S h i v wrote:

>> - you should update the Copyright year in each you touch
>>
> 
> Will update suitably after legal review

The copyright thing is a general requirement not up to the legal
review. And while that's still required even though you're not
a Sun employee, you can add one for you if you like. See the
what the sponsor checks for on

http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/on/crt/sponsor-tasks/

(which is for ON but should mostly match sfw, and most of which
is for your sponsor but there are interesting bits in there
for you too :)

> 
>> - if you use "wx rm ..." to delete a file, it will correctly
>>    show up as being moved to "deleted_files/"
> 
> Will check.
> webrev & related tools need a howto/FAQ !

this is something you can't do really because you don't have
a teamware workspace (which is where deleted_files comes from, I
doubt that will live on in svn/hg unless we choose not to use
their native way, and I don't see why we would do that). This will be
what your sponsor help with. or at least it will be more pain without
really using teamware :)

> 
>> - assuming you still retain libexpect5.43.a after ARC, why
>>    install it in /usr/lib/expect5.43/, rather than just /usr/lib?
>>
> Will leave it to ARC. The default install location where ppl expect it
> to be present.

but you need to propose something to them. While you can say "I put
it here because I think it's the best of these <x> options because..."
and they can discuss the options with you, they don't seem to like
'please pick one of these <x> options for me'.

now if that's what you're doing then great, just not quite sure from
the above :)


> 
>> - manpages should be run through a sed script to add the Sun
>>    stability classification, etc, before being installed (eg
>>    see the sunman-stability script in several other dirs)
>>
> 
> Will leave it to after ARC. Doesn't CCD need to do this. Expect in CCD
> doesn't seem to do it.

No the CCD doesn't do it because it's all unsupported and not ARC'd.
When it's part of Solaris and ARC'd, that's when the stability levels
(and making sure the docs are correct, like not referencing man pages
we don't have or are in the wrong sections, hopefully) need to be
addressed).

        Mike

Reply via email to