On 29/11/2012 14:51, Edward Ned Harvey
(opensolarisisdeadlongliveopensolaris) wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Enda o'Connor - Oracle Ireland -
Say I have an ldoms guest that is using zfs root pool that is mirrored
down the
guest and the other service domain gracefully, then boot guest off
c3d0s0 ( have restarted the service domain there ), the large file is
obviously missing now.
Is there any way if the guest is stopped, that I can know which side of
the mirror to boot off that was most recent?
Enda
diagnostic relief patch
so are you on s11, can I see pkg info entire
this bug is fixed in FCS s11 release, as that is 175b, and it got fixed
in build 164. So if you have solaris 11 that CR is fixed.
In solaris 10 it is fixed in 147440-14/147441-14 ( sparc/x86 )
Enda
cu
Carsten
On 15/02/2012 17:16, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
While I'm not in need of upgrading my server at an emergency level, I'm
starting to think about it -- to be prepared (and an upgrade could be
triggered by a failure at this point; my server dates to 2006).
I'm actually more concerned with software
current kernel level is, zones might have to
be halted if patching the live BE.
If doing tis manually, then apply latest rev of 119254/119255 (
SPARC/x86 ) patch utils patch first.
Enda
On 21/01/2012 10:46, bhanu prakash wrote:
Hi All,
Please let me know the procedure how to patch a server
On 29/09/2011 23:59, Rich Teer wrote:
Hi all,
Got a quick question: what are the latest zpool and zfs versions
supported in Solaris 10 Update 10?
TIA,
root@pstx2200a # zfs upgrade -v
The following filesystem versions are supported:
VER DESCRIPTION
---
that rpool has
the whole disk ).
Post boot of zfsBE, one can modify the swap and dump zvols ( look on
google for zfs root swap ).
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
properly monitored, and queries stated
to run really really slow.
Enda
On 09/12/2010 20:22, Jabbar wrote:
Hello Tony,
If the hardware hasn't changed I'd look at the workload on the database
server. If the customer is taking regular statspack snapshots they might
be able to see whats causing
value?
In my experience with DB's, triggers are the root of all evil.
Enda
On 15/10/2010 14:36, Gerry Bragg wrote:
A customer is running ZFS version15 on Solaris SPARC 10/08 supporting
Oracle 10.2.0.3 databases in a dev and production test environment. We
have come across some cache inconsistencies
archvies the entire root pool ( there is a -D to exclude
datasets ), and can only be installed via jumpstart. There is no way to
provision a BE using a flash archive yet, or at least not that I'm aware of.
Enda
following is my current system status
lustatus
Boot Environment
correct to me, surely this should be
rpool/mailtmp, assuming you don't have other pools it might live in. (
what does zpool import say by the way )
Did this get added to a running zone, and then fail on reboot perhaps,ie
to me this never worked.
Enda
I just don't understand where the dataset
delivers the
sparc new boot for zfs boot etc, jsut make sure you take the very latest
live upgrade patch 121430-43
Enda
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
I have a Solaris 10 U5 system massively patched so that it supports ZFS
pool version 15 (similar to U8, kernel Generic_141445-09), live upgrade
dick hoogendijk wrote:
OpenSolaris-b128a has zfs version 22 w/ deduplication.
Do I need to update older pools to take advantage of this dedup or can I
just create a new zfs filesystem with this option?
it's pool wide, so a zpool upgrade is necessary, or else create a new pool.
cheers
Enda
.
Enda
Breandan Dezendorf wrote:
Does dedup work at the pool level or the filesystem/dataset level?
For example, if I were to do this:
bash-3.2$ mkfile 100m /tmp/largefile
bash-3.2$ zfs set dedup=off tank
bash-3.2$ zfs set dedup=on tank/dir1
bash-3.2$ zfs set dedup=on tank/dir2
bash-3.2$ zfs set
update 9 releases to get the latest zpool version,
existing pools would require a zpool upgrade.
Enda
cheers,
James
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi
This looks ok to me, message but not an indicator of an issue
could you post
cat /etc/lu/ICF.1
cat /etc/ICF.2 ( the foobar Be )
also lumount foobar /a
and cat /a/etc/vfstab
Enda
Mark Horstman wrote:
I'm seeing the same [b]lucreate[/b] error on my fresh SPARC sol10u8 install
(and my
Hi T
his will boot ok in my opinion, not seeing any issues there.
Enda
Mark Horstman wrote:
more input:
# lumount foobar /mnt
/mnt
# cat /mnt/etc/vfstab
# cat /mnt/etc/vfstab
#live-upgrade:Wed Oct 21 09:36:20 CDT 2009 updated boot environment foobar
#device device mount
Mark Horstman wrote:
Then why the warning on the lucreate. It hasn't done that in the past.
this is from the vfstab processing code in ludo.c, in your case not
causing any issue, but shall be fixed.
Enda
Mark
On Oct 21, 2009, at 12:41 PM, Enda O'Connor enda.ocon...@sun.com wrote:
Hi T
Hi
Yes sorry remove that line from vfstab in the new BE
Enda
Mark wrote:
Ok. Thanks. Why does '/' show up in the newly created /BE/etc/vfstab but
not in the current /etc/vfstab? Should '/' be in the /BE/etc/vfstab?
btw, thank you for responding so quickly to this.
Mark
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009
Hi
This is 6884728 which is a regression from 6837400.
the workaround is as you done, remove the lines from vfstab
Enda
Brian wrote:
I am have a strange problem with liveupgrade of ZFS boot environment. I found a similar discussion on the zones-discuss, but, this happens for me on installs
as well for any
further instructions.
Enda
Tomas Ögren wrote:
On 28 September, 2009 - Jorgen Lundman sent me these 1,7K bytes:
Hello list,
We are unfortunately still experiencing some issues regarding our support
license with Sun, or rather our Sun Vendor.
We need ZFS User quotas. (That's
Hi
So ship date is 19th October for Solaris 10 10/09 ( update 8 ).
Enda
Enda O'Connor wrote:
Hi
Yes Solaris 10/09 ( update 8 ) will contain
6501037 want user/group quotas on zfs
it should be out within a few weeks.
So if they have zpools already installed they can apply
141444-09/141445-09
of the configuration
should prove
interesting.
isn't exadata based on linux, so not clear where zfs comes into play,
but I didn't see any of this oracle preso, so could be confused by all this.
Enda
-- richard
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
what is
workign as such.
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
error
format label
Ready to label disk, continue? y
Warning: error writing EFI.
Label failed.
Any help would be appreciated.
run format -e then label and select SMI,
this will erase any data on said disks by the way.
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
on opensolaris by the way.
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi
What does boot -L show you?
Enda
On 08/28/09 15:59, cindy.swearin...@sun.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
I've had no more luck researching this, mostly because the error message
can mean different things in different scenarios.
I did try to reproduce it and I can't.
I noticed you are booting
,
including instructions on miniroot patching.
Enda
Fredrich Maney wrote:
Any idea what the Patch ID was?
fpsm
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Bob
Friesenhahnbfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Jerry K wrote:
It has been a while since this has been discussed, and I am hoping
the below line to the end of /etc/pam.conf:
other password required pam_smb_passwd.so.1 nowarn
Do you know what that is?
I don't find any pkg named like that here.
pkg search -r pam|grep smb
nada
try pkg search -r pam_smb_passwd.so.1
which gives SUNWsmbs package
Enda
nada
You might find it if you searched instead with
$ pkg search -r smb
In SXCE, at least, /usr/lib/security/pam_smb_passwd.so is
part of the SUNWsmbfsu package.
Hi
And looks like 2008.11 has it in SUNWsmbs.
Enda
James
--
Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris
Sun Microsystems
http
not really necessary, in ufs world,
it was just easier to keep var on a seperate disk slice etc, so that the
root FS would not fill with log files, patch data and or core dumps etc
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
and if possible the exact output from
patchadd 137137-09
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
starting on a different drive?
HELP HELP HELP
boot the working alt root drive, mount the other drive to /a
then
mv /a/etc/zfs/zpool.cache /a/etc/zfs/zpool.cache.corrupt
reboot
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http
do this if you add a second disk to the system.
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Enda O'Connor wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose I have a single ZFS pool on a single disk;
I want to upgrade the system to use two different, larger disks
and I want to mirror.
Can I do something like:
- I start with disk #0
- add mirror on disk #1
(resilver
What hardware are you on, and what firmware are you at.
Issue is coming from firmware.
Enda
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi
try and get the stack trace from the core
ie mdb core.vold.24978
::status
$C
$r
also run the same 3 mdb commands on the cpio core dump.
also if you could extract some data from the truss log, ie a few hundred
lines before the first SIGBUS
Enda
On 11/06/08 01:25, Krzys wrote:
THis is so
Hi
Wierd, almost like some kind of memory corruption.
Could I see the upgrade logs, that got you to u6
ie
/var/sadm/system/logs/upgrade_log
for the u6 env.
What kind of upgrade did you do, liveupgrade, text based etc?
Enda
On 11/06/08 15:41, Krzys wrote:
Seems like core.vold.* are not being
- core dumped
hmm above might be relevant I'd guess.
What release are you on , ie is this Solaris 10, or is this Nevada build?
Enda
Creating shared file system mount points.
Creating compare databases for boot environment zfsBE.
Creating compare database for file system /var.
Creating compare
Hi Krzys
Also some info on the actual system
ie what was it upgraded to u6 from and how.
and an idea of how the filesystems are laid out, ie is usr seperate from
/ and so on ( maybe a df -k ). Don't appear to have any zones installed,
just to confirm.
Enda
On 11/05/08 14:07, Enda O'Connor wrote
and ulimit for coredumps
after this, in order to not risk filling the system with coredumps in
the case of some utility coredumping in a loop say.
Enda
On 11/05/08 13:46, Krzys wrote:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, Enda O'Connor wrote:
On 11/05/08 13:02, Krzys wrote:
I am not sure what I did wrong but I did
Hi
No that should be fine, as long as disk is SMI labelled then that's
fine, and lU would have failed much earlier if it found an EFI labelled
disk.
core dump is not due to this, something else is causing that.
Enda
On 11/05/08 15:14, Krzys wrote:
Great, I will follow this, but I
, in which case it
will take the swap and dump size you have preset.
But I think we need to see the coredump/truss at this point to get an
idea of where things went wrong.
Enda
On 11/05/08 15:38, Krzys wrote:
I did upgrade my U5 to U6 from DVD, went trough the upgrade process.
my file system
Hi
Clive King has a nice blog entry showing this in action
http://blogs.sun.com/clive/entry/replication_using_zfs
with associated script at:
http://blogs.sun.com/clive/resource/zfs_repl.ksh
Which I think answers most of your questions.
Enda
Ross wrote:
Hey folks,
Is anybody able to help
-discuss
Hi
yes, its' in u6, I have migrated u5 ufs on svm to zfs boot
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
in snv_94 though.
Enda
The type of pool doesn't matter.
Regards,
markm
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
___
zfs-discuss
, then suggest installing 138053-02, which requires
127127-11, the update 5 kernel patch. ( install latest patch utils patch
first though, 119255-xx )
Enda
Martin Gasthuber wrote:
Hi,
in which opensolaris (nevada) version this fix is included
thanks,
Martin
On 13 Aug, 2008, at 18:52
, including the space for the sparse zones.
zones can be on zfs or any other supported config in combination with zfs root.
Is there a specific question you had in mind with regard to sparse zones and
zfs root, no
too clear if I answered your actual query.
Enda
Does somebody have more
cannot open/stat device /dev/dsk/c5t1d0s2
that should be /dev/rdsk/c5t1d0s2
Enda
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Lori Alt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is also necessary to use either installboot (sparc) or
installgrub (x86)
to install the boot
Dave wrote:
Enda O'Connor wrote:
As for thumpers, once 138053-02 ( marvell88sx driver patch ) releases
within the next two weeks ( assuming no issues found ), then the
thumper platform running s10 updates will be up to date in terms of
marvel88sx driver fixes, which fixes some pretty
important issues for thumper.
Strongly suggest applying this patch to thumpers going forward.
u6 will have the fixes by default.
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Alan Burlison wrote:
Lori Alt wrote:
It's hard to know what the right thing to do is from within
the installation software. Does the user want to preserve
as much of their current environment as possible? Or does
the user want to move toward the new standard configuration
(which is
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rainer,
Sorry for your trouble.
I'm updating the installboot example in the ZFS Admin Guide with the
-F zfs syntax now. We'll fix the installboot man page as well.
Perhaps it also deserves a mention in the FAQ
Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) wrote:
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rainer,
Sorry for your trouble.
I'm updating the installboot example in the ZFS Admin Guide with the
-F zfs syntax now. We'll fix the installboot man page
to create separate slices
o Enables underlying ZFS architecture for swap and dump devices
o Enables you to set characteristics like compression on swap
and dump devices, and eventually, encryption
Hi
also makes resizing easy to do as well.
ie
zfs set volsize=8G lupool/dump
Enda
Cindy
Alan
an upgrade, as it needs args )
to see the version number.
BTW s10_u6 will have version 10, as will the kernel patch that releases
with u6 that applies to u5.
Enda
Chris Cosby wrote:
We're running Solaris 10 U5 on lots of Sun SPARC hardware. That's ZFS
version=4. Simple question: how far behind
Hi Tommaso
Have a look at the man page for zfs and the attach section in
particular, it will do the job nicely.
Enda
Tommaso Boccali wrote:
Ciao,
the rot filesystem of my thumper is a ZFS with a single disk:
bash-3.2# zpool status rpool
pool: rpool
state: ONLINE
scrub: none
,
device automatically transforms into a two-way mirror of device and new_device.
If device
is part of a two-way mirror, attaching new_device creates a three-way mirror,
and so on.
In either case, new_device begins to resilver immediately.
Enda
Srinivas Chadalavada wrote:
Hi All,
I had
of space
really )
so one solution based on Mike's would be to create a symlink in the
pspool save/patch-id for each undo.z being moved.
Note I have not tested any of this out so beware :-)
Enda
Jim
---
Mike Gerdts wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
[EMAIL PROTECTED
the -a if all looks ok.
The recommended cluster ( under downloads in patch page ) has all the latest
patches and
requirements, might be easier to grab and work with it.
Enda
TIA --Kenny
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss
will trim it down
sufficiently ), so examine it and see if there are any zfs related stuff in there.
That might be sufficient to get an idea of where zfs is stuck, else might need the entire
text file.
Assuming that this actually works ( seen as reboot is apparently even stuck )
Enda
#!/bin/sh
) or 5.3.0.10 (or
later) or any level of 6.1 then you'll have the fix.
}
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
they are shipped.
There are no sustaining patches for this issue 6579855 ( the only CR
fixed in 127871-02 )
but the CR 6587133 mentioned above is fixed in generic patch 125205-07,
available on SunSolve
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss
be 127729 and Ku 120012-14.
I assume that your system already has zfs, or are you looking for the
list of patches to get zfs going in u1 or earlier
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo
/
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hi Bob
Looking in to getting this changed, actually spotted this earlier on
today myself.
Enda
of zones on zfs is just not supported yet
patching does wok though for zones on zfs
add 119254-50/119255-50 (SPARC/X86 ) and patching will eork
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs
and enhancements to Solaris.
I think you mean 8/07, ( update 4 ) release?
But yes this release is most advised,
Enda
-- richard
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Solaris 10 release )
What writeup are you looking at?
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
numbers, 9.07 was what
Richard meant.
Enda
When is the next release for Sparc due out?
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Enda O'Connor ( Sun Micro Systems Ireland) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Dec 21, 2007 9:15 AM
To: Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
David Runyon wrote:
Does anyone know this?
David Runyon
Disk Sales Specialist
Sun Microsystems, Inc.
4040 Palm Drive
Santa Clara, CA 95054 US
Mobile 925 323-1211
Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Russ Lai wrote:
Dave;
Does ZFS support Oracle RAC?
Dick Davies wrote:
I had some trouble installing a zone on ZFS with S10u4
(bug in the postgres packages) that went away when I used a
ZVOL-backed UFS filesystem
for the zonepath.
Hi
Out of interest what was the bug.
Enda
I thought I'd push on with the experiment (in the hope Live Upgrade
not actually upgrade unless you
specify the -a.
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Enda,
Wednesday, April 11, 2007, 4:21:35 PM, you wrote:
EOCSMSI Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello zfs-discuss,
In order to get IDR126199-01 I need to install 120473-05 first.
I can get 120473-07 but everything more than -05 is marked as
incompatible
also so I'm
stuck for now and I would really like to get that IDR running.
Can someone help?
Hi
This patch will be on SunSolve possibly later today, tomorrow at latest
I suspect as it has only justed being pushed out from testing.
I have sent the patch in another mail for now.
Enda
remember to plan ahead, then yes. ;)
-brian
not necessarily, metainit -a -f will force all onto one disk, but should
only be used in emergency cases really, where you are already in the
situation of not having a partition to put the meta DB on.
Enda
will be listed in the KU and the ZFS patch.
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Enda
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
as part of the
name )
see if 124205 is in this file, I will check with the people responsible
for current.zip in the mean time.
I suspect that a current.zip including this patch has not been released yet.
Enda
David W. Smith wrote:
I'm pretty sure I have a service plan, but smpatch
and then the system, touching /reconfigure, all to no
avail
I then added the rest of the patches you suggested and rebooted my zones
and I had /dev/zfs, strange.
But David had all the patches added and still did not get /dev/zfs in the
non global zones
Enda
George Wilson wrote:
Apologies
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer wrote:
Hi
I guess the problem is that David is using smpatch (our automated patching
system )
So in theory he is up to date on his patches
( he has since removed
122660-02
122658-02
122640-05
)
So
Hi
I logged CR 6457216 to track this for now.
Enda
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer wrote:
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer wrote:
Hi
I guess the problem is that David is using smpatch (our
Slight typo
I had to run
# zfs umount tank
cannot unmount 'tank': not currently mounted
# zfs umount /export/home1
# zfs umount /export/home
#
in order to get zpool destroy to run
Enda
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer wrote:
Hi
I was trying to overlay a pool
Hi
Looks like same stack as 6413847, although it is pointed more towards hardware
failure.
the stack below is from 5.11 snv_38, but also seems to affect update 2 as
per above bug.
Enda
Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
Hi,
my colleage is just testing ZFS and created a zpool which had a backing
83 matches
Mail list logo
