, and he submitted/presented a white
paper at ICCF-18. I'd need a much clearer definition of what the soliton
theory of LENR is before I trust that could disprove anything. Do you
actually
*Seriously. Ed's theory has been peer-reviewed by JCMNS, Infinite Energy,
and he submitted/presented a white paper at ICCF-18.*
Herein lies the problem with the LENR community. It is mired in the
misconceptions of the deuterium/palladium history of LENR that has
developed over the last 25 year,
Axil -- Yes, I know you have an axe to grind with Ed. That was my point.
It's really quite amazing how you can call out Storms' theory for not
being peer-reviewed (even though it has been several times as I pointed
out) and not see the irony. When can we here on vortex expect a draft of
your white
This is great. Note the accumulated charge of pure, life-enhancing energy
... [radiated] into the environment along a plane perpendicular to the
direction of flow.
Vortex is the wacky overunity devices study group. I did not expect such
things to become a personal hobby, or to take such
Eric -- That Schauberger diagram link is a visual and intellectual feast as
far as I'm concerned. That quote you pulled from it is sort of my
case-in-point for why I used the analogy. If nanomagnetic vortices, induced
by non-linear collective modes, are transducing or transforming vacuum
And I think the quote along a plane perpendicular to the direction of flow
is relevant. I believe this coincides with, say, Moray King's hypothesis
of a orthogonal flux of the vacuum energy. Eric Dollard uses almost the
exact same terminology in describing his complex (i.e. part imaginary)
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:28 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I am anonymous and as such I avoid the complications and the pitfalls of
ego and reputation. Whatever Ed says about me does not stick.
Perhaps you are anonymous. But you have left a trail of breadcrumbs as to
your identity
If you miniaturize that down to a few atoms, perhaps a spark across one of
Storms's favored cracks, then you have a great visual depiction of a
1Dimensional Luttinger Liquid BEC but with a spin component that I have not
accounted for so far.
as an example:
Well said Kevin.
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
wrote:
So now we have Ahern and Celani settling in with MFMP. No wonder they've
been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize.
They deserve it FAR more than Obama did.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:05 PM,
At 08:05 PM 7/25/2014, Foks0904 . wrote:
I'm sure many of you know of
Brian Ahern from his EPRI report, his MIT colloquium appearance earlier
this year, and now his collaboration with MFMP. Even if you're not aware
of him, I think this conversation has enough for 3-4 threads worth of
topics.
This is an excellent interview. Have not finished yet, but there are a few
things to add. Ahern is strongly impressed with a magnetic invention
(Manelas device) since he did the 8 day test - and which device others have
belittled. It is similar to the Floyd Sweet device (for the historians of
I've been trying to find Ahern publications, but have so far failed.
Only his patent on aharmonic modes, which is patently obfuscated.
From: Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
I've been trying to find Ahern publications, but have so far failed.
Only his patent on anharmonic modes, which is patently obfuscated.
A little of it's in these slides :
http://www.slideshare.net/ecatreport/ahern-lenr-theories
Here are some slides of a presentation, which may be less obfuscated
http://www.slideshare.net/ecatreport/ahern-lenr-theories
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher
I've been trying to find Ahern publications, but have so far failed. Only
his patent on aharmonic modes, which is
Yeah, those are also in PDF form at
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/AhernBSenergyloca.pdf
Several sections of Celani's ICCF18 cover Ahern :
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CelaniFfurtherpro.pdf
Localization is a major subject in condensed matter physics.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anderson_localization
A Nobel prize was issued in this field. Oftentimes, experimenters stumble
on an effect that has been developed in other areas of science that are
unknown to them. Ahern may have done
Yeah he's pretty dismissive of the Heat/Helium work, which I disagree with
for PdD at least, and we're still waiting on reliable ash measurements from
NiH, but he's of course entitled to his opinion and I still have a lot of
respect for his views. I think, like he said, his theory applies better
Most scientists are constrained in their focus by their specialization to a
limited field of study. To understand a system fully, many fields of study
must be considered to put all the pieces together.
One obvious area of inquiry that Ahern never pursued is to understand how
magnetism affects
Axil -- Perhaps you missed it, but he refers to both spintronics and the
vortex-like character of cooperative electron orbitals. So no, I don't
think he's neglecting the relevance of spin on that scale. He even
references the work of Hotson, who puts lots of emphasis on the untapped
potential of
Another area that Ahern needs to look into is the way the Higgs field seems
to connect together magnetism and quantum chromodynamics (QCD), which is
the theory of quark-gluon interactions.
When Ahern is postulating that nanomagnitism is effecting the vacuum, he
may mean to address how the Higgs
I only when through the recording once, so what you say might be so. But he
did not expound on the importance of how free electrons can form vortexes
as an energy concentration mechanism. Electron orbitals can never achieve
the degree of localization and the concentration necessary for the proper
I'm not so sure one needs to posit Higgs Field interactions -- maybe. I see
it in a very basic way without too much esoterica. In over-unity electrical
systems (possibly cold fusion) we initiate non-linear coupling between
appropriate materials. This non-linear coupling produces these collective
The vacuum becomes unstable with the injection of energy: magnetic energy.
Based on the strength of that magnetic energy, the vacuum behaves in
various ways. This variably in the response of the vacuum to variable
magnetic energy input is where the wide variability in LENR reactions comes
from.
“Ion acoustics” go back to Hannes Alfven (another Swedish connection) and
probably is relevant to the Manelas solid-state ferrite magnetic billet, even
though there is no obvious plasma involved, no frozen-in mode and so on – but
the key is negative hysteresis. Even the great Alfven was accused
The vacuum behaves differently based on the structure of the matter that it
encloses. The way the vacuum behaves in space free of matter is different
from the way the vacuum behaves inside the nucleus, which in turn is
different from the way the vacuum behaves inside a proton or the neutron.
This
picking up and displacing very fine grained material and re-depositing it
elsewhere
With all respect, this is some conceptual junk that you pick up along the
way as an inappropriate analogy.
The key is that the magnetic field has an effect on the vacuum which
results in a complicated set of
*it is in these domains of the nano-material that these coherent
structures can become stable *
There are only a few particles that stay together for an extended period
of time, only the proton really. The neutron will stay around within the
context of the proton, but will decay when isolated
picking up and displacing very fine grained material and re-depositing it
elsewhere
With all respect, this is some conceptual junk that you pick up along the
way as an inappropriate analogy.
The key is that the magnetic field has an effect on the vacuum which
results in a complicated set of
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
*it is in these domains of the nano-material that these coherent
structures can become stable *
There are only a few particles that stay together for an extended period
of time, only the proton really. The neutron will
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 6:38 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
*it is in these domains of the nano-material that these coherent
structures can become stable *
There are only a few particles that stay together for an extended period
of time, only the proton really. The neutron will
*just another wannabe who can't take criticism*
If you want to understand the origin, development, and effect of
longitudinal waves, then look at the theory and experiments of Ken
Shoulders. He observe dark mode vortex production and the resultant
projection of a monopole magnetic field a long
Anyone who references a plasmoid structure cannot take the theory of Ed
Storms seriously.
A plasmoid projects the causation of the reaction at a distant from the
plasmoid. That negates the premise of Ed's theory because Ed's theory is
one where the action of causation is directed inward within
I know Ken Shoulders' work Axil. In fact, I've devoted a small section to
Ken over at blue-science (amongst many other relevant people from the OU
world I've investigated/archived):
http://www.blue-science.org/articles/suggested-articles/. His work is an
important piece of the next generation of
And you seem to have some strange chip on your shoulder regarding Ed Storms
and his theory. If a plasmoid EVO is producing excess heat and
transmutation, all fusion theories are wrong, not just Ed's. I don't
understand your rant in the slightest.
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Axil Axil
*pointless polemics over minutia.*
The devil is in the details. A magnetic driver for the LENR reaction has
large engineering implications. For example, Nuclear magnetic resonance
can tell what material will work in a reactor an which ones won't. Dynamic
nuclear polarization can be used to dampen
I'm sure many of you know of Brian Ahern from his EPRI report, his MIT
colloquium appearance earlier this year, and now his collaboration with
MFMP. Even if you're not aware of him, I think this conversation has enough
for 3-4 threads worth of topics. We even flirt with the ever-so-dangerous
So now we have Ahern and Celani settling in with MFMP. No wonder they've
been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize.
They deserve it FAR more than Obama did.
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:05 PM, Foks0904 . foks0...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure many of you know of Brian Ahern from his EPRI report, his
39 matches
Mail list logo
