Unless you don't own a domain and you have a subdomain at bellsouth.net.
For this you would register 'bellsouth.net/yoursite' as your domain.  Then
if the URL contained 'bellsouth.net/theirsite' it would still get reported.

Paul Coleman

"Paul Coleman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
9bmn0v$n9o$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9bmn0v$n9o$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> That's not what I said.  I said on behalf on my domain.  This means if
they
> see my domain's URL in the body,  don't look up the providers, just ignore
> it.  Your scenario would still get reported.
>
> "Gary Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> 9bmm4c$mta$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9bmm4c$mta$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > How 'bout this scenario?
> >
> > My ISP is bellsouth.net.  If I banned them from all reports, then if
> someone
> > ELSE from bellsouth.net spammed me, I couldn't report them, no matter
how
> > hard I tried to do so.
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Gary Henderson
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> > "Paul Coleman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > 9bmfb2$k8k$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9bmfb2$k8k$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > You know, the more I have to think about this the more it becomes
> apparent
> > > that my request is a must have.  Perhaps you can explain why anyone
> would
> > > want to inform them selves or their own provider that you received a
> SPAM
> > > and you suspect your self to be the sender of the SPAM.  This tool
> > provides
> > > a list of possible receivers of a SPAM report.  It goes through logic
to
> > > determine if the recipient should be pre-checked or not.  It makes
> > > absolutely no logical sense at all to pre-check me or my provider as a
> > > recipient to notify them that I might be the sender of this SPAM.  I
am
> > now
> > > convinced that this should not be an option, it should be a mandatory
> part
> > > of the application.  It should never pre-check a recipient of a report
> > that
> > > is either my domain or my provider on behalf of my domain period.
> Unless
> > > you all can give me a reasonable example of why anyone would want to
do
> > > that, I am offering my new proposal.  I am no longer asking that this
be
> > > optional, I am asking that it be mandatory.  The application should
not
> > > pre-check the recipient if it is one of my domains or one of my
> providers
> > > because of one of my domains.
> > > Paul Coleman
> > >
> > > "dollface" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > > Paul Coleman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >It appears you are and expert in doing this process.  I must
> > > > >admit I am not, and I hope I never have to become one.  I need
> > > > >every bit of assistance I can use.  I have absolutely no idea
> > > > >what "larting" is or means.  I can tell you one thing for sure.
> > > > > I resent being accused of "click-click-click and not pay
> > > > >attention anymore".  There is absolutely no truth in that
> > > > >phrase.  My suggestion still stands and in no way allows anyone
> > > > >to go "click-click-click and not pay attention anymore" to
> > > > >anything.  I can't understand your resentment to my  suggesting
> > > > >safeguards to help prevent mistakes. I would simply like to be
> > > > >able to have the option to not report to my Domian or any of
> > > > >the providers up the chain on behave of my domian.  That does
> > > > >not give me or anyone else the abilty to go "click-click-click
> > > > >and not pay attention anymore".
> > > >
> > > > While you may have noble intentions, there are always those users
> > > > who will simply go click click click.  To make such an option
> > > > available to one would mean making it available to all...and that
> > > > simply opens up too many Pandora's boxen.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > SpamCop user, not the admin.  Ideas expressed are my own.
> > > > Please reply to group unless you have a specific issue with
> > > > me.  Spam will be promptly and happily thwhacked with my
> > > > very largest mallet...
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>


_______________________________________________
SpamCop-Help mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://news.spamcop.net/mailman/listinfo/spamcop-help

Reply via email to