Improve Wicket performance with ETags

that the page hasn't changed since last time the client requested it, so sends back a response of 304 (Not Modified) with an empty body. What you guys think about this? :) Is the wicket cache system etagged already? []'s!! -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (11) 8565

Re: VOTE: Configuring DEPLOYMENT/DEVELOPMENT mode.

+1... But just to make sure: is the DEPLOYMENT configuration going to be default? -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (11) 8565-7739 (11) 3055-2060 (48) 8404-1300 On 5/31/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Al Maw: - We default to DEVELOPMENT and we

Re: Need description and scope of Apache Wicket project for graduation

Tapestry's description :)... -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 5/23/07, Francisco Diaz Trepat - gmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Excelent Quote. Should be on the Site. f(t) On 5/23/07, James McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a wicket

Wicket supporting Java 1.4 until... ?

this version? []'s -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060

Re: Wicket supporting Java 1.4 until... ?

I'm just wondering if isn't a good idea to have Wicket been supported under 1.4 until Sun drops it. :) -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 5/23/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: really ? i thought sun wanted to have a cycle

Re: Wicket supporting Java 1.4 until... ?

supported = javac -target 1.4 -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 5/23/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: define 'supported' On 5/23/07, Bruno Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm just wondering if isn't a good idea to have

Re: 1.3 release/graduation schema

Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060

Re: poll: validators and behaviors combined... contribute or IS-A?

I agree... -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 5/14/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/14/07, Ryan Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: fwiw, I think your initial opinion was correct (i.e. validator HAS-A behavior). Besides

Re: poll: validators and behaviors combined... contribute or IS-A?

Because Wicket is component based... :) We actually reuse components and somewhere we want to disable validators. For example: chained components where one component if selected, must disable another component's validator. -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300

Re: poll: validators and behaviors combined... contribute or IS-A?

To follow with onAttach/onDetach (I don't remember if these has -ed) -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 5/11/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so why is it onadded() here and bind() in ibehavior? -igor On 5/11/07, Eelco

Re: inspecting property models

Why limit to getTargetClass() when its possible to return with getTarget() and do a getTarget().getClass() ? -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 5/11/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This discussion came out of the recent

Re: Hibernate Validator integration?

Why don't let IValidator has its own behavior if it wants to. IValidator.getBehavior() Behavior goes on the client-side, right? (I'm still a little confused about all these interfaces...) Isn't this ok ? If not, why? -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300

FormTester.setValue not working

to it on JIRA. []'s! miojo -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060

Re: Hibernate Validator integration?

Cool. This can do the job. :) Dummy question: why newValidationBehavior and not just newBehavior ? :D []' s! -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 5/10/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's what we have/ had. You let

Re: Hibernate Validator integration?

. []'s -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 5/10/07, Bruno Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cool. This can do the job. :) Dummy question: why newValidationBehavior and not just newBehavior ? :D []' s! -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc

Re: Hibernate Validator integration?

Updated to revision 2123http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-hibernate-behavior/src/main/java/org/wicketstuff/hibernate/validator/HibernateFormComponentValidator.java?revision=2123view=markup []'s -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com

Re: Hibernate Validator integration?

[x] All above -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 5/10/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If we are talking about client side validators: then you want support for 2 behaviors that are attached to blur and onchange ? or one

Re: Hibernate Validator integration?

There's no removeValidator(), right? So, we dont have to care about behaviors added by validators. -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 5/10/07, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/10/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: Hibernate Validator integration?

Commited. -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 5/9/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, updating myself in this thread... :D I think for this integration succeed, one important question must be resolved: Q) What kind

Re: Hibernate Validator integration?

Ryan, want to work together on this? Regards, -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 5/8/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think someone (you?) just has to take up the initiative. I think the core team is too tight up atm

Re: Hibernate Validator integration?

Ryan, lets finish this thread and move on to gTalk and *talk* about this. I'm adding you right now. No, I dont have an account yet, and yes you can start the project in wicket-stuff and after that, I'll ask you for permission. What'd you think? []' s -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc

Re: Securing form submission with action token

Isn't this already implemented in Wicket's Core? -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 5/7/07, Mark Sandori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking at making a version of the Form component that supports the action token pattern

Re: [VOTE] Propose Wicket for Graduation

[X] Yes, propose Wicket for Graduation -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 5/4/07, Jan Vermeulen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [X] Yes, propose Wicket for Graduation Jan. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-VOTE--Propose

Re: [vote] Name the release after 1.3

I'd vote for 2.0, but what about waiting for that, after wicket leaves apache incubator? Until, 1.4 is fine I think. :) Cheers PS: Wicket in Brazil... :) http://blog.brunoborges.com.br/search/label/Wicket -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060

Re: Hibernate Validator integration?

Sorry.. worst than Draft Review: JSR 303 is in Draft Ballot yet!! So it'll take some time until a final specification for this under JPA. :( Let's continue with HV ? :D []'s -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 4/25/07, Bruno Borges [EMAIL

Re: [vote] Release Apache Wicket 1.3.0-incubating-beta1

+1... lol :D -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 4/25/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/25/07, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 4/25/07, Sylvain Wallez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -... the NOTICE file

Re: Style id instead wicket:id ?

attribute for css styling wicket:id allows duplicates in markup while id doesnt, so validation would fail. link wicket:id=aspan wicket:id=a/span/a is allowed. it is cleaner to use our own namespaced attribute to avoid interference. -igor On 4/23/07, Bruno Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I

Hibernate Validator integration?

Has anybody made an integration between Wicket and Hibernate Validator? HV is probably going to be the reference implementation for JSR 303 and JBoss Seams use it integrated with JSF. Looks cool... http://hibernate.org/412.html http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=303 Cheers -- Bruno Borges Summa

Re: Hibernate Validator integration?

support annotations in the Pojo itself, as H.V. is an independent framework (doesn't need to have annotations at the persistence level). []'s -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060 On 4/25/07, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I

Style id instead wicket:id ?

an article in my blog about Wicket (in portuguese) at blog.brunoborges.com.br -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060

Re: [vote] Name the release after 1.3

[x] Apache Wicket 7.05 - I'm an Ubuntu user... :D On 4/19/07, Janne Hietamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 19.4.2007, at 1.04, Martijn Dashorst wrote: Apache Wicket 1.3 will be followed by: [x] Apache Wicket 2.0 (i.e. becomes our old 2.0 minus the c'tor change) -- Bruno Borges Summa

Re: [wicket-374] Allow disable autoEnable for wicket:links

Guys, is it possible to apply this patch before 1.3 goes out? :D Cheers On 3/12/07, Bruno Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well... As you guys can see in JIRA, I sent the diff implementing this functionality... Really... It's really useful :) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-374

WicketServlet from wicket-1.x is not working?

!... :) []'s -- Bruno Borges Summa Technologies Inc. www.summa-tech.com (48) 8404-1300 (11) 3055-2060

Re: State 1.3/ features

models, validators and generics. I think that's it. Oh, that's all? For a second I was worried. :) -- Nick Heudecker Professional Wicket Training Consulting http://www.systemmobile.com Eventful - Intelligent Event Management http://www.eventfulhq.com -- Bruno Borges Summa

[wicket-374] Allow disable autoEnable for wicket:links

, and of course, wicket-375 would probably be an issue asking to allow this setting per page... :) Is there wicket tags with attributes? wicket:link auto=false sounds nice... Or maybe in Java, something in the wicket.WebMarkupContainer class. What do you guys think? Cheers! -- Bruno Borges Summa

Re: State 1.3/ features

annotations that includes something like @MustCallSuper (forget what its called), that combined with an apt builder in an ide will make these kinds of contracts very easy to enforce at compile time. we are just not there just yet. -igor On 3/9/07, Bruno Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I want

Re: [wicket-374] Allow disable autoEnable for wicket:links

Why not? This is great for menus, bookmarkable pages, etc... =) On 3/9/07, Johan Compagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: personally: don't use auto links ;( On 3/9/07, Bruno Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-374 Guys, this feature would really