Re: [yocto] Kernel configuration fragments and defconfig from kernel source tree, not meta layer file

2015-03-17 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Alex J Lennon wrote: > Hi, > > I've been looking into a request to have Yocto kernel configuration > fragment support in meta-raspberrypi with a defconfig which is pulled > from the kernel source tree for the configured machine. > > My understanding is that Yocto e

Re: [yocto] yocto master work-shared, kernel .config seems to have gone awol

2015-03-30 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-03-30 01:36 PM, Alex J Lennon wrote: Hi, I'm updating to Yocto master and have been seeing that when I bitbake -c devshell virtual/kernel I go into a work-shared tree now. There was a discussion on the list about this. See the patch from Ross: [OE-core] [PATCH] devshell: allow the sta

Re: [yocto] "fatal: A branch named 'meta-orig' already exists."

2015-03-31 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-03-31 6:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: oh, what fresh hell is this? ... snip ... NOTE: Preparing RunQueue NOTE: Executing SetScene Tasks NOTE: Executing RunQueue Tasks ERROR: Function failed: do_validate_branches (log file is located at /home/rpjday/oe/builds/qemux86/tmp/work/qemux86

Re: [yocto] "fatal: A branch named 'meta-orig' already exists."

2015-04-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-04-01 3:07 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-03-31 6:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: oh, what fresh hell is this? ... snip ... NOTE: Preparing RunQueue NOTE: Executing SetScene Tasks NOTE: Executing RunQueue Tasks ERROR: Function

Re: [yocto] "fatal: A branch named 'meta-orig' already exists."

2015-04-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 7:24 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > >> On 2015-04-01 3:07 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> > >> > > On 2015-03-31 6:26 PM, Robert P. J. Day w

Re: [yocto] [kernel config]: specified values did not make it into the kernel's final configuration

2015-04-04 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Liam Maps wrote: > Hi, > > During the build of a core-image-base for BeagleBone using the master branch > I was presented with the following warning: > > "WARNING: [kernel config]: specified values did not make it into the > kernel's final configuration:" > > The fu

Re: [yocto] [kernel config]: specified values did not make it into the kernel's final configuration

2015-04-04 Thread Bruce Ashfield
nt to a value that is valid for the kernel in question. So no matter what we set it to, the kernel configuration system (i.e. korg, not yocto) has the final say. That's more than often what you are seeing when those values change. Bruce > > Thank you. > > > > On

Re: [yocto] The error of task do_validate_branches

2015-04-13 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-04-13 11:14 PM, neil...@emerson.com wrote: Hi, all I build the custom linux-yocto kernel, it appears the error as bellow : Hi Neil, Can you provide a bit more information ? What release/branch are you building ? Obviously you are building a variant of linux-yocto that wasn't released

Re: [yocto] SRCREV Issue for custom linux kernel

2015-04-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-04-14 6:48 AM, Raghavendra Kakarla wrote: Hi All, I got the an error while i am checking out the linux kernel from the SVN to build in the YOCTO project environment. What release is this ? master ? An older release ? And are you seeing this same error if you have a kernel recipe tha

Re: [yocto] Move device tree generation from include file to bbclass

2015-04-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-04-15 08:33 AM, Bach, Pascal wrote: Hi Adding oe-core, since that's the right place to have a discussion like this. As ARM now also moved to device tree it look like in future we will have more kernels that are using device tree then ones that are not. True, but it has been like t

Re: [yocto] Move device tree generation from include file to bbclass

2015-04-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > > On 04/15/2015 04:13 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >> On 2015-04-15 08:33 AM, Bach, Pascal wrote: >>> >>> Hi >>> >> >> Adding oe-core, since that's the r

Re: [yocto] Move device tree generation from include file to bbclass

2015-04-15 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Nikolay Dimitrov wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > > On 04/15/2015 06:26 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Nikolay Dimitrov >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Bruce, >>> >>> >>> On

Re: [yocto] [poky] Initramfs not appended to kernel image

2015-04-16 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-04-16 6:23 AM, Wouter van Rooy wrote: Hello, For the last week or so I have been struggling to build a kernel image with an embedded initramfs using the mechanisms provided by Poky Daisy. In local.conf I have set INITRAMFS_IMAGE_BUNDLE to "1" and INITRAMFS_IMAGE to the name of my image

Re: [yocto] SRCREV Issue for custom linux kernel

2015-04-16 Thread Bruce Ashfield
patches.scc \ " LINUX_VERSION ?= "3.10.14" LINUX_VERSION_EXTENSION ?= "-custom" SRCREV = "94" PR = "r0" PV = "${LINUX_VERSION}" S = "${WORKDIR}/linux-3.10.14" COMPATIBLE_MACHINE_arqlyn = "arqlyn" Regards, Raghav

Re: [yocto] SRCREV issue with linux-yocto-custom do_validate_branches()

2015-04-17 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-04-17 6:12 AM, Mills, Clayton wrote: Hi All, I'm having a little trouble with do_validate_branches() inherited by my linux-yocto-custom. I'm building the 3.14.28 kernel with ltsi kernel patch set applied, so was trying to set this up with a custom linux recipe in my bsp. Out of curio

Re: [yocto] Problems enabling systemd

2015-04-20 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 04/20/2015 04:43 AM, Anders Darander wrote: * Matt Schuckmann [150417 23:27]: I've got an image for a AM3352 system based on Dylan and Arago and I'm trying to switch to systemd for init. So far I haven't had much luck. First off I'm getting different results depending on where I turn it o

Re: [yocto] Problems enabling systemd

2015-04-20 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 04/20/2015 02:06 PM, Matt Schuckmann wrote: -Original Message- From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 7:52 AM To: Matt Schuckmann; Yocto Project Subject: Re: [yocto] Problems enabling systemd On 04/20/2015 04:43 AM, Anders Darander

Re: [yocto] SRCREV issue with linux-yocto-custom do_validate_branches()

2015-04-21 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 04/21/2015 08:21 AM, Mills, Clayton wrote: On 17 April 2015 14:28, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-04-17 6:12 AM, Mills, Clayton wrote: Hi All, I'm having a little trouble with do_validate_branches() inherited by my linux-yocto-custom. I'm building the 3.14.28 kernel with ltsi ke

Re: [yocto] [poky] Initramfs not appended to kernel image

2015-04-27 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-04-20 05:09 AM, Wouter van Rooy wrote: Hi Bruce, First of all, thanks for your answer. It would be a comforting idea to get this initramfs implemented cleanly in my project. On 16-04-15 16:22, Bruce Ashfield wrote: I'm the proud owner of the bugzilla to document this process b

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

2015-04-28 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-04-28 02:49 AM, Schaumlöffel, Jan wrote: Hi everyone, I have a working root fs based on “dizzy”, for which I created a customized machine config, a custom package config recipe and a custom image recipe. When running into problems with the python installation on that rootfs I decided to

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

2015-04-28 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-04-28 11:36 AM, Schaumlöffel, Jan wrote: Hmmm. It shouldn't have gone missing. Bits of the kernel build outputs did move around in 1.8, but the abiversion is still generated and placed in the STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR. I was just wondering, is there an easy way to resolve these Paths from

Re: [yocto] Yocto linux-kernel

2015-04-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 04/29/2015 08:38 AM, Parthiban Kandasamy wrote: i am using beagleboard-xm like board for my custom use. for my development i am using yocto-dora-1.5 as bsp and kernel-2.6.32(i downgraded). while bitbaking kernel, i got error as follows: Log data follows: | DEBUG: Executing shell fun

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

2015-04-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 04/29/2015 03:38 AM, Schaumlöffel, Jan wrote: Have you tried setting linux-dummy as the preferred provider for the kernel ? That would skip the build processing doing anything more than satisfying the various kernel dependencies. Ah, that's a good hint, I'll try that. After your build ha

Re: [yocto] Kernel customized do_fetch issue

2015-04-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-04-29 01:39 PM, Joel (Xi Zhou) Zhou wrote: Hi all, I created a do_fetch() for checkout in-house git repo, which is working fine with OE. do_fetch() { cd ${WORKDIR} rm -rf ${PN}-${PV} git clone ssh://svcsw...@git-ccxsw.inhouse.com/linux-lsk ${PN}-${PV} cd ${PN}-${

Re: [yocto] Kernel customized do_fetch issue

2015-04-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-04-29 02:08 PM, Joel (Xi Zhou) Zhou wrote: But the question has to be asked. Why exactly are you manually fetching the kernel ? The fetcher can take care of most everything. The whole story is starting at the url of our git repo. We have a git URL like: ssh://svcsw...@git-ccxsw.

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

2015-04-30 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-04-30 3:14 AM, Schaumlöffel, Jan wrote: That is really odd. I'll be interested to hear how that happened. I just did a test and it points to where I expect: [/home/bruc...poky/build]> bitbake -e core-image-minimal | grep STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR # $STAGING_KERNEL_BUILDDIR STAGING_KERNE

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

2015-04-30 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-04-30 08:27 AM, Schaumlöffel, Jan wrote: What kernel recipe is used when your machine is set to 'astro' ? Something custom ? Or have you added machine compatibility to another known kernel recipe ? How would I see which kernel recipe is used? This is where my brute force techniques pr

Re: [yocto] fido: out-of-tree module build fails due to wrong Module.symvers reference

2015-05-04 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-05-03 12:16 PM, Timo Korthals wrote: Dear yocto developers, the following "more generic" workaround worked also, which let's me assume that the "Module.symvers" in ${S} is somehow broken? Content of "linux-yocto_3.19.bbappend": do_install_append() { cp -f ${KBUILD_OUTPUT}/Module.sy

Re: [yocto] Need advice on tracking down "-dirty"

2015-05-08 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-05-08 5:36 AM, Spriggs, Jim wrote: Hi Guys, Using poky dizzy with meta-altera (from OE), and trying to implement a simple loadable kernel-module by following the method outlined in Lab3 of https://www.yoctoproject.org/sites/default/files/kernel-lab-1.6.pdf. I'm doing an "rm -rf tmp"

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

2015-05-11 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-05-11 02:10 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: It is plausible. But in theory, linux-dummy should still provide what you need (but since it doesn't build anything, there is no abi .. and no modules can be built against it) .. s

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

2015-05-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-05-12 10:20 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-05-11 02:10 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: It is plausible. But in theory, linux-dummy should still provide what you need

Re: [yocto] [meta-ti] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

2015-05-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
gt;>> >>>> On May 14, 2015 6:08 PM, "Denys Dmytriyenko" wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:35:20AM -0400, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >>>>> > On 2015-05-12 10:20 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: >>>

Re: [yocto] [meta-ti] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

2015-05-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-05-19 07:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:16 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On May 14

Re: [yocto] Kernel config fragments are no longer applied after update to Fido

2015-06-04 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Neuer User wrote: > Hello > > I have the following kernel recipe, which is based on some help from > Bruce Ashfield last year: > > - > inherit kernel > require recipes-kern

Re: [yocto] [meta-ti] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

2015-06-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-06-09 9:12 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-05-19 07:39 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Brian Hutchinson wrote: On Fri, May 15, 2015 at

Re: [yocto] failure in linux-yocto kernel do_patch

2015-06-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-06-12 04:41 AM, Mayank Agarwal wrote: Hi I am getting the following error while compiling linux-yocto from yocto openembedded. DEBUG: Executing shell function do_patch | Deleted branch meta-temp (was d36a7ef). | WARNING: addon feature "features/nfsd/nfsd-enable.scciso" was not found

Re: [yocto] Problems using "In-Tree" defconfig File

2015-06-19 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-06-19 03:28 AM, Andreas Fenkart wrote: I want to use a defconfig, that is provided by the linux git repository, hence this seems to fit my need: http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/1.8/kernel-dev/kernel-dev.html#using-an-in-tree-defconfig-file KBUILD_DEFCONFIG_KMACHINE ?= defconfig_file An

Re: [yocto] Migration from 1.7.1 to 1.8 - kernel-abiversion missing

2015-06-23 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-06-23 3:15 PM, Robert Calhoun wrote: On 4/30/15 10:06 AM, "Bruce Ashfield" wrote: On 2015-04-30 08:27 AM, Schaumlöffel, Jan wrote: What kernel recipe is used when your machine is set to 'astro' ? Something custom ? Or have you added machine compatibility to

Re: [yocto] Creating image with genericx86 machine and RT-Preempt Patch

2015-07-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-07-07 7:56 AM, Gorny Krystian wrote: Hi, I try to build an image for a x86 architecture with RT-Preemtp Patch. So I use the genericx86 machine and try to build the core-image-rt recipe. This fails with the following errors: /> ERROR: Nothing PROVIDES 'linux-yocto-rt' (but /media/disk/my

Re: [yocto] Creating image with genericx86 machine and RT-Preempt Patch

2015-07-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-07-07 12:30 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-07-07 7:56 AM, Gorny Krystian wrote: Hi, I try to build an image for a x86 architecture with RT-Preemtp Patch. So I use the genericx86 machine and try to build the core-image-rt recipe. This fails with the following errors: /> ER

Re: [yocto] populate_sdk and kernel headers

2015-07-08 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-07-08 1:05 PM, Benjamin Fleming wrote: Ok, adding kernel-devsrc to my IMAGE_INSTALL caused the kernel source to be included in the SDK. Unfortunately, it is now also included in the target image. I found adding kernel-devsrc instead to TOOLCHAIN_TARGET_TASK gave me what I wanted (/usr/s

Re: [yocto] Selecting different kernel inside an image recipe

2015-07-08 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-07-08 12:36 PM, Klaus Knopper wrote: Hello Leonardo, On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 10:40:10AM -0500, Leonardo Sandoval wrote: On 07/08/2015 09:50 AM, Klaus Knopper wrote: Hello list, I'm trying to build variantions/brands of an image that only differ in kernel configuration and kernel modul

Re: [yocto] Kernel header missing for specific Target

2015-07-17 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 15-07-17 08:47 AM, Gorny Krystian wrote: Hi I try add to my core-image-rt image on a x86 arch my own IO driver. I have already my own recipe, for normal user space programs everything is working fine. For the kernel space driver Yocto is missing at do_comile task the asm/atomic.h header file

Re: [yocto] Kernel header missing for specific Target

2015-07-17 Thread Bruce Ashfield
the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. -Original Message- From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 3:32 PM To: Gorny Krystian; y

Re: [yocto] Problem overwriting default kernel config values

2015-07-18 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-07-17 9:35 PM, Ryan Soussan wrote: Hello, We're having a problem overwriting the default linux kernel config values. We tried adding our own .cfg file to our layer and appending it to the source url of the linux-yocto bitbake file. The variable in our case is not getting overwritten tho

Re: [yocto] Problem overwriting default kernel config values

2015-07-18 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-07-18 11:53 PM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-07-17 9:35 PM, Ryan Soussan wrote: Hello, We're having a problem overwriting the default linux kernel config values. We tried adding our own .cfg file to our layer and appending it to the source url of the linux-yocto bitbake file.

Re: [yocto] Kernel header missing for specific Target

2015-07-23 Thread Bruce Ashfield
this e-mail is strictly forbidden. -Original Message----- From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Sent: Friday, July 17, 2015 5:40 PM To: Gorny Krystian; yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] Kernel header missing for specific Target On 15-07-17 09:55 AM, Gorny Krystian wro

Re: [yocto] qemux86 and generic86

2015-08-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:44 AM, Amit Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > > > I have a basic doubts on qemux86 build application image is not working on > generic86 target. > > Suppose I have a application which I would like to test on target board, but > the target board is not yet ready. If I will want to tes

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][meta-virtualization] openvsitch: set CONFIGUREOPT_DEPTRACK to empty

2015-08-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 15-08-26 01:48 AM, rongqing...@windriver.com wrote: From: Roy Li compilation failed since the needed dirs maybe not created when make ".in" target, fix it by creating the needed dirs before, but mainstream thinks the needed dirs should be created when do configuration. at last, find CONFIGUR

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi] kernel do_patch lasts ages

2015-08-31 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-08-31 9:07 PM, Andreas Müller wrote: On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Andreas Müller wrote: Hi since one week or so my build sometimes freezes with linux-raspberrypi-3.18.11+gitd64fa8121fca9883d6fb14ca06d2abf66496195e-r0 do_patch (pid 7335) without any progress noticeable. In log.d

Re: [yocto] Warning about auto generated BSP description

2015-09-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 15-09-13 04:15 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: I'm getting the following warning: [kernel]: An auto generated BSP description was used, this normally indicates a misconfiguration. Check that your machine (chroma-bsp) has an associated kernel description. Googling turns up the information that thi

Re: [yocto] Warning about auto generated BSP description

2015-09-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 15-09-14 01:38 PM, Paul D. DeRocco wrote: From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] The tool may have created these files, but the question is .. What release are you using ? If you check something in the kernel meta directory, I can tell you if the warning is wrong, or

Re: [yocto] RFC: Yocto LTS?

2015-10-14 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 15-10-14 11:12 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: Hi, On 14/10/15 14:50, akuster808 wrote: Chris, On 10/14/2015 06:28 AM, Chris Simmonds wrote: Hi, Is there a statement about the period of support for a Yocto release? Looking through the updates, it seems that 12 months is typical, a was the case

Re: [yocto] multiple yocto-kernel-cache mirrors support in linux-yocto style recipe

2015-10-20 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 15-10-20 09:01 AM, Luo Zhenhua wrote: Hi, I created a bbappend for linux-yocto_4.1.bb to use our own kernel source git url, a yocto-kernel-cache git tree is created to manage the distro specific kernel fragments, I want to use both Yocto yocto-kernel-cache and our own yocto-kernel-cache git,

Re: [yocto] kernel defconfig configuration

2015-10-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 15-10-29 03:22 AM, Edward Wingate wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Daniel. wrote: I suggest that you do an "bitbake -fc configure YOUR_KERNEL" and inspect the .config WORKDIR folder. Is that yours .config? I'm not sure if this is the WORKDIR I'm suppose to be looking at, but after I

Re: [yocto] kernel defconfig configuration

2015-10-30 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 15-10-29 03:06 PM, Edward Wingate wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 6:10 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: That's the kernel's configuration subsystem at play, it still has to process the the defconfig (which was placed as .config before starting the kernel build). Invalid options are remov

Re: [yocto] Copying the kernel in the poky directory

2015-11-26 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 15-11-26 02:39 AM, Deepika Teriar wrote: Hi I am customizing yocto for beaglebone black I do not want my kernel to get downloaded from the git after I clean the build directory. So i have kept the linux-kernel directory with the name kernel-3.14.29 in the poky directory. And in the linux-yoct

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][yocto-kernel-cache] base.cfg: enable TMPFS_POSIX_ACL and TMPFS_XATTR

2015-11-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-11-26 2:50 AM, rongqing...@windriver.com wrote: From: Roy Li enable Tmpfs POSIX Access Control Lists and Tmpfs extended attributes this will remove the error when systemd apply the ACL to tmpfs: systemd-udevd[335]: Failed to apply ACL on /dev/dri/card0: Operation not supported

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][yocto-kernel-cache] netfilter: enable several netfilter options

2015-11-29 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-11-26 12:25 AM, rongqing...@windriver.com wrote: From: Roy Li the below kernel options are enabled: LOG target support IPv6 connection tracking support, "addrtype" address type match support "recent" match support the default configuration of ufw(Uncomplicated Firew

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][yocto-kernel-cache] netfilter: enable several netfilter options

2015-11-30 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2015-11-30 8:08 PM, Rongqing Li wrote: On 2015年11月30日 13:22, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 2015-11-26 12:25 AM, rongqing...@windriver.com wrote: From: Roy Li the below kernel options are enabled: LOG target support IPv6 connection tracking support, "addrtype" ad

Re: [yocto] compiling out-of-tree modules with master

2015-12-01 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 15-12-01 11:57 AM, Stuart Weaver wrote: Hi All, I’m currently merging my Yocto repo up to master (from Daisy). I’m having problems compiling some of the out-of-tree modules that we have which I’ve tracked down to the Makefiles looking for: include/generated/autoconf.h include/generated/uapi

Re: [yocto] [meta-oracle-java][PATCH v2] oracle-jse-jdk: Don't use ${D} installing symlink target

2015-12-04 Thread Bruce Ashfield
to the final target so that the patch is correctly fixed up during populate_sysroot. Looks good to me: Acked-by: Bruce Ashfield Signed-off-by: Kyle Russell --- recipes-devtools/oracle-java/oracle-jse-jdk.inc |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/recipes

Re: [yocto] PREEMPT-RT patch: wrong header

2015-12-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12/07/2015 08:03 AM, mike9874 channel wrote: Hello, i am building an image for qeumux86 with the PREEMT-RT patch. Therefore I use the following in my image.conf file: PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel = "linux-yocto-rt" PREFERRED_VERSION_linux-yocto-rt ?= "4%" I get an image with the 4.1.8-rt

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][yocto-kernel-cache] netfilter: enable several netfilter options

2015-12-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:24 AM, Bruce Ashfield < bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com> wrote: > On 2015-11-30 8:08 PM, Rongqing Li wrote: > >> >> >> On 2015年11月30日 13:22, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >> >>> On 2015-11-26 12:25 AM, rongqing...@windriver.com wrot

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][yocto-kernel-cache] base.cfg: enable TMPFS_POSIX_ACL and TMPFS_XATTR

2015-12-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 11/26/2015 02:50 AM, rongqing...@windriver.com wrote: From: Roy Li enable Tmpfs POSIX Access Control Lists and Tmpfs extended attributes this will remove the error when systemd apply the ACL to tmpfs: systemd-udevd[335]: Failed to apply ACL on /dev/dri/card0: Operation not supported

Re: [yocto] how can i figure out where a particular kernel config option came from?

2015-12-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12/09/2015 05:36 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: short version: with a short BSP layer i've been handed, the eventual kernel .config file ends up with the setting: CONFIG_WIRELESS=y which makes no sense as the target board has no wireless and the BSP itself doesn't set that, so how can i

Re: [yocto] in-tree defconfig

2015-12-10 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 12/09/2015 06:43 PM, Robert Berger wrote: Hi, This seems to do the trick: https://github.com/RobertBerger/meta-mainline/blob/jethro-training-v4.1.x/multi-v7-ml/recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto-custom.inc That's what I would have suggested. Set the kconfig mode so that in tree config becom

[yocto] [PATCH 2/3] poky-lsb/poky-tiny: update preferred kernel to 4.1

2015-12-18 Thread Bruce Ashfield
The 3.14 LTSI kernel has been removed, so we bump the preferred kernel version to 4.1. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield --- meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky-lsb.conf | 2 +- meta-yocto/conf/distro/poky-tiny.conf | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta-yocto/conf

[yocto] [PATCH 0/3] yocto/meta-yocto-bsp: remove 3.14 and 3.19 references

2015-12-18 Thread Bruce Ashfield
http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=zedd/kernel-yocto Bruce Ashfield (3): yocto-bsp: remove 3.14 and 3.19 bbappends poky-lsb/poky-tiny: update preferred kernel to 4.1 meta-yocto-bsp: remove 3.14 and 3.19 bbappends .../linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.14.bbappend | 11 .../re

[yocto] [PATCH 3/3] meta-yocto-bsp: remove 3.14 and 3.19 bbappends

2015-12-18 Thread Bruce Ashfield
the 3.14 and 3.19 kernels have been removed from oe-core master, so we drop the bbappens for the yocto reference BSPs. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield --- .../linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.14.bbappend | 11 --- .../recipes-kernel/linux/linux-yocto_3.14.bbappend | 20

[yocto] [PATCH 1/3] yocto-bsp: remove 3.14 and 3.19 bbappends

2015-12-18 Thread Bruce Ashfield
The 3.14 and 3.19 kernel have been removed from oe-core, so we drop our bbappends. Signed-off-by: Bruce Ashfield --- .../linux/linux-yocto-rt_3.14.bbappend | 33 .../linux/linux-yocto-tiny_3.14.bbappend | 33 .../linux/linux-yocto-tiny_3.19

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 10/28] LSI AXM55xx: Various performance fixes for rapidio endpoint code.

2014-05-02 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-02 03:16 PM, Charlie Paul wrote: From: Michael Bringmann Increased the inbox mail buffer size by 8 times. Is there a reason why it was increased ? Were events being lost under load ? .. that's what we want to see in the commit message. Removed __devinit from the initialization rou

Re: [linux-yocto] [PATCH 1/1] mei.cfg: enable Intel chipsets

2014-05-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-02 08:01 PM, Kamble, Nitin A wrote: On 4/25/2014 8:51 AM, Hart, Darren wrote: On 4/24/14, 18:42, "Kamble, Nitin A" wrote: From: Nitin A Kamble Enable Intel Chipsets in the AMT/MEI driver. Signed-off-by: Nitin A Kamble Acked-by: Darren Hart Hi Bruce, Can you pull this fix in t

Re: [yocto] Anybody managed to get Beagleboard xM to work?

2014-05-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-05 10:38 PM, Jeremy Cole-Baker wrote: Hi, Has anyone else been successful in getting a Beagleboard xM to work? Our QA results for Yocto 1.5 and through most of the 1.6 cycle had green results, with a few issues that are logged in the bugzilla. Core functionality definitely worked.

Re: [yocto] A simpler way of creating an using a local kernel repository - BeagleBone example

2014-05-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2014-05-06, 6:31 PM, Bob Feretich wrote: I have had problems getting good download performance when accessing the kernels at kernel.org. Since I expect to build the kernel several times, I decided to create a copy of the kernel repository locally and use that for my builds. There are instruct

Re: [yocto] Anybody managed to get Beagleboard xM to work?

2014-05-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2014-05-06, 6:10 PM, Jeremy Cole-Baker wrote: On 7/05/2014 2:01 a.m., Bruce Ashfield wrote: Anything else I am missing? Some configuration I need to set up? I have no idea where to look! It is frustrating because it seems to be very close to working. As an alternative to using the Yocto

Re: [yocto] linux-yocto custom device tree in overlay

2014-05-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-07 11:33 AM, Andreas Galauner wrote: Hi Yocto Community, I'm currently trying to build a custom image for a beaglebone black for which I need to enable the can-controllers on the SoC. I managed to create an overlay which already deals with building a few tools for CAN communication, I c

Re: [yocto] linux-yocto custom device tree in overlay

2014-05-08 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-08 09:48 AM, Andreas Galauner wrote: On 07/05/14 21:37, Bruce Ashfield wrote: So you can either patch it into the kernel, or do a bbappend with that copies it into the source tree (linux/arch/arm/boot/dts/mydevicetree.dts). Thx! That worked fine. Glad to hear! Bruce For

Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-09 09:44 AM, Brian Karcz wrote: Hi, Not sure if this is the correct place to email this, but I’ve seen a few other meta-atmel references so I figured I’d give it a shot. I’m attempting to setup a core-image-minimal build using the guidelines in the meta-atmel README for the at91sam9x5e

Re: [yocto] Question / issue

2014-05-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-09 01:14 AM, Paul McGougan wrote: Hi all. We are currently using Poky 1.5.0. We have created our own custom layer for our powerpc-based board. We are running u-boot as our bootloader and want to use the new FIT (FDT) style kernel/dtb image blob. To that end, in our custom layer we

Re: [yocto] [meta-atmel] at91sam9x5ek: "no machine record defined" failure for core-image-minimal

2014-05-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
dance. My ultimate goal is to port the at91sam9x5ek machine definition to one for the at91sam9g20ek demo board and then port THAT over to a custom machine based roughly off that reference design. -Original Message- From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Sent: Friday, May 09,

Re: [yocto] Question / issue

2014-05-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-12 01:56 AM, Paul McGougan wrote: From: Bruce Ashfield [mailto:bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com] Secondly, (and this is our main issue) I have found that by adding the do_install_append function, even if it is completely empty, whenever I try to bitbake anything that depends on the kernel

Re: [yocto] kernel-yocto.bbclass ignoring SRCREV?

2014-05-21 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-21 08:33 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Hi, is my understanding of kernel-yocto.bbclass correct that it effectively completely ignores any specific git commit ID that was gien in SRCREV, but instead always checks out and uses the HEAD of the respective branch? Or am I missing something here?

Re: [yocto] kernel-yocto.bbclass ignoring SRCREV?

2014-05-21 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-05-21 08:44 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 14-05-21 08:33 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Hi, is my understanding of kernel-yocto.bbclass correct that it effectively completely ignores any specific git commit ID that was gien in SRCREV, but instead always checks out and uses the HEAD of the

Re: [yocto] Building for Boards not supported by Yocto Project

2014-06-05 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-06-05 07:28 AM, Kashyap Gada wrote: Hello. I have successfully built and tested core-image-sato through the process given by the quick start guide at the yocto project website. Now I intend to build an image for a board which is not officially supported by yocto project. I have a FriendlyA

Re: [yocto] Newbee - patching kernel

2014-06-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-06-06 09:39 AM, Kai Ulrich wrote: Hi, Is there a way to create a separate layer that adds kernel patches to an existing machine? Is there a example to learn from? Patching the kernel works just like patching any package, but there is a specific section in the manual (which perhaps you've

Re: [yocto] Hmm, possible bug in poky?

2014-06-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-06-06 07:16 AM, Neuer User wrote: I get the following error: WARNING: Failed to fetch URL file://defconfig, attempting MIRRORS if available ERROR: Fetcher failure: Unable to find file file://defconfig anywhere. The paths that were searched were: /home/ubuntu/yocto/sources/meta-omnisonix/r

Re: [yocto] Hmm, possible bug in poky?

2014-06-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
e. But as Gary just suggested, getting a full directory listing in tree format would help clarify they layout you are using. Bruce Am I doing it right (now with the :=), or is there something fundamentally wrong with the two recipes and the include file? Michael Am 06.06.2014 16:40, schrieb

Re: [yocto] Newbee - patching kernel

2014-06-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-06-06 04:00 PM, Kai Ulrich wrote: Hi Bruce, Thanx for your answer. So can I write a recipe which just contains the patches an extends an kernel-recipe? Correct. You add them to the SRC_URI, just like you'd patch any package. Bruce k. / Hi, />/ />/ Is there a way to create a s

Re: [yocto] Hmm, possible bug in poky?

2014-06-06 Thread Bruce Ashfield
── linux-yocto-tiny_3.4.bb Do this for each of the kernel recipes you are trying to use. Am I doing it right (now with the :=), or is there something fundamentally wrong with the two recipes and the include file? Michael Am 06.06.2014 16:40, schrieb Bruce Ashfield: On 14-06-06 07:16 AM

Re: [yocto] beaglebone black usb device problem (daisy)

2014-06-08 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 2014-06-03, 6:06 AM, Daniel Groß wrote: Hello there, I have successfully build several beaglebone (qt4embedded demo and sato+mono hard float) images using yocto 1.6 (daisy) for the beagle bone black. However USB devices (mouse, keyboard, anything) are only found during the first boot. I narr

Re: [yocto] Conditional Configuration Fragments

2014-06-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-06-09 11:26 AM, Pierre Yves MORDRET wrote: Hello, I really don’t know whether this is feasible or not, but I’m trying to build a yocto image (custom image) with conditional configuration fragments. Today I have 2 image type: one for deployment purpose and another for debug purpose. Debug

Re: [yocto] Conditional Configuration Fragments

2014-06-10 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-06-10 11:11 AM, Pierre Yves MORDRET wrote: On Monday 09 June 2014 09:56:20 Paul Eggleton wrote: On Monday 09 June 2014 12:41:36 Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 14-06-09 11:26 AM, Pierre Yves MORDRET wrote: Hello, I really don't know whether this is feasible or not, but I'm trying

Re: [yocto] Linux Yocto style kernel errors with no config fragments

2014-06-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-06-12 09:46 AM, Alex J Lennon wrote: Hi, I was taking a quick look at converting the meta-raspberrypi kernel recipes to be linux-yocto style, to provide config frag support. I'm working with poky master, referencing linux-yocto-custom.bb in meta-skeleton This seems to be working as far a

Re: [yocto] Linux Yocto style kernel errors with no config fragments

2014-06-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-06-12 09:59 AM, Alex J Lennon wrote: On 12/06/2014 14:53, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 14-06-12 09:46 AM, Alex J Lennon wrote: Hi, I was taking a quick look at converting the meta-raspberrypi kernel recipes to be linux-yocto style, to provide config frag support. I'm working with

Re: [yocto] Linux Yocto style kernel errors with no config fragments

2014-06-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-06-12 10:52 AM, Alex J Lennon wrote: On 12/06/2014 14:59, Alex J Lennon wrote: On 12/06/2014 14:53, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 14-06-12 09:46 AM, Alex J Lennon wrote: Hi, I was taking a quick look at converting the meta-raspberrypi kernel recipes to be linux-yocto style, to provide

Re: [yocto] Conditional patches on kernel depending on board, how to maintain?

2014-06-12 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-06-12 07:54 AM, Daniel Hilst Selli wrote: I have a SoM which will be used on several boards, this SoM has a base kernel for it, with its board-*.c file. In each board I may have different peripherals, so I have to patch the same board-*.c file depending on my target board, and that patches

Re: [yocto] how many variations to build for a beaglebone black (BBB)?

2014-07-07 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-07-07 09:13 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: i want to build a bootable system for a BBB, and i can see at least three possibilities: 1) the meta-yocto-bsp layer defines the beaglebone as one of its reference boards 2) the "meta-ti" layer is advertised as "official" TI board su

Re: [yocto] How to select defconfig for kernel build with yocto/bitbake

2014-07-09 Thread Bruce Ashfield
On 14-07-09 05:38 AM, Dr. Markus Eich wrote: Dear all, I work on the process to compile odroid xu kernel with yocto/bitbake In the kernel sources (from hardkernel) I have the corresponding defconfig file, i.e. in the git folder /arch/arm/configs/odroidxu_ubuntu_defconfig. How can I tell bitbak

Re: [yocto] How to select defconfig for kernel build with yocto/bitbake

2014-07-10 Thread Bruce Ashfield
link is being created. Do specific tasks work ? i.e. is that happening during unpack/patch, or during compilation. Bruce /Markus On 09.07.2014 14:44, Bruce Ashfield wrote: On 14-07-09 05:38 AM, Dr. Markus Eich wrote: Dear all, I work on the process to compile odroid xu kernel with yoct

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >