How about crash dumps?
michael
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Peter Wood wrote:
> I'm sorry. I should have mentioned it that I can't find any errors in the
> logs. The last entry in /var/adm/messages is that I removed the keyboard
> after the last reboot and then it sh
Peter,
sorry if this is so obvious that you didn't mention it: Have you checked
/var/adm/messages and other diagnostic tool output?
regards
Michael
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Peter Wood wrote:
> I have two identical Supermicro boxes with 32GB ram. Hardware details at
> the
rdware raid
controller not in jbod mode, or even an external san. jbods normally show
up as lun 0 (d0) with different target numbers (t1, t2, ...). Maybe
something wrong with lun numbering on your box?
-- Michael
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zf
whether or not it
risked integrity.
Sent from my iPhone
On 13 Oct 2012, at 23:02, Ian Collins wrote:
> On 10/14/12 10:02, Michael Armstrong wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I have a "portable pool" i.e. one that I carry around in an enclosure.
>> However, any SSD
Hi Guys,
I have a "portable pool" i.e. one that I carry around in an enclosure. However,
any SSD I add for L2ARC, will not be carried around... meaning the cache drive
will become unavailable from time to time.
My question is Will random removal of the cache drive put the pool into a
"degr
without accelerator (gnu dd with oflag=sync). Not bad at all.
This could be just good enough for small businesses and moderate sized
pools.
Michael
--
Michael Hase
edition-software GmbH
http://edition-software.de
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-dis
I have an 8 drive ZFS array (RAIDZ2 - 1 Spare) using 5900rpm 2TB SATA drives
with an hpt27xx controller under FreeBSD 10 (but I've seen the same issue with
FreeBSD 9).
The system has 8gigs and I'm letting FreeBSD auto-size the ARC.
Running iozone (from ports), everything is fine for file sizes
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Michael Hase wrote:
If you were to add a second vdev (i.e. stripe) then you should see very
close to 200% due to the default round-robin scheduling of the writes.
My expectation would be > 200%, as 4 disks are involved.
sorry to insist, but still no real answer...
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Michael Hase wrote:
So only one thing left: mirror should read 2x
I don't think that mirror should necessarily read 2x faster even though the
potential is there to do so. L
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Michael Hase
got some strange results, please see
attachements for exact numbers and pool config:
seq write factor seq read factor
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Michael Hase wrote:
This is my understanding of zfs: it should load balance read requests even
for a single sequential reader. zfs_prefetch_disable is the default 0. And
I can see exactly this scaling behaviour with sas disks
hen going from one disk to a mirrored configuration. It's just the
sequential read/write case, that's different for sata and sas disks.
Michael
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,h
than
expected, especially for a simple mirror. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Michael
--
Michael Hase
http://edition-software.de pool: ptest
state: ONLINE
scan: none requested
config:
NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM
ptest ONLINE 0 0 0
c13t4d0 O
t 9:35 AM, Edward Ned Harvey
> wrote:
> > From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> > boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Michael Armstrong
> >
> > Is there a way to quickly ascertain if my seagate/hitachi drives are as
> large as
> &
ing able to grow the pool...Thanks,Michael
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
just fine. You can't enable dedup on a dataset
> and any writes won't dedup they will "rehydrate".
>
> So it is more like partial dedup support rather than it not being there at
> all.
"rehydrate"???
Is it instant or freeze dried?
Mike
- ---
Michael
e that the name came after the TLA.
> "zfs" came first and "zettabyte" later.
as Jeff told it (IIRC), the "expanded" version of zfs underwent
several changes during the development phase, until it was decided one
day to attach none of them to "zfs" and just
Hi,
snapshots are read-only by design; you can clone them and manipulate
the clone, but the snapshot itself remains r/o.
HTH
Michael
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 13:35, wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have got a bunch of corrupted files in various snapshots on my ZFS file
> backing store.
Or, if you absolutely must run linux for the operating system, see:
http://zfsonlinux.org/
On Oct 17, 2011, at 8:55 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> If you absolutely must run Linux on your storage server, for whatever reason,
> then you probably won't be running ZFS. For the next year or two, it wou
ing with your Oracle Sales Rep.
I think his requirements are being driven by a PHB who wants to see a "GUI".
crontab, ssh - functionality already there, simple and not many "moving parts"
but obviously too obfuscated for the PHB to understand.
Good luck.
Mike
---
when combined with just plain old crontab.
If it's a graphical interface you're looking for, I'm sure someone has hacked
together somethings in TCL/Tk pr Perl/TK as an interface to cron which you
could probably hack to have construct your particular crontab entry.
Just a thought
Warm welcomes back.
So whats neXt?
- Mike DeMan
On Sep 2, 2011, at 6:30 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> I'm now no longer at Oracle, and the past couple of weeks have been a bit of
> a mess for me as I disentangle myself from it.
>
> I apologize to those who may have tried to contac
Are you truly new to ZFS? Or do you work for NetApp or EMC or somebody else
that is curious?
- Mike
On Aug 29, 2011, at 9:15 PM, Jesus Cea wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all. Sorry if I am asking a FAQ, but I haven't found a really
> authorizative answer to t
I can not help but agree with Tim's comment below.
If you want a free version of ZFS, in which case you are still responsible for
things yourself - like having backups, then maybe:
www.freenas.org
www.linuxonzfs.org
www.openindiana.org
Meanwhile, it is grossly inappropriate to be complaining ab
er than rpool. Which feels kludgy. Is there a better way?
>
> echo "set zfs:zil_disable = 1" > /etc/system
echo "set zfs:zil_disable = 1" >> /etc/system
Mike
---
Michael Sullivan
m...@axsh.us
http://www.axsh.us/
Phone: +1-662-259-
Mob
+1 on the below, and in addition...
...compact flash, like off of USB sticks is not designed to deal with very many
writes to it. Commonly it is used to store a bootable image that maybe once a
year will have an upgrade on it.
Basically, trying to use those devices for a ZIL, even they are mir
e using an external USB drive which was
appropriately sized and turn on autoexpand.
Mike
---
Michael Sullivan
m...@axsh.us
http://www.axsh.us/
Phone: +1-662-259-
Mobile: +1-662-202-7716
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@open
in use at a time
and operations would need to be transaction based with commits and rollbacks.
Way off-topic, but Smalltalk and its variants do this by maintaining the state
of everything in an operating environment image.
But then again, I could be wrong.
Mike
---
Michael Sullivan
ething like parted to shrink the NTFS partition
2) create a new partition without FS in the space now freed from NTFS
3) boot OpenSolaris, add the partition from 2) as vdev to your zpool.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/
__
ppens between two writes (even from a single user), it will
be consistent from the POV of the FS, but may not be from the POV of the
application.
HTH
Michael
--
Michael Schuster
http://recursiveramblings.wordpress.com/
___
zfs-discuss mailing li
ood idea, another things to keep in mind
> technology change so fast, by the time you want a replacement, may be HDD
> does exist any more
> or the supplier changed, so the drives are not exactly like your original
> drive
>
>
>
>
> On 5/28/2011 6:05 PM, Mich
Always pre-purchase one extra drive to have on hand. When you get it, confirm
it was not dead-on-arrival by hooking up on an external USB to a workstation
and running whatever your favorite tools are to validate it is okay. Then put
it back in its original packaging, and put a label on it abou
I think on this, the big question is going to be whether Oracle continues to
release ZFS updates under CDDL after their commercial releases.
Overall, in the past it has obviously and necessarily been the case that
FreeBSD has been a '2nd class citizen'.
Moving forward, that 2nd class idea becom
ZFSv28 is in HEAD now and will be out in 8.3.
ZFS + HAST in 9.x means being able to cluster off different hardware.
In regards to OpenSolaris and Indiana - can somebody clarify the relationship
there? It was clear with OpenSolaris that the latest/greatest ZFS would always
be available since it
Hi David,
Caught your note about bonnie, actually do some testing myself over the weekend.
All on older hardware for fun - dual opteron 285 with 16GB RAM. Disk systems
is off a pair of SuperMicro SATA cards, with a combination of WD enterprise and
Seagate ES 1TB drives. No ZIL, no L2ARC, no t
I think we all feel the same pain with Oracle's purchase of Sun.
FreeBSD that has commercial support for ZFS maybe?
Not here quite yet, but it is something being looked at by an F500 that I am
currently on contract with.
www.freenas.org, www.ixsystems.com.
Not saying this would be the right so
I obtained smartmontools (which includes smartctl) from the standard apt
repository (i'm using nexenta however), in addition its neccessary to use the
device type of sat,12 with smartctl to get it to read attributes correctly in
OS afaik. Also regarding dev id's on the system, from what i've see
Hi guys,
I'm currently running 2 zpools each in a raidz1 configuration, totally
around 16TB usable data. I'm running it all on an OpenSolaris based box with
2gb memory and an old Athlon 64 3700 CPU, I understand this is very poor and
underpowered for deduplication, so I'm looking at building a new
Additionally, the way I do it is to draw a diagram of the drives in the system,
labelled with the drive serial numbers. Then when a drive fails, I can find out
from smartctl which drive it is and remove/replace without trial and error.
On 5 Feb 2011, at 21:54, zfs-discuss-requ...@opensolaris.org
y 80%-100% busy. Just for small files the array sits almost idle, the
array can do way more. I discovered this on different solaris versions, not
only this test system. Is there any explanation for this behaviour?
Thanks,
Michael
--
This message posted from opensolaris.orglocal
Versio
't figure out how this happened all of the sudden and how best to
> troubleshoot it.
>
> If you have any help or technical wisdom to offer, I'd appreciate it as this
> has been frustrating.
look in /var/adm/messages (.*) to see whether there's anything
interesting aro
che table of what's in the L2ARC. Using 2GB of RAM
>with an SSD-based L2ARC (even without Dedup) likely won't help you too
>much vs not having the SSD.
>
>If you're going to turn on Dedup, you need at least 8GB of RAM to go
>with the SSD.
>
>-Erik
>
Thanks everyone, I think overtime I'm gonna update the system to include an ssd
for sure. Memory may come later though. Thanks for everyone's responses
Erik Trimble wrote:
>On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 15:11 +, Michael Armstrong wrote:
>> I've since turned off dedup, ad
I've since turned off dedup, added another 3 drives and results have improved
to around 148388K/sec on average, would turning on compression make things more
CPU bound and improve performance further?
On 18 Jan 2011, at 15:07, Richard Elling wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2011, at 4:21 PM,
Hi guys, sorry in advance if this is somewhat a lowly question, I've recently
built a zfs test box based on nexentastor with 4x samsung 2tb drives connected
via SATA-II in a raidz1 configuration with dedup enabled compression off and
pool version 23. From running bonnie++ I get the following res
perMicro is one of the
brands of choice, but even then one must adhere to a fairly tight HCL. The
same holds true for Solaris/OpenSolaris with third-party hardware.
SATA Controllers and multiplexers are also another example of the drivers being
written by the manufacturer and Solaris/OpenSolaris
On Jan 7, 2011, at 6:13 AM, David Magda wrote:
> On Fri, January 7, 2011 01:42, Michael DeMan wrote:
>> Then - there is the other side of things. The 'black swan' event. At
>> some point, given percentages on a scenario like the example case above,
>> one
At the end of the day this issue essentially is about mathematical
improbability versus certainty?
To be quite honest, I too am skeptical about about using de-dupe just based on
SHA256. In prior posts it was asked that the potential adopter of the
technology provide the mathematical reason to
, not me.
For my home media server, maybe, but even then I'd hate to lose any of my
family photos or video due to a hash collision.
I'll play it safe if I dedup.
Mike
---
Michael Sullivan
michael.p.sulli...@me.com
http://www.kamiogi.net/
Mobile: +1-662-202-7716
US Phon
argue that that should have
already happened with S11 express... I don't know it has, but that's
not *the* release of S11, is it? And once the code is released, even
if after the fact, it's not reverse-engineering anymore, is it?
Michael
PS: just in case: even while at Oracle, I
H
--
regards/mit freundlichen Grüssen
Michael Schuster
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Ummm… there's a difference between data integrity and data corruption.
Integrity is enforced programmatically by something like a DBMS. This sets up
basic rules that ensure the programmer, program or algorithm adhere to a level
of sanity and bounds.
Corruption is where cosmic rays, bit rot, ma
Linux on any hardware as well. Then your
hardware and software issues would probably be multiplied even more.
Cheers,
Mike
---
Michael Sullivan
michael.p.sulli...@me.com
http://www.kamiogi.net/
Japan Mobile: +81-80-3202-2599
US Phone: +1-561-283-2034
On 23 Oct 2010, at 12:53
On Oct 8, 2010, at 4:33 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> From: Peter Jeremy [mailto:peter.jer...@alcatel-lucent.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 10:02 PM
>>
>> On 2010-Oct-08 09:07:34 +0800, Edward Ned Harvey
>> wrote:
>>> If you're going raidz3, with 7 disks, then you might as well just
Can you give us release numbers that confirm that this is 'automatic'. It is
my understanding that the last available public release of OpenSolaris does not
do this.
On Oct 5, 2010, at 8:52 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
> ZFS already aligns the beginning of data areas to 4KB offsets from the lab
Hi upfront, and thanks for the valuable information.
On Oct 5, 2010, at 4:12 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>> Another annoying thing with the whole 4K sector size, is what happens
>> when you need to replace drives next year, or the year after?
>
> About the only mitigation needed is to ensure that a
On Oct 5, 2010, at 2:47 PM, casper@sun.com wrote:
>
>
> I've seen several important features when selecting a drive for
> a mirror:
>
> TLER (the ability of the drive to timeout a command)
> sector size (native vs virtual)
> power use (specifically at home)
> perform
On Oct 5, 2010, at 1:47 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wrote:
>> Western Digital RE3 WD1002FBYS 1TB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal
>> Hard Drive -Bare Drive
>>
>> are only $129.
>>
>> vs. $89 for the 'regular' black drives.
>>
>> 45% higher price, but it is my understanding that the 'RAID Editi
I'm not sure on the TLER issues by themselves, but after the nightmares I have
gone through dealing with the 'green drives', which have both the TLER issue
and the IntelliPower head parking issues, I would just stay away from it all
entirely and pay extra for the 'RAID Editiion' drives.
Just ou
ere's the relevant code from main():
Mark, I think that wasn't the question, rather, "what's the difference
between 'zfs u[n]mount' and '/usr/bin/umount'?"
HTH
Michael
--
michael.schus...@oracle.com http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recurs
I'm sorry to say that I am quite the newbie to ZFS. When you say zfs
send/receive what exactly are you referring to?
I had the zfs array mounted to a specific location in my file system
(/mnt/Share) and I was sharing that location over the network with a samba
server. The directory had read-
Oh and yes, raidz1.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I don't know what happened. I was in the process of copying files onto my new
file server when the copy process from the other machine failed. I turned on
the monitor for the fileserver and found that it had rebooted by itself at some
point (machine fault maybe?) and when I remounted the drive
I recently lost all of the data on my single parity raid z array. Each of the
drives was encrypted with the zfs array built within the encrypted volumes.
I am not exactly sure what happened. The files were there and accessible and
then they were all gone. The server apparently crashed and reb
Lao,
I had a look at the HAStoragePlus etc and from what i understand that's to
mirror local storage across 2 nodes for services to be able to access 'DRBD
style'.
Having a read thru the documentation on the oracle site the cluster software
from what i gather is how to cluster services togeth
Hey all,
I currently work for a company that has purchased a number of different SAN
solutions (whatever was cheap at the time!) and i want to setup a HA ZFS file
store over fiber channel.
Basically I've taken slices from each of the sans and added them to a ZFS pool
on this box (which I'm cal
Hi,
I'm trying to track down an error with a 64bit x86 OpenSolaris 2009.06 ZFS
shared via iSCSI and an Ubuntu 10.04 client. The client can successfully log
in, but no device node appears. I captured a session with wireshark. When the
client attempts a "SCSI: Inquiry LUN: 0x00", OpenSolaris s
hat OS are you using?
Michael
--
michael.schus...@oracle.com http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Hello,
I've been getting warnings that my zfs pool is degraded. At first it was
complaining about a few corrupt files, which were listed as hex numbers instead
of filenames, i.e.
VOL1:<0x0>
After a scrub, a couple of the filenames appeared - turns out they were in
snapshots I don't really nee
- provide measurements (lockstat, iostat, maybe some DTrace) before and
during test, add some timestamps so people can correlate data to events.
- anything else you can think of that might be relevant.
HTH
Michael
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
z
them is to destroy snapshots.
Or have I still misunderstood the question?
yes, I think so.
Here's how I read it: the snapshots contain lots more than the core files,
and OP wants to remove only the core files (I'm assuming they weren't
discovered before the snapshot
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
> I depends on if the problem was fixed or not. What says
> zpool status -xv
>
> -- richard
[r...@nas01 ~]# zpool status -xv
pool: tank
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
> Aren't you assuming the I/O error comes from the drive?
> fmdump -eV
okay - I guess I am. Is this just telling me "hey stupid, a checksum
failed" ? In which case why did this never resolve itself and the
specific device get marked as degra
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Marty Scholes wrote:
> Start a scrub or do an obscure find, e.g. "find /tank_mointpoint -name core"
> and watch the drive activity lights. The drive in the pool which isn't
> blinking like crazy is a faulted/offlined drive.
Actually I guess my real question is
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Marty Scholes wrote:
> Start a scrub or do an obscure find, e.g. "find /tank_mointpoint -name core"
> and watch the drive activity lights. The drive in the pool which isn't
> blinking like crazy is a faulted/offlined drive.
>
> Ugly and oh-so-hackerish, but it
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Haudy Kazemi wrote:
> ' iostat -Eni ' indeed outputs Device ID on some of the drives,but I still
> can't understand how it helps me to identify model of specific drive.
Curious:
[r...@nas01 ~]# zpool status -x
pool: tank
state: DEGRADED
status: One or more de
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 10:24 -0700, Michael Johnson wrote:
>> I'm currently planning on running FreeBSD with ZFS, but I wanted to
>>double-check
>> how much memory I'd need for it to be stable. The ZFS wiki currently says
>you
>
I just don't need more than 1 TB of
available
storage right now, or for the next several years.) This is on an AMD64 system,
and the OS in question will be running inside of VirtualBox, with raw access to
the drives.
Thanks,
Michael
saying that you employ enough kernel hackers to keep up even without Oracle?
(I
am admittedly ignorant about the OpenSolaris developer community; this is all
based on others' statements and opinions that I've read.)
Michael
___
Nikola M wrote:
>Freddie Cash wrote:
>> You definitely want to do the ZFS bits from within FreeBSD.
>Why not using ZFS in OpenSolaris? At least it has most stable/tested
>implementation and also the newest one if needed?
I'd love to use OpenSolaris for exactly those reasons, but I'm wary of using
on 11/07/2010 15:54 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>on 11/07/2010 14:21 Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk said the following:
>>
>> I'm planning on running FreeBSD in VirtualBox (with a Linux host)
>> and giving it raw disk access to four drives, which I plan to
>> configure as a raidz2 volume.
storing backups of my personal files on this), so if there's a
chance
that ZFS wouldn't handle errors well when on top of encryption, I'll just go
without it.
Thanks,
Michael
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolar
detected in the middle of resilvering.)
I will of course have a backup of the pool, but I may opt for additional backup
if the entire pool could be lost due to data corruption (as opposed to just a
few files potentially being lost).
Thanks,
Michael
[1] http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/co
Just in case any stray searches finds it way here, this is what happened to my
pool: http://phrenetic.to/zfs
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinf
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Alex Blewitt wrote:
> You are sadly mistaken.
>
> From GNU.org on license compatibilities:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
>
> Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL), version 1.0
> This is a free software license. It has
For the record, in case anyone else experiences this behaviour: I tried
various things which failed, and finally as a last ditch effort, upgraded my
freebsd, giving me zpool v14 rather than v13 - and now it's resilvering as it
should.
Michael
On Monday 17 May 2010 09:26:23 Michael Do
On 19.05.10 17:53, John Andrunas wrote:
Not to my knowledge, how would I go about getting one? (CC'ing discuss)
man savecore and dumpadm.
Michael
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Mark J Musante wrote:
Do you have a coredump? Or a stack trace of the panic?
On Wed, 19 May 2010,
er a proper replace of the failed
partitions?
Many thanks,
Michael
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
I agree on the motherboard and peripheral chipset issue.
This, and the last generation AMD quad/six core motherboards all seem to use
the AMD SP56x0/SP5100 chipset, which I can't find much information about
support on for either OpenSolaris or FreeBSD.
Another issue is the LSI SAS2008 chipset f
standard monitoring tools? If not, what other tools exist that can do the
same?
"zpool iostat" for one.
Michael
--
michael.schus...@oracle.com http://blogs.sun.com/recursion
Recursion, n.: see 'Recursion'
___
zfs-discuss mail
rks really well.
>
> --
> -Peter Tribble
> http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
> ___
> zfs-discuss mailing list
> zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Mi
ead a block from more devices simultaneously, it
will cut the latency of the overall read.
On 7 May 2010, at 02:57 , Marc Nicholas wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> What makes you think striping the SSDs would be faster than round-robin?
>
> -marc
>
> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 1:09 PM,
anything to come close in its approach to disk data
management. Let's just hope it keeps moving forward, it is truly a unique way
to view disk storage.
Anyway, sorry for the ramble, but to everyone, thanks again for the answers.
Mike
---
Michael Sullivan
michael.p.sulli...@m
On 6 May 2010, at 13:18 , Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> From: Michael Sullivan [mailto:michael.p.sulli...@mac.com]
>>
>> While it explains how to implement these, there is no information
>> regarding failure of a device in a striped L2ARC set of SSD's. I have
>
&
Hi Ed,
Thanks for your answers. Seem to make sense, sort of…
On 6 May 2010, at 12:21 , Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
>> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Michael Sullivan
>>
>> I have a question I canno
I got a suggestion to check what fmdump -eV gave to look for PCI errors if the
controller might be broken.
Attached you'll find the last panic's fmdump -eV. It indicates that ZFS can't
open the drives. That might suggest a broken controller, but my slog is on the
motherboard's internal controll
Thanks for your reply! I ran memtest86 and it did not report any errors. The
disk controller I've not replaced, yet. The server is up in multi-user mode
with the broken pool in an un-imported state. Format now works and properly
lists all my devices without panic'ing. zpool import panic's the b
This is how my zpool import command looks like:
Attached you'll find the output of zdb -l of each device.
pool: tank
id: 10904371515657913150
state: ONLINE
action: The pool can be imported using its name or numeric identifier.
config:
tank ONLINE
raidz1-0 ONLIN
90 reads and not a single comment? Not the slightest hint of what's going on?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Ok, thanks.
So, if I understand correctly, it will just remove the device from the VDEV and
continue to use the good ones in the stripe.
Mike
---
Michael Sullivan
michael.p.sulli...@me.com
http://www.kamiogi.net/
Japan Mobile: +81-80-3202-2599
US Phone: +1-561-283-2034
On 5
1 - 100 of 375 matches
Mail list logo
