Re: [zeromq-dev] New ZeroMQ website and help needed

This is looking really great Doron! I'm cleaning up some things in preparation for a new GoCZMQ release. Once I get in support for the new Go modules dependency management, I'll set aside some time for add a section for GoCZMQ on the site. I can commit to having it to you no later than next Sunday

Re: [zeromq-dev] Unsubscribe

Glad you're sticking around Osiris! I haven't contributed much myself in the last while - goczmq has stabilized and doesn't need much work, and at work I moved into a management position and that transition took all my time and energy for awhile. Now I'm learning Rust and working on a czmq

Re: [zeromq-dev] R.I.P. Pieter Hintjens

Meeting Pieter for the first time in person, in London when I was there for Strata ( I think it was 2012? ) resulted in an evening of drinks, walks, and conversations with him and another friend of mine that stands out as one of my favorite experiences I have had traveling for conferences...

Re: [zeromq-dev] Call for testing for libzmq 4.2.3

Hi Luca! I'll run some of my test suites against it later today and see if anything breaks. On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:05 AM Luca Boccassi wrote: > Hi, > > With https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/2733 duct-taped the major > blocker for releasing libzmq 4.2.3 is

Re: [zeromq-dev] Zyre demo at OpenWRT Summit in Prague, last Pieter's project

It was great watching this while drinking my morning coffee today! On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:12 AM Luca Boccassi wrote: > On 26 October 2017 11:08:24 BST, Benjamin Henrion > wrote: > >Zyre demo at OpenWRT Summit in Prague, last Pieter's project: > > >

Re: [zeromq-dev] Go binding support of zeromq

Hello Jay! I'm the original author of zeromq/goczmq, and I've used pebbe/zmq4 as well. I'll do my best to answer your questions! 1. Both pebbe/zmq4 and zeromq/goczmq support ZeroMQs security features. 2. The performance in my experience is reasonably the same. The main difference in my mind is

Re: [zeromq-dev] Moving GSL into the ZeroMQ Github org

Thanks for the heads up Luca! On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 7:49 AM Luca Boccassi wrote: > Hello all, > > After a proposal from Eric, the current maintainer of GSL in the iMatix > Github organisation, we've forked GSL into the ZeroMQ org. > > This was done because there is now

Re: [zeromq-dev] FOSDEM 2018 - ZeroMQ gathering/hackaton?

I'm going to see if I can make this happen for FOSDEM 2018 :) On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:11 PM Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 11:18 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 11:53 +0200, Benjamin Henrion wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at

Re: [zeromq-dev] ZeroMQ Github Org and 2-factor authentication

Thanks Luca! On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 7:56 AM Luca Boccassi wrote: > 2 more admins have enabled 2FA (thanks!), that leaves 6 admins without. > > As discussed previously I've proceeded to demote those 6 admins to > users, and contacted them again via email, asking to ping

Re: [zeromq-dev] ZeroMQ Github Org and 2-factor authentication

Thanks for bringing up this issue Luca! I am 100% in favor of enforcing 2 factor auth for the org. On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:15 AM Harald Achitz wrote: > As a user: please​ make it an requirement for write access to have 2factor > auth. > > Thanks for having this idea

[zeromq-dev] zdiscgo - new project

I've been working on a new ZeroMQ project - "zdiscgo" - it is a CZMQ service discovery zactor with support for Go plugins. Link here: https://github.com/taotetek/zdiscgo After I fix up the travis integration this weekend I was thinking about moving it to the ZeroMQ org w/ a C4 contribution

Re: [zeromq-dev] Releasing libzmq 4.2.1 and czmq 4.0.2 before end of year

Sounds good Luca! On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 2:35 PM Luca Boccassi wrote: > Hello all, > > A few bug fixes have accumulated in the past couple of months, so I'd > like to push out libzmq 4.2.1 and czmq 4.0.2 so that they can be picked > up by the next Debian stable. > >

Re: [zeromq-dev] ?==?utf-8?q? FOSDEM feb 4 & 5 Brussel?

I arrive on Thursday morning and would love to see everyone. On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 9:24 AM Arnaud Loonstra wrote: > I'm willing to participate however I arrive on Friday. I could try to > arrive early though. > > Rg, > > Arnaud > > > On Monday, December 12, 2016 15:08 CET,

Re: [zeromq-dev] Happy Pieter Hintjens Day

Cheers, Osiris! To Pieter. On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 6:35 PM Osiris Pedroso wrote: > Today is the birthday of Pieter Hintjens > (3 December 1962 – 4 > October 2016). After Pieter's death earlier this year I decided I will >

Re: [zeromq-dev] ZeroMQ 4.2 release, planning

__asm__("pushf\norl $0x4,(%rsp)\npopf"); > >> > >>> > >> > >>> All was fine. > >> > >>> > >> > >>> I ran tests built from the zeromq4-1 repository against a shared > lib > >> > >

Re: [zeromq-dev] zmq prebuilt for node

Awesome Kyle! On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 6:48 PM Luca Boccassi wrote: > Great stuff! > > We'll be happy to add this to the org, unless there are any objections > tomorrow morning I'll create the repo with the same name. Let me know which > Github users should be added as

Re: [zeromq-dev] ZeroMQ 4.2 release, planning

A new stable version would definitely help me in my quest to get ZeroMQ support enabled by default in rsyslog in distros. On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 2:40 PM Doron Somech wrote: > I say lets bump. > > On Oct 15, 2016 20:32, "Luca Boccassi" wrote: > > As

Re: [zeromq-dev] BDFL literally

That's great news Trevor On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 3:18 AM Trevor Bernard wrote: > Don't worry about sponsorship. My company will pay to renew them for > the next while (within reason). Just send me the details and I'll pay > the the bill. > > -Trev > > On Thu, Oct 6,

Re: [zeromq-dev] Goodbye my friend

I was just reading over the first PR I ever made to CZMQ and thinking about the first time I met Pieter, in London in 2013. We had a wonderful evening bar hopping and having adventures, and a night long rambling conversation about anything and everything except ZeroMQ. I'm so glad to have known

Re: [zeromq-dev] Bye bye Pieter

I'm so sad that he is gone, and so grateful to have this community and to know you all a little bit because of him. On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:41 PM Brian Adamson wrote: > It was a great honor to have interacted with Pieter and his energy, > willingness to help,

Re: [zeromq-dev] A home for universal, cross-project protocols

This is wonderful. I would happily help as a maintainer. On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 5:19 AM Yurii Rashkovskii wrote: > Hi, > > I had a thought that some of the protocols designed by ZeroMQ and other > communities have really outgrown their communities and would really benefit >

Re: [zeromq-dev] czmq / zauth

needs it (as we do in the security selftests). > > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Brian Knox <bk...@digitalocean.com> wrote: > > Is there currently a way one can check if zauth is running for a process > - > > e.g., imagine a case where a zauth actor may be been started by a

[zeromq-dev] czmq / zauth

Is there currently a way one can check if zauth is running for a process - e.g., imagine a case where a zauth actor may be been started by another thread - is there a way one can check (in a thread safe manner) if this was the case? Brian ___

Re: [zeromq-dev] New version of C4 (C4.2?)

This reminds me - I'm going to experiment with using go build tags for controlling builds of draft contracts in goczmq. I like the "used by real users" qualification on marking contracts as stable. On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 2:53 AM Pieter Hintjens wrote: > Hi all, > > I was

Re: [zeromq-dev] ZeroMQ 4.2 release, planning

As a heads up I'm adding support for RADIO / DISH, SCATTER / GATHER and CLIENT / SERVER to rsyslog for the 8.19 release later this month. The code will be wrapped with define checks so keep it safe to compile against CZMQ stable. If these are still considered draft and won't be built by default

[zeromq-dev] CZMQ "stable" release versioning

When we cut another "stable" release of CZMQ to keep packagers happy, I'm wondering what version we'll use - specifically around a stable release that include radar/dish, scatter/gather and client/server. I want to start a new version of the rsyslog input and output plugins that only support the

Re: [zeromq-dev] Moving list to Google groups?

Excellent. +1 for staying with mailman then. On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Kevin Sapper wrote: > Staying with Mailman is indeed the better choice. Even though I like > Google groups they don't have an option the migrate away from it which is a > deal breaker IMO. >

Re: [zeromq-dev] Moving list to Google groups?

I'm not averse to google groups, in that it is low friction / low maintenance - and I always hesitate to suggest self hosted / higher friction / higher maintenance solutions unless I'm willing to implement and maintain them myself. Brian On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Pieter Hintjens

Re: [zeromq-dev] ZeroMQ hackathon, 27-28-29 January

;> HQ, in fact. > >> > >> Rue des Ateliers 15, Brussels. > >> > >> I'll arrange a spot to crash for those who need sleep. > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Brian Knox <bk...@digitalocean.com> > >> wrote: > >>&g

Re: [zeromq-dev] ZeroMQ hackathon, 27-28-29 January

Can't wait! I arrive in Brussels around 7:30 am on the 27th and will make my jet lagged way over to whatever the location turns out to be :) On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:33 AM, Pieter Hintjens wrote: > Hi all, > > Just to remind anyone in the region of Brussels at the end of

Re: [zeromq-dev] C4 and CI

John - thanks for sharing your experiences with trying out the C4 process! It's definitely an interesting situation when "the build system" that determines if a PR has broken a build or not can't be simple or in one spot. I think the key point to identify is "what is the criteria for a PR to be

Re: [zeromq-dev] ZeroMQ hackathon/workshop (Brussels, 27/1-29/1 2016)

I'll be a little late the first day - if all goes well I arrive in Brussels at 7:30am that Wednesday morning. Can't wait to see everyone who is going! Brian On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Trevor Bernard wrote: > I'm very much looking forward to participating at

Re: [zeromq-dev] Internet of Things devroom - FOSDEM 2016

I will be arriving in Brussels the morning of January 27th (Wednesday) and staying through the morning of February 2nd. On Sunday at FOSDEM I'll be helping Luna run the Golang dev room - will definitely hang out in the IoT dev room on Saturday and I'm certainly up for getting together with

[zeromq-dev] zpoller_wait does not work with ZMQ_SERVER sockets

I was doing some work to add support for ZMQ_CLIENT and ZMQ_SERVER sockets to GoCZMQ and ran across this issue. I've filed a problem report on czmq with a test case to reproduce it: https://github.com/zeromq/czmq/issues/1123 I vaguely remember some previous discussions around poll and

Re: [zeromq-dev] New ZeroMQ Organization Project

idea. I'm going to suggest modestly that "gomq" could >> >> work better as a name. "gogozmq" looks like a binding name. >> >> >> >> FWIW we started on a small C library (libzmtp) and what we made was a >> >> DEALER socket. This is immediately

Re: [zeromq-dev] New ZeroMQ Organization Project

e a binding name. > > FWIW we started on a small C library (libzmtp) and what we made was a > DEALER socket. This is immediately useful, and could be a good > starting point. > > -Pieter > > > > On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Brian Knox <bk...@digitalocean.com>

[zeromq-dev] New ZeroMQ Organization Project

Luna and I have been talking about implementing a subset of ZeroMQ in pure go to complement goczmq for people who don't want C dependencies. It would solve a great set of problems for both of us and we feel would be useful to others as well. We wanted to give a heads up that we're going to

Re: [zeromq-dev] Cookbook repository

> >>> > >>> This is a fantastic idea... > >>> > >>> The Guide is old, and the process predates C4. It's time to build a > >>> new repository of examples IMO. > >>> > >>> We can write recipes clearly, as proble

Re: [zeromq-dev] Cookbook repository

I think a ZeroMQ cookbook sounds like a neat idea. I'd happily contribute some examples for the GoCZMQ bindings - it would be a fun project to implement some of the patterns using them. Tying each pattern to a problem statement would be very much in the spirit of ZeroMQ development methodology

Re: [zeromq-dev] Use case of migration from Kafka to ZeroMQ

I loved this article. I made similar decisions around the same trade-offs for real time log subscription to back end logs at DigitalOcean. Separating the concerns of "real time view of what is happening now" and "historical view of what happened in the past" allowed me to solve these two separate

[zeromq-dev] CZMQ related travis failures

CZMQ is currently failing to build on travis-ci for GoCZMQ, just wanted to see if anyone else has run into this. As far as I can tell the code involved hasn't changed in over a year, so not sure why it's causing travis issues now: src/zbeacon.c: In function ‘zbeacon’: src/zbeacon.c:281:13:

Re: [zeromq-dev] CZMQ related travis failures

Merged! Thanks Doron! On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Doron Somech somdo...@gmail.com wrote: PR is pending, should be fixed once merged. On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Brian Knox bk...@digitalocean.com wrote: Aha! Mystery solved. No problem Doron! On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 10:59 AM

Re: [zeromq-dev] CZMQ related travis failures

Joe - that's what I'm thinking too. On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Joe McIlvain joe.eli@gmail.com wrote: Could be that Travis updated its software packages so that a different set of warning/error settings are active for the compiler. On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 5:02 AM, Brian Knox bk

Re: [zeromq-dev] CZMQ related travis failures

zmq_pollitem_t has very recently gained a new poller field. Perhaps that new field should be moved to the end? On 16 Aug 2015 22:06, Brian Knox bk...@digitalocean.com wrote: Joe - that's what I'm thinking too. On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Joe McIlvain joe.eli@gmail.com wrote: Could

Re: [zeromq-dev] CZMQ now available in Debian

This is fantastic news! Will make packaging rsyslog w/ the omczmq / imczmq enabled quite a bit easier. Cheers! Brian On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Luca Boccassi luca.bocca...@gmail.com wrote: Dear maintainers and users, FYI, CZMQ packages are now available in Debian unstable (Sid) [1].

Re: [zeromq-dev] CZMQ and Server and Client Sockets

safe socket the socket will signal it once a command is ready, multiple sockets can use the same poller. When signalled the zmq_poll will check all sockets for events. What do you think? On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Brian Knox bk...@digitalocean.com wrote: Doron - as a heads up, being

Re: [zeromq-dev] CZMQ and Server and Client Sockets

Doron - as a heads up, being able to poll multiple sockets from zpoller would be of great interest to me (I use zpoller in goczmq quite a bit). Cheers, Brian On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Doron Somech somdo...@gmail.com wrote: Andrew are you using CZMQ? which class do you use for multiple

Re: [zeromq-dev] CZMQ and Server and Client Sockets

This is great! I need to make some time to experiment with GoCZMQ with these - the thread safety opens up some possibilities. On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Doron Somech somdo...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I added server and client sockets support to CZMQ, you can take a look at the change

Re: [zeromq-dev] Not receiving unsubscription messages in XPUB socket with ZMQ_XPUB_VERBOSE when using a proxy

Ricardo - if you are lucky, there might be a loophole here for you to exploit with a little lawyering. This is my preferred solution although it could break applications that subscribe multiple times to the same topic and expect to stop receiving messages only when they unsubscribe the same

Re: [zeromq-dev] Not receiving unsubscription messages in XPUB socket with ZMQ_XPUB_VERBOSE when using a proxy

in applications that want this behavior. Hope this sounds more sensible. On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 08:02:54AM -0400, Brian Knox wrote: Ricardo - if you are lucky, there might be a loophole here for you to exploit with a little lawyering. This is my preferred solution although it could

Re: [zeromq-dev] Not receiving unsubscription messages in XPUB socket with ZMQ_XPUB_VERBOSE when using a proxy

. Cheers, Brian On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Ricardo Catalinas Jiménez jimenezr...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 08:02:54AM -0400, Brian Knox wrote: Ricardo - if you are lucky, there might be a loophole here for you to exploit with a little lawyering. This is my preferred

Re: [zeromq-dev] zsock_new_

Hi Andrew - it's working here last I checked, which was right after the latest libzmq and czmq stable releases. I'll clean up my environment and reinstall from scratch after work today to double check and let you know. Brian On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Hume and...@humeweb.com wrote:

Re: [zeromq-dev] zsock_new_

, then rebuild goczmq against it - tests worked then too. Do you have a series of steps I can follow to try to reproduce the issue? On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Brian Knox bk...@digitalocean.com wrote: Hi Andrew - it's working here last I checked, which was right after the latest libzmq

Re: [zeromq-dev] zsock_new_

working. Thanks for the info! Brian On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Andrew Hume and...@humeweb.com wrote: “reckoned goczmq and built it” what does that mean? is that just the go get command, or is there more? On Jun 8, 2015, at 12:44 PM, Brian Knox bk...@digitalocean.com wrote: Andrew

Re: [zeromq-dev] License statement in source headers

No objections here. On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote: Hi all, It's been pointed out to me that the libzmq sources all refer to the LGPLv3 and not the ZeroMQ COPYING.LESSER with its static link exception. Does anyone object if I change all the source

Re: [zeromq-dev] Adding CURVE support to JZMQ version 3.1.0

I don't use jzmq myself but this is great! Will be glad to test with goczmq when you are ready! On May 27, 2015 7:09 PM, Arthur Low - Crack Semiconductor a...@cracksemi.com wrote: OK - Good news! I have the client-side CURVE support now working with my modified ZAuth.java and Socket.cpp,

Re: [zeromq-dev] zproject and zactors

the project setup/installation it would be helpful to know where in the process you did fail and which steps succeed. //Kevin On Sa, 2015-05-16 at 14:55 -0400, Brian Knox wrote: Thanks for the feedback Pieter - will sit down with it again when I get a chance! Brian On Sat, May 16, 2015

[zeromq-dev] zproject and zactors

I've got a project in mind where a set of zactors that provide various services would be an excellent fit. Digging through zproject, I see that zactors appear to be supported. So, I've decided this is a great use case to finally dive into zproject. Following the guide here -

Re: [zeromq-dev] zproject and zactors

-Pieter On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 3:21 PM, Brian Knox bk...@digitalocean.com wrote: I've got a project in mind where a set of zactors that provide various services would be an excellent fit. Digging through zproject, I see that zactors appear to be supported. So, I've decided

[zeromq-dev] GoCZMQ release and breaking change

I wanted to give a heads up that Luna and I are working on finalizing a few things in GoCZMQ to declare a stable release (since CZMQ 3 is being cut soon, and this is the API GoCZMQ targets). We have one upcoming breaking change and then I believe that should be it. We have some C-isms in the code

[zeromq-dev] Malamute make check segfault

Was building malamute today and noticed that make check is segfaulting when trying to send Running malamute selftests... * mlm_proto:OK * mlm_server: OK * mlm_client: N: 15-05-06 15:39:15 server is using PLAIN security connecting frontend to broker connecting backend to broker setting frontend

Re: [zeromq-dev] libzmq and czmq releases

to cut stable releases of libzmq and czmq any time now. If you need these urgently, let me know. It's a matter of a few hours' work. -Pieter On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Brian Knox bk...@digitalocean.com wrote: While I am happy living in the land of build zeromq and czmq from head every

[zeromq-dev] libzmq and czmq releases

While I am happy living in the land of build zeromq and czmq from head every day - I'd like to get zeromq enabled rsyslog packages as part of the next rsyslog release (8.10). This will mean creating zeromq and czmq packages as part of the dependencies for a few linux distros, because I build my

Re: [zeromq-dev] Canonical language for the Guide

I think that C/CZMQ is a reasonable choice. I'm intrigued by the idea of being able to generate examples in different languages from a DSL - but concerned it might add confusion instead of clarity. Brian On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Gregg Irwin gr...@pointillistic.com wrote: Hi Pieter,

Re: [zeromq-dev] zmq FOSDEM IoT videos online

It was great seeing you at FOSDEM and learning about your project! Brian On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Arnaud Loonstra arn...@sphaero.org wrote: Hi all, I just received notice that the videos of the IoT devroom which Pieter organised at FOSDEM this year are online. I have given a talk

Re: [zeromq-dev] Software versioning / contracts / SBOM

I'd be glad to engage in this experiment with goczmq. Brian On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote: Hi all, After that fun and helpful thread on multipart et al, I'd like to open another discussion, on software versioning. I've written up a proposal at

Re: [zeromq-dev] Notes from a hackathon

After catching up on this thread, I feel like at least three problems are being conflated into one problem. I'll state what I see being discussed from my perspective: 1. Using multi part messages as a way to route to clients from a router socket is overly complicated and not how new users expect

Re: [zeromq-dev] Notes from a hackathon

at 8:06 PM, Doron Somech somdo...@gmail.com wrote: Brian - The issue is that with the new api and to enable thread safety the routing id is part of the message. So czmq new api should somehow expose routing id on the message and/or part of the send message. On Feb 2, 2015 7:39 PM, Brian Knox

Re: [zeromq-dev] Notes from a hackathon

Doron - I did a test implementation around this idea in goczmq today and I'm liking the semantics. I wrote an interface that conforms to io.Reader and io.Writer where you pass a call a byte buffer and you get the message placed into it. When the socket is a router socket, it silently drops the

Re: [zeromq-dev] zyre

failed (i assume the author had it working at some point.) On Jan 19, 2015, at 4:24 AM, Brian Knox bk...@digitalocean.com wrote: There is gyre - it hasn't had any work done on it in quite awhile as far as I can tell, and I've never tried to use it: https://github.com/zeromq/gyre I'm currently

Re: [zeromq-dev] zyre

There is gyre - it hasn't had any work done on it in quite awhile as far as I can tell, and I've never tried to use it: https://github.com/zeromq/gyre I'm currently working on a zproto template that is compatible with goczmq here -

Re: [zeromq-dev] gozmq beacon

Andrew: what is actually published is the IP address of the beacon = so the HI in the example is a topic, and not what is actually received. So, the publisher is publishing on topic HI, and the subscriber is subscribing on topic HI. Running locally: ./b Beacon configured on: 192.168.1.199

Re: [zeromq-dev] gozmq beacon

the timeout expires. (i changed the timeout to 5s to help debug this.) so i deduce the listener never gets what the publisher sends. can there be firewalls or some other networking crap interfering with this? On Jan 18, 2015, at 4:29 AM, Brian Knox bk...@digitalocean.com wrote: Andrew: what

Re: [zeromq-dev] what is the purpose of the Go binding for czmq?

I'm the person who started the Go binding for CZMQ. The number one purpose for me, when I started it, was having fun. Brian On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Peter Kleiweg pklei...@xs4all.nl wrote: I thought the main purpose of czmq is to eleviate the 'primitive' capabilities of the C

Re: [zeromq-dev] troubles starting to use go czmq

Andrew - can you let me know which versions of both libzmq and czmq you are building go czmq again? All tests are working for me and for Luna (who helps develop it). If you give me a little info maybe we can figure out what you are running into. Cheers, Brian On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:39 AM,

Re: [zeromq-dev] what is the purpose of the Go binding for czmq?

or contributions, I'm happy to collaborate! Brian On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Peter Kleiweg pklei...@xs4all.nl wrote: Brian Knox schreef op de 17e dag van de louwmaand van het jaar 2015: I'm the person who started the Go binding for CZMQ. The number one purpose for me, when I started

Re: [zeromq-dev] troubles starting to use go czmq

I do see a couple of import paths that are set to my personal repo instead of the goczmq repo in multiperf/multiperf.go, and perf/perf.go - I'll send a pull request to fix those in just a moment. On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Brian Knox bk...@digitalocean.com wrote: Andrew - can you let me

Re: [zeromq-dev] zbeacon

Andrew - this might be helpful - http://hintjens.com/blog:32 Note- I am not using the beacon code yet anywhere myself - goczmq has an implementation that wraps the czmq API, with a simple unit test, and that's about it at the moment. Brian On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Andrew Hume

Re: [zeromq-dev] troubles starting to use go czmq

: ErrActorCmd ./beacon.go:85: undefined: ErrActorCmd ./beacon.go:90: undefined: ErrActorCmd (beacon is the next thing i want to work on.) On Jan 17, 2015, at 12:32 PM, Brian Knox bk...@digitalocean.com wrote: Andrew - can you let me know which versions of both libzmq and czmq you are building

Re: [zeromq-dev] troubles starting to use go czmq

Added an issue for tracking this here - https://github.com/zeromq/goczmq/issues/79 Cheers, Brian On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Brian Knox bk...@digitalocean.com wrote: Andrew - thanks so much for the feedback - tomorrow morning when I'm coding again, I'll build against those specific

Re: [zeromq-dev] what is the purpose of the Go binding for czmq?

cross pollination of ideas I bet we can have some fun and build some useful things! Brian On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 5:47 PM, Peter Kleiweg pklei...@xs4all.nl wrote: Brian Knox schreef op de 17e dag van de louwmaand van het jaar 2015: Peter - really, it was more about wanting to see how czmq

Re: [zeromq-dev] czmq container serialization

This is not something I would personally have any need for. I'm not certain that it is a general enough problem that it needs solving in czmq itself, but maybe others feel differently. Brian On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Alex Cornejo acorn...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, As part of an

Re: [zeromq-dev] Just a neat data visualisation

ooh you can grab things with the mouse and throw them, and they bounce around! On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote: That is weird and lovely and I can't see what the point is :-) On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Chris Laws clawsi...@gmail.com wrote: While

Re: [zeromq-dev] Just a neat data visualisation

If I don't finish a commit for goczmq today it's chris's fault now ;) On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Brian Knox bk...@digitalocean.com wrote: ooh you can grab things with the mouse and throw them, and they bounce around! On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com

Re: [zeromq-dev] zproject - a project skeleton generator

Can't wait to take this for a spin! On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote: This is awesome. I've added you to the ZeroMQ owners group, so you can move that project into the ZeroMQ organization. On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 9:36 PM, Kevin Sapper

Re: [zeromq-dev] CZMQ community red cards

-- Citation Brian (http://lists.zeromq.org/pipermail/zeromq-dev/2014-October/027554.html) We do not merge everything and then fix it if it is broken. Your statement is empirically false. Citation Pieter

Re: [zeromq-dev] CZMQ community red cards

no interest in the rest of this discussion. Brian On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 9:10 AM, r...@q-leap.de wrote: Brian == Brian Knox bk...@digitalocean.com writes: Roland -- Roland Citation Brian Roland ( http

Re: [zeromq-dev] CZMQ community red cards

I'll describe my overall feelings concerning this as best I can. 1. Recently, some of the interactions in the czmq pull request comments have felt like a game of passive aggressive point scoring instead of people working together to make useful software. 2. I've been involved with ZeroMQ for a

Re: [zeromq-dev] CZMQ community red cards

That is something the czmq maintainers are exceedingly bad at. The sad thing is the we merge everything and then fix it if its broken behaviour is in direct opposition to the C4.1 rules. We do not merge everything and then fix it if it is broken. Your statement is empirically false. On Thu, Oct

Re: [zeromq-dev] DEALER-ROUTER question

Conceptually I like the idea of czmq folding back into libzmq. While requiring both llibzmq and czmq for a language binding that wraps czmq isn't the end of the world, it is an additional complexity. I very much look forward to the czmq 3.0 release, and I'm hoping to have goczmq feature complete

Re: [zeromq-dev] libzmq v4.0.5

You can't just open a socket and get to work anymore. I just wanted to say that I find this statement to be empirically false. I just open a socket and get to work all the time. I think this thread is getting fuzzy, and I don't know what the problem is that it is trying to address anymore. On

Re: [zeromq-dev] libzmq v4.0.5

Speaking as someone who started with zeromq at version 2: The breaking changes between 2 and 3 almost caused me to abandon zeromq altogether. Since 3.2 (if I'm remembering correctly that 3.2 was the fix this mess version), things have been relatively smooth sailing. I've been routinely

Re: [zeromq-dev] zmq_utils.h - zmq.h?

Doesn't bother me. On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote: Hi all, I'm wondering if anyone still cares that the utility functions sit in a different header file. There is a single library, and having two header files for different sections in it seems like

Re: [zeromq-dev] Gyre

Armen - this is fantastic! I'm going to have so much fun reading this code! On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Armen Baghumian ar...@opensourceclub.org wrote: Hello, I'm happy to announce that I've ported Zyre to Go. It's a direct translation of C code to Go. https://github.com/armen/gyre

Re: [zeromq-dev] Gyre

Armen - I'm currently doing quite a bit of zeromq work with go. I will gladly be an immediate test victim for your codec_go.gsl - I've used zproto from C quite a bit and I have resources to stress test things. Cheers! Brian On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Armen Baghumian

Re: [zeromq-dev] Go examples in ØMQ - The Guide

Peter - +1 for your suggestion. I've been using the zmq4 bindings quite a bit lately by the way - thank you for creating them! On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Peter Kleiweg pklei...@xs4all.nl wrote: There are examples in Go for part of the examples in the ZGuide. These are based in the Go

Re: [zeromq-dev] PUB/SUB unreliabiliity

From what i've read, PUB SUB should be reliable when the _HWM are set to zero (don't drop). By reliable I mean no messages should fail to be delivered to an already connected consumer. Your understanding of pub-sub behavior and how it interacts with the HWM is incorrect. Please see:

Re: [zeromq-dev] PUB ZMQ_SNDHWM doesn't work

Setting the HWM on a PUB socket to 0 would have the opposite effect of what you want. PUB sockets, when exceeding the HWM, drop messages. For a description of what different socket types do in a mute state, please see the documentation: http://api.zeromq.org/4-0:zmq-socket You should probably

[zeromq-dev] zproto and states

Is there a state in zproto for any valid zeromq message? My case is this: I have back end daemon the processes some stats messages for a small project. The messages are sent over zeromq using the node.js bindings, and consist of a single frame containing a JSON string. I would like to play

Re: [zeromq-dev] ZeroMQ codeup this summer?

I can't fully commit to it yet - but I'm certainly interested and would try to attend. Brian -Original Message- From: zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org [mailto:zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Pieter Hintjens Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 7:29 AM To:

  1   2   >