Thanks, Aaron. I'll give it a browse.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Aaron D. Osgood
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 5:05 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Serial Port Monitoring
G
nest!
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Chuck Hogg
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 5:08 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Serial Port Monitoring
I know it might be out of some peoples bud
292
ch...@shelbybb.com
http://www.shelbybb.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Robert West
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 4:52 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Serial Port Monitoring
t have the URL handy
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone with Nextel Direct Connect
-Original Message-
From: "Robert West"
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 16:52:07
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Serial Port Monitoring
Thanks Scott. I knew there had
Behalf Of Scott Reed
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 4:40 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Serial Port Monitoring
I ask them at MUM and they said this will be enabled soon.
I sent it as enhancement suggestion, but have not heard anything from them.
Robert West wrote
I ask them at MUM and they said this will be enabled soon.
I sent it as enhancement suggestion, but have not heard anything from them.
Robert West wrote:
> Before I go over to the MT forums and get treated like an idiot (they are
> somehow able to see through my clever disguise, darn it!) I'm loo
Before I go over to the MT forums and get treated like an idiot (they are
somehow able to see through my clever disguise, darn it!) I'm looking for
anyone who has used the serial pins on the Routerboard to send an on/off
signal.
I have a home brew solar install that runs an AP but there are ti
The manual says 2 days. But it depends on altitude and ambient temperature.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 11:30 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MikroTik
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 22:48 -0500, Robert West wrote:
> You can put all that and a couple of kittens in there. Those Rootennas
> rock, man!
LOL. How long do the kittys have to stay before they're ready to eat?
MM. Mikrowave kittens. :-)
--
***
You can put all that and a couple of kittens in there. Those Rootennas
rock, man!
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 8:25 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA
To all those interested,
The mikrotik-us...@wispa.org can be subscribed to by going to
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users.
The motorola-us...@wispa.org can be subscribed by going to
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/motorola-users.
Rules and Penalties are as f
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 19:15 -0500, Jerry Richardson wrote:
> My thought is to use a MT411AR + R52 in a 5GHz Rootenna with an N connector
> installed in the bottom of the enclosure for an Omni.
>
> Having never worked with these specific parts I want to make sure there is
> room in the bottom of
n...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jerry Richardson
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 6:15 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] MikroTik setup
Looking at using MT in a small public WiFi setup. The topology is going
to be a 5.7GHz WDS PMP from the top of a 10-story bu
Looking at using MT in a small public WiFi setup. The topology is going to be a
5.7GHz WDS PMP from the top of a 10-story building looking down onto the
streets with 2.4 client access at street level. Initially this will not be a
mesh but I may implement MT's MME later.
My thought is to use a M
back to N-Male so its not an issue.
George
_
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Travis Johnson
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 10:43 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MikroTik N- 52 Mbits in a 20MHz channel
Hi,
How similar
Hi,
How similar are the Rocketdishes compared with the PacWireless dishes?
We have over 100 of the Pac dishes, so I am just wondering how they
compare as far as mounting, build, alignment, etc.?
Travis
Microserv
George Morris wrote:
Thought this might be interesting.
This is a live link
Nothing complicated. This link is 48.23 Kilometres.
Just using Nstreme with polling, exact size 3200.
The key seems to be clean spectrum, a decent signal level (about -57 in this
particular case), and a 411AH/XR-5 to get enough horsepower.
We are running 3.30 Wireless Test. The Wireless Test pac
Sounds like symptoms of an ip address conflict possibly.
Sent from Windows mobile device...
-Original Message-
From: Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 5:33 PM
To: Mikrotik discussions
Cc: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Mikrotik] Frustrating connectivity issues
: Mikrotik discussions
Cc: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Mikrotik] Frustrating connectivity issues.
>The whole time the RDP session will stay connected and functional.
Are you sure it's functional? I expect it probably isn't usable while
the
pings stop just like browsing isn
the office.
Mark McElvy
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 5:33 PM
To: Mikrotik discussions
Cc: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [Mikrotik] Frustrating connectivity iss
>The whole time the RDP session will stay connected and functional.
Are you sure it's functional? I expect it probably isn't usable while the
pings stop just like browsing isn't capable.
What are you pinging from/to?
Do you have the Tranzeo fix applied to your CPEs as you're using a Mikrotik
AP
I got signed up. Thanks
Gerard Dupont III wrote:
> Scott,
>
> There is a Mikrotik list. QuickLink Wireless joined as a vendor member
> and sponsored the list last week. I'll check into why it isn't showing
> up on the mailing lists page.
>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
>
>
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik consultant/help
Scott,
There is a Mikrotik list. QuickLink Wireless joined as a vendor member
and sponsored the list last week. I'll check into why it isn't showing
up on the mailing lists page.
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrot
Scott,
There is a Mikrotik list. QuickLink Wireless joined as a vendor member
and sponsored the list last week. I'll check into why it isn't showing
up on the mailing lists page.
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik
Gerard
Scott Reed wrote:
> Are you sure there is Mikrotik list?
bybb.com
> http://www.shelbybb.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com
> Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 8:23 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik consultan
Solutions, LLC
>> (317) 831-3000 x200
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com
>> Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 8:23 AM
>> To: WISPA Ge
e of doing this.
>
> Eric Rogers
> Precision Data Solutions, LLC
> (317) 831-3000 x200
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com
> Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 8:23
ober 25, 2009 8:23 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik consultant/help
I want to run RouterOS on an x86 machine between a satellite internet
connection and a small wireless network (about 20 users) so that I can
give one group of users more bandwidth and another group of users l
lf Of os10ru...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 8:23 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik consultant/help
I want to run RouterOS on an x86 machine between a satellite internet
connection and a small wireless network (about 20 users) so that I can
give one group of users
I want to run RouterOS on an x86 machine between a satellite internet
connection and a small wireless network (about 20 users) so that I can
give one group of users more bandwidth and another group of users less
bandwidth. It's also important that the bandwidth usage within a group
be distr
Bad radio or interference etc. on one end of the link.
Also the 4 port cards die under load. I've had to pull all of mine out and
run indivudual ethernet cards.
marlon
- Original Message -
From:
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:50 AM
Force the eth to 10M and see how it changes things.
sa...@michianawireless.com wrote:
> Ok,
>
> Im going bonkers. We are getting ping drops from our Mikrotik devices to the
> other. Our main router is PC based with one of those 4 port RB cards in it.
> Starting the other day out of the blue the
September 2009 17:51
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Weirdness!?
Ok,
Im going bonkers. We are getting ping drops from our Mikrotik devices to the
other. Our main router is PC based with one of those 4 port RB cards in it.
Starting the other day out of the blue the net started
wisp-router.com" , "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Weirdness!?
You've looked into CPU load and firewall stuff, right?
I too would try a new POE - only $20 to help find out.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite
ight
> passive injector like our poe-in-w.
>
> /Eje
> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sa...@michianawireless.com
>
> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:50:45
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Weirdness!?
>
>
m: sa...@michianawireless.com
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:50:45
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Weirdness!?
Ok,
Im going bonkers. We are getting ping drops from our Mikrotik devices to the
other. Our main router is PC based with one of those 4 port RB cards in it.
Starting the
Ok,
Im going bonkers. We are getting ping drops from our Mikrotik devices to the
other. Our main router is PC based with one of those 4 port RB cards in it.
Starting the other day out of the blue the net started acting funky and we were
getting large pauses. So I started pinging. Get ping loss
Ok,
Im going bonkers. We are getting ping drops from our Mikrotik devices to the
other. Our main router is PC based with one of those 4 port RB cards in it.
Starting the other day out of the blue the net started acting funky and we were
getting large pauses. So I started pinging. Get ping loss
e unit.
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Josh Luthman"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:04 PM
> Subject: R
nd
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Luthman"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental
speeddegradetp Zero then drop- repeat.
> WDS and nstreme can be used with wireless-test I
t; From: "Josh Luthman"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 9:43 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental speed
> degradetp Zero then drop- repeat.
>
>
> > Well your problem reminded me of wds + nstreme p
Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Luthman"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 9:43 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental speed
degradetp Zero then drop- repeat.
> Well your problem reminded me of wds
I never got that t-shirt. ;-)
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Dennis Burgess"
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:08 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mik
...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Randy Cosby
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:07 PM
> To: sc...@brevardwireless.com; WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik load balancing ( was backhaul choices )
>
> Just curious - what routerboards are you using? Are you bridging
..@brevardwireless.com; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik load balancing ( was backhaul choices )
Just curious - what routerboards are you using? Are you bridging vlans
across the link?
Randy
Scott Carullo wrote:
> I've been using for bridging with the N hardware withou
>
> Scott Carullo
> Brevard Wireless
> 321-205-1100 x102
>
> Original Message
>
>> From: "Randy Cosby"
>> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:18 PM
>> To: "WISPA General List"
>> Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik load balancing
tember 17, 2009 12:18 PM
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik load balancing ( was backhaul choices )
>
> Anyone else had a chance to play with MPLS much on the mikrotiks?
>
> Having read the wiki article* about using MPLS to bridge two networks
&g
Anyone else had a chance to play with MPLS much on the mikrotiks?
Having read the wiki article* about using MPLS to bridge two networks
(instead of WDS or EoIP) I have tried it on a new link I put up. So far
so good. I think I need to play with the MTU settings a bit more to
optimize it. Wha
I had this with XR9's. Replace the XR9 on sub B.
Tom DeReggi wrote:
> I have a problem with Mikrotik I have not been able to solve. Wondering if
> anyone has any insight.
>
> A summary config is
>
> I have a 433AH setup as AP with 1 XR900 and 1 R5H (5.8Ghz). The Cat5
> Ethernet port goes t
amp; Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Josh Luthman"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 12:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental spe
DS?
Do you have any recommendations on best practice config now for MT PTMP,
(without routing)?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Josh Luthman"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, Sep
You're not using nstreme are you?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Tom
pgrade"
> and then reboot
>
> We have been experiencing a few odd issues as well.
>
> Mac
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> > Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
> > Sent: Wedne
eneral List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental speed
> degradetpZero then drop- repeat.
>
> PAul,
> I'll try updating the firmware, that makes sense to try.
> Upgrading from 3.10 to 3.28, is it likely that I can do that remotely
> without my cli
tAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Sharples"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 2:20 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental speed
degradetpZero then drop- repeat.
> Maybe just ba
l Message -
> From: "Tom DeReggi"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 5:25 PM
> Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental speed degrade
> tpZero then drop- repeat.
>
>
>>I have a problem with Mikrotik I have
which went bad.
Tom S.
- Original Message -
From: "Tom DeReggi"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 5:25 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Problem - 900Mhz-WDS-incremental speed degrade
tpZero then drop- repeat.
>I have a problem with M
I have a problem with Mikrotik I have not been able to solve. Wondering if
anyone has any insight.
A summary config is
I have a 433AH setup as AP with 1 XR900 and 1 R5H (5.8Ghz). The Cat5
Ethernet port goes to a SMC VLAN switch, where the SMC tags and untags VLAN
ID, and continues to the B
;> Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Scott Reed
>>
>> Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:10:19
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Processor Load
>>
>>
>> I checked all of this befor
;
> Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:10:19
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Processor Load
>
>
> I checked all of this before posting. That is the reason for the
> original question about how to see processor load. I was hoping someone
> would know tha
t;only ones that have the tool to view the content of the .rif file.
>
>/Eje
>Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Scott Reed
>
>Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:10:19
>To: WISPA General List
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Processor Load
&g
e the tool to view
the content of the .rif file.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Scott Reed
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 07:10:19
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Processor Load
I checked all of this before posting. That is the reason fo
n to see ssh attacks.
>
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott Reed"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 7:24 PM
> Subject:
;WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 7:24 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Mikrotik Processor Load
> Anyone know an easy way to figure out what a 532 with 2 PtP links on it
> would be running at 80+%? No queues, no filters. Moving about 2Mbps
> from the 2 backhauls down th
Connection tracking? Do you have all of the extra packages you don't
use disabled? I've seen this once with web proxy enabled and someone
using it to send spam.
-Kevin
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
> Anyone know an easy way to figure out what a 532 with 2 PtP links on it
>
Anyone know an easy way to figure out what a 532 with 2 PtP links on it
would be running at 80+%? No queues, no filters. Moving about 2Mbps
from the 2 backhauls down the wire.
--
Scott Reed
Sr. Systems Engineer
GAB Midwest
1-800-363-1544 x4000
Cell: 260-273-7239
---
How to weight bgp paths with Mikrotik?
We have two feeds using two bgp connections to two different providers. Our
first that we been using is completely usage based. The new one we just added
is our new cogent link which is 100M flat rate. I would prefer most if not all
traffic now use the co
ginal Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I think I listed all my reasons.
No support from anyone on it
MT doesn'
computer.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:22 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
>
> I think
ject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I think I listed all my reasons.
No support from anyone on it
MT doesn't get the channel right (small but on a bad day big)
Poor bang/buck - Ligowave is best here IMO
On 8/20/09, Jason Hensley wrote:
> Any reason you're avoi
ginal Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:44 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
>
> I personally am avoiding 3.65 and MT. Ligowave and an80
I think that should read "table", not "cable".
Josh Luthman wrote:
> I personally am avoiding 3.65 and MT. Ligowave and an80 are what I am
> going to do.
>
> I do know it works, though. You have to find the cable that matches
> 5.8 frequency in MT to 3.65 in actual output. No support by MT (or
Any reason you're avoiding MT with 3.65?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I personally am avoiding
; pocketbook is just a little tight right
now and I've GOT to do something about my primary backhaul.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of David E. Smith
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:59 PM
To: WISPA General List
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I personally am avoiding 3.65 and MT. Ligowave and an80 are what I am
going to do.
I do know it works, though. You have to find
On Thu, August 20, 2009 2:51 pm, Jason Hensley wrote:
> I know it works, but will the FCC come crashing down on me if they find
> out
> I have these in place?
As long as you're licensed (just a couple hundred bucks), and every 3650
endpoint is registered with the FCC (you have to register not just
: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I personally am avoiding 3.65 and MT. Ligowave and an80 are what I am
going to do.
I do know it works, though. You have to find the cable that matches
5.8 frequency in MT to 3.65 in actual output. No support by MT (or
even as much as an answer to my questions).
On 8
I personally am avoiding 3.65 and MT. Ligowave and an80 are what I am
going to do.
I do know it works, though. You have to find the cable that matches
5.8 frequency in MT to 3.65 in actual output. No support by MT (or
even as much as an answer to my questions).
On 8/20/09, Jason Hensley wrote
I need a backhaul link outside of 2.4 and 5.8. If I put together a Mikrotik
system, say an RB600 with an Xr3 and put a 20db Grid on each end would that
be legal? Admittedly I'm not up to speed on what is and is not allowed in
3650 as far as power output, etc etc. This would be a short backhaul -
,
>> there is no jeopardy. And, that screen can come more and more
>> frequently...maybe every 5 minutes until they call.
>>
>> ...just a further thought.
>>
>> . . . j o n a t h a n
>> -Original Message---
: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
Slander only applies if it is untrue. Stating a fact, regardless of how
embarrassing it is would not be slander. When your bank places a
foreclosure notice on your house because you haven't paid your mortgage
you don't get to sue. As was stated earlier
re and more
> frequently...maybe every 5 minutes until they call.
>
> ...just a further thought.
>
> . . . j o n a t h a n
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Mike Hammett
> Sent: Wednesday, Au
message screen is
>> only on port 80 and doesn't stop the VoIP phone from accessing 911, etc.,
>> there is no jeopardy. And, that screen can come more and more
>> frequently...maybe every 5 minutes until they call.
>>
>> ...just a further thought.
>>
>> . .
> only on port 80 and doesn't stop the VoIP phone from accessing 911,
>> etc.,
>> there is no jeopardy. And, that screen can come more and more
>> frequently...maybe every 5 minutes until they call.
>>
>> ...just a further thought.
>>
>> . .
On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 11:27 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
You're correct with the liability thing... it sucks that people sue over
such petty things.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-i
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 14:27 -0400, Josh Luthman wrote:
> Don't mean to start a flame war...so please don't...
>
> This whole idea/feature is native with Powercode.
Flame on, buddy! :-)
You are correct. Flexibility such as we are discussing is part of many
packages. The difference with PowerCo
Don't mean to start a flame war...so please don't...
This whole idea/feature is native with Powercode.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the trut
If it is BillMax, it is also easy. Don't know about others.
Butch Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 07:24 -0700, Chuck Profito wrote:
>
>> It sounds like wisp nirvana! Do you mind me asking what billing system you
>> are using, and are you trying to integrate the same? Can Butch Evans write
On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 07:24 -0700, Chuck Profito wrote:
> It sounds like wisp nirvana! Do you mind me asking what billing system you
> are using, and are you trying to integrate the same? Can Butch Evans write a
> integration script for this?
Some details would be needed to determine if I would be
that screen can come more and more
frequently...maybe every 5 minutes until they call.
...just a further thought.
. . . j o n a t h a n
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 1
.@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Mike Hammett
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 10:27 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
>
> You're correct with the liability thing... it sucks that people sue
> over
> such petty things.
>
>
2009 6:38 PM
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
> There is some potential liability in this.
>
> You don't know if friends are visiting and using the computer...or, the
> subscriber has an Wi-Fi w/o WAP/WEP and others are (potentially
...@michianawireless.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 4:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
Well. We kinda do this now. When a customer get to far out. We manually add
a rule to the router at the tower site he is connected to that redirects all
his port 80 traffic to a
uot;
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
>
> Hmm,
>
> Well anything is possible, I guess. But I do not see how alerting a
> customer that his account went past due and presenting the option to pay
> it now, is slandering. If his account is p
xt on it
like "Don't you to be an idiot and deadbeat like these morons".
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: sa...@michianawireless.com
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:49:06
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
Hmm,
Well
ent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 6:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
Well. We kinda do this now. When a customer get to far out. We manually
add a rule to the router at the tower site he is connected to that
redirects all his port 80 traffic to a webpage that says
reless.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 6:03 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
Well. We kinda do this now. When a customer get to far out. We manually
add a rule to the router at the tower site he is connected to that
redirects all his port 80 traffic to a we
c indefinitely to the pay
your bill page until paid.
I hope that explains it better.
Thanks,
John
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Profito"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 11:45:59 AM GMT -05:00 Columbia
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
W
Eje Gustafsson
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 6:05 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
Yepp bit expected. Because a web page consists of multiple images most of
the time and if you use every nth you never know if that rule will then hit
a icon, text page or
rial from
any computer.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Josh Cheney
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 8:00 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik Redirect
sa...@michianawireless.com wrote:
> Really
501 - 600 of 992 matches
Mail list logo
