James Allison wrote:

>  You said:
>
>      Any atoms of silver which accumulate on the electrode while
>      it is negative which might cause silver sludge in a DC
>      process is immediately sent back into the water as a colloid
>      on the next half cycleas well.
>
>      Why do you think that sludge is formed?
>
> And I say:
>
> Hey, I prefaced that whole thing by stating that it was an "opinion".
> But I've said it before, and I'll say it again...
>
> <----- begin rant ----->
>
> "In an AC powered operation as some others are promoting, where the
> polarity is constantly switched, other undesirable things may happen;
> it is known that in all electro-colloidal silver generating processes,
> some charge stripping of silver ions does occur as they come in
> contact with the cathode, resulting in their gaining electrons, and
> the resulting reduction to atomic silver particles (without the charge
> that is said to produce the pathogen disabling effect.) In a DC
> system, these reduced metallic particles remain as a grayish 'sludge'
> buildup on the surface of the cathode, and eventually are very visible
> at higher current levels. In a system where the polarity is switched
> constantly, this sludge is propelled and dispersed back into the water
> continuously, as evidenced by the 'clean electrodes' spoken of.
>
> When the positively charged silver particles contact the cathode they
> gain electrons and become plain old silver again.  That is what the
> electrode is made of in the first place.  Why would the silver get
> propelled off?  It has no charge, thus has no force from the electric
> potential to propel it off as large particles.  Instead, it simple
> becomes part of the silver of the cathode, to be emitted as a colloid
> when it becomes the anode, which involves stripping the electrons off
> again.  No sludge is formed.
>
> Mechanical effects of redispersal of plated out silver "sludge" from
> the cathode will occur at higher concentrations and especially at
> higher currents, especially if AC is used, resulting in much coarser,
> uncharged metallic silver particles than may be desired floating about
> in your product.
>
> I still see no way that sludge would be formed.  Within 1 cycle of a
> silver particle getting deposited onto the cathode and gaining an
> electron, it will become the anode, and the atom will lose an electron
> or more, become positive, and go out into the water as a Colloidal
> suspension.  This is no different than any other atom of silver on the
> electrode.  Sludge is formed by particles accumulating on the cathode
> and coalescing, or silver being oxidized on the cathode until they
> become so big they fall off from the gravity.  Reversal takes place so
> quickly particle size can never build up sufficient for the particle
> to fall off from gravity.  They simply go back out atom by atom, to
> become colloid, just like any of the atoms on the silver anode do.
>
> Filtering with good lab quality filter media may be able to remove
> some of this "non-ionic" silver; settling of most of the really larger
> particle "clumps" might also occur within 72 hours, I'd estimate, if
> the particles are not too fine.
>
> I get no settling even after a week.  I have never seen any sludge in
> my HVAC setup, and theoretically I can see no way it can occur.
>
> I guess the question is this; are the positively charged colloidal
> silver ions, (as produced in a DC process), what you want in your
> product, or do you want non-charged 'non-ionic' metallic silver
> particles, as produced in the AC processes?
>
> Huh?  If they are non-charged and non-ionic they would fall out of
> suspension rapidly.  They do not. Both DC and AC methods produce
> identical CS off the anode.  The difference is on the cathode.  In the
> DC method the silver collects, forms large particles, or react with O,
> and eventually falls off as sludge, in the AC process, they go back
> out as charged atoms of silver again, just like any of the electrode
> would.
>
> I don't know where you are getting this non-charged idea from, but it
> is wrong.
>
> From what I have researched and what I understand at this time, I'd
> stay with Dr. Becker's recommendations myself, and try to produce the
> positively charged Colloidal Silver Ions with a DC process.
>
> Electricity is electricity.  When the ions leave the electrode they
> are charged.  There is no way the ion knows that the anode will become
> a cathode later and thus decides to not be charged.
>
> [To summarize this for the technically inclined] please consider
> carefully that, just as positively charged silver ions are generated
> into the system at the anode, they are attracted to the negatively
> charged cathode. Many stay in the colloidal suspension, but as the
> concentration of silver ions build up, and the current flow through
> the system increases, more and more silver ions are drawn to, and come
> in contact with the cathode. When they do this, they are stripped of
> their positive charge, and 'plate out' on the surface of the cathode
> as a visible 'sludge', but do not bond to the surface structure - they
> accumulate as larger groups of loosely bonded, uncharged silver
> particles. If what I understand Dr. Becker and others to be saying is
> true, these uncharged silver particles, what I refer to as the 'silver
> sludge' formed at the cathode, should be removed if possible from your
> finished product.
>
> They can be removed and thrown away.  That is a waste.  Or, since they
> are pure silver, they can generate CS if the polarity is reversed.
> The same thing happens on LVDC, if you switch polarity every few
> minutes from what I have read here, no sludge.
>
> Using a DC power source, with no polarity reversal, is my strong
> recommendation (and that of many others) for predictably generating
> positively charged colloidal silver particles (biologically active
> silver ions) in your product, while controlling silver 'sludge'
> dispersal problems.
>
> If there is no sludge, then there are no dispersal problems.  If the
> CS stays in suspension, then the particles MUST be positively charged
> and thus biologically active.

Marshall