Hi all,
I'm home again after recent travels, once again getting back up to speed
on all the good things done by others.
We have a lot of good new code, documentation, and development aids in
the repository. Can we agree that it's reasonable to plan for a beta
release of WSJT-X v1.4 before too
Hi all,
My, you've been busy here -- lots of very impressive progress! Many
thanks to all of you contributors to the WSJT-related projects!
[Brief aside: My wife and I thoroughly enjoyed our 8-day cruise --
Venice to Athens, with stopovers at ports on the Dalmatian coast: Split,
Korcula, Dubr
On 04/09/2014 19:24, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Joe,
>
> I'm home again after recent travels, once again getting back up to speed
> on all the good things done by others.
Hope the travels were enjoyable, I gather from Dave G4RGK that the WX in
France wasn't too pleasant.
>
> We have a lot of g
Hi Bill and all,
> Hope the travels were enjoyable, I gather from Dave G4RGK that the WX in
> France wasn't too pleasant.
Some rain, to be sure. But we had a delightful time nevertheless!
Thanks for detailing the remaining issues you're aware of in WSJT-X v1.4.
I'm working on bringing the User
On 04/09/2014 21:37, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi Bill and all,
Hi Joe,
>
>> Hope the travels were enjoyable, I gather from Dave G4RGK that the WX in
>> France wasn't too pleasant.
> Some rain, to be sure. But we had a delightful time nevertheless!
>
> Thanks for detailing the remaining issues you're aw
Hi Joe, Bill, All,
While there may be issues, I'd have to say v1.4 has allot of nice
features over v1.3. I've had "very few" problems overall, both on
Windows and Linux. A couple were my own doing. With the FT-2KD, it's
been very stable, though I don't often use all the advanced features.
If PSKr
ot;
- 1788 Richard Henry Lee
> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 21:58:20 +0100
> From: g4...@classdesign.com
> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
>
> On 04/09/2014 21:37, Joe Taylor wrote:
> > Hi Bill and all,
> Hi Joe,
> >
>
gt; From: g4...@classdesign.com
> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
>
> On 04/09/2014 21:37, Joe Taylor wrote:
> > Hi Bill and all,
> Hi Joe,
> >
> >> Hope the travels were enjoyable, I gather from Dave G4RGK that
the WX in
On 04/09/2014 20:48, Bill Somerville wrote:
Below are some updates on issues I reported that may be blocking for a
Beta release of WSJT-X v1.4:
> On 04/09/2014 19:24, Joe Taylor wrote:
>> Hi all,
> Hi Joe,
>> I'm home again after recent travels, once again getting back up to speed
>> on all the g
Hi all,
On 9/11/2014 12:04 PM, Bill Somerville wrote:
> Below are some updates on issues I reported that may be blocking for a
> Beta release of WSJT-X v1.4:
I've given some thought to how best to announce public availability of a
beta release of WSJT-X, v1.4. How about a brief announcement to
A really good idea, Joe. Elecraft has always made a point of involving
their customers, and it has gotten them a lot of useful input.
73, Jim K9YC
On Thu,9/11/2014 10:17 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
> 1. We plan to make a beta release soon.
> 2. Here's a short list of new features...
> 3. Here's a lin
Hi Bill and Joe,
1) What version of Qt are you compiling against?Qt5.2.1?I compiled a
local version of Qt5.2.1 from source following your suggestion to be able to
get full c++11 support.But qt-project now has 5.3.1 available. Have you
(or anyone) used this and should we incorpo
On 11/09/2014 19:40, John Nelson wrote:
> Hi Bill and Joe,
Hi John,
>
> 1) What version of Qt are you compiling against?Qt5.2.1?I compiled
> a local version of Qt5.2.1 from source following your suggestion to be able
> to get full c++11 support.But qt-project now has 5.3.1 available
: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 19:40, John Nelson wrote:
> Hi Bill and Joe,
Hi John,
>
> 1) What version of Qt are you compiling against?Qt5.2.1?I
compiled a local version of Qt5.2.1 from source following your suggestion to
be able to get full c++11 support.But qt-pr
, 2014 2:00 PM
> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
>
> On 11/09/2014 19:40, John Nelson wrote:
>> Hi Bill and Joe,
> Hi John,
>> 1) What version of Qt are you compiling against?Qt5.2.1?I
> compiled a local version of Qt5.
4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 2:27 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 20:04, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
> When is hamlib-3 used? At least for my build on Windows 7 hamlib2 is
> what is used and ends up in
5,871,848 wsjtx.exe
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 2:27 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 20:04, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
> When is hamlib-3 used
certain you have followed all the instructions to install the latest
JTSDK?
Maybe Greg can chip in with a hint as to why this is not working.
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 2:27 PM
> To: wsjt-devel@l
Hi John,
I’ve compiled (and am running) 1.4 Rev 4204 under OSX 10.9.4 with Qt 5.3.1.
Granted, one successful installation is hardly conclusive, however, I have done
it.
Scott D. Hernalsteen/W8CQD
FCC Licensed Amateur Radio Operator
(Amateur Extra C
iginal Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 3:46 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 21:31, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
> I reinstalled JTSDK-QT and that cleared up the DLL
updated JTSDK to fix this issue but it appears you are
> still not getting PkgConfig on your PATH during the build.
>
> Are you certain you have followed all the instructions to install the latest
> JTSDK?
>
> Maybe Greg can chip in with a hint as to why this is not working.
,081 bytes
>
>
> But it does run now at least.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 3:46 PM
> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
>
But what about hamlib-3.dll?
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 4:05 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 22:01, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
> I th
On 11/09/2014 22:05, Bill Somerville wrote:
> No Hamlib DLLs which is what you have below - all is OK now.
Oops, no it's not. That libhamlib-2.dll should not be there. I suspect
it is old and not put there by the build you have just done.
Try nuking the install directory and running the build aga
On 11/09/2014 22:08, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
> But what about hamlib-3.dll?
Not required - we statically link Hamlib for now so as not to clash with
any other application that uses Hamlib-2.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
--
Want
Bill
> G4WJS.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 2:00 PM
>> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
>>
>> On 11/09/2
On 11/09/2014 21:43, KI7MT wrote:
> Hi Bill, Mike,
Hi Greg,
>
> Just FYI
>
> I just built both Debug and Release install targets, and the only thing
> Hamlib related in the Build Tree are the .cpp.obj and .cpp files, which
> should be there I would expect.
>
> The install directories are clear of a
Hi Bill, Mike,
I just deleted the wsjtx directory
C:\JTSDK\QT\wsjt\{build,install,package}
Ran the build: build wsjtx rinstall
I don't see any libhamlib*.dll's in the tree at all. I suspect it was a
combination of pkg-config and the Build Script causing the issue, as
there were extensive update
Hi Bill,
See below,
On 9/11/2014 21:24, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 11/09/2014 21:43, KI7MT wrote:
>> Hi Bill, Mike,
> Hi Greg,
>>
>> Just FYI
>>
>> I just built both Debug and Release install targets, and the only thing
>> Hamlib related in the Build Tree are the .cpp.obj and .cpp files, which
>
lib-2.dll errors too once I renamed that
hamlib3 one.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 4:09 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 22:05, Bill Somerville wrote:
ce!
OK, send me your latest CMakeCache.txt and I'll try and find out why
Hamlib-2 is being referenced.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 4:09 PM
> To: wsjt-devel@lists.s
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 4:48 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 22:42, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
> Nope...removed the whole JTSDK-QT\wsjtx directory and rebuilt &
.
Mike W9MDB
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 4:48 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 22:42, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
> Nope...removed the whole JTS
On 11/09/2014 22:50, Michael Black wrote:
> //Path to a library.
> hamlib_STATIC_LIBRARY:FILEPATH=hamlib_STATIC_LIBRARY-NOTFOUND
>
The above line is the clue. I'm not sure why that is still showing as
-NOTFOUND. I think there may be a problem with the package finder I
wrote for Hamlib since *
talled in:
libdir='/c/test-install/hamlib/mingw32/lib'
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:00 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 22:50, Michael Black wrote:
ut not being picked
up correctly in the configuration phase in your case.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:00 PM
> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Ba
1, 2014 5:15 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 23:08, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
> OK...removed the wsjtx tree and "build wsjtx rconfig"
> Still not found
> What file is it looking for?
OK, I need to see the output of t
In src\wsjtx\CMakeLists.txt
CMakeLists.txt:# find_library (hamlib_RUNTIME NAMES hamlib hamlib-2
PATH_SUFFIXES bin)
CMakeLists.txt.console:# find_library (hamlib_RUNTIME NAMES hamlib
hamlib-2 PATH_SUFFIXES bin)
Mike
W9MDB
--
On 11/09/2014 23:21, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
in the drectory
/JTSDK-QT/hamlib3/mingw32/lib
is there a file named libhamlib.a
?
73
Bill
G4WJS.
--
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production database.
When
[wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 23:21, Michael Black wrote:
Hi Mike,
in the drectory
/JTSDK-QT/hamlib3/mingw32/lib
is there a file named libhamlib.a
?
73
Bill
G4WJS.
--
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade
as not set up to build
the static archive (./configure --enable-static ...).
> Mike W9MDB
73
Bill
G4WJS.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:37 PM
> To: WSJT software development
> Subject: Re
git
Requires.private:
Cflags: -I${includedir}
Libs: -L${libdir} -lhamlib
Libs.private:
-Original Message-
From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:44 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
On 11/09/2014 23
Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:00 PM
>> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
>>
>> On 11/09/2014 22:50, Michael Black wrote:
>>
>>
>>> //Path to a library.
merville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2014 5:37 PM
>> To: WSJT software development
>> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
>>
>> On 11/09/2014 23:21, Michael Black wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
&
JTSDK is corrupt or the
>> Hamlib-3 build in there is mis-configured and was not set up to build
>> the static archive (./configure --enable-static ...).
>>> Mike W9MDB
>> 73
>> Bill
>> G4WJS.
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Bill Somervi
On 12/09/2014 00:04, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 11/09/2014 23:57, KI7MT wrote:
>> Hi Bill,
> Hi Greg,
>> Yup, I think that's the issue. I've never been able to build Hamlib3 on
>> Windows, only on Linux. My current version was from one of your DropBox
>> Downloads I believe.
>>
>> I can Zip up my
>>> the static archive (./configure --enable-static ...).
>>>> Mike W9MDB
>>> 73
>>> Bill
>>> G4WJS.
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Bill Somerville [mailto:g4...@classdesign.com]
>>>> Sent: T
Hi Bill,
Thanks.
I had the actual commands and such saved, but need to setup the
environment. Will talk about that offline.
I'm sending the update now.
73's
Greg, KI7MT
On 9/11/2014 23:21, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 12/09/2014 00:04, Bill Somerville wrote:
>> On 11/09/2014 23:57, KI7MT wrote:
On 12/09/2014 00:21, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 12/09/2014 00:04, Bill Somerville wrote:
>> On 11/09/2014 23:57, KI7MT wrote:
>>> Hi Bill,
>> Hi Greg,
>>> Yup, I think that's the issue. I've never been able to build Hamlib3 on
>>> Windows, only on Linux. My current version was from one of your Dro
Hi Bill,
On 9/11/2014 23:36, Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 12/09/2014 00:21, Bill Somerville wrote:
>> On 12/09/2014 00:04, Bill Somerville wrote:
>>> On 11/09/2014 23:57, KI7MT wrote:
Hi Bill,
>>> Hi Greg,
Yup, I think that's the issue. I've never been able to build Hamlib3 on
Window
Hi Scott,
> I’ve compiled (and am running) 1.4 Rev 4204 under OSX 10.9.4 with Qt 5.3.1.
Thanks for the report. I will do some tests on the weekend.
--- John G4KLA
--
Want excitement?
Manually upgrade your production d
t decode I am not up to speed enough to fully dig into it yet. But
I will be.
Thank you,
73 de Bill ND0B
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 3:03 PM
To: 'WSJT software development'
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
Hi all,
My, you've be
On 25/06/2015 21:03, Joe Taylor wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Joe,
>
> My, you've been busy here -- lots of very impressive progress! Many
> thanks to all of you contributors to the WSJT-related projects!
>
> [Brief aside: My wife and I thoroughly enjoyed our 8-day cruise --
> Venice to Athens, with stopove
Hi Bill,
No worries about the WSJT_SS_ISCAT yahoo group -- it has served a very
worthwhile purpose, and certainly no toes have been stepped on! (The
discussion can be moved back here at some appropriate time after your
improvements have been merged into the WSJT trunk.)
Thanks for sending the
lists.
73
Charlie
-Original Message-
From: Joe Taylor [mailto:j...@princeton.edu]
Sent: 25 June 2015 21:04
To: 'WSJT software development'
Subject: [wsjt-devel] Back in town
Hi all,
My, you've been busy here -- lots of very impressive progress! Many
thanks to all of y
55 matches
Mail list logo
