I believe the main difference is that 13 calls for 6in min water supply
for a combined service. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David
Bitton
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 9:37 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: domestic demand per nfpa 13

I find it curious that if you have a 4-story residential building and
design it to NFPA 13R, you would have to include the domestic demand but
take the same building and add a garage in the basement and commercial
space on the ground floor and now you don't have to include the domestic
demand because NFPA 13 does not require it.  

In such buildings with a combined water entry, I've been adding the
domestic demand in accordance with the guidelines of 13R.

David
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Roland
Huggins
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 11:15 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: domestic demand per nfpa 13

Why are you asking since it is normally not included in the
calculations.

Roland


On May 8, 2012, at 8:05 AM, Joel Chaim wrote:

> Is there a table for domestic demand as per NFPA. 13? I only saw it 
> under NFPA 13 R.
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was 
> scrubbed...
> URL:
<http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/private/sprinklerforum/attach
ment
s/20120508/4a03127a/attachment.html 
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://fireball.firesprinkler.org/mailman/listinfo/sprinklerforum

Reply via email to