Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?

EBS Admin, from what I read it looked like it was a motto, not some keywords. -- Brett P. On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:29, EBS Admin wrote: > Hi Darren, > > Maybe if you read what I wrote properly you would see that the > H1 surrounding the logo has different key words in it dependi

Re: [WSG] RE: More than one H1?

Seems to me that Providers of Miniature Clips for Business is more of a tag line and not really appropriate to put in an h1 heading. -- Brett P. On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:10, EBS Admin wrote: > No but you can wrap MiniClip - Providers of Miniature Clips for Business. > > ---

[WSG] What is a Perl, NFA and Java Usenet group?

Hi all! Does anyone know a good Usenet group that deals with Perl, NFAs and Java? I need one that deals with all three together, and would like to have more specific groups that deal with each one in particular, as well. Please reply off-list, as this is off-topic from the group. Regards, -- Bre

Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Oh, that is a good point! Let's do!!! -- Brett P. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Tony McNulty wrote: > Just for that I think we should keep him on! > > ------ > *From*: Brett Patterson > *Date*: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:35:16 -0400 > *To*: > *

Re: [WSG] Re WSG Digest

Please remove this user from the group ASAP! -- Brett P. On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Daniel Rowan < danielpaulro...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Stop emailling me you fucktards i unsubscribed leave me alone! > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:40 PM, TapirDesigns > wrote: > >> I am currently away u

Re: [WSG] [Spam] :changing font sizes from within a page.

I agree with James. Although, I find the best possible, all-around solution is to use all of the above! If the user does not have JavaScript/cookies enabled, then the user will use their browser, else they cannot view the text in large size. If the user does have JavaScript/cookies enabled, then th

Re: [WSG] JavaScript Language Clarifying within HTML

Thank you! -- Brett P. On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:48 AM, David Dixon wrote: > The language attribute was deprecated in html 4, so I wouldn't advise > using it. > > see: http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/interact/scripts.html#h-18.2.1 > > Thanks, > > David > >

[WSG] JavaScript Language Clarifying within HTML

I am not sure about the most recent standards regarding the "language" attribute of the SCRIPT tag within an HTML page, so I would like to know if it is still recommended to use the "language" attribute within the SCRIPT tag? And what version, if it is recommended to use that attribute, would one

Re: [WSG] Image mapping standards question

nt, but I'm not aware of a > standard technique for this. > > Regards, > Mike > > -- > *From:* li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] *On > Behalf Of *Brett Patterson > *Sent:* 01 June 2009 15:35 > *To:* wsg@webstand

[WSG] Image mapping standards question

It has recently come to my attention the struggles of an end-user when viewing images for any user. I have seen sites such as Facebook, MySpace, and other sites where pictures are hosted use roll-overs for recognizing certain parts of an image. I realize that this can be done using image maps as we

Re: [WSG] Background image not visible in ie

Have you used the CSS: background-position: center center; ? -- Brett P. On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Ben Dodson wrote: > It does of course require JavaScript which isn't strictly necessary as you > can get the same effect with just CSS (especially for the purposes of the > example

Re: [WSG] Box model in IE7

Well, good deal then. :) -- Brett P. On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Rimantas Liubertas wrote: > > Getting back on subject, I do not think the box model has been fixed in > IE7, > > but I do not know for sure. You might try adding margin for separation > with > > containing div tags in browse

Re: [WSG] Box model in IE7

Getting back on subject, I do not think the box model has been fixed in IE7, but I do not know for sure. You might try adding margin for separation with containing div tags in browsers. -- Brett P. Is the box model in IE7 still messed up? I thought they sorted it? > > I am floating a div to the

Re: [WSG] Box model in IE7

Forgot to mention that you do set specific formatting on text afterwards, as you mentioned, Janice. And I might add that that is a good point Christian, it does seem a little silly! -- Brett P. On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Brett Patterson < inspiron.patters...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: [WSG] Box model in IE7

imum as the basic > reading size below which it's a straign on the eyes. > > I personally don't mess with browser defaults and don't tend to use resets, > but for minimal purposes only. > > > > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:12 AM, Brett Patterson < > in

Re: [WSG] Box model in IE7

I have always been told to use something along the lines of either body { font-size: 100%; /* a fix for internet explorer */ } because of the way IE reads/sizes font. Starting out with html at only 62.5% font-sizing would completely mess up IE and the font in the browser would it not? -- Brett P.

[WSG] Possible layout problems with using this CSS code?

Would using: * { margin: 0; padding: 0; border: 0; } before the body to zero out all margins, paddings and borders, cause any accessibility problems or any problems one should be made aware of before using it for layout? -- Brett P. *

Re: [WSG] Re: Browser Backwards Compatibility -- How far back?

Okay, thank you all. I will use the Yahoo! Graded Browser Support matrix for information. -- Brett P. On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:23 AM, Ted Drake wrote: > The Yahoo! Graded Browser Support matrix is a good standard of what > browsers are appropriately supported. > http://developer.yahoo.com/yu

[WSG] Browser Backwards Compatibility -- How far back?

Hi all, I was just reading from a book that talked about some code that would not work in Internet Explorer 3.0, but would in Internet Explorer 4.0 and later, and Netscape Navigator 3.0 and later. This brought up a question that I could not find direct and consistent answers while searching the In

Re: [WSG] Safari 4 and 3.2 Running Simultaneously

You might could try the custom installation when installing and then creating and naming a different folder in your Program Files folder...name it something different than the currently installed Safari browser's folder... -- Brett P. On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Gregorio Espadas wrote: > H

Re: [WSG] Classes---Adding multiple classes to an element, is there a downfall???

Yea, I would never consider allowing it on any project I am working on either...I was actually asking because I have heard that it could be done, but never really understood (maybe, come to think of it, heard) what the downfalls were. I do, now, thanks to you and Russ Weakley. -- Brett P. On Tue

Re: [WSG] Classes---Adding multiple classes to an element, is there a downfall???

ied at the top?::: .information.more-styles { styles: here; } -- Brett P. On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Matthew Pennell wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Brett Patterson < > inspiron.patters...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Note the space in the second paragraph cla

[WSG] Classes---Adding multiple classes to an element, is there a downfall???

Hey all, a quick question, consider the following code: Content goes here on line 1 Content goes here on line 2 Note the space in the second paragraph class attribute...from what I have heard this allows multiple classes to be applied to a single element. Is there a downfall to applying mult

Re: [WSG] a Div tag won't pick up the height of a floated image?

r lazy people. > > > > On 17/02/2009, at 5:25, Brett Patterson > wrote: > > Will a div tag pick up the height of an image that is floated left? I have >> an image that is floated to the left and an unordered list that I am trying >> to get to move to the right side of

[WSG] a Div tag won't pick up the height of a floated image?

Will a div tag pick up the height of an image that is floated left? I have an image that is floated to the left and an unordered list that I am trying to get to move to the right side of an image, in a horizontal layout...the unordered list (navigation bar) is also in a horizontal line position. I

Re: [WSG] A Semi-Transparent Background Color?

quot;practicing" the code on my personal MySpace page to see the results...my MySpace page can be seen at http://www.myspace.com/irontombraider -- Brett P. On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:04 PM, Brett Patterson < inspiron.patters...@gmail.com> wrote: > To Mike, with what I am currently a

Re: [WSG] A Semi-Transparent Background Color?

; > > > > On 12/02/2009, at 1:04 PM, Brett Patterson wrote: > > Hi all, >> >> I was wondering why there was no implementation to allow a >> semi-transparent background color using CSS? If there is, is there a link >> that would point me in

[WSG] A Semi-Transparent Background Color?

Hi all, I was wondering why there was no implementation to allow a semi-transparent background color using CSS? If there is, is there a link that would point me in the direction to figure out how to go about implementing it on a Web page? -- Brett P.

Re: [WSG] Opera Targeting?!

Okay, one quick question. You say 200% is twice the default size, but in browsers like Firefox 3, there is only the (shortcut) Ctrl++ to zoom in, and I cannot find the percentage of that zoom, so is 200% font size increasement one or two clicks? -- Brett P. On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:47 AM, Gunlau

Re: [WSG] Opera Targeting?!

u said makes more sense than that. Now I realize where most of my problems have stemmed from. -- Brett P. On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis < bhawkesle...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 3/2/09 20:13, Brett Patterson wrote: > >> I really don't understand what

Re: [WSG] Opera Targeting?!

IE differently then all the other browsers update their own. Microsoft does not really use v3.0.8 like Firefox would, 9.26 like Opera would, etc. -- Brett P. On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Brett Patterson < inspiron.patters...@gmail.com> wrote: > I really don't understand what

Re: [WSG] Opera Targeting?!

I really don't understand what you mean, when you say: > It's a designer-bug. Vertical position of the navigation relies entirely > on font size, which means it is all over the place in my browsers on > first load. > > No two browsers calculate font size exactly the same before rendering, > so rel

[WSG] Opera Targeting?!

Hello All, I am in the process of working on my portfolio. It is not complete yet, but one problem with my navigation menu on the top exists. Although it is a minor pixel alignment in Opera, I cannot, for the life of me, figure out why only Opera is aligning my tabs (which are the top part of my n

[WSG] HTML 5 and XHTML 2 combined

a > strike). And then what idea is there of a standard that is not supported or > used? > > It's just a question about who has the power to decide the future of the > Web. The browser vendors? the coders/developers? "us"? or just everyone in > cooperation? > > 2

Re: [WSG] Image with borders due to Anchor tag

Okay, I understand. Thanks. -- Brett P. On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:46 AM, Simon Moss wrote: > Isn't it because the img tag when within an anchor tag will by default show > a blue border around it - behaviour from the days before css? Separate > behaviour from the anchor tag itself - a special i

Re: [WSG] Image with borders due to Anchor tag

ctually easy to remove the borders from an image in an anchor tag > using css, not inline. > > a img{ > border:none; > } > > When that's done, you can do whatever you want with the link or with the > image. > > > Johan Douma > johando...@gmail.com > > 20

Re: [WSG] Image with borders due to Anchor tag

Okay. That makes sense. -- Brett P. On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:52 PM, David Dorward wrote: > Brett Patterson wrote: > > So, my question is this. Why does the image tag have to have the border > > placed on it, instead of placing the border or text-decoration styles on >

Re: [WSG] embedding quicktime .mov cross-platform

I agree with Steve and Nancy. Have you tried to convert .mov into .mpeg, or similar? Try using sourceforge.net to locate some file format converters. And as far as embedding a movie or similar, have you searched alistapart.com ? And might I suggest http://www.delicious.com/irontombraider? I hav

Re: [WSG] SEO and Flash

I concur with Benjamin. "Try to use Flash only where it is needed. Many rich media sites such > as Google's YouTube use Flash for rich media but rely on HTML for > content and navigation. You can too, by limiting Flash to on-page > accents and rich media, not content and navigation. In addition to

Re: # Re: [WSG] Beta Testers Needed for BCAT

And we do agree. But again, NOT THE POINT, although it may be wrong, it may need to be designed accessible in the first place, it hasn't, so don't argue the point. End it at the fact that something needs to be done and people are ignorant. BCAT is doing what people should be doing, fixing things th

Re: # Re: [WSG] Beta Testers Needed for BCAT

ery well could have. With some minor changes, we could have talked with video conferencing. Kinda hard to do, but it can be done. -- Brett P. On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Brett Patterson < inspiron.patters...@gmail.com> wrote: > Pardon the language, but Hell no. For a number of different rea

Re: # Re: [WSG] Beta Testers Needed for BCAT

Pardon the language, but Hell no. For a number of different reasons. Among that being, I can't work with the code as good as I can with Microsoft's and the fact that it costs too much money. Although it is proprietary, I can recode most of what I need to do (Microsoft's code). To say I disagree wit

Re: # Re: [WSG] Beta Testers Needed for BCAT

The below was to James Ducker. -- Brett P. On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Brett Patterson < inspiron.patters...@gmail.com> wrote: > THANK YOU!!! I could not agree with you more. And in the same since, I > think we agree with each other. > > Congratulations on an argument

Re: # Re: [WSG] Beta Testers Needed for BCAT

Christie, your argument is about the most ridiculous argument there is. Everything you have stated is SOLELY about you and your personal preferences. Observe: I'm not a highly visual person, I even prefer reading data to being given a > graph. > So what? *NONE OF THIS IS ABOUT YOU!!!* Your person

Re: # Re: [WSG] Beta Testers Needed for BCAT

THANK YOU!!! I could not agree with you more. And in the same since, I think we agree with each other. Congratulations on an argument "well-played." And well-thought!!! -- Brett P. On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:05 AM, James Ducker wrote: > Hi WSG, > > This entire argument is getting a bit muc

Re: # Re: [WSG] Beta Testers Needed for BCAT

I hope I can throw my 2 cents in. Not trying to argue, but to TRY and answer some questions. > A question was asked early in this thread about what are the benefits of > using Flash? There's been no answer to that question. I was hoping to > learn > some answers because I've been confused about w

[WSG] Image with borders due to Anchor tag

Hi all, I do not know if this has been asked before, and if it has I apologize for asking again, but consider the following code: http://www.mozilla.org"; class="small-names"> Inside the tag there is an inline style that declares that the image have no border. I used the inline style here, in t

Re: [WSG] JavaScript as External File vs. Internal Code and linking to images

> Tatham Oddie > > call:+61414275989 , > call:+61280113982, > skype:tathamoddie, msn:tat...@oddie.com.au, tatham.oddie.com.au > > > > *From:* li...@webstandardsgroup.org [mailto:li...@webstandardsgroup.org] *On > Behalf Of *Brett Patterson > *Sent:* Wednesday, 7 J

[WSG] JavaScript as External File vs. Internal Code and linking to images

Recently, I experimented with changing check boxes with JavaScript. If the user clicked on the words next to the check box, then the box would be checked, once checked if the user clicked again, then the box would be unchecked. I wound up having to apply the same code to the check box itself in ord

Re: [WSG] Acceptable JavaScript Coding Practice?

, Christian Montoya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Brett Patterson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To All, > > > > I was playing around with a page where I found out that just about > > everything that I wanted to do I had to

Re: [WSG] Acceptable JavaScript Coding Practice?

Hi Steve, How could another method change the element the identifier variable is pointing at? I thought that that could only occur if I changed the id attribute or the variable itself, or the argument (here namedFunction('timer')) where timer is the argument? Hi Chris, Is not acceptable to put e

[WSG] Acceptable JavaScript Coding Practice?

To All, I was playing around with a page where I found out that just about everything that I wanted to do I had to use: function namedFunction(layer) { var whatever = document.getElementById(layer); * // other code here.* } And I got really annoyed at having to either copy and paste or retype

Re: [WSG] inline-block effect

As well as from mine. Did any of the above solve your problem? And what does OP mean? On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 8:05 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suspect that the OP miss-stated the problem. From my understanding, he > wants the BGcolor to extend for _only_ the width of the TEXT, not for the >

[WSG] Streamline a video question

I am trying to put a video on the Web, but I cannot get it to play automatically. I want to have them stream so that they will play immediately instead of lagging a minute or so when clicked on. Is there a standard/recommended way to do this? Links for reading about it would be greatly appreciated.

Re: [WSG] inline-block effect

It is. At least as far as I knew it to be. This is why I said to use the span tag. On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:59 AM, Stuart Foulstone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Am I confused? I thought was a block-level element. > > > > On Mon, December 1, 2008 6:32 pm, Andrew famiano wrote: > > I'm trying to se

Re: [WSG] inline-block effect

or you could just do Your Header Text Here. And in your CSS, .hello {background-color: color;} On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Сергей Кириченко <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > 1. float:left > 2. position:absolute > 3.insert span with bg into H2 > and non standart trick > inline-block for all and {dis

Re: [WSG] the Name attribute

What Dave? On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Dave Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 10:18 +, David Dorward wrote: > > Brett Patterson wrote: > > > Where could I find a good information site about the > > > document.images.imageId sc

Re: [WSG] the Name attribute

AIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brett Patterson wrote: > > So I thought. But why, when using JavaScript can you not target the ID > > of an element such as an image? > > You can. > > > You can target the name, but not the ID, > > Incorrect. > > > not withou

Re: [WSG] Fw: The Great Firewall of Australia

1) That, I do believe is a crock of shit!2) If he does anything like that, he will be dead!!! --and-- 3) Anyone who believes in those ideas are fucked up, stupid, and this I can promise, will NOT make it in this world, dead or alive! 4) Like I said, I think this a crock of shit, and possibly

Re: [WSG] the Name attribute

, David Dorward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brett Patterson wrote: > > I don't why, but XHTML (I am using Strict 1.0 in the below examples), > > has deprecated the use of the name attribute. That being said, my > > question is, "Why was the name attribute deprecated

Re: [WSG] HTML/XHTML/XML - Question about the future of.

Sorry, forgot to add, that the purpose of XHTML, from what some of the top designers and working group members have stated, I may have misinterpreted, but XHTML was built to help designers/developers transition from HTML to XML. On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Brett Patterson < [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [WSG] HTML/XHTML/XML - Question about the future of.

>From what I have read so far, you are pretty much agreeing with me. Hence, David, you said and I quote, "HTML 5 is "Everything you need to know to build a browser" with some definition of HTML, XHTML, DOM, SQL and HTTP in it.", therefore, HTML5 (not to be confused with xHTML or XHTML), is being ph

Re: [WSG] the Name attribute

That is strange, the examples didn't show. Any idea as to why? On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Brett Patterson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't why, but XHTML (I am using Strict 1.0 in the below examples), has > deprecated the use of the name attribute. That bein

[WSG] the Name attribute

I don't why, but XHTML (I am using Strict 1.0 in the below examples), has deprecated the use of the name attribute. That being said, my question is, "Why was the name attribute deprecated?". -- Brett P. *** List Guidelines: http://

Re: [WSG] HTML/XHTML/XML - Question about the future of.

>From the few recent posts, I have become so far confused, as anyone would as to why, Gunlaug, you keep stating xHTML5 or as above you say XHTML5? HTML and xHTML/XHTML are different. xHTML is XHTML, albeit 1.0 or 1.1 or 2.0 etc. So, is it a typo? -- Brett P.

Re: [WSG] your best practise for CSS sprites for elements that have no height declared

OK. So, lets agree that (Start here quoting you:::If you're not using a decent compressor then png's are 15% - 20% oversized.:::end quoting you here.) we are both right. I am simply stating as such without using a compressor (Start quoting you:::If you're not using a decent compressor then png's ar

Re: [WSG] your best practise for CSS sprites for elements that have no height declared

First of all, No I am not! Second I have tried out differences. Notice the difference in file sizes. Thirdly, I did not say that png did not support 8-bit, nowhere does it say that, it does however say that GIF only supports a maximum of 256 colors. Fourthly, Todd your argument is off subject, beca

Re: [WSG] Which is read first? Scripts or Styles?

[WSG] Which is read first? Scripts or Styles? > > On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 10:24 -0500, Brett Patterson wrote: > > I have no idea why, but for some reason I cannot remember which is > > read first! Are scripts or styles read first? > > As others have mentioned, they are read in

Re: [WSG] your best practise for CSS sprites for elements that have no height declared

No, I may have to disagree. GIF files are (a majority of them, if not all, are) smaller. They have to be. Considering GIF only supports up to a maximum of 256 colors. (it is 8-bit). Try http://www.sitepoint.com/article/gif-jpg-png-whats-difference/ ---or--- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gra

Re: [WSG] First Attempt

As someone who has read the post, in Dreamweaver 8, to follow along with Todd's statement, choose (File --> New) and under the General tab choose Starter Pages. You may choose from the list DW8 has. The rest I agree with. Try learning some of the code from the pre-existing sites, modify one section

Re: [WSG] your best practise for CSS sprites for elements that have no height declared

Yes, and colors in a row or horizontal line, so to speak, compress better depending on the compression mechanism. Just say that jpeg files read/compress horizontal, and gif files read/compress vertical, not sure if that is exactly correct, just an example. But iii (if the size is 1 pixel wide f

[WSG] Which is read first? Scripts or Styles?

I have no idea why, but for some reason I cannot remember which is read first! Are scripts or styles read first? And which is the recommended order to list them? Styles or Scripts first? -- Brett P. *** List Guidelines: http://webs

Re: [WSG] XHTML Standard question

OK. For the last almost 24 hours, I have been trying to get the link to the results posted on the server to work, but have failed miserably. The results were made public to subscribers of the newsletters they mail out every month. They have not yet decided to use the Internet to mail out the newsle

[WSG] HTML/XHTML/XML - Question about the future of.

I have, rather unfortunately, entered into an argument with a couple colleagues about the future of HTML/XHTML/XML. So, I was wondering, based on everyone's expertise level here who is right. I say that in the years coming, maybe 20 years from now, who knows, but eventually HTML and XHTML will be

Re: [WSG] XHTML Standard question

OK. I had forgotten you could use server-side validation. Thanks. On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Anthony Ziebell < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Remember to use server side validation and you don't need to worry about > rewriting standards :) > > > Brett Patterson w

[WSG] XHTML Standard question

I know that most, if not possible to say all, Web page designers use JavaScript for form validation. During a recent poll done by a few local colleges, 41.2% of the people who responded stated that they would rather not have to enable JavaScript, but on rare occasion they do for certain sites that

[WSG] Another Question about JavaScript.

I hate to ask another question about JavaScript, but I need help with ONE more thing, please? *Using the following JS code in XHTML Transitional:* function proc() { var num = document.heartSearch.hsQty.value*8.95; document.hSearchoutput.hsTotal.value = r2(num); } function prc2() { var num =

Re: [WSG] Reset form fields to default values when user clicks the refresh/reload button in there Browser, not on the page.

Ah, ok, I got it figured out thanks. On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Maben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > On Nov 13, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Brett Patterson wrote: > > Sorry, but no. If you look in FF3 it keeps the text entered in the form > field when page is refreshed the

Re: [WSG] Reset form fields to default values when user clicks the refresh/reload button in there Browser, not on the page.

x27;m not claiming that script solves your problem, but would be a > gateway for you to write something that does. > > On Nov 13, 2008, at 1:32 PM, Brett Patterson wrote: > > Sorry, but no. If you look in FF3 it keeps the text entered in the form > field when page is refreshed the sa

Re: [WSG] Reset form fields to default values when user clicks the refresh/reload button in there Browser, not on the page.

Sorry, but no. If you look in FF3 it keeps the text entered in the form field when page is refreshed the same. It does not remove it. There are no code examples, and I have exhausted the library and internet resources. On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Todd Budnikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > so

Re: [WSG] Reset form fields to default values when user clicks the refresh/reload button in there Browser, not on the page.

ww.4guysfromrolla.com/demos/OnBeforeUnloadDemo1.htm > > > On Nov 13, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Brett Patterson wrote: > > The Reload Current Page button in Firefox, and I think the Refresh Page > button in IE, and whatever those buttons are called in other browsers. NOT > with an input button to

Re: [WSG] Reset form fields to default values when user clicks the refresh/reload button in there Browser, not on the page.

orm reset input button? value="Reset!">? You lost me on the "but instead using the browser's > button.. what button? > On Nov 13, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Brett Patterson wrote: > > How do I get a form field to reset itself back to its default value if the > user ha

Re: [WSG] Reset form fields to default values when user clicks the refresh/reload button in there Browser, not on the page.

orm reset input button? value="Reset!">? You lost me on the "but instead using the browser's > button.. what button? > On Nov 13, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Brett Patterson wrote: > > How do I get a form field to reset itself back to its default value if the > user ha

Re: [WSG] Reset form fields to default values when user clicks the refresh/reload button in there Browser, not on the page.

orm reset input button? value="Reset!">? You lost me on the "but instead using the browser's > button.. what button? > On Nov 13, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Brett Patterson wrote: > > How do I get a form field to reset itself back to its default value if the > user ha

[WSG] Reset form fields to default values when user clicks the refresh/reload button in there Browser, not on the page.

How do I get a form field to reset itself back to its default value if the user has changed it? Without clicking on a refresh/reload button on the page but instead using the browser's button. *The XHTML Transitional code I have is*: 0 1

Re: [WSG] Question on servers and Email campaign

I agree with everyone!!! NEVER EVER give out your information like that. Read http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_engineering_(computer_security)because it sounds like a Social-Engineering attack!! You are right. On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Andrew Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >>

Re: [WSG] Who are the "Away on leave" Notices from? THREAD CLOSED, THREAD CLOSED, THREAD CLOSED!

And I'll bring the empty belly. On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Andrew Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And I'll bring the beer! :) > > Sent from my iPhone. > > > > > On 06/11/2008, at 8:53 PM, 8bits Media <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Russ, >> >> Will you be bringing a cake? >> >> Nick. >>

Re: [WSG] Question about change color of numbers in OL list

Change the OL tag color:red, and then use the span color:blue for your span. On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Антон Грахов <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi to all, > > how to change color of numbers in items OL list, but do not change > color of text in items? > > My idea with inner : > > CSS code:

Re: [WSG] Who are the "Away on leave" Notices from?

Return Receipt Your RE: [WSG] Who are the "Away on leave" Notices from? document: wasChristie Mason received by: at:11/05/2008 13:41:14 _ Sorry, could not resist. ;) On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:4

Re: [WSG] Who are the "Away on leave" Notices from?

Oh. I have always just set mine up to not send out for specific e-mail addresses. Sorry, did not mean to exasperate the issue. I did not know it was one. On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 4:32 PM, Paul Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Just auto replies from list members away on leave (who have set their

[WSG] Who are the "Away on leave" Notices from?

Are these away on leave notices from people who manage the webstandardsgroup.org site? Or individual people? It is kinda getting annoying? -- Brett P. *** List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe

Re: [WSG] URL length best practices [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

What? On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Ashley Butler < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please stop emailing me! > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Joe Ortenzi > Sent: Wednesday, 5 November 2008 3:30 PM > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > Su

Re: [WSG] URL length best practices

I don't think it matters. Not as long as readable characters are used, like & in place of &. On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Todd Budnikas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Wondering if people have insights into the length of a url for an article, > and whether or not it is recommended to complete the

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please - let blocks

OK. Thanks On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Keryx Web <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brett Patterson skrev: > >> I like that explanation. I get it now. Thanks. One more quick question >> though, what is a let-block, in general? Thanks. That really does make it a >

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please - versions

I like that explanation. I get it now. Thanks. One more quick question though, what is a let-block, in general? Thanks. That really does make it a lot easier to understand. Brett On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 6:04 AM, Keryx Web <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brett Patterson skrev: > >&g

Re: [WSG] CSS invisible to IE

There are conditional CSS HTML codes that can apply to FF. If you want to use them, you can try: If the above does not work, try adding an additional N in , as in . On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Luke Hoggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Hi, > > This list isn't really a help desk. For such

Re: [WSG] Accessible JS/Mootools

It says the page validates. And I visited it, but don't see no problems with it. On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Essential eBiz Solutions Ltd < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > can anyone help me with this? > > > Many Thanks > > Mathew O'Connor > > > > 0800 3

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

There is only one JavaScript, as created by Netscape. Though it can be used for other things, such as programming an application, I think that is worded right. On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Hassan Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > liorean wrote: > > Anyway, by the time the first ful

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

ead JavaScript as JScript? On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 10:43 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Behalf Of Brett Patterson > > Sent: 28 October 2008 12:35 > > To: wsg@webstandardsgroup.org > > Subject: Re: [

Re: [WSG] JavaScript clarification please

When you say support, are you saying that Internet Explorer will not execute JavaScript, or it will execute JavaScript as JScript? And in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JavaScript link you provided it states that JavaScript is heavily object-based, so should I assume this as well to be correct?

  1   2   >