On 11 Jul 2012, at 06:59, Matteo Centro wrote:
> From the top of my head: maybe putting some rel="nofollow" on the links?
Thanks. I'll give that a try.
— K.R.H.
___
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailin
On 2012-07-12, at 3:49 PM, Hugo Cambero wrote:
> Thanks for your answers, yes I found a method like this:
>
> public static User createUser(EOEditingContext editingContext, String
> maternalName
> , String name
> , String password
> , String paternalName
> , String username)
Any attributes in
On Jul 12, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Maik Musall wrote:
>
> Am 12.07.2012 um 23:58 schrieb Louis Demers:
>> User newUser = (User)EOUtilities.createAndInsertInstance(ec,
>> User.ENTITY_NAME) ;
>
> Much too wordy for my taste, and needs a cast on top of it. Just add a second
> constructor in your templ
Thanks for your answers, yes I found a method like this:
public static User createUser(EOEditingContext editingContext, String
maternalName
, String name
, String password
, String paternalName
, String username)
But I prefer to user the method like this:
User newUser = ERXEOControlUtilities.crea
Oh, I like that!
-Lon
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Maik Musall wrote:
>
> Am 12.07.2012 um 23:58 schrieb Louis Demers:
>> User newUser = (User)EOUtilities.createAndInsertInstance(ec,
>> User.ENTITY_NAME) ;
>
> Much too wordy for my taste, and needs a cast on top of it. Just add a second
>
Hola Hugo,
Bienvenido!
If you are using the EOGenerate templates for your EO classes you'll also find
this code is generated for you. For example in my _Person.java class:
public static com.wowodc.model.Person createPerson(EOEditingContext
editingContext) {
com.wowodc.model.Person eo = (
Am 12.07.2012 um 23:58 schrieb Louis Demers:
> User newUser = (User)EOUtilities.createAndInsertInstance(ec,
> User.ENTITY_NAME) ;
Much too wordy for my taste, and needs a cast on top of it. Just add a second
constructor in your template which does ec.insertObject(this), so that you can
simply
On 2012-07-12, at 2:46 PM, Hugo Cambero wrote:
> Hi Everybody
>
> My name is Hugo, I'm from Mexico. I have been developing using WebObjects and
> Wonder Frameworks, I'm newbie in this topic.
>
> Well, I have a problem, I hope you can help me. I'm developing a test
> application, I want to lea
On 2012-07-12, at 1:33 PM, Klaus Berkling wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2012, at 1:09 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>> I can't add much. The problem is in the adaptor. I'd focus on the first
>> error "sendBuffers(): send error: Bad address" and consider the rest to be
>> symptoms. Other than adding some
On Jul 12, 2012, at 1:09 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> I can't add much. The problem is in the adaptor. I'd focus on the first
> error "sendBuffers(): send error: Bad address" and consider the rest to be
> symptoms. Other than adding some logging messages to the adaptor, I have no
> ideas or poin
Hi Klaus,
I can't add much. The problem is in the adaptor. I'd focus on the first error
"sendBuffers(): send error: Bad address" and consider the rest to be symptoms.
Other than adding some logging messages to the adaptor, I have no ideas or
pointers.
> Next up, debugging an apache module..
Grumble. I hate it when Karl is right.
Chunk and needing a diet
On 2012-07-12, at 11:36 AM, Karl wrote:
> Its Chunk, not Chuck now. Please start signing appropriately.
>
> Karl
>
> On 2012-07-12, at 9:28 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2012-07-12, at 4:01 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
>>
Hi All.
Some of you might remember me writing about this issue during WOWODC. I'm
restarting the thread because I still can't find a solution. I get the
following error when making https requests to one of our apps (no problem with
static html pages):
"Did not receive any response from appli
Hi John & Hugi;
True, this is the biggest gap I've come across - I have an app that does
exactly that. However, there are a few built-in alternatives, namely
SQLTemplate and EJBQLQuery. But if you have a lot of this in your app,
you'll probably want to wait to consider migrating.
In my use of
On 2012-07-12, at 11:51 AM, Ramsey Gurley wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:11 AM, Alexander Spohr wrote:
>
>> We want to go the WO-way and are asking us how we can make that way bring us
>> into the future.
>>
>> You propose to switch to a different lane and have us all run into another
>> direc
Thanks for your recommendation Johann Wernet
Yes, you are right, I have a problem with my model, I'll change it, and
I'll seek about ERXEOControlUtilities
Regards
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Johann Werner wrote:
> Hi Hugo,
>
> welcome to WO!
>
> Am 12.07.2012 um 20:46 schrieb Hugo Cambero
Hi Hugo,
welcome to WO!
Am 12.07.2012 um 20:46 schrieb Hugo Cambero:
> Hi Everybody
>
> My name is Hugo, I'm from Mexico. I have been developing using WebObjects and
> Wonder Frameworks, I'm newbie in this topic.
>
> Well, I have a problem, I hope you can help me. I'm developing a test
> app
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:11 AM, Alexander Spohr wrote:
> We want to go the WO-way and are asking us how we can make that way bring us
> into the future.
>
> You propose to switch to a different lane and have us all run into another
> direction.
In the context of this discussion, I think Aaron's
¡Hola Hugo!
On 2012-07-12, at 11:46 AM, Hugo Cambero wrote:
> Hi Everybody
>
> My name is Hugo, I'm from Mexico. I have been developing using WebObjects and
> Wonder Frameworks, I'm newbie in this topic.
Welcome!
> Well, I have a problem, I hope you can help me. I'm developing a test
> app
Its Chunk, not Chuck now. Please start signing appropriately.
Karl
On 2012-07-12, at 9:28 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>
> On 2012-07-12, at 4:01 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
>
I think Hugi also use it.
>>>
>>> Is that a point for or against it? :-P
>>
>>
>
> Ah ha! So you ARE still readin
On 2012-07-12, at 4:01 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
>>> I think Hugi also use it.
>>
>> Is that a point for or against it? :-P
>
>
Ah ha! So you ARE still reading the list! :-) Good to see you around!
> But yes, I've used Cayenne on a couple of projects. As you know it feels a
> *lot* li
Oh how I wish I could press once GoLipse button and all wonder/wo
frameworks would just work.
Anyway... I did all that, git'd the Wonder Integration and imported all
frameworks into Eclipse.
Things were looking good, no compile errors, etc. but, when I try to launch
I get the following:
I have mo
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Hugi Thordarson wrote:
> >> Cayenne is still missing a lot of functionality when compared to
> EOF/Wonder and generally feels less mature (understandably, since EOF is
> ancient). This is perhaps not such a huge problem, since functionality can
> always be added—b
I guess the URL would be useful :-)
http://soapui.org/REST-Testing/rest-functional-testing.html
On Jul 12, 2012, at 12:28 PM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
> Came across this the other day when I was grabbing latest soapUI.app to
> explore a SOAP webservice. It seems soapUI *might* be a solution for R
Came across this the other day when I was grabbing latest soapUI.app to explore
a SOAP webservice. It seems soapUI *might* be a solution for REST service
testing . I have not tried it, so YMMV.
On Jul 3, 2012, at 11:14 PM, Paul Hoadley wrote:
> Hi Henrique,
>
> On 03/07/2012, at 1:20 PM, H
We want to go the WO-way and are asking us how we can make that way bring us
into the future.
You propose to switch to a different lane and have us all run into another
direction. That is a totally different discussion. We don’t want to change our
way of programming, we just want the core to be
Hi WOrriors,
I still question why we are fighting so hard for Object-relational
mapping. If we are contemplating doing work, shouldn't we consider going
straight for object databases? Take out the transcription layer. Let's get
more productive. Only use OR-mapping for old systems that we must
Hi Benjamin,
The value defined by the er.attachment.s3.key property is always encoded. It
doesn't cause any real problem in runtime besides the ugly URL. One possible
solution is to convert '%2F' back to '/' after the URL encoding executed here
[1].
[1]https://github.com/projectwonder/wonder/b
I apologize if this has already been suggested or discussed elsewhere, but it
might be a worthwhile exercise to extend the API and feature comparison on the
WIKI (http://wiki.wocommunity.org/display/WO/Alternative+Technologies-Cayenne
... thanks John) in the direction of a roadmap between where
>> Cayenne is still missing a lot of functionality when compared to EOF/Wonder
>> and generally feels less mature (understandably, since EOF is ancient). This
>> is perhaps not such a huge problem, since functionality can always be
>> added—but there is indeed a *lot* of work to be done to reach
Hi;
I can't speak for WO integration but from the perspective of using
Cayenne with other infrastructure, I can say that I enjoyed working with
Cayenne a while back -- I'm sadly not using it at the moment.
Coming from an integrated stack like WO, it is possible to forget that
Cayenne is focu
Sorry forgot to include the proper subject line
On 7/12/12 3:55 AM, "Vinny Luc" wrote:
>
>
>>
>>On Jul 10, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Dawn Lockhart wrote:
>>
as soon as you click on any action on the query or pick page, you are
immediately logged out with no exceptions thrown
>>>Are the actio
>
>On Jul 10, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Dawn Lockhart wrote:
>
>>>as soon as you click on any action on the query or pick page, you are
>>>immediately logged out with no exceptions thrown
>>Are the actions that fail a form submission? Does the action method ever
>>get called? Is the session terminated? I
Sent from my iPhone
On 12 Jul 2012, at 00:10, "Alexis Tual"
mailto:alexis.t...@gmail.com>> wrote:
2012/7/11 Brook, James mailto:jbr...@lgi.com>>
So presumably Motorola has a server-side framework with REST, sync and
persistence to go with this...
You'll have to ask them directly, but they
34 matches
Mail list logo
